In other words, consider yourself lucky if you got a '96 bike at the '97
price, not ripped off. Learn to compare components/frame, not just the
model year, because some manufactures change the price range of a given
model drastically from year to year.
Josh
I recently purchase the '97 F700. I guess I lucked out because mine came
with the DD60 headshock and not the MC60 that the spec. sheet shows.
Can't comment on the bike yet as I've only been on it once. Weather
skinks in the D.C. area.
Josh
You Would be Very Lucky if you got the 96 it's much better.
What color is it?
Jeff.
So why do you believe the '96 is better? The frames are the same, and
the components really depend on where/when you buy.
On Fri, 07 Mar 1997 19:29:45 -0800, Jeff Venglass <sh...@ranchonet.com>
wrote:
Not true. The '97 comes with the CAAD2 frame whereas the '96 had the
CAAD3. On the overall the '96 had better components, but it was almost
twice as expensive as this year's F700. These bikes really shouldn't be
compared, because the only thing they have in common is the type
specification. Cannondale could have prevented a lot of confusion if
they hadn't renumbered their line-up. The '96 F700 is somewhat
comparable with this year's F1000.
BTW it seems that here in Europe the components specifications differ
consistently. All '97 F700s I have seen have a DD60. And those in the
shops all have STX brakes, but I never encountered one on the trail that
hadn't upgraded to either V's or Maguras.
--
Camiel Rouweler (cami...@surf.phys.tue.nl)
"I don't want to be called 'boy' anymore. I find that term
sexist and demeaning!". "How do you want to be called then?"
"I want to be called 'chromosomally advantaged youth." (Calvin&Hobbes)
The Parts on the 96 are much better then the 97 and the 96 is a Cad 3
frame and the 97 is a Cad 2 frame.
Ride Fast.
Jeff