Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Fastest 100hp homebuilt or kit?

2,660 views
Skip to first unread message

tom pettit

unread,
Nov 11, 2005, 6:37:51 PM11/11/05
to
Okay, I don't want to pay the fuel bill on a monster engine. I do want to
go fast. What kit or plans homebuilt will go 200 mph on 100 hp?

tom


John Ammeter

unread,
Nov 11, 2005, 6:54:32 PM11/11/05
to

Most will easily go over 200 mph..... straight down...

John

Jim Carriere

unread,
Nov 11, 2005, 7:01:31 PM11/11/05
to

LOL :)

Serious answer, Vari Eze comes close, probably not too many others.

GTH

unread,
Nov 11, 2005, 7:49:16 PM11/11/05
to
Jim Carriere a écrit :

Hi all,

I'm not aware of any homebuilt flying that fast straight and level on
100 hp.
In my hangar there are two LongEze, and they are not capable of doing
more than 165-175 mph at full throttle. It is no surprise when we
consider the large wing and small pusher propeller.

The fastest 100 hp kitplane I know of is the Dyn Aero MCR 01, reaching
190-195 mph with a Rotax 912S.

I've just built a four seater version with a Rotax 914 100 hp turbo, and
we recorded 181 mph at 100 % power. I'm using the 3 GPS method.

More info in English at
http://www.avnet.co.uk/lts/index.html

You'll see a short takeoff video on my website.

Regards,
Gilles Thesee
Grenoble, France
http://contrails.free.fr

Adetokunbo Desalu

unread,
Nov 11, 2005, 7:59:22 PM11/11/05
to
Very funny!

On serious matter...
200mph on 100 horsepower? Rare! In this category, you will have to look at
single seat aircraft. On top of my head, Midget Mustang from Mustang
Aeronautics is a good example. AR-5 from www.ar-5.com is another example
but I'm not sure if you can get your hand on them. I can't think of others
but it is a start.


--
Toks Desalu
PP-ASEL
Dyin' to Soar
"John Ammeter" <jamme...@123cablespeed.com> wrote in message
news:5tadnWanu7y...@cablespeedwa.com...

Montblack

unread,
Nov 11, 2005, 8:05:02 PM11/11/05
to
("tom pettit peak org")

> Okay, I don't want to pay the fuel bill on a monster engine. I do want
> to go fast. What kit or plans homebuilt will go 200 mph on 100 hp?


http://www.mustangaero.com/
Midget Mustang
Aluminum, single-place, aerobatic speed machine!
200 mph with a 100hp Continental O-200

<http://www.mustangaero.com/Midget%20Mustang/Midget%20Mustang.html>
With a 100hp Continental it will have a top speed close to 200mph and can
cruise over 175mph burning only 6gal/hr.


Montblack

Robert Little

unread,
Nov 11, 2005, 8:37:02 PM11/11/05
to
Lightning Bug is a glass 100 hp canoe that cruised over 200 mph with a 6'4"
x 240 lb pilot. Simply, a single place White Lightning. It flies with a
inline 3-cylinder AMW (?).

"tom pettit peak org>" <tompet<atdot> wrote in message
news:b6OdnZZNSpD...@scnresearch.com...

Kyle Boatright

unread,
Nov 11, 2005, 8:41:48 PM11/11/05
to
A Cassuit or other F-1 racing design would come close, depending on how much
attention you paid to building a straight, clean airframe.


"tom pettit peak org>" <tompet<atdot> wrote in message
news:b6OdnZZNSpD...@scnresearch.com...

Message has been deleted

ric

unread,
Nov 12, 2005, 12:36:02 AM11/12/05
to
It's actually "Cassutt", and they claim 200-230mph.
See http://cassutt.lornet.com/

Ric

"Kyle Boatright" <kboat...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:FZqdnZIMOdL...@comcast.com...

