Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Chinese balloon live updates: Moving eastward, over central US, Pentagon says

0 views
Skip to first unread message

bawk bawk biden!

unread,
Feb 3, 2023, 7:31:29 PM2/3/23
to
BEIJING -- U.S. officials say a massive surveillance balloon believed to
be from China and seen above Montana is being tracked as it flies over the
continental United States.

"The United States government has detected and is tracking a high-altitude
surveillance balloon that is flying over the continental United States
right now," Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder said in a statement on Thursday. "NORAD
[North American Aerospace Defense Command] continues to track and monitor
it closely."

China's foreign ministry has claimed it is a civilian balloon used for
meteorological purposes, but U.S. politicians, many on the right, are
already demanding President Joe Biden shoot it down.

Feb. 03, 2:16 p.m. EST

Biden first briefed Tuesday, took military's recommendation on balloon: WH

President Joe Biden was first briefed about the Chinese surveillance
balloon on Tuesday, according to White House press secretary Karine Jean-
Pierre, two days before the news was publicly confirmed by U.S. officials.

"He asked the military to present options," she told reporters in a gaggle
on Air Force One. "It was the strong recommendation by Secretary Austin,
Chairman Milley, the commander of Northern Command, not to take kinetic
action because of the risk to safety and security of the people on the
ground. President Biden took that recommendation from the military
seriously."

"The president will always put the safety of the security of the American
people first," she said.

Jean-Pierre said Biden continues to receive regular briefings from
national security team, and that he "agreed" with Secretary of State
Blinken's decision to delay his trip to China.

"We are tracking closely and keeping all options on the table," the press
secretary said.

Feb. 03, 1:41 p.m. EST

Biden again ignores questions on Chinese balloon

President Joe Biden didn't answer questions reporters shouted about the
Chinese surveillance balloon as he left the White House and boarded Marine
One shortly after 1 p.m. Friday.

Biden has yet to publicly comment on the balloon since it was confirmed to
be flying over the continental U.S. by officials on Thursday.

Biden is heading to Philadelphia, where he and Vice President Kamala
Harris will appear at an infrastructure event in the afternoon and then
later will speak at the Democratic National Committee's winter meeting.

Feb. 03, 1:27 p.m. EST

'Gang of 8' staff received classified briefing on Chinese surveillance
balloon

Staff to the so-called "Gang of 8" received a classified briefing on the
balloon by the administration Thursday afternoon, according to multiple
congressional officials.

The "Gang of 8" refers to the group of congressional leaders who are
briefed on classified intelligence matters. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy,
R-Calif., requested a meeting with the group on Thursday.

"China's brazen disregard for U.S. sovereignty is a destabilizing action
that must be addressed, and President Biden cannot be silent," McCarthy
said.

It's unclear if the classified briefing for the staff is a precursor to
their bosses being briefed. No meeting appears to be on the books so far.

-ABC News' Trish Turner

Feb. 03, 12:50 p.m. EST

Surveillance balloon is 'maneuverable,' Pentagon says

After saying the Chinese surveillance ballon was headed eastward, Pentagon
press secretary Brig. Gen. Patrick Ryder said the balloon is
"maneuverable."

"So, the balloon is maneuverable. Clearly, it's violated U.S. air space,
and again we've communicated that fact to the PRC," Ryder said.


"The balloon has changed its course, which is why we are monitoring it.
That is as specific as I can get," he said, not giving further details on
how it could be maneuvered.

"We continue to assess and make appropriate decisions based on how we are
going to address what we perceive as a potential threat," Ryder added.
"The safety and security of the American people is paramount. At this time
we assess it does not pose a physical threat to people on the ground."

Feb. 03, 12:33 p.m. EST

Pentagon confirms shooting down balloon was an 'option'

Pentagon press secretary Brig. Gen. Patrick Ryder confirmed Friday that
shooting down the balloon was considered.

"In terms of the discussions about whether or not to shoot down this
balloon, that was an option. That was something that was taken into
consideration," Ryder said. "Again, because we assessed that currently it
does not pose a physical or military risk to people on the ground, for now
we are continuing to monitor and review options."

