He says he won't do it again because the LT tires are not designed for
such speeds, but he seems to think that his truck won't accelerate as
quickly as a Z06, but "could easily stay with a Z06 (yes Corvette) on
the straight."
Anyway, enough of his silly boasting. Don't all full sized pickups,
in the non-performance category (not counting the Lightning, what
else?) have a speed governor around 105 mph? I asked him, and he said
his didn't. If it did come from the factory with a governor, then how
did he disable the governor? I know for a fact that he has the
factory computer in the vehicle.
Does Dodge leave all of their pickups un-governored? If so, aren't
they taking a liability risk when someone in their HD Dodge Ram cracks
it up at 120 mph?
"Arch" <cr1...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c8cde796.03033...@posting.google.com...
> The GM governors are quite violent when the come on.....kills all
> the power instantly.
I'll second that. My '99 454 is still accelerating hard when it
hits the speed limiter and its like hitting a wall.
As far as I know all the gm cars have speed limiters too. I was in one
of the generic mid-sized cars when it hit the speed limiter between
nascar turn 2 & 3 (back straight) at charlotte (lowes). I suggested to
the student driver that it might be a good idea to avoid doing that in
nascar turn 3 or 4 :)
joel
I have a friend with a Ram SS/T (1998 model) and he's put just about all
the Mopar Performance goodies on the 5.9 (360) engine- computer, cam,
fast-ratio rockers, performance cylinder heads (the cast iron version),
MP intake,oversized throttle body, MP headers, and cat-back exhaust. Its
his daily driver with over 120,000 miles, and it runs 13s in the quarter
(he won't use nitrous or a blower- thinks that's "cheating":-) He's
actually used several different performance computers with it (both MP
and Jet, IIRC). His computers don't seem to have a speed limiter (at
least he hasn't found it- God knows not from lack of searching :-) but
the do seem to have a *rev* limiter and different computers have it at
different levels. One particularly annoying computer would sometimes
kiss the rev limiter before the transmission would shift, but I think he
got that sorted out in the latest setup.
And FWIW, he test drove a 5.7 Hemi Ram 1500 and although quick, its not
anywhere close to his modified truck. The salesman demanded a ride in
the SS/T before he would believe the claim, and apparently was a little
bit pale when the ride was over. It'll be interesting to see if Mopar
Performance comes out with the same line of goodies for the 5.7 Hemi
that they have for the 360.
The speed limiter should have been in the factory computer which he
removed....... One of the reasons to chip or change it is to remove the
limiter, like your friend did.
Chris Z.
Pete Geurds
Douglassville, PA
mike hunt
>Not only GM, ALL vehicles sold in the US have a speed limiter
>based on the sustained top speed rating of the tire on the
>vehicle when new, except those equipped with 'Z' rated tires.
This is correct, which makes it a royal[*] PitA later on if you want
to shark your car and the sharked chip manufacturer has nothing
compatible in stock. I obtained the possible engine codes for my '89
Pontiac, but Superchips told me they had nothing available.
Hypertech and Jet don't seem to have a compatible chip either, and
when they did it was only for the auto tranny version (or so they
claimed).
Since my limiter kicks in at a ridiculous 96mph (not violently btw,
is this unusual for a GM car? From what I've read it appears so), I
have been running a policy of "shark it or sell it" for a while now.
When I've pulled my fingers out and pulled my life together
(emerging from a tempus horribilis of long term illness), the white
"speedless wonder" will be sold or traded for $1900 and replaced by
a *real* car. BMW perhaps? Very likely if the price is right. :)
[*] I am aware there are a lot of yanks reading here, and that
adjective is probably not appropriate for them. ;)
--
ricardo, ex-euroslav vancouver bc canada
e-mail: remove spamfreezone to reply