On 7/31/2023 3:31 PM, AMuzi wrote:
> On 7/31/2023 12:59 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
>> On 7/31/2023 8:04 AM, Roger Meriman wrote:
>>>
>>> Trikes as a general rule don’t fit in most cycle
>>> infrastructure unless it’s
>>> very new and wide otherwise there is always some pinch
>>> point that can’t be
>>> passed by trikes or wheelchairs often as well.
>>
>> We've even had trouble getting out tandem through some
>> terribly positioned bollards on one bike trail. And I've
>> seen folks having to unhitch kiddie trailers to wiggle them
>> around obstacles.
>>
>> Cycles do come in a wide variety, and facility designers
>> sometimes don't remember that fact.
>>
>
> Politician gets favorable press ('doing something for those darned
> cyclists'), various contractors pad the projects just as any other
> public project and kick back to the politicians and the staff who write
> and contract. Mistresses all around get new Mercedes. It's a win-win-win !
>
> If anything gets built at all it's a miracle[1] and if one ever were
> useful at a reasonable cost it would be headline news. Don't hold your
> breath.
The specific example I was thinking of had none of those elements. It
was simply an ignorant designer with good intentions.
This was in the nearby metropark. The guy designing their bike
facilities has a degree in Landscape Architecture. When he was fresh out
of school and newly hired, he was told to design a bi-directional bike
lane on a park road - in my view, a fundamentally flawed concept, as
usual. He decided that it was necessary to physically keep cars out by
planting chunks of telephone poles across the path at 20+ locations,
four of them side by side at each location, with something like 28"
between them. Unacceptable by AASHTO standards, and stupid by any standard.
I spent years trying to educate him on that and other matters until he
retired, but it did little good. The tandem problem happened years later
at the entrance to another similar path. By then I'd convinced him that
at if posts were necessary (which they were not) at least the AASHTO
minimum spacing was necessary. But the start of this new segment was in
a weirdly narrow spot, and he angled the line of posts in such a way
that we couldn't ride through them with the tandem. We had to dismount,
or at best "scooter" through with our feet on the ground.
Trouble was, he actually was a really nice guy and sincerely believed he
was doing what was best. There were no kickbacks or politics involved.
He just had zero knowledge or experience about riding a bike.
BTW, just before he retired, I and some other cyclists finally got the
metropark board of trustees to agree that all future facilities would
meet AASHTO standards. Those standards are far from perfect, but at the
time they were far better than what this guy was drawing up.
--
- Frank Krygowski