Ryder said because of the "size" of the balloon, "any potential debris
field would be significant and potential cause civilian injuries or deaths
or significant property damage."

Ryder was asked multiple times if the U.S. will shoot down the balloon
once it's over a body of water.

"We are monitoring the situation closely, but beyond that I will not have
any additional information," he said.

When asked how close President Joe Biden was to ordering a shootdown of
the balloon, Ryder said he "will not get into internal discussions with
the White House."

Feb. 03, 12:19 p.m. EST

'We know its a surveillance balloon,' Pentagon says, disputing China's
claims

Pentagon press secretary Brig. Gen. Patrick Ryder disputed statements from
China that the balloon spotted over the continental U.S. is a
meteorological research device.

"We are aware of the PRC (People's Republic of China) statements. However,
the fact is, we know it's a surveillance balloon," Ryder said. "I'm not
going to be able to be more specific than that."

"We do know that the balloon has violated U.S. airspace and international
law, which is not acceptable," Ryder told reporters. "We've conveyed this
directly to the PRC at multiple levels."

Feb. 03, 12:13 p.m. EST

Balloon is moving eastward, now hovering over the central US

Pentagon press secretary Brig. Gen. Patrick Ryder provided an update
Friday on where the balloon is flying.

"While we won't get into specifics in regards to the exact location I can
tell you that the balloon continues to move eastward and is currently over
the center of the continental United States," Ryder told reporters.
"Again, we currently assess that the balloon does not present a military
or physical threat to people on the ground at this time."

Feb. 03, 12:04 p.m. EST

GOP lawmaker says he's in favor of 'shooting' China balloon down

Republican Rep. Mike Gallagher, chair of the newly-formed House Select
Committee on China, told ABC News Live on Friday he doesn't "buy" China's
statements that the balloon flying over the U.S. is a meteorological
device that was blown off course.

"It also doesn't strike me as a coincidence that this was in the vicinity
of the Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana," Gallagher said, "where we
have our Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles."

Gallagher said he believed Secretary of State Anthony Blinken made "the
right call" postponing his trip to China over the controversy.

On the balloon itself, Gallagher said he was "in favor of shooting it
down."

"I think we had plenty of options to shoot it down or even better, find a
way to reduce its altitude and capture it so we can get a look at the
instrumentation," he told ABC News' Alexis Christoforous.

Feb. 03, 11:35 a.m. EST

US will keep lines of communication open with China: Official

A senior State Department official said the U.S. was still dedicated to
keeping lines of communication with China open despite postponing
Secretary Antony Blinken's visit.

"The secretary was prepared to depart for Beijing tonight to take on a
wide-ranging agenda," the official told reporters. "We have noted the PRC
statement of regret, but the presence of this balloon in our airspace is a
clear violation of our sovereignty as well as international law. And it is
unacceptable it has occurred."

"After consolations with our interagency partners, as well as with
Congress, we have concluded that the conditions are not right at the
moment for Secretary Blinken to travel to China," the official added.

The official said Blinken has indicated he will visit China when
conditions allow, but did not stipulate what those conditions would have
to be.

They also said talks with Beijing would continue across multiple levels of
government and that Blinken had been in touch with his Chinese counterpart
Friday morning.

"We will maintain open lines of communication with the PRC to address our
concerns about this ongoing incident and to responsibly manage the
competition between our countries," the official said.

Asked whether the department believed China's explanation of the balloon's
purpose and how it happened into American airspace, the official said, "We
remain confident in our assessment of the situation."

-ABC News' Shannon Crawford

<https://abc7.com/chinese-spy-balloon-china-over-montana-us/12766077/>

Mighty✅ Wannabe✅

unread,
Feb 3, 2023, 8:27:05 PM2/3/23
to
The US government is deliberately omitting to tell the world the
altitude of the balloon.

Why?

I am sure the US government knows how high the balloon is. Why does the
US government omit this information?

Hisler

unread,
Feb 3, 2023, 11:48:48 PM2/3/23
to
Math be racis'.
--
You voted for student loan forgiveness. You got $7 eggs and World War 3.

