Today I noticed that my left front tire is worn down to the cord on a
couple of places on the outer edge. I know it's not a good thing, but
just how bad is it? I know it's due to a misalignment because it's the
same on the other side, just not that bad. I will get a realignment of
the front as soon as possible and I'm wondering if I have to buy new
front tires at the same time? I don't have to get the car inspected
until August and I was hoping to drive on the tires until then since a
new pair of tires for my car costs almost $400 including mounting and
tax. However I don't want to get a tire blowout or anything when I'm
traveling down the highway at 90 mph.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Ulf
'97 Camaro Z28 6-speed
Yeah, you can probably get by till August, provided you take it easy,
and don't drive more than two miles a month. Even then, I suggest you
keep speed down to 30 mph.
--
Don Stauffer in Minneapolis
home web site- http://home1.gte.net/stauffer/
home email- stau...@gte.net
work email- stau...@htc.honeywell.com
cama...@my-dejanews.com wrote in message
<36966D6F...@my-dejanews.com>...
> Hey!
>
> Today I noticed that my left front tire is worn down to the cord on a
> couple of places on the outer edge. I know it's not a good thing, but
> just how bad is it? I know it's due to a misalignment because it's the
> same on the other side, just not that bad. I will get a realignment of
> the front as soon as possible and I'm wondering if I have to buy new
> front tires at the same time? I don't have to get the car inspected
> until August and I was hoping to drive on the tires until then since a
> new pair of tires for my car costs almost $400 including mounting and
> tax. However I don't want to get a tire blowout or anything when I'm
> traveling down the highway at 90 mph.
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Ulf
>
> '97 Camaro Z28 6-speed
>
>
>
Cords showing is bad news. Suggest check for bad shocks/struts, worn
suspension parts, wheel bearings and correct before tire replacement and
alignment.
If you think the cost of new tires are expensive, what's the cost of a
replacement camaro when the car gets wrapped around a tree? Also, should
not be going 90 mph with cords exposed (A common sense thing for you I
hope!)
>Hey!
>
>Today I noticed that my left front tire is worn down to the cord on a
>couple of places on the outer edge. I know it's not a good thing, but
>just how bad is it? I know it's due to a misalignment because it's the
>same on the other side, just not that bad. I will get a realignment of
>the front as soon as possible and I'm wondering if I have to buy new
>front tires at the same time? I don't have to get the car inspected
>until August and I was hoping to drive on the tires until then since a
>new pair of tires for my car costs almost $400 including mounting and
>tax. However I don't want to get a tire blowout or anything when I'm
>traveling down the highway at 90 mph.
>Any thoughts?
>
>Thanks,
>Ulf
>
>'97 Camaro Z28 6-speed
If I were you, I'd park the car and inspect the whole front suspension
and replace everything that's worn out.
And until then, don't use the car ! If by chance you get pulled over
for a traffic violation...The police officer/constable may just feel
it necessary to impound your vehicle on the basis that it's unsafe to
operated on a public road or highway
After all, you might not be the only person who would suffer any
misery from an accident at 90 MPH if your tire decides to blow out !
Steve
If you're seeing cord, you probably don't want to drive any farther than
the tire store, and then directly to the alignment rack. If you're
really that hard up for cash see if you can't score some less worn tires
from a junkyard. Cord is a BIG no-no. Once you wear THROUGH the cord
(how long do you think that will take?) you're only a couple miles from
a blowout, unless you're REAL lucky. BTW, your alignment will be better
if you have it done with the new tires on.
nate
Ulf
Steve Gerland wrote:
> 90 MPH with cord showing on a *front* tire?
> Are you serious?
>
> Steve
>
> cama...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> : Hey!
cama...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> Now that I know the cord is showing I won't drive that fast, but I was
> referring to my normal freeway cruising speed. Now the fastest I drive is 60
> mph which is when I'm late for school, but that shouldn't be any problems
> since it's only a 5 minute city drive. BTW, is it really that serious? I
> mean the rest of the tire still has some thread left and if I could only get
> all the wear of the places where the cord is showing I figured I'll be all
> right. I'm more worried that if I get pulled over by a cop and he sees it,
> he'll turn evil...
In most places the cops would give you a ticket. even if parked Look at it
this way: would you use a condom that worn? You could have a blow out and
kill yourself or worse yet someone else dirving with tread showing. The cords
are NOT a wear surface.
