Where did you find that defined? I looked in all the spots I
normally used and none of them had Ixxxx.
test_driver <
test_driv...@aviationbanter.com> wrote:
> I thought I would let you all know that I figured out what that code
> means in the METAR.
> The code deals with Ice Accretion:
> Hourly Ice Accretion Amount:
> Ice accretion for the current hour encoded in hundredths of an inch
> (0.01 in.) has the following format:
> ? I1nnn Where: ?I? - is the icing indicator for the group ?1" - is the
> reported time period (one hour) ?nnn? - is the thickness accumulated to
> the nearest one-hundredth of an inch (0.01 in.). A trace amount is
> encoded as ?000.?
> Three (3-) Hourly Ice Accretion Amount:
> ? The accretion of ice over the past three hour time period in
> one-hundredths of an inch (0.01 in.) would have the format: I3nnn Where:
> ?I? - is the icing indicator for the group ?3" - is the reported time
> period (three hours) ?nnn? - is the thickness accumulated to the nearest
> one-hundredth of an inch (0.01 in.). A trace amount is encoded as ?000.?
> The remark may be encoded at the intermediate synoptic times (0300,
> 0900, 1500, or 2100 UTC). When conditions warrant, the ?I3nnn? remark
> will be encoded immediately following the hourly ice accretion amount
> (I1nnn).
> Six (6-) Hourly Ice Accretion Amount:
> ? The accretion of ice over the past six hour time period in
> one-hundredths of an inch (0.01 in.) will have the format: I6nnn Where:
> ?I? - is the icing indicator for the group ?6" - is the reported time
> period (six hours) ?nnn? - is the thickness accumulated to the nearest
> one-hundredth of an inch (0.01 in.). A trace amount is encoded as ?000.?
> The remark may be encoded at the mandatory synoptic times (0600, 1200,
> 1800, or 0000 UTC). When conditions warrant, the ?I6nnn? remark will be
> encoded immediately following the hourly ice accretion amount (I1nnn).
> This could be very helpful to us but the NWS has not installed this
> update to all stations yet.
> --
> test_driver
--
Don Poitras