Mark Mocho
未读,2021年11月20日 21:21:582021/11/20您无权在此群组中删除帖子
请登录以举报消息
要么此群组的电子邮件地址为匿名状态,要么您得查看成员电子邮件地址权限才能查看原始帖子
收件人
Nick- I flew with the 302 for 10 years or so, and yes, I really liked it. As you know, I am not a competition pilot, so I used it as designed- to tell me whether I was going up or down. Period. It was at least as "great" as the stuff you and I used while flogging hang gliders around the sky and probably a lot better. In the sailplane world, Netto, Super Netto, Total Energy, wind and all of the other bells and whistles are better than what we used to have. You are obviously knowledgeable about the setup, operation and use of this venerable system, which is a good reason to keep on using it.
However-
I changed to the S80 several years back, and immediately loved it. (The S80 is essentially the same as the S100, minus the IGC-FAI approved logger.) Naturally, there was a learning curve associated with the much more complex and extensive list of features, including the map, waypoint ID and related glide numbers needed, the Flarm display and all of the other things available. The 80 mm size is larger than the 57 mm 302, but with the huge amount of available information 57 mm is simply too small. Especially if you are mentioning your aging eyeballs.
Features are abundant, and once you get used to the system, going through the many pages available and judicious use of the customizable options, updating and configuration is pretty intuitive, but maybe not so easy for your average bricklayer. A certain amount of computer savvy is needed. Fortunately, the manual is pretty well laid out. (It's definitely superior to the instructions you generally get with some cheap Chinese device.)
All in all, my suggestion is to upgrade to the 80 mm S100. As I mentioned, the 57 mm is just too small. I also suggest going with the remote stick controller. It isn't that expensive, is pretty easy to install and makes usage of many common features a breeze without having to push buttons and twirl knobs on the S100 itself. I found that it's a pain to use one hand to operate the knobs and buttons, especially since you almost always mask the display with your hand. Just using the buttons on the stick eliminates most of the fumbling, although there are some functions that are easier to manipulate with the main controls on the panel mounted instrument (Volume, Zoom and such)
Downloading your flight is also much easier, as it uses the accepted IGC format as opposed to the antiquated CAI format that is difficult to get accepted by the OLC and FAI. We all know that Cambridge pioneered the flight logging technology, but their proprietary CAI format has been superseded internationally by the IGC/FAI.
Another problem with updating or retrieving information in the 302 is the fact that it requires a serial RS232 interface. Yes, there is a USB port available, but it is data IN only. Forget about downloading or interactively updating your settings. (At least that was the situation when I was using the 302.) The S100 has multiple options for communication between devices, including the damn near foolproof removable SD card. Unless you drop it in the cockpit and lose it, which is a real possibility. (Ask me how I know this. Did you know that there is a mysterious low pressure area under the seat pan that can and will suck an SD card through any available opening?
My advice is to upgrade to the 80 mm S100 and remote stick controller. Keep the 302 operational if you have the panel space to provide you with your security blankie until you are mature enough to dump it and go with newer technology.
PS- I changed to the LX9000 a couple of years ago, and it is even MORE of an awsome system.