--
Delete either one of the 2's from my address to reply
Ciao, Ray (Boomer) McNairy
"624"
"So many fools, so few comets!"
Not true. There are people that stupid. In fact, I remember stopping
in at a local gas station (near the house I grew up, I must have been
about 13, I know I was nowhere near old enough to actually drive, the
place is long out of business) and my dad went in to BS with the
owner/mechanic/buddy of his. Some guy rolls in in a clapped out old
Fairmont, pulls a decently corded tire out of the trunk, asks the mech.
to mount it for him. He just rolls his eyes and does it. My dad's
looking at him kinda funny (obviously.) When the guy leaves the mech
says to my dad "that guy's in here about twice a month, same deal, he's
got a flat because he runs crap tires. I've tried to tell him to buy
new ones but he refuses to listen to me." My dad's still looking at him
funny, says "isn't that unsafe to have him driving around on that tire?"
The response? "You should see the one I took off!" HOLY F**KING S**T!
the tire was worn through to the cord ALL THE WAY AROUND (not just at
the edge, all the way across the tread) and through it in several
places. One of which obviously finally gave out.
So to give you the short response, yes, there are unbelievably stupid
people in this world.
nate
PS - if you figure $5 to mount a tire every two weeks, how much was he
really "saving?" Hmmm....
(Put your asbestos suit on, kid.)
1. If you can't afford to keep it in tires, and the front end adjusted,
you should not be driving a hot rod like that. Park it, or preferably
sell it, and buy something more suited to your current economic status.
Insurance and tires for a econobox are much cheaper, and will leave more
money for school. If you are beating on the car so hard as to wreck the
front suspension, and grind off the tires, something a little milder
seems called for.
2. I hope someone in the town you live sees your post, and drops a dime
to the law. Killing your own silly self would be simple Darwinism in
action, but the minivan full of kids in the oncoming lane on the curve
when the tire blows out don't deserve to die, too. And it WILL fail, the
only question is when.
3. Pretty sad that your self-identity is so wedded to your wheels that
you use it as a sig file. Don't get me wrong- I enjoy a well-set-up car
and a winding road as much as the next guy, but I don't abuse equipment
or knowingly drive anything that will endanger others. But it's just a
car, not who I am.
Flame mode off.
I used to know guy a like you, loved to drive fast, didn't have much
sense about it. Grew up, scraped together enough cash for a Vette, lost
an argument with a tree in it. Now he's plant food.
aem sends....
>This must be a joke. Nobody is that stupid
Oh ya?
On a totally different topic about stupid people...
I,long ago,used to pump gas,well,this dumb fuck pulled in with a
rather expensive Mercedes Benz.
He asked me to check the oil !
When I did, I replied what oil ?
It didn't even register on the dip stick !
Like it was bone dry ! In fact, the dip stick looked some what baked !
Anyhow,I told the chap that it would probably need a minimum of two
liters just to bring it up to the "add a " level !
Non the less, he confered that he had oil at home, and that he would
pour a liter in when he got home in penticton(Which in this case would
be about 300 + miles !)
Now thats stupid.
It really scares me what some people do !
:Today I noticed that my left front tire is worn down to the cord on a
:couple of places on the outer edge. I know it's not a good thing, but
:just how bad is it? [...] However I don't want to get a tire blowout or
:anything when I'm
:traveling down the highway at 90 mph.
:Any thoughts?
--
george jefferson : geo...@sol1.lrsm.upenn.edu
to reply simply press "r"
-- I hate editing addresses more than I hate the spam!
>Hey!
>
>Today I noticed that my left front tire is worn down to the cord on a
>couple of places on the outer edge. I know it's not a good thing, but
>just how bad is it? I know it's due to a misalignment because it's the
>same on the other side, just not that bad. I will get a realignment of
>the front as soon as possible and I'm wondering if I have to buy new
>front tires at the same time? I don't have to get the car inspected
>until August and I was hoping to drive on the tires until then since a
>new pair of tires for my car costs almost $400 including mounting and
>tax. However I don't want to get a tire blowout or anything when I'm
>traveling down the highway at 90 mph.
>Any thoughts?
>
>Thanks,
>Ulf
>
>'97 Camaro Z28 6-speed
>
This HAS to be a trick question. I think "duh" would be a good
answer.
