Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Whatever happened to Adam Yoshida?

179 views
Skip to first unread message

David E. Powell

unread,
Aug 17, 2010, 11:04:39 PM8/17/10
to
A rather precocious young man who posted here some years back. I
always wondered if things worked out OK for him. He was very exuberant
and brassy, and I hope the journey since has been kind to him!

Keith Willshaw

unread,
Aug 18, 2010, 4:09:29 AM8/18/10
to

"David E. Powell" <David_Po...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:1e482c11-ec16-4535...@c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...


> A rather precocious young man who posted here some years back. I
> always wondered if things worked out OK for him. He was very exuberant
> and brassy,


He still is.

> and I hope the journey since has been kind to him!
>

http://www.adamyoshida.com/

Keith

La N

unread,
Aug 18, 2010, 4:59:23 AM8/18/10
to

Oooohhhh .... he's from my Province ... and he's expounding on the dreaded
HST which most British Columbians loathe.

- nilita


David E. Powell

unread,
Aug 18, 2010, 12:41:03 PM8/18/10
to
On Aug 18, 4:59 am, "La N" <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Keith Willshaw wrote:
> > "David E. Powell" <David_Powell3...@msn.com> wrote in message

He makes a compelling case, too. Good to see him still doing his
thing.

Brian Colwell

unread,
Aug 18, 2010, 9:41:16 PM8/18/10
to

"Keith Willshaw" <keith...@kwillshaw.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:_yMao.126885$9R.111851@hurricane...
I didn't realize he was a "local boy" :-))

bmc


Andrew Chaplin

unread,
Aug 19, 2010, 9:02:09 AM8/19/10
to
"Brian Colwell" <bmco...@shaw.ca> wrote in
news:0Z%ao.89822$xZ2....@newsfe07.iad:

> I didn't realize he was a "local boy" :-))

I rest easy knowing that there are at least three mountain ranges and
thousands of kilometres of muskeg and Canadian Shield between him and me.
--
Andrew Chaplin
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)

Ken S. Tucker

unread,
Aug 19, 2010, 9:33:55 AM8/19/10
to
On Aug 19, 6:02 am, Andrew Chaplin <ab.chap...@yourfinger.rogers.com>
wrote:
> "Brian Colwell" <bmcolw...@shaw.ca> wrote innews:0Z%ao.89822$xZ2....@newsfe07.iad:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Keith Willshaw" <keithnos...@kwillshaw.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
> >news:_yMao.126885$9R.111851@hurricane...
>
> >> "David E. Powell" <David_Powell3...@msn.com> wrote in message

> >>news:1e482c11-ec16-4535...@c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com
> >> ...
> >>> A rather precocious young man who posted here some years back. I
> >>> always wondered if things worked out OK for him. He was very
> >>> exuberant and brassy,
>
> >> He still is.
>
> >>> and I hope the journey since has been kind to him!
>
> >>http://www.adamyoshida.com/
>
> > I didn't realize he was a "local boy" :-))
>
> I rest easy knowing that there are at least three mountain ranges and
> thousands of kilometres of muskeg and Canadian Shield between him and me.

So are people in BC about you.
Why don't you lazy govmonks get real jobs instead
of taxing the crap from real working people to party
in Ottawa Offtario.
Ken

William Black

unread,
Aug 19, 2010, 10:16:58 AM8/19/10
to
On 19/08/10 14:33, Ken S. Tucker wrote:


> Why don't you lazy govmonks get real jobs instead
> of taxing the crap from real working people to party
> in Ottawa Offtario.


If you had a government job that had reasonable pay and decent
conditions would you give it up?

Or would you go out in the rain and snow to shovel shit for peanuts out
of a sense of moral outrage?

--
William Black

Free men have open minds
If you want loyalty, buy a dog...

Andrew Chaplin

unread,
Aug 19, 2010, 11:05:25 AM8/19/10
to
William Black <willia...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in news:i4jecr$307$1
@news.eternal-september.org:

> On 19/08/10 14:33, Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>
>
>> Why don't you lazy govmonks get real jobs instead
>> of taxing the crap from real working people to party
>> in Ottawa Offtario.
>
>
> If you had a government job that had reasonable pay and decent
> conditions would you give it up?
>
> Or would you go out in the rain and snow to shovel shit for peanuts out
> of a sense of moral outrage?

