PezCycling News?
B. Lafferty
trouble coming to reconciling the L'Equipe report with their love of
Armstrong?
Gary
B. Lafferty
"Gary" <speciali...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:mX2Pe.440$8q.342@lakeread01...
> Or perhaps being responsible journalists.
Are you saying that CyclingNews, VeloNews, The NY Times, The LA Times,
Houston Cronicle, etc are not responsible journalists?
matabala
"B. Lafferty" <Ma...@Italia.org> wrote in message
news:dN2Pe.1254$9i4...@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> Not a word about Armstrong and L'Equipe. On vacation or are they just
> having trouble coming to reconciling the L'Equipe report with their love
> of Armstrong?
News says or not. They aren't to be taken seriously and by clamoring for
their avowal in this instance it's permitted to wonder if you are either.
Ewoud Dronkert
> You must be the only person who would even bother to note what Pez Cycling
> News says or not.
No he isn't.
> They aren't to be taken seriously
Perhaps not, but I like their style. I don't think they take themselves
all too seriously; that's good.
--
E. Dronkert
B. Lafferty
"matabala" <wka...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:430cc931$0$1751$8fcf...@news.wanadoo.fr...
If you've ever read Pez regularly, you know that they have access to
Armstrong. Apparently Armstrong takes them seriously enough to give them
his time. Why is that? (rhetorical question)
Bob Schwartz
> If you've ever read Pez regularly, you know that they have access to
> Armstrong. Apparently Armstrong takes them seriously enough to give them
> his time. Why is that? (rhetorical question)
Because they are not on the enemies list. You know about the
enemies list, don't you?
Bob Schwartz
cv...@execpc.com
Does not read Pez regularly, does not give a fuck if they've
picked up the story or not.
matabala
"Ewoud Dronkert" <firs...@lastname.net.invalid> wrote in message
news:lmipg15olgnfubomi...@4ax.com...
B. Lafferty
"Bob Schwartz" <cv...@shell.core.com> wrote in message
news:11gpjul...@corp.supernews.com...
> B. Lafferty <Ma...@italia.org> wrote:
>> If you've ever read Pez regularly, you know that they have access to
>> Armstrong. Apparently Armstrong takes them seriously enough to give them
>> his time. Why is that? (rhetorical question)
>
> Because they are not on the enemies list. You know about the
> enemies list, don't you?
Right you are. I assume you've read Daniel Coyles book. Anyone who asks
the hard questions is an enemy.
matabala
"B. Lafferty" <Ma...@Italia.org> wrote in message
B. Lafferty
Donald Munro
>> If you've ever read Pez regularly, you know that they have access to
>> Armstrong. Apparently Armstrong takes them seriously enough to give them
>> his time. Why is that? (rhetorical question)
Bob Schwartz wrote:
> Because they are not on the enemies list. You know about the
> enemies list, don't you?
Taking a leaf out of Riis's (note)book.
Donald Munro
> Are you saying that CyclingNews, VeloNews, The NY Times, The LA Times,
> Houston Cronicle, etc are not responsible journalists?
People who fly blimps while under the influence of Belgian beer can hardly
be called responsible.
trg
mX2Pe.440$8q.342@lakeread01...
> Or perhaps being responsible journalists.
No. Bad journalists. The 5 W's of journalism include Why. They had an
article about the reception Hincapie got on the podium at Plouay, without
ever mentioning why fans didn't applaud. It's actually quite comical the
lengths to which they go.
B. Lafferty
"trg" <t...@world.REMOVE.THIS.std.com> wrote in message
news:deump5$ibj$1...@s1.news.oleane.net...
From L'Equipe:
Enfin, au sujet de l'affaire Lance Armstrong, accusé d'avoir eu recours à de
l'EPO lors du tour de France 1999, Hincapie s'est contenté de déclarer :
«Lance est mon meilleur ami. C'est un héros pour des milliards de gens et je
suis son premier supporter».
Might this friendship have something to do with it?
Bob Martin
>Marlene Blanshay wrote:
>> One thing I saw today which I have never seen: an actual group of
>> bent-riders. You don't usually see more than one or two at a time, but
>> this was like a whole big group of about 20!
>
>I hope you reported this sighting of so many heavily bearded men to your
>local department of homeland security.
Perhaps it was the Elbonian national squad