__________________________
Message: 28
To: dkir...@ix.netcom.com
From: ECur...@aol.com
Subject: Re: Back Issues
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 09:11:04 -0500 (EST)
Dave,
The answer is, at the present time, we don't have any special pricing
on back issues. Neither does Light Plane Maintenance (which is also $7
ea. by the way, for a thinner issue). I'm not sure I can name any
magazine that has a special on back issues. But the point is, this is
not a Turkish bazaar where you haggle over prices. You may buy
Christmas trees that way, you may buy a new car that way, you may buy a
new house that way, but I can assure you that you won't buy TV Guide,
Playboy, or People magazine that way, and you won't buy TBO back issues
that way. I'm trying hard (as I hope you are) not to lose my sense of
humor about all this, but just in case you are "losing it," we'd always
be happy to refund you on the remainder of your subscription. In your
case that comes to one issue's worth. (You're set to expire after the
March issue.) In closing let me just add that I find it amazing that
you think I am going to disagree with my wife on any of this, number
one, and No. 2 it seems incredible to me that you think it appropriate
to set our prices for us. I don't know what business you're in. Do
people set your prices for you? Do you try to get a lower price on milk
when you go to the store? Do you stand there and argue with the
manager: "Hey, listen, I've bought HUNDREDS of dollars worth of milk
from this store, and now I think it's time you gave me a little price
break on this milk!" I'm sure you would get the same reception from the
store manager as you are getting from me.
Thanks for listening to my side. Now get lost.
Kas Thomas
____________________________
Your magazine is good, but I'll live without it... Please cancel my
subscription. You can keep the money if you promise to buy Rita a set
of Dale Carnegie tapes. As far as getting lost... I'm on my way sir.
\/\/\/\/lots of snipping\/\/\//\
Letter from publisher in response to DK's note to Thomas:
David, cupla thoughts:
1. You did the correct thing by cancelling. Such attitudes as
Thomas displays are unwarranted and inexcusable in ANY business.
2. Thomas obviously has NO idea of what a market economy really
means. Buyer and seller agree on a price..or no transaction occurs.
However, maybe we should all go easy on the poor guy. He obviously
is walking on eggs...frightened his wife will come down hard on him. I
don't like the term "henpecked" because of its sexist connotation...but
I think it might be appropriate in this case.
I would hope you might crosspost this in any NG, whose readers may
be interested in this type of subject matter. The Thomas letter is a
classic in the "How not to do business" category, IMHO.
Cheers.