"Title 8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to
aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic
transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring
unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to
enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and
abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits
bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States
in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry. Subsection
1324(a)(3)."

And it's 1, 2, 3, 4 what are fighting for? Don't ask me I don't give
dam, the next stop is Banderastan!

https://www.globalgulag.us

Mighty Wannabe's Co-Owner

unread,
Feb 4, 2023, 6:55:10 AM2/4/23
to
On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 20:26:43 -0500, Mighty? Wannabe? <@.> wrote:

>The US government is deliberately omitting to tell the world the
>altitude of the balloon.
>
>Why?
>
>I am sure the US government knows how high the balloon is. Why does the
>US government omit this information?

They've already said its at 60,000 feet, you illiterate, dumb shit.

Mighty✅ Wannabe✅

unread,
Feb 4, 2023, 8:56:23 AM2/4/23
to
You see, you ignorant fuck. Do you know the significance of "60,000 feet"?

That is the reason the US government deliberately didn't mention the
altitude of the balloon.

When you report the sighting of an object up in the air, the altitude is
the most important parameter to describe the object, and the US
government deliberately omitted it. I could smell a rat right away.

When the nuclear reactor blew up in Fukushima in 2011, it was reported
all over the world for many weeks. The US government never mentioned
which country had manufactured the nuclear reactors. After two months, I
had a hunch that it was "Made in the USA". After I Googled it, it was
made by GE. That's why the US government avoided mentioning the maker of
the reactor. If it was made by France or Canada (only a few countries
could make nuclear reactors and Japan would buy from), the news would
have been something like "French (or Canadian) nuclear reactor blew up
in Fukushima, Japan".

Have you figured out the significance of "60,000 feet" yet?




Mighty Wannabe's Co-Owner

unread,
Feb 4, 2023, 9:29:08 AM2/4/23
to
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 08:55:57 -0500, Mighty? Wannabe? <@.> wrote:

>Mighty Wannabe's Co-Owner wrote on 2/4/2023 6:55 AM:
>> On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 20:26:43 -0500, Mighty? Wannabe? <@.> wrote:
>>
>>> The US government is deliberately omitting to tell the world the
>>> altitude of the balloon.
>>>
>>> Why?
>>>
>>> I am sure the US government knows how high the balloon is. Why does the
>>> US government omit this information?
>> They've already said its at 60,000 feet, you illiterate, dumb shit.
>
>
>You see, you ignorant fuck. Do you know the significance of "60,000 feet"?
>
>That is the reason the US government deliberately didn't mention the
>altitude of the balloon.

Yet they did, you simpering oaf. "60,000" feet.

What part if that is too difficult for your alcohol-soaked brain to
grasp?

>When you report the sighting of an object up in the air, the altitude is
>the most important parameter to describe the object, and the US
>government deliberately omitted it. I could smell a rat right away.

No, they did not. I've heard *and* read about it countless times
already.


>Have you figured out the significance of "60,000 feet" yet?

You sure as shit haven't. Go back to sucking down those Colt 45's and
quit humiliating yourself.

Mighty✅ Wannabe✅

unread,
Feb 4, 2023, 9:39:43 AM2/4/23
to
Stupid kraut wrote on 2/4/2023 9:29 AM:
>> You see, you ignorant fuck. Do you know the significance of "60,000 feet"?
>>
>> That is the reason the US government deliberately didn't mention the
>> altitude of the balloon.
> Yet they did, you simpering oaf. "60,000" feet.
>

So you still haven't figured out the significance of "60,000 feet" that
the US government tried to hide from the public, you mouthbreathing gun
loon?



Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 4, 2023, 9:42:12 AM2/4/23
to
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 09:39:17 -0500, Mighty? Wannabe? <@.> wrote:
>>>Mighty Wannabe's Co-Owner wrote on 2/4/2023 6:55 AM:
>>>> On Fri, 3 Feb 2023 20:26:43 -0500, Mighty? Wannabe? <@.> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The US government is deliberately omitting to tell the world the
>>>>> altitude of the balloon.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why?
>>>>>
>>>>> I am sure the US government knows how high the balloon is. Why does the
>>>>> US government omit this information?
>>>> They've already said its at 60,000 feet, you illiterate, dumb shit.
>>>
>>>
>>>You see, you ignorant fuck. Do you know the significance of "60,000 feet"?
>>>
>>>That is the reason the US government deliberately didn't mention the
>>>altitude of the balloon.
>>
>>Yet they did, you simpering oaf. "60,000" feet.

