I owned a DG303 Acro for about 5 years, and flew it in a few contests.
Performance is quite comparable to a Discus 1 at the same wing loading,
I had no problem outclimbing them, or keeping up at 100+ knots (however,
a Discus 2 could walk away from me at anything over 80 knots). A DG303
will easily outrun an LS4. I had winglets and regular tips, handling with
the winglets was nicer, thermalling a bit easier. The cockpit is quite
comfortable, visibility incredible, build quality excellent. Rigging can
be a bit of a pain (automatic torque tube hookups that always seem to be
out of position). The one area where I think the Discus 1 wins is handling,
the DG is good, but the Discus is a step beyond...
Marc
--
_____________________________
Marc Ramsey, ma...@ranlog.com
http://www.ranlog.com/ramsey/
LG
There's one SZD-55 for sale in Georgia actually.
Best regards,
--
Janusz Kesik
Aero Club of Czestochowa, Poland
jant...@interia.pl
www.soaring.enter.net.pl
GG 994618 ; ICQ 127478803
"James Scott" <REMOVE_TO_...@steveisfifty.com> wrote in message
news:a75f87$iqvhr$1...@ID-49798.news.dfncis.de...
> I can't afford a Discus so am thinking of... <cut>
One thing it doesn't have is light controls, particularly the ailerons. The
ship climbs well, but you have to fly it rather mechanically; it doesn't "talk
to you" like the Discus, my old Standard Cirrus, or a lot of other ships.
The DG's are indeed a terrific value. They are solidly built, comfortable and
safe to fly.
I like having a 5" wheel and a Tost drum brake that really works. The
pneumatic tailwheel is also a nice feature.
The spoilers are excellent and very short landings are possible. I would
prefer the wheelbrake control not be on the spoiler handle, however.
The underwing blowholes are a pain in the ass, but important to keep clean.
Takes about two hours once a year using welder's tip files and very low
pressure (~ 20 psi) compressed air.
I fly regularly with a friend in an LS-4. The two ships climb similarly. In
the low-to-mid cruising range (60-75 KIAS) he is usually a tad better than me
in the same air, but above 80 KIAS the DG is better.
Feel free to contact me for more info.
> Can't afford Discus? Then go for SZD-55 it's a real competitor for this
> glider and it is beating DG-300, not to mention LS-4 which should be
> compared with Jantar Standard 2/3
>
> There's one SZD-55 for sale in Georgia actually.
>
> Best regards,
>
>
Last time I saw it, the SZD in Georgia was in fine condition. I know
the owner. He is careful and meticulous. I think it would be a great
ship.
-Jim
They have not published a revised polar for the 303.
The data plate in my DG303 has DG300 on it.
They also come with factory winglets.
Chris
Ed
P.S. I belive the SZD factory has shut down so getting
parts for a 55 may be trick in the future and everyone
I've spoken to who owned one was not overlly impressed
John Cochrane
"James Scott" <REMOVE_TO_...@steveisfifty.com> wrote in message
news:a75f87$iqvhr$1...@ID-49798.news.dfncis.de...
Ed
At 22:48 20 March 2002, John Cochrane wrote:
>What makes you think a DG300 is any cheaper than a
>discus? The price seems
>about the same, and varies widely depending on age,
>options, gel coat,
>instruments etc. the DG is a fine glider, but if you
>want a discus, buy a
>discus. Mine for instance (which just happens to be
>for sale!)
>
>John Cochrane
>
>'James Scott' wrote in message
>news:a75f87$iqvhr$1...@ID-49798.news.dfncis.de...
> P.S. I belive the SZD factory has shut down so getting
> parts for a 55 may be trick in the future and everyone
> I've spoken to who owned one was not overlly impressed
Not overly impressed with what? The fact that the factory has shut
down or the sailplane itself?
Nick.
sz...@bigpond.com
Best regards,
--
Janusz Kesik
Aero Club of Czestochowa, Poland
jant...@interia.pl
www.soaring.enter.net.pl
www.szybowce.enter.net.pl/faq.htm <<<Czym jest latanie na szybowcach>>>