Steve
"58" is spam stopper.
cama...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
: Now that I know the cord is showing I won't drive that fast, but I was
: referring to my normal freeway cruising speed. Now the fastest I drive is 60
: mph which is when I'm late for school, but that shouldn't be any problems
: since it's only a 5 minute city drive. BTW, is it really that serious? I
: mean the rest of the tire still has some thread left and if I could only get
: all the wear of the places where the cord is showing I figured I'll be all
: right. I'm more worried that if I get pulled over by a cop and he sees it,
: he'll turn evil...
: Ulf
: Steve Gerland wrote:
: > 90 MPH with cord showing on a *front* tire?
: > Are you serious?
: >
: > Steve
: >
I would suggest you re-evaluate your priorities.
cama...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Today I noticed that my left front tire is worn down to the cord on a
> couple of places on the outer edge. I know it's not a good thing, but
> just how bad is it? I know it's due to a misalignment because it's the
> same on the other side, just not that bad. I will get a realignment of
> the front as soon as possible and I'm wondering if I have to buy new
> front tires at the same time? I don't have to get the car inspected
> until August and I was hoping to drive on the tires until then since a
> new pair of tires for my car costs almost $400 including mounting and
> tax. However I don't want to get a tire blowout or anything when I'm
> traveling down the highway at 90 mph.
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Ulf
>
> '97 Camaro Z28 6-speed
--
- Larry Smith
----DON'T RETURN EMAIL TO ME----
until you check my address for spam-wedge
In article <36966D6F...@my-dejanews.com>,
cama...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Today I noticed that my left front tire is worn down to the cord on a
> couple of places on the outer edge. I know it's not a good thing, but
> just how bad is it? I know it's due to a misalignment because it's the
> same on the other side, just not that bad. I will get a realignment of
> the front as soon as possible and I'm wondering if I have to buy new
> front tires at the same time? I don't have to get the car inspected
> until August and I was hoping to drive on the tires until then since a
> new pair of tires for my car costs almost $400 including mounting and
> tax. However I don't want to get a tire blowout or anything when I'm
> traveling down the highway at 90 mph.
> Any thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Ulf
>
> '97 Camaro Z28 6-speed
>
>
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
cama...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Today I noticed that my left front tire is worn down to the cord on a
> couple of places on the outer edge. I know it's not a good thing, but
> just how bad is it? I know it's due to a misalignment because it's the
> same on the other side, just not that bad. I will get a realignment of
> the front as soon as possible and I'm wondering if I have to buy new
> front tires at the same time? I don't have to get the car inspected
> until August and I was hoping to drive on the tires until then since a
> new pair of tires for my car costs almost $400 including mounting and
> tax. However I don't want to get a tire blowout or anything when I'm
> traveling down the highway at 90 mph.
> Any thoughts?
>
If you value your life you will get the new tires today. Forget about your
life-get them today anyway, I care about my life when I'm on the same road
as you!
cama...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> Now that I know the cord is showing I won't drive that fast, but I was
> referring to my normal freeway cruising speed. Now the fastest I drive is 60
> mph which is when I'm late for school, but that shouldn't be any problems
> since it's only a 5 minute city drive. BTW, is it really that serious? I
> mean the rest of the tire still has some thread left and if I could only get
> all the wear of the places where the cord is showing I figured I'll be all
> right. I'm more worried that if I get pulled over by a cop and he sees it,
> he'll turn evil...
>
> Ulf
>
REPLACE THOSE TIRES NOW!!!!> YES, I KNOW I'M SHOUTING. THIS IS SERIOUS.
Ulf
Nathan J Nagel wrote:
> Excerpts from netnews.rec.autos.tech: 8-Jan-99 Cord showing on tire, is
> th.. by cama...@my-dejanews.co
> >
> > Hey!
> >
> > Today I noticed that my left front tire is worn down to the cord on a
> > couple of places on the outer edge. I know it's not a good thing, but
> > just how bad is it? I know it's due to a misalignment because it's the
> > same on the other side, just not that bad. I will get a realignment of
> > the front as soon as possible and I'm wondering if I have to buy new
> > front tires at the same time? I don't have to get the car inspected
> > until August and I was hoping to drive on the tires until then since a
> > new pair of tires for my car costs almost $400 including mounting and
> > tax. However I don't want to get a tire blowout or anything when I'm
> > traveling down the highway at 90 mph.
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ulf
> >
> > '97 Camaro Z28 6-speed
>
cama...@my-dejanews.com wrote in message
<3697E7BB...@my-dejanews.com>...