I'll get me coat, galoshes and shovel. ;^)

Jack Linthicum

unread,
Aug 19, 2010, 11:14:00 AM8/19/10
to
On Aug 19, 11:05 am, Andrew Chaplin <ab.chap...@yourfinger.rogers.com>
wrote:
> William Black <william.bl...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in news:i4jecr$307$1

My wife's relatives live in South Carolina. Long ago they learned that
in hard times the only place that actually payed their help was the
government. If South Carolina gets it, how come it misses so many
others?

USG (ret)

Andrew Chaplin

unread,
Aug 19, 2010, 1:05:47 PM8/19/10
to
Jack Linthicum <jackli...@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:aa66be38-456b-41f2...@v8g2000yqe.googlegroups.com:

> On Aug 19, 11:05 am, Andrew Chaplin <ab.chap...@yourfinger.rogers.com>
> wrote:
>> William Black <william.bl...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in
>> news:i4jecr$307$1 @news.eternal-september.org:
>>
>> > On 19/08/10 14:33, Ken S. Tucker wrote:
>>
>> >> Why don't you lazy govmonks get real jobs instead
>> >> of taxing the crap from real working people to party
>> >> in Ottawa Offtario.
>>
>> > If you had a government job that had reasonable pay and decent
>> > conditions would you give it up?
>>
>> > Or would you go out in the rain and snow to shovel shit for peanuts
>> > out of a sense of moral outrage?
>>
>> I'll get me coat, galoshes and shovel. ;^)
>

> My wife's relatives live in South Carolina. Long ago they learned that
> in hard times the only place that actually payed their help was the
> government. If South Carolina gets it, how come it misses so many
> others?
>
> USG (ret)

Too many people think that, because the government employs people to
provide services, it owes them a job. The fact that they might be
unsuitable for the job to which they applied and are consequently
rejected, or that there might be more qualified candidates never occurs
to them; they think the government owes them a job. The government does
not owe them a job, it owes them cost-effective services required by law.
It will employ the necessary human resources it can get at labour market
rates to provide those services.
--
Andrew Chaplin
Canadian government, not yet retired

Richard Casady

unread,
Aug 19, 2010, 1:17:43 PM8/19/10
to
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:05:47 -0500, Andrew Chaplin
<ab.ch...@yourfinger.rogers.com> wrote:

> they think the government owes them a job. The government does
>not owe them a job,

The gov used to not only provide jobs, they were manditory. Fun stuff
like machinegun schlepping. Been a third of a century since there was
a draft in the US. How soon we forget.

Casady

Jack Linthicum

unread,
Aug 19, 2010, 1:22:07 PM8/19/10
to
On Aug 19, 1:05 pm, Andrew Chaplin <ab.chap...@yourfinger.rogers.com>
wrote:

I gave up a career in academia for time with CIA and later with the
FCC. I think I gave good service at a lower pay level than I would
have had in teaching at the university level. I retired and have a
decent pension when my friends are bemoaning their 201Ks that started
out as 401Ks.

Brian Colwell

unread,
Aug 19, 2010, 2:07:27 PM8/19/10
to

"Andrew Chaplin" <ab.ch...@yourfinger.rogers.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9DD95BEACA...@216.196.109.144...

Don't rest too easy............Rumour has it he owns a Landrover Discovery,
that just loves that type of terrain ! :-))

bmc


Keith Willshaw

unread,
Aug 19, 2010, 3:34:55 PM8/19/10
to

"Brian Colwell" <bmco...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:wpebo.28380$RZ1....@newsfe24.iad...

If he had a real Landie I might worry but not if it's a Disco

Keith

La N

unread,
Aug 19, 2010, 3:41:41 PM8/19/10
to

Anyway, I don't know this Yoshida, but it appears he lives close to me, and
he is railing against the hated HST (harmonized sales tax just instituted in
our province), which makes him okay in my books.

