A loss of battery voltage will reset the VATS module - and from this point
on, if the module cannot read the resistance when the key is turned, it will
initiate a 4 minute timer to disable the engine. This cycle will repeat so
long as a correct resistance is NOT read.
A common failure with this type of security system is the ignition lock
cylinder assembly. There are two small wires leading from the harness, up
the column, terminating at the wiper contacts inside the cylinder. Repeated
cycling of the cylinder each time the car is started fatigues these two
small wires (approx 24AWG) and one eventually breaks. Of course there are
other possibilities as to the cause of your problem, but I would say this is
"likely," considering the age of the car.
Diagnostics of this part of the VATS system are not difficult to perform if
you correctly identify the 2 wires in this part of the circuit, and take all
of the usual precautions regarding the SIR system.
Replacing the cyclinder is the normal procedure, but keep in mind that your
old ignition keys will not work in the new cylinder since the key cuts will
not be the same. Also, new VATS keys must be matched to the resistance of
the old, since this resistance value has been permanently stored in the
module. The keys can be measured with a DVOM, and conversion charts are
printed in GM service information to convert this resistance to a VATS code
number (1 to 15). Incidentially, GM has a special tool called the
"PASS/VATS Interrogator," which performs these functions easier when the
"Interrogator" is installed in-line into the security system (or simply to
read the key-code directly).
An alternative, (saving you money) to replacing the cylinder assembly is to
install a small resistor close to the value of the key across the two wires.
You will lose the benefits of the VATS system, since won't really be reading
the key-code. But if the car is old and you aren't afraid of the risk . . .
.
I hope this info is helpful, and do please take extreme caution if you
attempt to perform diagnostics/service on this yourself due to the presence
of the SIR (airbags) wiring located in this area. Once you've seen them
going off, you can appreciate the danger. :-)
If you find that your problem lies elsewhere this time, still keep this info
in mind, because this is a high-failure rate problem with this system. I'm
interested to know how this works out, so please leave a follow-up.
Good Luck,
Nick
Phil Bright <pbr...@winfordeng.com> wrote in message
news:50887590.01101...@posting.google.com...
Phil Bright a écrit :
"Phil Bright" <pbr...@winfordeng.com> wrote in message
news:50887590.01101...@posting.google.com...
Jacques Labonte <jlab...@cooptel.qc.ca> wrote in message news:<3BC5F131...@cooptel.qc.ca>...
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hanc...@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
"Phil Bright" <pbr...@winfordeng.com> wrote in message
news:50887590.0110...@posting.google.com...
- Phil Bright
1.) The operation of the "security" lamp as you describe is normal. The
lamp is provided a ground by the module for 5 seconds after the key is
turned on to indicate the system is working. With this condition you can
verify that the rest of the cranking circuit works by removing the starter
enable relay and jumpering from terminal 1 (Yellow 10AWG from IGN switch) to
terminal 4 (Other Yellow 10AWG to PRNDL switch) in the harness connector.
There are only 4 wires to this relay, which is located to left of column
under the dash. (Other two wires are PPL/WHT 20AWG from Fuse 1, and BLK/YEL
24AWG grounded by VATS module.)
2.) The module has two outputs besides the lamp. One provides a ground
path for the starter enable relay (which in turn completes a circuit to the
starter solenoid), found on module pin A4 BLK/YEL. The other output sends a
signal (I believe it is PWM, not simply switched) to the PCM (Engine Control
Module), module pin A3-DK BLU. If you are thinking of bypassing this system
you would need to duplicate its outputs using another electronic device.
The inputs to the module from the key reader are terminals B8 and B7
(WHT/BLK &PPL/WHT).
3.) ***The security system has no direct link with the shift interlock.
*** The Shift Interlock Solenoid is operated independently and involves a NC
switch at the brake pedal which breaks the circuit to the solenoid. The
solenoid receives power from Fuse 2 which is Hot in Run/Start and the
circuit also passes through the PRNDL (transmission gear range/neutral
safety) switch, which only allows the solenoid to lock the shifter only when
the trans is in park. Verify that you can shift out of park with the key in
the "Off" position.
4.) Once the key is ON the shift interlock solenoid is powered up. The
brake switch is on the positive side of this, and there are no other
components between the switch and the solenoid. You should be able to shift
with the key OFF >>>After opening and closing the door and waiting -
Remember, these cars usually have "retained accessory power" and this
circuit is included <<< C206 (The large conn. at the base of the
column-you had apart already) is the only connector between the switch and
the solenoid. There are no "electronics" in the shift interlock circuit at
all.
If it wasn't for the fact that you cannot unlock the shift lever by
depressing the brake I'd say the PRNDL switch was bad, out of adj, or has
water in the connections, etc. Both the Cranking circuit and the Shift
interlock circuit pass through the PRNDL and those switches do fail. But
since you can't shift by depressing the pedal (keeping the RAP function in
mind), I really don't see where there is a connection.
If there is always power at the interlock solenoid, find out why - this
should not be.
To verify if the starter enable relay is being commanded on by the VATS
module disconnect the BLACK connector at the Transaxle PRNDL switch (under
the hood - black, centered around shift cable linkage) and check for 12
volts at terminal G (10AWG Yellow wire) when the key is in START.
Sorry for the long message. I am not a "regular" here, but I hope that long
messages are not frowned upon. I'd like to know what is going on with this
car too.
-Nick Carr
Phil Bright <pbr...@winfordeng.com> wrote in message
news:50887590.01101...@posting.google.com...