Message has been deleted

THEByleDuct

unread,
Nov 12, 2005, 3:26:47 AM11/12/05
to
One that is rarely mentioned is the mini-IMP http://www.mini-imp.com/

100hp
200+ mph max speed
180+ mph cruise speed
45-50 mph stall speed
5 gph consumption
Full specs at http://www.mini-imp.com/news.htm

Philippe Vessaire

unread,
Nov 12, 2005, 4:57:47 AM11/12/05
to
"tom pettit" <tompet<at>peak<dot>org> wrote:

> Okay, I don't want to pay the fuel bill on a monster engine. I do want
> to go fast. What kit or plans homebuilt will go 200 mph on 100 hp?


http://www.avnet.co.uk/lts/pages/mcr.htm
http://www.avnet.co.uk/lts/pages/vla.htm

not yet 200mph, performances are for Rotax 912.

You can't, to day, see fastest 80HP two seater. You don't realy get a lot
more speed with 100HP (only 7% more).
VNE is 199mph....

by
--
Pub: http://www.slowfood.fr/france
Philippe Vessaire Ò¿Ó¬
philippe.vessaire@_No_Spam_tele2.fr

firstflight

unread,
Nov 12, 2005, 8:41:27 AM11/12/05
to
How about 200kts on 80hp engine? 2 seats.
http://www.lhaviation.com/site_frame/bases_marges/index.htm

LH-10 Ellipse. Might have to wait a few years, but I know I want one!

JF

"Philippe Vessaire" <aill...@No.Spam> wrote in message
news:w0jdf.454$Q23...@nntpserver.swip.net...

> Philippe Vessaire ҿӬ
> philippe.vessaire@_No_Spam_tele2.fr


Robert Little

unread,
Nov 12, 2005, 8:53:46 AM11/12/05
to
So that is where the BD-12 went?
"firstflight" <first...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:KMKdnfr9G5yYbOje...@gwi.net...

jls...@bellsouth.net

unread,
Nov 12, 2005, 9:47:01 AM11/12/05
to
Klaus's O-200 makes much more than 100 HP. Probably more like 150.

He manufactures, uses, and sells high-compression pistons for the
O-200. Plus, when he's racing it's probably turning 4k rpm or better.

Book rpm for the 100 HP O-200 is 2750 at takeoff, much less at cruise.

Mike Arman didn't have to "trick" the Rotax 582 for power to get over
200 mph in the AR-5. He did trick the airframe, however. Read all
the books and articles in his bibliography and you can build his
airplane too. He doesn't sell plans but you could still figure it all
out and come close, especially if you're as sharp and as talented as
Arman. Of course, I'm addressing the original poster here, only.

Philippe Vessaire

unread,
Nov 12, 2005, 11:11:01 AM11/12/05
to
firstflight wrote:

> How about 200kts on 80hp engine? 2 seats.
> http://www.lhaviation.com/site_frame/bases_marges/index.htm
>
> LH-10 Ellipse. Might have to wait a few years, but I know I want one!
>

>> http://www.avnet.co.uk/lts/pages/mcr.htm
>> http://www.avnet.co.uk/lts/pages/vla.htm
MCR01

vapor plane vs 20 years flying...

Philippe Vessaire Ò¿Ó¬
philippe.vessaire@_No_Spam_tele2.fr

GTH

unread,
Nov 12, 2005, 11:45:56 AM11/12/05
to
firstflight a écrit :

> How about 200kts on 80hp engine? 2 seats.
> http://www.lhaviation.com/site_frame/bases_marges/index.htm
>
> LH-10 Ellipse. Might have to wait a few years, but I know I want one!
>
>
You bet !

A magnificent example of vapor technology ;-)
Unobtanium wings with Gossamer skin on helium-cell Futurium foam,
Not-Yet-Invented engine and No-Drag01 airfoil, the lot...

I saw the mockup at the Blois Show (France) last September.
IMHO, a very good add-on to MS Flight Simulator.

GTH

unread,
Nov 12, 2005, 12:05:17 PM11/12/05
to
nss...@gmail.com a écrit :

This is a single-seater. Besides, the mini-Imps I know of are much, much
slower than that.
And the takeoff performance and handling are reported to be, ahem...abysmal.

