Rossi's B sample negative, Ricco heading home ?
Keith
Anyway when was the last time a B sample came back negative ?!
Victor Kan
> Makes Ricco look even more stupid for dumping her...
>
> Anyway when was the last time a B sample came back negative ?!
As folks in another venue have noted, we (as in the public) should
never know when that occurs, unless the athlete releases that info or
they get popped again in the future and that time their B sample
confirms (or they admit it after the A positive).
Magilla Gorilla
> Makes Ricco look even more stupid for dumping her...
>
> Anyway when was the last time a B sample came back negative ?!
Marion Jones (EPO). And for the record, she later admitted to taking
EPO. This chick Rossi is guilty as sin too. Think about it - what are
the chances statistically that the only female cyclist in the history of
the sport to test positive for CERA just so happen to be banging a guy
who was King of CERA use?
I don't believe in fucking coincidences like that. She sucks anyway, so
this shouldn't harm her so-called 'career' anyway.
Magilla
Robert Fred
> Think about it - what
> are the chances statistically that the only female cyclist in the
> history of the sport to test positive for CERA just so happen to be
> banging a guy who was King of CERA use?
50-50.
ronaldo_jeremiah
>
> I don't believe in fucking coincidences like that.
>
> Magilla
I have a different theory. I think Ricco slipped her some of his
leftover CERA so that he would have grounds to break up with her and
make himself look better by comparison. I expect she was totally
surprised when she tested positive.
I think Ricco is a sociopath.
-rj
Magilla Gorilla
CERA in injected asshole.
Thanks,
Magilla
ple...@nospam.us
Not a sociopath - probably only narcissistic.
-ns
ronaldo_jeremiah
>
> Not a sociopath - probably only narcissistic.
>
> -ns
Yeah, that's another possibility, but I said what I meant. I think he
is actually a sociopath. (Having said that, I'll admit it's
ridiculous to try to make such a diagnosis from afar.) Check and
you'll see - he meets a lot of the criteria.
As long as I'm spinning this theory, here is a question - if he did
give his girlfriend CERA without her knowledge, might that explain the
inconsistent test results? For example, if CERA is meant to be
injected, and he instead put some in her food or a drink, could that
cause her to have an A test positive and/or a B test negative? (Might
the samples be more time sensitive if the drug was administered
orally?)
-rj
z, fred
Time sensitivity shouldn't have anything to do with means of
administration. The A & B tests came from the same urine sample.
ronaldo_jeremiah
>
> Time sensitivity shouldn't have anything to do with means of
> administration. The A & B tests came from the same urine sample.
I wouldn't think so, but that is already being mentioned as a cause
for the discrepancy in news reports:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/rossi-still-facing-investigation-for-possible-cera-use
I'm aware the A and B are the same sample divided in half. It seems
the source is discussing the time in storage. I don't have the
background to know if that would matter or not, even assuming proper
storage.
-rj
Magilla Gorilla
Mexican Low Rider Mafia
"Magilla Gorilla" <m.go...@sandiegozoo.org> wrote in message
news:4BBA3F1E...@sandiegozoo.org...
God must be dead if you're alive.
Betty Munro
>> Everyone who believes in God is mentally ill.
Mexican Low Rider Mafia wrote:
> God must be dead if you're alive.
A hit, a very palpable hit