Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

KX-170B/KI-214 Connectors

488 views
Skip to first unread message

Jim Weir

unread,
Jun 20, 2003, 6:31:45 PM6/20/03
to
Thanks to one of the good guys on this newsgroup, I am now the proud owner of a
KX-170B and a KI-214. However, the connectors on these units are somewhat of a
mystery.

On the KX-170, the power connector is specified in the manual to be an Amphenol
26-190-42 and I'm reasonably certain that I can pry one of those out of some
distributor's stock. However, if anybody has one floating around, I'd be more
than happy to make whatever deal you might want to make for it. However, the
two RF antenna connectors (Nav and Com) are identical and appear to be the same
SIZE as BNC. However, they have no locking ears and I suspect that the
specified connector (TED 9-10-12, which I have never heard of) have spring clips
of some sort that will grasp the flared end of the connector for security.

The KI-214 has me totally baffled. The power connector looks like the
grandfather (or maybe a funny uncle) of the computer D-connector, but has FOUR
rows of male pins...a row of 6, a row of 7, a row of 6, and a row of 7. The
keying mechanism on the ends of the connector is a male on one end and a female
on the other end. There appears to be a latch for a hood to snap on to. The
glideslope RF connector looks like a lilliputian BNC. If you could shrink a BNC
by about half, you'd have this sucker nailed.

Any help on any of these connectors, manufacturer, source, etc. would be
certainly welcome.

Jim
Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com j...@rst-engr.com

Jon Woellhaf

unread,
Jun 20, 2003, 6:43:12 PM6/20/03
to
Burndy, perhaps?

"Jim Weir" <j...@rst-engr.com> wrote in message
news:0227fv4jvjeq26ir9...@4ax.com...

Aaron Coolidge

unread,
Jun 20, 2003, 11:15:52 PM6/20/03
to
In rec.aviation.owning Jim Weir <j...@rst-engr.com> wrote:

: than happy to make whatever deal you might want to make for it. However, the


: two RF antenna connectors (Nav and Com) are identical and appear to be the same
: SIZE as BNC. However, they have no locking ears and I suspect that the
: specified connector (TED 9-10-12, which I have never heard of) have spring clips
: of some sort that will grasp the flared end of the connector for security.

Jim, these RF connectors are exactly the same as a MALE bnc without the
"twist-lock" part. They are attached to the radio mounting tray only,
with a little bit of mechanical play so thay they'll line up with the
flared end on the radio. In a pinch, dremel off the twisty retaining ring
of a male BNC and clamp the antenna cable securely after stuffing it into
the back of the radio. (My DME lived like this for almost a year.) I will
try to dig up a picture of the TED part this weekend, so at least you'll know
what you're looking for.

: The KI-214 has me totally baffled. The power connector looks like the


: grandfather (or maybe a funny uncle) of the computer D-connector, but has FOUR
: rows of male pins...a row of 6, a row of 7, a row of 6, and a row of 7. The
: keying mechanism on the ends of the connector is a male on one end and a female
: on the other end. There appears to be a latch for a hood to snap on to. The
: glideslope RF connector looks like a lilliputian BNC. If you could shrink a BNC
: by about half, you'd have this sucker nailed.

That 4-row unit sounds like Amphenol to me. I'd look at their series 17HD.
Are you sure that it's a D-Sub? I seem to remember that these had a greenish
plastic substrate and were more square than a D-Sub. I can't remember the
series off hand, but I think that they were Cinch. Do they look like
the connectors on the back of a Cessna RT-328 radio? (I've never seen
a KI-214.)

The RF connector could be anything, but I'd bet SHV, MHV, or RFX. Try
looking at www.pasternack.com, they have everything you could immagine
in RF connectors and some you probably couldn't immagine. Their printed
catalog has 2 or 3 pages devoted to RF connector identification, with
dimensioned mechanical drawings and all. Perhaps you could find the same
on their website.

--
Aaron Coolidge (N9376J)
BS/EE 1992 WPI, Diretor of Engineering GridCom International

Aaron Coolidge

unread,
Jun 20, 2003, 11:21:13 PM6/20/03
to
In rec.aviation.owning Aaron Coolidge <fa...@nospamshell01.theworld.com> wrote:

: That 4-row unit sounds like Amphenol to me. I'd look at their series 17HD.