- nilita

Eugene Griessel

unread,
Aug 19, 2010, 3:54:00 PM8/19/10
to
"La N" <nilita20...@yahoo.com> wrote:

That's like supporting Mussolini because he made the trains run on
time. Support Yoshida and you will be in WW3 before you know it.

For people who like peace and quiet: a phoneless cord.

Jack Linthicum

unread,
Aug 19, 2010, 4:07:06 PM8/19/10
to
On Aug 19, 3:54 pm, eug...@dynagen.co.za (Eugene Griessel) wrote:

> "La N" <nilita2004NOS...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Keith Willshaw wrote:
> >> "Brian Colwell" <bmcolw...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> >>news:wpebo.28380$RZ1....@newsfe24.iad...
>
> >>> "Andrew Chaplin" <ab.chap...@yourfinger.rogers.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:Xns9DD95BEACA...@216.196.109.144...
> >>>> "Brian Colwell" <bmcolw...@shaw.ca> wrote in
> >>>>news:0Z%ao.89822$xZ2....@newsfe07.iad:
>
> >>>>> "Keith Willshaw" <keithnos...@kwillshaw.demon.co.uk> wrote in
> >>>>> messagenews:_yMao.126885$9R.111851@hurricane...
>
> >>>>>> "David E. Powell" <David_Powell3...@msn.com> wrote in message

Those damn Eskimos again?

Arved Sandstrom

unread,
Aug 19, 2010, 4:20:13 PM8/19/10
to
Keith Willshaw wrote:
> "Brian Colwell" <bmco...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:wpebo.28380$RZ1....@newsfe24.iad...
[ SNIP ]

>>
>> Don't rest too easy............Rumour has it he owns a Landrover
>> Discovery, that just loves that type of terrain ! :-))
>>
>> bmc
>
> If he had a real Landie I might worry but not if it's a Disco
>
> Keith

Whatever he's got (Land Rover Discovery, Range Rover, Range Rover Sport)
it's still just an SUV with very good to excellent off-road
capability...which means unless it finds some handy logging roads it's
getting almost nowhere in the Canadian boreal forest.

AHS
--
Before a man speaks it is always safe to assume that he is a fool.
After he speaks, it is seldom necessary to assume it. -- H.L. Mencken


William Black

unread,
Aug 19, 2010, 7:48:34 PM8/19/10
to
On 19/08/10 21:20, Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> Keith Willshaw wrote:
>> "Brian Colwell"<bmco...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>> news:wpebo.28380$RZ1....@newsfe24.iad...
> [ SNIP ]
>>>
>>> Don't rest too easy............Rumour has it he owns a Landrover
>>> Discovery, that just loves that type of terrain ! :-))
>>>
>>> bmc
>>
>> If he had a real Landie I might worry but not if it's a Disco
>>
>> Keith
>
> Whatever he's got (Land Rover Discovery, Range Rover, Range Rover Sport)
> it's still just an SUV with very good to excellent off-road
> capability...which means unless it finds some handy logging roads it's
> getting almost nowhere in the Canadian boreal forest.

Depends on how old it is.

The original Discovery had Defender running gear.

David E. Powell

unread,
Aug 20, 2010, 1:54:40 AM8/20/10
to
On Aug 19, 4:20 pm, "Arved Sandstrom" <dces...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Keith Willshaw wrote:
> > "Brian Colwell" <bmcolw...@shaw.ca> wrote in message

> >news:wpebo.28380$RZ1....@newsfe24.iad...
> [ SNIP ]
>
> >> Don't rest too easy............Rumour has it he owns a Landrover
> >> Discovery, that just loves that type of terrain ! :-))
>
> >> bmc
>
> > If he had a real Landie I might worry but not if it's a Disco
>
> > Keith
>
> Whatever he's got (Land Rover Discovery, Range Rover, Range Rover Sport)
> it's still just an SUV with very good to excellent off-road
> capability...which means unless it finds some handy logging roads it's
> getting almost nowhere in the Canadian boreal forest.

This is assuming that it is stock and without special
modifications. ;)

Seriously, glad to see he is still out doing his thing, and I hope he
is well and happy. Always liked his spirit and verve.

0 new messages