On the other hand, the MCR 01 are very well behaved, conventional
airplanes, with brilliant takeoff and landing performance. And they are
flying by the hundred in this country.
See
http://contrails.free.fr/temp/MOV00659.MPG

Darrel Toepfer

unread,
Nov 12, 2005, 12:37:38 PM11/12/05
to
GTH wrote:

> On the other hand, the MCR 01 are very well behaved, conventional
> airplanes, with brilliant takeoff and landing performance. And they are
> flying by the hundred in this country.
> See
> http://contrails.free.fr/temp/MOV00659.MPG
>
> Regards,
> Gilles Thesee
> Grenoble, France
> http://contrails.free.fr

How much do you have invested in your 4 seater? Thanks, looks nice...

keepitrunning

unread,
Nov 12, 2005, 3:36:48 PM11/12/05
to

"Jim Carriere" <jimca...@yahoooo.nospam> wrote :

> Serious answer, Vari Eze comes close, probably not too many others.

I wonder what the horse power is in Klaus Savier's Vari Eze? Reno Race
results show
he goes 250mph:
http://www.sportclass.com/race_results_2004.html


Here is his site:
http://www.lightspeedengineering.com/Technicalities/Articles.htm

Gary


UltraJohn

unread,
Nov 12, 2005, 8:01:17 PM11/12/05
to
Rand Robinson KR-2 but only if you resist the temptation to Modify (ie add
weighty accessories) supposedly does it on 75 hp but I think it's a bit
exaggerated!
John

"tom pettit" <tompet<at>peak<dot>org> wrote:

Message has been deleted

Stealth Pilot

unread,
Nov 13, 2005, 9:48:13 AM11/13/05
to

mike arnold

Nathan Young

unread,
Nov 13, 2005, 6:55:49 PM11/13/05
to
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:37:51 -0800, "tom pettit"

<tompet<at>peak<dot>org> wrote:

Super Pulsar 100
http://www.pulsaraircraft.com/


Jim

unread,
Nov 13, 2005, 10:06:48 PM11/13/05
to
I don't see a 200 mph cruise on 100 HP on the Pulsar website. They list the
O200 as a possible powerplant for the Super 100 but don't provide any
performance numbers for it. I wish the AR5 would go into kit production.
It is a neat airplane and goes like stink on a miserly fuel burn.


Jerry Springer

unread,
Nov 13, 2005, 11:42:39 PM11/13/05
to

True Jim but you and I would not fit in it. :-)

Jerry

Jim

unread,
Nov 13, 2005, 11:57:03 PM11/13/05
to
I met the guy that built it (I think you were there) - he wasn't real small
and with a serious diet I think we could fit.

:-)

jim


Nathan Young

unread,
Nov 14, 2005, 10:34:14 AM11/14/05
to
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 04:57:03 GMT, "Jim" <n14...@earthlink.net> wrote:

>I met the guy that built it (I think you were there) - he wasn't real small
>and with a serious diet I think we could fit.

Not sure if you mean height or weight, but the Pulsar website shows
photos of a a 6'7" guy who flew it. The seats must be on a hell of
recline to fit someone that large.

Nathan Young

unread,
Nov 14, 2005, 10:36:23 AM11/14/05
to

Good point on the SP100. They list O-200, IO-240, O-235, Rotax and
Jabiru as engine options. These range from 80-125hp, so it is not
clear which engine is being used.

The AR5 was a single seat, right?

Another possibility would be the Q200. It is supposed to go 200mph
using an O-200, but I believe most are around 180mph.

Jim

unread,
Nov 14, 2005, 11:24:40 AM11/14/05
to
Evidently they are pushing the auto engines. The performance numbers are
there for all but the O200.

Yes the AR5 is a single seat and IIRC the designer/builder was tall but not
too big around.

If I was going to build a small go-fast it would probably be the VariEze.
As for the Q200: 180 mph cruise is nothing to sneeze at on 5 gph.

jim

'05 HR2
looking for an RV3 kit or a single seat O200 250 mph homebuilt (NO F1's)
:-)

jim

abripl

unread,
Nov 14, 2005, 1:42:00 PM11/14/05
to
Shucks. BD-5 will do it with less than 100 hp. You can pick one up
cheap. But you need 3000+ hrs to finish one.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SQ2000 canard: http://www.abri.com/sq2000

Richard Lamb

unread,
Nov 14, 2005, 5:40:28 PM11/14/05
to
I'm nearly 6' 3 and 300 pounds and found the Pulsar to be quite
comfortable.
Snug, yes, but no problem...