>
>
>
[crickets.wav] (© 2022 All Rights Reserved)
>
>
>

>>What part if that is too difficult for your alcohol-soaked brain to
>>grasp?
>
>
>
[crickets.wav] (© 2022 All Rights Reserved)
>
>
>
>>>When you report the sighting of an object up in the air, the altitude is
>>>the most important parameter to describe the object, and the US
>>>government deliberately omitted it. I could smell a rat right away.
>>
>>No, they did not. I've heard *and* read about it countless times
>>already.
>
>
>
[crickets.wav] (© 2022 All Rights Reserved)
>
>
>
>>
>>>Have you figured out the significance of "60,000 feet" yet?
>>
>>You sure as shit haven't. Go back to sucking down those Colt 45's and
>>quit humiliating yourself.

>So you still haven't figured out the significance of "60,000 feet" that
>the US government tried to hide from the public, you mouthbreathing gun
>loon?

Still waiting for you to explain your 60,000 foot fantasy. What's
keeping you?

>
>
>
[crickets.wav] (© 2022 All Rights Reserved)
>
>
>

Mighty✅ Wannabe✅

unread,
Feb 4, 2023, 9:52:56 AM2/4/23
to
Klaus Schadenfreude wrote on 2/4/2023 9:42 AM:
> Still waiting for you to explain your 60,000 foot fantasy. What's
> keeping you?


60,000 ft is the internationally defined boundary of domestic airspace.
That means the Chinese balloon is flying in international airspace, not
American airspace.

There are satellites flying at all sorts of altitudes above China and
the US. Those satellites don't violet any country's airspace because
they are well above 60,000 ft.

If the US shoots down a Chinese balloon at 60,000ft or above, it sets a
precedent for China to shoot down American spy satellites and American
unmanned space shuttle at any altitude above China.






Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 4, 2023, 10:05:35 AM2/4/23
to
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 09:52:30 -0500, Mighty? Wannabe? <@.> wrote:

>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote on 2/4/2023 9:42 AM:
>> Still waiting for you to explain your 60,000 foot fantasy. What's
>> keeping you?
>
>
>60,000 ft is the internationally defined boundary of domestic airspace.

Go ahead and cite that "international definition," you drunk
Hitlerite.


>That means the Chinese balloon is flying in international airspace, not
>American airspace.

Wrong. It's in our airspace. That's why China is apologizing, nitwit!

FUCK but you're stupid!

LOL

Mighty✅ Wannabe✅

unread,
Feb 4, 2023, 10:30:29 AM2/4/23
to
Klaus Schadenfreude wrote on 2/4/2023 10:05 AM:
> On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 09:52:30 -0500, Mighty✅ Wannabe✅ <@.> wrote:
>
>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote on 2/4/2023 9:42 AM:
>>> Still waiting for you to explain your 60,000 foot fantasy. What's
>>> keeping you?
>>
>> 60,000 ft is the internationally defined boundary of domestic airspace.
> Go ahead and cite that "international definition,"
>


https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/phak/media/17_phak_ch15.pdf


>>
>>
>> 60,000 ft is the internationally defined boundary of domestic airspace.
>> That means the Chinese balloon is flying in international airspace, not
>> American airspace.
>>
>>
>>
>> There are satellites flying at all sorts of altitudes above China and
>> the US. Those satellites don't violet any country's airspace because
>> they are well above 60,000 ft.
>>
>>
>>
>> If the US shoots down a Chinese balloon at 60,000ft or above, it sets a
>> precedent for China to shoot down American spy satellites and American
>> unmanned space shuttle at any altitude above China.
>>
>>
>>
> Wrong. It's in our airspace. That's why China is apologizing, nitwit!
>

Chinese are polite people, unlike you lowbrow mounthbreathing obnoxious
idiots.

