On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:49:24 -0700 (PDT), dump...@hotmail.com
>On Mar 26, 3:12�pm, Bill <blackuse...@gmail.com
>> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:46:58 -0700 (PDT), dumpst...@hotmail.com
>> >On Mar 26, 12:16 pm, Bill <blackuse...@gmail.com
>> >> Now why on earth would either India or the UK need a heavy bomber?
>> >> Both have missile systems that are perfectly adequate.
>> >So do Russia & China........
>> But neither India nor the UK are hegenomising aggressive powers
>> looking to expand their territory.
>> India is forced to pacifism by their constitution and sending troops
>> to operate on foreign soil except in self defence can be interpreted
>> as a crime.
>> This is why Indian representation in peace keeping forces is almost
>> always paramilitary police.
>> The UK tried to rule the world, �but gave it up after a bit to
>> concentrate on parties...
>India shares a border with one of those "hegenomising aggressive
>and fought a war with them in the past.
They might want to build a
>nuclear triad in the future to ensure the robustness of their second-