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from rhan...@nospamsk.sympatico.ca
Home Page: http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Arcade/9967/
<cama...@my-dejanews.com> wrote in message
news:3697E7BB...@my-dejanews.com...
I wouldn't sweat it...give it a day or two and you won't have to use that
silly air pressure gauge to check the air....you can just look through the
hole in the tire and see how much is in it...So much simpler, and you don't
have to shell out for the gauge!
The Dirtyman
cama...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> I get that once I wear through the cord I'm risking a blowout, but since the
> cord is only showing on the outer edge on the tire and it's not more than
> about half an inch wide, even though it shows almost around the whole tire,
> I still think that I could get away with realignment because the rest of the
> tire still shows tread even though maybe not the legal amount. Besides,
> front end alignment $19.95, two new tires $400. See the difference? Trust
> me, if I had $400 I would get a new set of tires but I don't. I was also
> thinking that if I swap places of the tires so that the cord is on the
> inside where there isn't any wear that would work too, right? And how could
> the realignment only last for a couple of weeks anyway?
Sure hope you don't live in Calif as I don't want you anywhere close to me. At
least put them on the rears so you will have some slight degree of control when
they blow. NOT if but when they blow. I doubt if an alignment shop that's
close to being responsible would touch it.
>This must be a joke. Nobody is that stupid
It's worse than that. There is organized stupid going on. Just down
the street here is a place that _rents_ used tires. The idea is, you
rent a half-decent set of rubber, get your annual safety inspection,
then mount the old sh*t back on your (probably uninsured) vehicle. The
place is just a few blocks down from the insurance-by-the-week store.
Happy motoring...
Rand
Rand McNatt wrote in message <36981b63...@news.arn.net>...
cama...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> I get that once I wear through the cord I'm risking a blowout, but since the
> cord is only showing on the outer edge on the tire and it's not more than
> about half an inch wide, even though it shows almost around the whole tire,
> I still think that I could get away with realignment because the rest of the
> tire still shows tread even though maybe not the legal amount. Besides,
> front end alignment $19.95, two new tires $400. See the difference? Trust
> me, if I had $400 I would get a new set of tires but I don't. I was also
> thinking that if I swap places of the tires so that the cord is on the
> inside where there isn't any wear that would work too, right? And how could
> the realignment only last for a couple of weeks anyway?
If your wheels are towed in so bad that your tires look like this /--\ and the
worn parts would not contact the road, you seriously need to get another car.
Preferably an Escort....
You don't have to wear through the whole tire, only a big enough spot to
let air out.
> front end alignment $19.95, two new tires $400. See the difference? Trust
Sure do. But I think you're missing the point here. Youve already got
a large investment in your car. It would be a shame to total your car
b/c you saved $400, don't you think?
> me, if I had $400 I would get a new set of tires but I don't. I was also
> thinking that if I swap places of the tires so that the cord is on the
> inside where there isn't any wear that would work too, right? And how could
> the realignment only last for a couple of weeks anyway?
Not that it won't last, but your tires aren't worn "square" so that the
alignment will be harder to set correctly.
Do yourself a favor, see if there isn't a junkyard or used tire store
near you that can sell you a pair of decent tires. I know there's a
couple of them in Cleveland and Pittsburgh, the two cities I've spend
most of my life in.
nate
>
> Ulf
>
You have a misconception here.
>When a tire blows, or goes flat, there is much more control if it is on the
FRONT. Not the rear. Ask any roundy-round racer.
Now how the hell would that work? Used tires run about $25 per in the
areas I'm used to, you mean to tell me you can have tires mounted
(twice) for less enough than that to make it worthwhile? (everywhere
I've ever gone wants $10 per for mount/balance, OK so you only need one
balance job) Or is this just another example of stupid thinking?
nate
> >>This must be a joke. Nobody is that stupid
>> >It's worse than that. There is organized stupid going on. Just down
>> >the street here is a place that _rents_ used tires. The idea is, you
>> >rent a half-decent set of rubber, get your annual safety inspection,
>> >then mount the old sh*t back on your (probably uninsured) vehicle.
>
>Now how the hell would that work? Used tires run about $25 per in the
>areas I'm used to, you mean to tell me you can have tires mounted
>(twice) for less enough than that to make it worthwhile? (everywhere
>I've ever gone wants $10 per for mount/balance, OK so you only need one
>balance job) Or is this just another example of stupid thinking?