If you shoot down their balloon outside of your airspace boundary, you
set a precedent for your own satellites and unmanned space shuttle to be
shot down over China.



Mighty? Wannabe?

unread,
Feb 4, 2023, 10:33:40 AM2/4/23
to
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 09:52:30 -0500, Mighty? Wannabe? <@.> wrote:

>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote on 2/4/2023 9:42 AM:
>> Still waiting for you to explain your 60,000 foot fantasy. What's
>> keeping you?
>
>
>60,000 ft is the internationally defined boundary of domestic airspace.

I'm SUCH a fucking idiot. Of COURSE there is no "international
agreement."

I made it all up, hoping you wouldn't notice!

Every time I try to make myself look smart, you and Swill come along
and make me look like a COMPLETE IDIOT!!!!!

Mighty Wannabe's Co-Owner

unread,
Feb 4, 2023, 10:40:50 AM2/4/23
to
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 10:30:02 -0500, Mighty? Wannabe? <@.> wrote:

>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote on 2/4/2023 10:05 AM:
>> On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 09:52:30 -0500, Mighty? Wannabe? <@.> wrote:
>>
>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote on 2/4/2023 9:42 AM:
>>>> Still waiting for you to explain your 60,000 foot fantasy. What's
>>>> keeping you?
>>>
>>> 60,000 ft is the internationally defined boundary of domestic airspace.
>> Go ahead and cite that "international definition,"
>>
>
>
>https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/phak/media/17_phak_ch15.pdf


Nothing in there says there is any international agreement for 60,000
feet.

If it did, you would have quoted the relevant passage.

>> Wrong. It's in our airspace. That's why China is apologizing, nitwit!
>>
>
>Chinese are polite people, unlike you lowbrow mounthbreathing obnoxious
>idiots.

Chinese are apologizing for VIOLATING US AIRSPACE because they are in
the wrong, and they stupidly believed that nobody would notice.

>If you shoot down their balloon outside of your airspace boundary, you
>set a precedent for your own satellites and unmanned space shuttle to be
>shot down over China.

Then we would nuke them.

They are in our airspace and we have every right to bring it down.

China on Friday expressed regret for a large balloon that floated into
American airspace
^^^^^^^^^^^

“China is a responsible country that always abides by international
law and has no intention of infringing on any country’s territory and
airspace.” -foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning
“As for the balloon,” she added, “we are looking into and verifying
the situation and hope that both sides can handle this together calmly
and carefully.”

https://www.usnews.com/news/world-report/articles/2023-02-03/china-expresses-regret-for-drifting-balloon-that-alarmed-u-s-military-leaders

China is "polite" becuase China is afraid.

WHY are you so fucking stupid ALL the time?

EXPLAIN ----->

Klaus Schadenfreude

unread,
Feb 4, 2023, 10:45:46 AM2/4/23
to
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 10:30:02 -0500, Mighty? Wannabe? <@.> wrote:

>Klaus Schadenfreude wrote on 2/4/2023 10:05 AM:
>> On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 09:52:30 -0500, Mighty? Wannabe? <@.> wrote:
>>
>>> Klaus Schadenfreude wrote on 2/4/2023 9:42 AM:
>>>> Still waiting for you to explain your 60,000 foot fantasy. What's
>>>> keeping you?
>>>
>>> 60,000 ft is the internationally defined boundary of domestic airspace.
>> Go ahead and cite that "international definition,"
>>
>
>
>https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/phak/media/17_phak_ch15.pdf


"60,000 feet is international airspace."
-Drunken hitlerite Wannabe


Vertical Sovereign Territory.
Interestingly, there is no international law (or agreement) defining
the vertical boundary of a nation’s sovereign territory/airspace (the
boundary between outer space which is not subject to national
jurisdiction and national airspace).
-H. Bertil Nordin
Managing Partner at Nordin & SNFNY Law PLLC

I think we'll go with the second guy.

LOL!!!!!