: Are you sure that it's a D-Sub? I seem to remember that these had a greenish
: plastic substrate and were more square than a D-Sub. I can't remember the
: series off hand, but I think that they were Cinch. Do they look like
: the connectors on the back of a Cessna RT-328 radio? (I've never seen
: a KI-214.)

Aha! I found it! I was looking for the KA-25 that I pulled out last year.
It's got a similar connector to the KI-214, except it's 6-7-6 (three rows).
It's made by Winchester Electric Inc. and mine is a part# MRE 20 H (it's
not clear if that's for the backshell or the connector.
I've never heard of Winchester Electric Inc.

Aaron Coolidge

unread,
Jun 20, 2003, 11:29:08 PM6/20/03
to
In rec.aviation.owning Aaron Coolidge <fa...@nospamshell01.theworld.com> wrote:

: Aha! I found it! I was looking for the KA-25 that I pulled out last year.

: It's got a similar connector to the KI-214, except it's 6-7-6 (three rows).
: It's made by Winchester Electric Inc. and mine is a part# MRE 20 H (it's
: not clear if that's for the backshell or the connector.
: I've never heard of Winchester Electric Inc.


Jim, have a look at http://www.winchesterelectronics.com/products/rp/rp.asp
and have a good time trying to find one at a distributor (did someone say
"engineering samples"?).

Mike Ferrer

unread,
Jun 21, 2003, 11:08:39 AM6/21/03
to
The TED type of coax tray connector has been used by King, Garmin and others
for years. Very common. Uses a snap ring to hold the connector in place.

http://www.edmo.com/s2/s2-9.asp


"Jim Weir" <j...@rst-engr.com> wrote in message
news:0227fv4jvjeq26ir9...@4ax.com...

> Thanks to one of the good guys on this newsgroup, I am now the proud owner
of a
> KX-170B and a KI-214. However, the connectors on these units are somewhat
of a

> mystery. (snip)
>
> (snip) two RF antenna connectors (Nav and Com) are identical and appear


to be the same
> SIZE as BNC. However, they have no locking ears and I suspect that the
> specified connector (TED 9-10-12, which I have never heard of) have spring
clips
> of some sort that will grasp the flared end of the connector for security.
>

Jim Weir

unread,
Jun 21, 2003, 11:33:47 AM6/21/03
to
Aaron Coolidge <fa...@nospamshell01.TheWorld.com>
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

->Jim, these RF connectors are exactly the same as a MALE bnc without the
->"twist-lock" part.

Not quite. They are flared at the mouth of the connector to guide the male
connector and provide a lip for the spring clip to hold on to.


They are attached to the radio mounting tray only,

->with a little bit of mechanical play so thay they'll line up with the
->flared end on the radio. In a pinch, dremel off the twisty retaining ring
->of a male BNC and clamp the antenna cable securely after stuffing it into
->the back of the radio. (My DME lived like this for almost a year.)

That was my first cobble thought.


I will
->try to dig up a picture of the TED part this weekend, so at least you'll know
->what you're looking for.

That's what I'd prefer to do. Is TED a STYLE or a MANUFACTURER?

->That 4-row unit sounds like Amphenol to me. I'd look at their series 17HD.
->Are you sure that it's a D-Sub? I seem to remember that these had a greenish
->plastic substrate and were more square than a D-Sub. I can't remember the
->series off hand, but I think that they were Cinch. Do they look like
->the connectors on the back of a Cessna RT-328 radio? (I've never seen
->a KI-214.)

As you noted in a subsequent post, they are Winchester. Your comment was quite
correct in that "engineering sample" is damn near the only way I'm going to get
one of these in this century.


->
->The RF connector could be anything, but I'd bet SHV, MHV, or RFX. Try
->looking at www.pasternack.com, they have everything you could immagine
->in RF connectors and some you probably couldn't immagine. Their printed
->catalog has 2 or 3 pages devoted to RF connector identification, with
->dimensioned mechanical drawings and all. Perhaps you could find the same
->on their website.

Pasternack was my first shot and nothing on their web pages (or in the little
catalog I keep on my shelf) resembles this little hummer. I doubt King invented
a connector, but I'll bet they got themselves an orphan.

