info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Mandated Attire
8 views
Skip to first unread message
Joy Beeson
Jun 23, 2023, 10:28:48 PM6/23/23
to
The more wonderful you think helmets are, the more strongly you should
oppose mandatory helmet laws.
You can't mandate the wearing of helmets without creating a legal
definition of the word "helmet" -- thereby banning all helmets that
don't precisely match that definition.
--
Joy Beeson
joy beeson at centurylink dot net
http://wlweather.net/PAGEJOY/
pH
Jun 27, 2023, 5:38:07 PM6/27/23
to
On 2023-06-24, Joy Beeson <jbe...@invalid.net.invalid> wrote:
>
> The more wonderful you think helmets are, the more strongly you should
> oppose mandatory helmet laws.
>
> You can't mandate the wearing of helmets without creating a legal
> definition of the word "helmet" -- thereby banning all helmets that
> don't precisely match that definition.
>
You haven't been paying attention, Joy. There are now those that want to
>
> The more wonderful you think helmets are, the more strongly you should
> oppose mandatory helmet laws.
>
> You can't mandate the wearing of helmets without creating a legal
> definition of the word "helmet" -- thereby banning all helmets that
> don't precisely match that definition.
>
mandate your speech and societal values although I do admit it's fun to be
scanctimonious about helmets, patch kits, rear view mirrors and things now
and again.
It's fun to tell others what to do...isn't that why we have children?
Like me and my 27" tire fixation. Let this 700C fad (and disc <disk?>
brake) fad end, already!
pH in Aptos
Just kidding, everybody, in case I have to actually say it.
0 new messages