Mighty Wannabe's Co-Owner

unread,
Feb 4, 2023, 10:55:07 AM2/4/23
to
> 60,000 ft is the internationally defined boundary of domestic airspace.


Soviet Union shot down the U2 plane, peacefully flying at 70,000 feet,
in 1960, in flagrant violation of international law, according to
hitlerite apologist Wannabe.

governo...@gmail.com

unread,
Feb 4, 2023, 11:03:49 AM2/4/23
to
Stupid Kraut Schedenfreude wrote on 2/4/2023 10:40 AM:
>> If you shoot down their balloon outside of your airspace boundary, you
>> set a precedent for your own satellites and unmanned space shuttle to be
>> shot down over China.
> Then we would nuke them.
>


I think not. We are three time loser to the Chinese.

Mao kicked our arse during the Mao-Chiang civil war. The Chiang regime
that we backed had fled to Taiwan in 1949 and it is still holed up there
now.

Then Mao kicked our arse in Korea.

Then Mao kicked our arse in Vietnam.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA !!!!!!!!



--

Putin is my Lord and Saviour.

Putin is guided by the beauty of his weapons.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W0rZ2CPCYBQ

Russia tests 'Sarmat' missile dubbed 'Satan 2'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8BqZc8FRgo

Putin’s Zircon hypersonic cruise missile travels 1000 km
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeT8ox2BuoU

Putin's Kinzhal Super Hypersonic Missile In Action
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q7fKqifFQPI

Putin To Deploy ‘Mach 27’ Avangard Hypersonic Missiles That Can ‘Outmaneuver’ Any Defense System
https://eurasiantimes.com/russia-goes-full-throttle-with-its-strategic-missile-forces/

Putin's 'indestructible' Poseidon super torpedoes to get more lethal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKdDcL7q7Ug

Mighty Wannabe's Co-Owner

unread,
Feb 4, 2023, 11:23:06 AM2/4/23
to
On Sat, 4 Feb 2023 11:03:23 -0500, Swill-worshipping hitlerite Wannabe
ineptly forged:

>Superior Mr. Schadenfreude schooled me on 2/4/2023 10:40 AM:
>>> If you shoot down their balloon outside of your airspace boundary, you
>>> set a precedent for your own satellites and unmanned space shuttle to be
>>> shot down over China.
>> Then we would nuke them.
>>
>
>
>I think not. We are three time loser to the Chinese.
>
>Mao kicked our arse during the Mao-Chiang civil war.

Um, we didn't fight in that war, you ignorant fucktard.

But thanks for admitting you LIED about the 60,000 feet!

LOL!!!!

Mighty? Wannabe?

unread,
Feb 4, 2023, 12:13:50 PM2/4/23
to
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/brazil-sinks-rusting-old-aircraft-123108086.html

BRASILIA (Reuters) - Brazil sank a decommissioned aircraft carrier in
the Atlantic Ocean off its northeast coast, the Brazilian Navy said,
despite warnings from environmentalists that the rusting 1960s
French-built ship would pollute the sea and the marine food chain.

The 32,000-tonne carrier had been floating offshore for three months
since Turkey refused it entry to be scrapped there because it was an
environmental hazard and the ship was towed back to Brazil.

"Floating for THREE MONTHS?!?!?" asked Nikolai Anatolyevich Yevmenov,
commander-in-chief of the Russian Navy.

"We would have paid good money to have something like THAT in our
fleet!"

"What's a little bit of rust?" he added.

Scout

unread,
Feb 4, 2023, 1:49:02 PM2/4/23
to

Mighty? Wannabe?

unread,
Feb 4, 2023, 4:38:44 PM2/4/23
to
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/us-military-shoots-chinese-spy-balloon-atlantic-ocean

While the balloon was off the coast of South Carolina, it was shot
down by U.S. military fighter jets on Saturday afternoon, according to
Fox News sources. A senior U.S. military official said that an F-22
was used to bring down the balloon at 58,000 feet, adding that a
single A9X missile was fired.

The F-22-- superior to any aircraft possessed by either the Russians
or the Chinese, could easily disable the balloon since it can
effortlessly fly above it, and down it with a missile.

0 new messages