Mike Ferrer

unread,
Jun 21, 2003, 12:28:12 PM6/21/03
to
Most, if not all, avionics shop keep them in stock. Pacific Coast Avionics
has them in their consumer catalog for $22. They wholesale for around $13.
I have a few in my shop if you can't find any locally. The part number you
originally mentioned has, I believe, changed to 9-30-10. Same connector.
TED is the mfr.

Mike

"Jim Weir" <j...@rst-engr.com> wrote in message

news:0au8fv4hjbo0053sr...@4ax.com...

Jim Weir

unread,
Jun 21, 2003, 4:44:56 PM6/21/03
to
Mike...

Are you talking about the little pint-sized BNC lookalike on the glideslope
receiver, or the snap-ring mount full size BNC on the back of the navcom? I
think we've got a good handle on the navcom; it is that little half-size BNC on
the glideslope that I searched Pasternak on and came up dry.

Jim

"Mike Ferrer" <mvfe...@charter.net>


shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

->Most, if not all, avionics shop keep them in stock. Pacific Coast Avionics
->has them in their consumer catalog for $22. They wholesale for around $13.

Rob Turk

unread,
Jun 21, 2003, 5:03:55 PM6/21/03
to
"Jim Weir" <j...@rst-engr.com> wrote in message
news:kqg9fvsbjs41sbl6a...@4ax.com...

> Mike...
>
> Are you talking about the little pint-sized BNC lookalike on the
glideslope
> receiver, or the snap-ring mount full size BNC on the back of the navcom?
I
> think we've got a good handle on the navcom; it is that little half-size
BNC on
> the glideslope that I searched Pasternak on and came up dry.
>
> Jim

Jim,

Could it be one of these? http://www.amphenolrf.com/products/precision.asp
I used a few of them in a ham Amateur TV transmitter I built years ago. They
sound exactly like what you have.

Rob


Mike Ferrer

unread,
Jun 21, 2003, 6:04:44 PM6/21/03
to
I am talking about the snap-ring type that mounts on the KX-170 tray. That
is the TED connector you were asking about. Not familiar with the one on the
KI-214.

Mike

"Jim Weir" <j...@rst-engr.com> wrote in message

news:kqg9fvsbjs41sbl6a...@4ax.com...

Steve Sharp

unread,
Jun 22, 2003, 6:46:20 AM6/22/03
to
Jim Weir wrote:


Losta stuff snipped:


>
> That's what I'd prefer to do. Is TED a STYLE or a MANUFACTURER?
>
>


Jim,

Ted Mfg. Corp.
11415 Johnson Dr.
Shawnee Mission, KS 66203
USA
Tel: 913-631-6211
Fax: 913-631-7212
http://www.tedmfg.com

The link appears to be deceased. but this may put you on the right track.

Hope this helps, thanks for all you have done for us.

Steve Sharp
Knoxville, TN

Jim Weir

unread,
Jun 22, 2003, 11:09:06 AM6/22/03
to
Nope. I searched my old Amphenol catalog which would have been issued just
about the time the KI-214 was being produced and came up dry. I searched at the
Amphenol and Pasternak websites and didn't see anything that resembled what I've
got.

Jim


"Rob Turk" <r.t...@chello.nl>


shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

->
->Could it be one of these? http://www.amphenolrf.com/products/precision.asp
->I used a few of them in a ham Amateur TV transmitter I built years ago. They
->sound exactly like what you have.
->
->Rob
->

Rob Turk

unread,
Jun 22, 2003, 11:35:32 AM6/22/03
to
"Jim Weir" <j...@rst-engr.com> wrote in message
news:4hhbfvg3sq2eenodk...@4ax.com...

> Nope. I searched my old Amphenol catalog which would have been issued
just
> about the time the KI-214 was being produced and came up dry. I searched
at the
> Amphenol and Pasternak websites and didn't see anything that resembled
what I've
> got.
>
> Jim

Can you post a (link to) picture?

Rob


Jim Weir

unread,
Jun 22, 2003, 11:50:18 AM6/22/03
to
I was over nailing it into the instrument panel yesterday and it is in the
hangar. I'll get it this afternoon and post a link to my website.

Thanks for your time and trouble.

Jim


"Rob Turk" <r.t...@chello.nl>
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

->
->Can you post a (link to) picture?

