Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

So, let me get this straight...

2 views
Skip to first unread message

NoDannyNo

unread,
May 21, 2011, 9:57:03 PM5/21/11
to
The fucker that actually failed a drug test gets off the hook and is
currently kicking ass in the Giro while the douche bag that never
failed once in 500+ times has investigators and media clowns crawling
up his anus. BAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! What a joke this sport
is...

(I know it's only May but I'm getting a head start on all the other
July-posting cocksuckers).
--

Anton Berlin

unread,
May 21, 2011, 9:58:45 PM5/21/11
to

Lance failed at least twice. This is an established fact.

Mike Jacoubowsky

unread,
May 22, 2011, 12:56:52 AM5/22/11
to
"Anton Berlin" <truth...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:92a18abc-c129-4aa3...@c1g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...

Note that "facts" are now determined by the number of times an
allegation has been repeated on rbr.

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com


Scott

unread,
May 22, 2011, 1:11:41 AM5/22/11
to
On May 21, 10:56 pm, "Mike Jacoubowsky" <Mi...@ChainReaction.com>
wrote:
> "Anton Berlin" <truth_88...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

It's not so much a factor of how many times an allegation has been
repeated, but rather who is repeating it, that determines its veracity.

Mike Jacoubowsky

unread,
May 22, 2011, 1:44:46 AM5/22/11
to
"Scott" <hendric...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:deb048f7-9e2c-42b4...@x10g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...

If true, then why hasn't Novitsky placed a gag order on any number of
rbr posters, to protect credibility of claims Lance doped?

Simply Fred

unread,
May 22, 2011, 7:09:48 AM5/22/11
to
NoDannyNo wrote:
> (I know it's only May but I'm getting a head start on all the other
> July-posting cocksuckers).

July is going to be an anti-climax, particularly if Lafferty suffers a
premature ejaculation.

NoDannyNo

unread,
May 22, 2011, 9:43:01 AM5/22/11
to

The saddle sore cortisone cream? And what other one?

Anton Berlin

unread,
May 22, 2011, 11:01:45 AM5/22/11
to

A positive EPO result that Lance paid to have quelled. Backed up by
several independent sources at this point and under oath. Let's
also note that the documentation was made after the positive
corticosteroid test which they were more than happy to accept.

Here's the core of the problem - just as EBAY doesn't want to stop
shill bidding as they benefit from higher prices so has the UCI
benefited from the Armstrong 'story'.

You can't have people that benefit 'self policing' themselves. Even
if Lance were the best scientist doper ever - he was probably
threshold detectable and positive many more times than we know
about.

Professional burglars break into hundreds of homes before every being
caught once. If the police are also on the take and give the guy a
pass they could break into countless homes and later claim

"20+ year career. 500 burglaries worldwide, in and out of many
windows. Never an arrest. I rest my case."

Phil H

unread,
May 22, 2011, 5:01:42 PM5/22/11
to

500 tests and only 2 "so called" positives. Those are very impressive
numbers when you look at false positive rates in scientiifc testing.
The probability of making a "type I" error is commonly between 1% and
5% so 0.4% is impressive :)
Phil H

Scott

unread,
May 22, 2011, 7:03:50 PM5/22/11
to
On May 21, 11:44 pm, "Mike Jacoubowsky" <Mi...@ChainReaction.com>
wrote:
> "Scott" <hendricks_sc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

That is an excellent question. Perhaps that Novitsky guy isn't as
smart as some folks give him credit.

Ronko

unread,
May 23, 2011, 4:13:16 AM5/23/11
to
In article <92a18abc-c129-4aa3-ac74-
8fa4af...@c1g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
truth...@yahoo.com says...

Would you kindly cite the two settled court cases?

0 new messages