Well, the poster above SAID it was worse than stupid.....
On the other hand, how about this. Say I own a shop with a sporatic
tyre mounting business, and I buy 4 used tyres for $100, and mount
them on an old set of common wheels I paid $50 for. I "rent" them to
people for $10 each ( these people would probably never buy new tyres
from me anyway, so they are customers I would not ordinarily have ).
Then you re-mount the lousy tyres for another $5 each after they get
the inspection. That's $60 from each client, and I can turn the same
set of tyres four times a week, for $240 in one week, say $1000 per
month. That's a pretty fair return on the investment for the shop,
and I get to keep my tyre changing staff and equipment busy. Sounds
pretty smart to me.
The customer pays only $60, passes the inspection, can keep driving on
his lousy tyres, and doesn't have to buy a $200+ set of new rubber, so
he saves $140+. The losers are the new tyre dealers, and of course
the rest of us on the road who have to hope he doesn't hit us when the
tyres blow.
Jay T
The problem is not loss of traction from less tread area, it is major
loss of traction in case of a blowout. If a tire blows on either end of
car you loose a substantial amount of steering. If the front blows, you
end up with MAJOR understeer. If the rear blows, you end up with MAJOR
oversteer. Either case frequently results in loss of control at freeway
speeds.
If the cords are showing you are tiny fractions of an inch away from a
blowout.
--
Don Stauffer in Minneapolis
home web site- http://home1.gte.net/stauffer/
home email- stau...@gte.net
work email- stau...@htc.honeywell.com
Yes, people are that stupid. I've seen 'em in action!
Wolf
On Sun, 10 Jan 1999 03:19:50 GMT, rand_remove_@_remove_arn.net (Rand
McNatt) wrote:
>On 9 Jan 1999 00:01:33 GMT, chil...@aol.com (Chili442) wrote:
>
>>This must be a joke. Nobody is that stupid
>
>It's worse than that. There is organized stupid going on. Just down
>the street here is a place that _rents_ used tires. The idea is, you
>rent a half-decent set of rubber, get your annual safety inspection,
Ulf
Look at the previous posts to this thread. Everyone knows you're an
accident waiting to happen and you continue to drive and "wear through a
couple of places."
If (or rather, when) you have the accident, I sure hope that I'm nowhere
near your camaro!
You also mention you don't like changing tires at 1230AM in the dark and
soiling the interior. Simple solution: Go to the tire shop BEFORE you
get a blowout and wreck.
I hope you don't interpret this as a flame. It's just extremely unfair to
innocent people that get tangled with your camaro WHEN you do wreck. Hope
you don't kill or injure anyone including yourself.
Thanks,
Ulf
This has got to be a troll. A guy with a $20,000 Z28 is too cheap to
put down $400 in tires so it'll stay on the road. If you're serious,
the best thing you can do is sell the Z and use the money for a bus
pass.
Jeff
Yip Yu wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jan 1999 cama...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
>
> > Hey!
> >
> > Today I noticed that my left front tire is worn down to the cord on a
> > couple of places on the outer edge. I know it's not a good thing, but
> > just how bad is it? I know it's due to a misalignment because it's the
> > same on the other side, just not that bad. I will get a realignment of
> > the front as soon as possible and I'm wondering if I have to buy new
> > front tires at the same time? I don't have to get the car inspected
> > until August and I was hoping to drive on the tires until then since a
> > new pair of tires for my car costs almost $400 including mounting and
> > tax. However I don't want to get a tire blowout or anything when I'm
> > traveling down the highway at 90 mph.
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ulf
> >
> > '97 Camaro Z28 6-speed
> >
> >
> >
> Cords showing is bad news. Suggest check for bad shocks/struts, worn
> suspension parts, wheel bearings and correct before tire replacement and
> alignment.
>
> If you think the cost of new tires are expensive, what's the cost of a
> replacement camaro when the car gets wrapped around a tree? Also, should
> not be going 90 mph with cords exposed (A common sense thing for you I
> hope!)
cama...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> I get that once I wear through the cord I'm risking a blowout, but since the
> cord is only showing on the outer edge on the tire and it's not more than
> about half an inch wide, even though it shows almost around the whole tire,
> I still think that I could get away with realignment because the rest of the
> tire still shows tread even though maybe not the legal amount. Besides,
> front end alignment $19.95, two new tires $400. See the difference? Trust
> me, if I had $400 I would get a new set of tires but I don't. I was also
> thinking that if I swap places of the tires so that the cord is on the
> inside where there isn't any wear that would work too, right? And how could
> the realignment only last for a couple of weeks anyway?