Yes, it does have a seriously reclined seat.

Richard

Richard Lamb

unread,
Nov 14, 2005, 5:42:02 PM11/14/05
to
Ok, I went on a quick diet and lost 100 pounds in the last minute or
so...

Richard

tom pettit

unread,
Nov 14, 2005, 9:57:39 PM11/14/05
to
Thanks all, for the suggestions. This will keep me busy looking things
over. Your help saved lots of searching.

tom


Mark Hickey

unread,
Nov 14, 2005, 10:45:09 PM11/14/05
to
"Richard Lamb" <cave...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Ok, I went on a quick diet and lost 100 pounds in the last minute or
>so...

I know people who post here semi-regularly who lose that with one good
enema...

Mark "no names" Hickey

Ful...@dow.com

unread,
Nov 20, 2005, 1:17:34 AM11/20/05
to

Not sure about the plane yet, but you'll notice on their website that
they no longer tout their " in-development " engine. They now list the
Jabiru 2200 as their powerplant.

Neal

ELIPPSE

unread,
Nov 23, 2005, 11:45:27 PM11/23/05
to
Hi! Klaus probably has more like about 125hp at the rated 2750 rpm and
sea-level, and turns only around or slightly above 3000 rpm in a race
at Reno's 7000' density altitude. His forte is that he's reduced his
EZE's drag incredibly!
I recently tested my Lancair 235 with an O-235 at 210 mph TAS at 4500'
dalt, 2910 rpm.I typically cruise 198 mph TAS at 2750 rpm at 14,500
dalt, 5.8 gph.
Jim Patillo's Q200 will do about 200 mph at 5000' dalt at 3000 rpm. I
tested his plane at the Livermore Quickie fly-in this past summer with
my three-blade prop, and NO spinner. He did 189 mph TAS at 5300' dalt,
2550 rpm. Correcting his TAS for my spinner on-spinner off ratio-test
in my Lancair, and estimating what his results would be with a similar
efficiency prop turning 3000 rpm yields 203 mph TAS. A well-built
Quickie with a good prop is a good machine!

ELIPPSE

unread,
Nov 24, 2005, 12:12:51 AM11/24/05
to
Hi! It's very important when discussing speeds that you designate TAS,
density altitude and rpm. Typically your speed will decrease about
0.6%/1000' increase in altitude. Thus a plane with a normally-aspirated
engine that goes 200 mph TAS at sea-level and 2750 rpm will be down to
about 189 mph TAS at 10,000' density altitude and about 2600 rpm.
Indicated airspeeds, without a calibrated and properly-located static
port and OAT sensor, are pretty meaningless. Also, due to dynamic (RAM)
pressure effect on engine power at 200 mph TAS, you have to be at about
9500' density altitude to obtain 75% power at rated rpm, not
7500'-8000' as usually assumed. At that density altitude and TAS, IAS
is 173 mph. Sea-level power at 200 mph TAS will be about 105% due to
RAM.

kayr...@yahoo.com

unread,
Nov 26, 2005, 1:00:58 AM11/26/05
to
Maybe the answer the original poster is looking for is to be able to
make power up high where the air is thin, so something like a Europa
with a Rotax 914. Otherwise I don't see 2 seats going 200mph on 100hp.

salsa...@sbcglobal.net

unread,
Dec 12, 2005, 4:43:12 AM12/12/05
to
Taylor Mini-IMP

On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:37:51 -0800, "tom pettit"
<tompet<at>peak<dot>org> wrote:

>Okay, I don't want to pay the fuel bill on a monster engine. I do want to
>go fast. What kit or plans homebuilt will go 200 mph on 100 hp?
>

>tom
>

Lou

unread,
Dec 12, 2005, 7:50:55 AM12/12/05
to

The numbers look similar to the pulsar 100.
The more I look at this one, the more I like it.

0 new messages