On 9/22/22 15:45, John Foster wrote:
<Snip...>> My impression is that there was something that happened to
cause the
> slack in the tow rope--possibly the tow vehicle loosing power
> temporarily while shifting gears? Then the pilot pulled back on the
> stick to take up slack or start the kiting phase...
Entirely speculatively possible, even if "aft stick to take up on-tow
slack" is nowhere-that-I-know-taught as part of routine slack rope
recovery procedures.
>...but was too slow
> and at too steep an angle of attack when the slack got taken up,
> which caused the wing to stall and spin in. Keep in mind that if the
> glider is in too high of a nose up attitude when the slack comes out,
> it can take a normal angle of attack relative to the motion of the
> glider (climbing), and suddenly change it to exceed the critical
> angle of attack when tension on the tow rope pulls in a more forward
> direction. In any event, I believe the pilot should have dropped the
> nose and released the tow rope. Someone more knowledgeable correct
> me if I'm wrong.
"AOA is life" whenever at "too-low-to-recover departures from controlled
flight" heights. No rational, sane, actively-thinking, glider pilot
should *ever* (actively or passively) take/assist actions at those
heights that simultaneously increase AOA, reduce their glider's
(not-presently-outside-source-assisted) kinetic energy state, and have
potential to demand a quick return to a kinetic-energy-increasing energy
state that is obtainable only by stick-required, time-eating, pilot
inputs. Feel free to rephrase the above into whatever verbiage that
helps you internalize the intended concepts...