>
> Ulf
>
> Nathan J Nagel wrote:
>
> > Excerpts from netnews.rec.autos.tech: 8-Jan-99 Cord showing on tire, is
> > th.. by cama...@my-dejanews.co
> > >
> > > Hey!
> > >
> > > Today I noticed that my left front tire is worn down to the cord on a
> > > couple of places on the outer edge. I know it's not a good thing, but
> > > just how bad is it? I know it's due to a misalignment because it's the
> > > same on the other side, just not that bad. I will get a realignment of
> > > the front as soon as possible and I'm wondering if I have to buy new
> > > front tires at the same time? I don't have to get the car inspected
> > > until August and I was hoping to drive on the tires until then since a
> > > new pair of tires for my car costs almost $400 including mounting and
> > > tax. However I don't want to get a tire blowout or anything when I'm
> > > traveling down the highway at 90 mph.
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ulf
> > >
> > > '97 Camaro Z28 6-speed
> >
Uhm, $425 for tires/alignment. Is your insurance deductable $500? You might
want to save $75 (and maybe your life or mine) and swap 'em out. How much for
the lawsuit if you did cause damage/injury/death because of a KNOWN dangerous
vehicle condition?
-falconfixer-
Motto:
"If i can't fix it - i'll fix it so no one can!"
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
I *can't* be the only one thinking at this point: "Why not put the spare on
now - at your convenience? Keep the totally worn out tire as a spare to be
replaced later."
In the vernacular of our youth today:
duh.
Ulf
We been had...
Have you ever smacked a curb? That could do it too. But if not, that
really bites, I feel your pain. You shouldn't have to align a new car.
But good luck trying to get any help from GM. You might want to check
the lit. that came with your car though, you might be able to get new
tires from whoever originally supplied them at a discount, depending on
how many miles are on your tires currently. (I'm assuming you still
have the factory tires on there.) Generally tires are supplied with a
treadwear warranty (30-60K miles, depending on the tire) and
replacements are prorated if the tires wear down to the bars before that
mileage.
> $39.95 not $19.95 as I heard before. And the tires costs $160 a piece.
> He guessed the car came miss aligned from the factory, according to
him that w
> as
> usual and you should have it checked or you would have to buy new
tires very s
> oon.
> (Like me.) When I asked the guy how many miles I had left on my front
tires he
> just
> laughed and said that I was down to the nylon now and below that there
was som
> e
> metal layer and below that there was nothing.
Well, I guess you know what you have to do now. Um, sorry? But since
your alignment guy found excessive toe and hopefully corrected it, your
new (or at least less worn) tires should last longer this time around.
nate
>
> Ulf
Thanks,
Ulf
I'll bet the dealership simply removed your steering wheel and re-clocked it.
I hope you get some compensation out of this...
This is just ANOTHER reason for me to drive PAST a GM dealership! I can't
stand the corporate arrogance!
Pete
You asked for opinions and you got them. Did you realize that *no one*
told you that it was okay? Doesn't a 100% vote mean anything to you?
The poster who told you to get used tires probably has the best solution.
Go to a junkyard and find tires that are the same in every dimension. I am
sure there is another Camaro in the junkyard that was wrecked when the
driver was too cheap to replace a safety hazard.
Pete
Is this a trick question? Are you just testing us or what?
Pete
Ten bucks says they didn't even put it on the rack, they just r&r'ed the
steering wheel. Someone probably smacked a curb (or similar object - it
can happen) before you got the car, or else the factory was having an
off day in the suspension and steering department.
You got fucked, my friend, but hopefully you've found a better place to
take your car.
later,
nate
Ulf
I have seen very few drivers who are too aggressive. Mostly it's
timid clueless drivers who get in my way.
Can I have your VCR when you're dead?
Grae
>HE CAN JUST KEEP HIS STINKING FANCY STEERING WHEEL! I DON'T
>WANT IT ANYMORE!
What? Not good enough for ya, eh? Just because it has a *little* bit
of brain matter smeared on it and a few teethmarks in it?
Perfectionist, are we?? ;-)
> (As a matter of fact, I DO feel better now.)
