hmm.
Once upon a time I had a '67 Dodge Dart, with the vaunted 225 slant six
engine. The car was a horrific heap which I paid less for than I likely
have in my pocket now, but the reason that I popped for it was that the
body was mostly rust-free, requiring only one minor repair around one of
the torsion bar sockets, being from either NC or SC (I forget which -
and when I say only one minor repair, I'm not counting dents!) and the
owner proudly told me that it had a recently installed remanufactured
engine. It did run well once I finally got it started. I proceeded to
change all the fluids, fix the wiring and the carburetor that kept it
from starting well, replaced the LF fender from when the PO had run it
into a parked car (possibly because the brakes were so shot that the
rear wheel cylinder pistons were loose in the drums!) completely rebuilt
the brakes and had new tires installed. The flexplate broke shortly
after :( I unloaded the car on an acquaintance for even less money
after the second transmission died due to a busted hose, thanks to the
mechanic that I paid to replace it not informing me that the cooler line
had been patched with fuel line down under the car where I couldn't see it.
The new owner of the car informed me that after she tore it down, she
found that the "recently remanufactured" engine had about 1/4" of crank
endplay. Hmm, ya think that might have been why the flexplate busted?
So anyway my assertion is that at least based on my personal experience,
keeping the endplay at least close to spec is important to having a
reliable vehicle. The sad thing is that had the PO not got boned by the
reman engine, I would have likely had good, cheap, durable (if
unsightly) transportation for as long as I felt like keeping the thing...
nate
--
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
http://members.cox.net/njnagel