I was putting 168s in the side/corner markers of my Honda and noticed
that they were not as bright as original lamps...194 was the correct
bulb for the application (although one bulb spec guide said otherwise)
--
Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hanc...@nospamhome.com
Home Page: http://members.home.net/hancockr
<hogr...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:377e7483...@news.earthlink.net...
> What about the difference between an 1157 and a 2057? I have used
> them interchangeably with no problems
>
>
the 194 is 2 and the 168 is 3
but that's inconsistent with what rm wrote about his 194s being brighter. I
guess I should just try them out then.
Some of the bulbs in the dash are melting the plastic around the bulb. I'm
using 194s that a speedometer repair shop sold me. I brought in the speedo unit
and he recommeneded the 194s for the backlighting. I'm not sure if the melting
was there before or after the 194s were installed. I guess I should just see
what the original bulbs were. Maybe it's in my shop manual.
Craig Ericsson wrote:
> Bulb info -
> 194 3 candle power (cp)
> 168 2 cp
> http://www.truck-lite.com/bulb.html
>
> Craig
>
> rm wrote:
>
According to Phillips and Osram Sylvania Small/Automotive
Lampo data sheets the 168 is 3 CandlePower vs 2 CP for the
194.
Another site with lots of automotive biulb data is:
http://lighting.mbz.org/tech/info/signal_bulbs/
2057 (equiv to 3057 wedge base) is 32/2 CP 1157 (equiv to
3157) is 32/3 CP so the 1157 is slightly brighter on the dim
filament.
Note that the 2357 (equiv to 3357 & hi-temp base 3457) is
40/3 CP so will be slightly briter on bright filament than
either of the above.
See also: http://lighting.mbz.org/tech/info/signal_bulbs/
>I believe the 2057 is brighter on both filaments.
>
>