I don't! I haven't got his VCR yet! ;-)
Grae
Ulf
>You're forgetting something, my car is equipped with a gadget called an
>AIRBAG which prevents the head, body parts, etc. to hit the steering
>wheel.
Oh, that's the device that protects you from being injured inside the
car by propelling you through the rear window upon impact? ;-)
>And regarding my VCR, in your dreams!
Awww - No fair! What about your CD player?
>And for your information, I don't intend to get into an accident either.
Nobody 'intends' to get in an accident (unless they wanna pull an
insurance scam!)... The main fear is that you ability to prevent an
accident is severely diminished when driving on the cords. Perhaps
more so than you originally though.
>Seriously though, I am getting new tires, any day now...
Good call. Looks like I'm gonna have to wait on that VCR...
Grae
>You're forgetting something, my car is equipped with a gadget called an
>AIRBAG which prevents the head, body parts, etc. to hit the steering
>wheel. And regarding my VCR, in your dreams! And for your information, I
>don't intend to get into an accident either. Seriously though, I am
>getting new tires, any day now... Especially after driving last Sunday
>night when it was raining, that was scary. Anytime I drove faster than 45
>mph or when I drove through a water puddle my car hydroplaned. I became
>very aware of this in a sharp right hand corner, with a lot of oncoming
>cars, that had stranded water on the roadway which I didn't see. Imagine
>my surprise...
Do you have Eagle GA tires? Just reminded me, some 'Maros had Eagle GA
tires. Stay away from Eagle GA tires. They suck on anything but dry
asphalt. Ask my insurance company, the city of Fairview Park, O, my
front bumper and pass-side fender, and the chain-link fence that Allstate
bought.
Damn GAs.
--
Feel pity for me; I have to drive through Linndale.
"Mellow greetings, sir... what seems to be your boggle?"
>How could you wear your tires down to the belts on a '97 already?
>Answer:you drive too aggressivly. driving aggressivly with worn tires
>is EXTREMELY dangerous. replace the tires before you hurt your car,
>yourself or someone else.
>
Huh?
His car is two years old. It came with Goodyear Eagle RS-A tires.
I know these tires well, they're semi-sticky asymmetrical tires, and
typically last only 30-40k for most drivers. Are you saying that
15 to 20 thousand miles a year is unreasonable? I sure don't.
Oh, wait - a Z28. That comes with Z-rated Eagle GS-C tires. You're
lucky if you can even get 30k out of them puppies, and they are NOT
CHEAP (a cheap Z-rated asymmetrical directional tire? HA!).
Add the facts that a Z28 will naturally wear out the inner edge of
the front tires due to alignment specs (if you drive like a baby),
and I have yet to see a well-aligned Camaro from the factory, then
it's no wonder he needs new tires.
Yeah, $400 for front tires sounds about right....
Ulf
"P. J. Remner" wrote.
> Do you have Eagle GA tires? Just reminded me, some 'Maros had Eagle GA
> tires. Stay away from Eagle GA tires. They suck on anything but dry
> asphalt. Ask my insurance company, the city of Fairview Park, O, my
> front bumper and pass-side fender, and the chain-link fence that Allstate
> bought.
>
> Damn GAs.
>
I believe this may be due to a largeish negative camber, to improve
handling. Don't quote me on it though.. :)
Dennis
--
Support Freedom on the Internet! http://eff.org
'68 Nova SS - 327 CID - TH350 - Goal: 383 'n gobs of torque.
'88 Sunbird - 2.0L OHC - 3T40 - 14x6 '85 Pontiac 6000 Alloys
IRC Operator: irc.total.net (EFNet) Nickname: Astinu
>P. J. Remner (aj...@cleveland.Freenet.Edu) wrote:
>: Add the facts that a Z28 will naturally wear out the inner edge of
>: the front tires due to alignment specs (if you drive like a baby),
>: and I have yet to see a well-aligned Camaro from the factory, then
>: it's no wonder he needs new tires.
>
> I believe this may be due to a largeish negative camber, to improve
>handling. Don't quote me on it though.. :)
>
Ask any Ford Taurus owner. Most of these cars, once the springs are
"set", have -1.0 to -1.8 degrees camber. And specified toe-out.
Tire eater deluxe.
I have -2.5 camber on the front of my RWD car, but I'm resigned to
rotating tires every 2,000 miles and replacing them every 10,000.
In sets of four. But oh, is it worth it!