Dennis O'Connor

unread,
Jun 23, 2003, 10:39:46 AM6/23/03
to
That connector is not listed in the general catalogs.. I suspect it was made
only for King and is available only thorugh them... I had the same problem 2
years ago... I have a background in industrial electronics and I understand
how to get proprietary parts, but I was not able to end run King on that
one... I bought the connector and shell from Eastern Aviation when I
purchased the KI214 and had my local radio shop hang the connector on the
harness for me and bench test the KX-170B - KI-214 before I twisted my
spine into a pretzel installing it... I darn sure wasn't going to have to
take it back out because it didn't work....

Denny


"Jim Weir" <j...@rst-engr.com> wrote in message

news:4hhbfvg3sq2eenodk...@4ax.com...

Jim Weir

unread,
Jun 23, 2003, 10:59:45 AM6/23/03
to
I got an email from Pasternak this morning...they seem to think that both
Amphenol and Kings (no relation to Bendix/King) made that connector in the "MB"
series and that it was popular (!?) on "low performance mobile radios", whatever
that means. However, rather than spend a couple of days trying to find dusty
stock on somebody's shelf, I'm just going to bite the bullet and trundle down to
either my local two-way shop OR the avionics shop down in Auburn.

Jim


"Dennis O'Connor" <doco...@chartermi.net>


shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

->That connector is not listed in the general catalogs.. I suspect it was made
->only for King and is available only thorugh them

Aaron Coolidge

unread,
Jun 23, 2003, 10:43:14 PM6/23/03
to
In rec.aviation.owning Jim Weir <j...@rst-engr.com> wrote:
: I got an email from Pasternak this morning...they seem to think that both

: Amphenol and Kings (no relation to Bendix/King) made that connector in the "MB"
: series and that it was popular (!?) on "low performance mobile radios", whatever
: that means. However, rather than spend a couple of days trying to find dusty
: stock on somebody's shelf, I'm just going to bite the bullet and trundle down to
: either my local two-way shop OR the avionics shop down in Auburn.

: Jim

Jim, you've got the right connector series for that little mini-BNC. It's also
an Automatic Connector, Inc "BSM" series, and it seems they've still got
it in production. I'll ask my tech tomorrow morning if he's got any stashed
in his toolbox - I think they might have been used on our internal gas main
inspection robot.

--
Aaron Coolidge (N9376J)
"100% of the world is covered by air. Use it all." - Citation ad

Dennis O'Connor

unread,
Jun 24, 2003, 8:46:57 AM6/24/03
to
Jim, it just dawned on my thick skull that you are discussing the BNC
connector, not the proprietary edge connector (that's what I get for not
reading the whole thread)... What I did on that was change out the mini BNC
female on the KI214 for a standard BNC... I absolutely refused to pay King
their highway robbery price for that connector to go on the coax...... It
is a bit of metal work but not at all daunting for the handy ham...

Denny
"Jim Weir" <j...@rst-engr.com> wrote in message

news:6a5efv4258i2evflh...@4ax.com...

Unknown

unread,
Jun 24, 2003, 3:30:00 PM6/24/03
to
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:46:57 -0400, "Dennis O'Connor"
<doco...@chartermi.net> wrote:

>Jim, it just dawned on my thick skull that you are discussing the BNC
>connector, not the proprietary edge connector (that's what I get for not
>reading the whole thread)... What I did on that was change out the mini BNC
>female on the KI214 for a standard BNC... I absolutely refused to pay King
>their highway robbery price for that connector to go on the coax...... It
>is a bit of metal work but not at all daunting for the handy ham...
>
>Denny

Just as a suggestion take a look at HRS or Hirose connectors. They are
what was on a lot of older handhealds...

Fairly good pricing still compared to the others.

Q

Dennis O'Connor

unread,
Jun 24, 2003, 6:01:49 PM6/24/03
to
My coax already had a standard male BNC on it which matched the Radair 240
head I was replacing, so it was a no brainer... I could give King/radio
shop $70 for a bastard BNC, or give em the finger... Thanks for the
reminder on the Hirose connectors...

Denny
<quipbid> wrote in message
news:8h9hfv0d7oskbobs9...@4ax.com...

0 new messages