Patrick Burns
>Right on, Patrick--- ANY car that pulls into MY shop with those junk ass
>plugs in it get REAL spark plugs first. If anyone who knows has ever seen
>the scope pattern from "Splitfires" they will have to agree-- it's ALL
>marketing and pricing-- perceived value in the trade.
Can you be more specific on what the scope pattern looks like and how it
compares, good or bad, to a set of new regular plugs?
>Right on, Patrick--- ANY car that pulls into MY shop with those junk ass
>plugs in it get REAL spark plugs first. If anyone who knows has ever seen
>the scope pattern from "Splitfires" they will have to agree-- it's ALL
>marketing and pricing-- perceived value in the trade.
What exactly is the problem with Splitfires? Do they provide any
benefit over other plugs, as subtle as it may be? Is the problem a
poor price/performance ratio or just no extra performance period?
Thanks.
I have run them in our racing bikes, i was impressed by the apparent quality
.. but they did nothing to the power. Conclusion ... waste of money ... buy
cheep plugs and change them often - they works best.
A free "trick" which will work better than splitfire's is file the electrode
down to the mid point on the core (? what is the name? brain fart!). This will
expose the spark to the fuel/air mix for free! It does take a couple minutes
time per plug so I guess it's not free ... at least it workes better than the
splitfires.
The only plug failure i have ever had which caused major engine damage was with
Autolites. The insulator spun in the housing causing a major air leak. This was
on a 2 stroke Yamaha TZ250 FII road racer down the front straight at Willow
Springs, about 150 mph. Air leak + 2 stroke + 13,500rpm = hard seize! yes I had
the clutch in quick.
Anyway Autolite looked at it all and said I over torqued the plug ... I guess
18 lbs with a Craftsman torque wrench was wrong. BULLSH*T, AUTOLITE SUCKS
PERIOD!
Smillie
We used to do this in the 50's on our cars but I dont think we had a name for it.
>scott...@aol.com (SCOTTGROEN) wrote:
>>Right on, Patrick--- ANY car that pulls into MY shop with those junk ass
>>plugs in it get REAL spark plugs first. If anyone who knows has ever seen
>>the scope pattern from "Splitfires" they will have to agree-- it's ALL
>>marketing and pricing-- perceived value in the trade.
>Can you be more specific on what the scope pattern looks like and how it
>compares, good or bad, to a set of new regular plugs?
Yes, I would also love to hear what you saw with the scope. I know
that no serious race teams (unless sponsored by splitfire) or
auto-makers use the plugs, but I would love to know why.
Andy Bajorinas
------------------------------------------------------------------
| Andrew P. Bajorinas | These opinions are my own and |
| Bajo...@Perkin-Elmer.com | not those of my employer. |
| Sr. Engineer |-------------------------------|
| Perkin-Elmer Corp, Norwalk, CT | A cat is not a wavefunction. |
|________________________________|_______________________________|
.
I think what he is trying to say is that a splitfire scope pattern looks no
different from any regular plug.
In <48g1p4$3...@inet-nntp-gw-1.us.oracle.com>, (af...@us.oracle.com) writes:
]In article <48appe$1b...@stealth.mindspring.com>, Chuck Smillie <c...@jhk.com>
]writes:
]> >One of the splitfire plugs I installed in a 1989 Jeep Wrangler burnt a hole
]> >in the piston. I have had other people tell me they have experienced the
]> >same thing.
It's speculation, but...
The improved fuel economy is a result of getting rid of the old worn plugs and
putting a new clean set in. The better performance is due to the design of the
plug. They simply use a larger insulator than normal plugs, resulting in a
hotter heat range. Then make some fancy "forked tounge" electrode so that you
percieve a difference; their plugs even look like snakes. (snake oil, get it?)
The hotter heat range could be why people are having problems with burning holes
in their pistons.
Kevin Tapperson
kevi...@mail.utexas.edu