First, I believe you want the bar level to minimize roll steer effects.
Second, the Panhard Bar is the only link transferring lateral forces.
The rest of the links are longitudinal with rod ends. The height of the
link mounting to the solid rear axle determines the moment around the
contact patch (or other reference point). The lateral force is the
lateral force threw the rear tires. The chassis mount should only
effect the angle of the bar, and on a long an initially level Panhard
bar this angle is small (for contrast the left upper a arm is 8" long at
15 degrees, the Panhard rod is 33-40 inches long at 0 degrees.)
So, the outer adjustment should have virtually no effect.
Am I right?
David
yes, BUT the bar is not set level initially and the raising and lowering
of the bar also moves the location of the rearend laterally giving some
change in the tracking of the rear end which can loosen or tighten the
car. Teams have been converting to a new adjustable setup that allows
raising and lowering both ends. This has just been adopted this season
as it was introduced around April, I believe from Hutcherson-Pagan, but
I don't remember for sure.
Now here is a question for everyone to chew on...
A stock Monza has a panhard bar which is mounted to the chassis on the
right side and the rearend housing on the left side (which is backwards
to the desired placement). Rules as they are, our division says "NO
altering stock suspension". This means we can't correct it by swapping
things around. So if we adjust the panhard bar backwards to the way one
would be normally adjusted, do we get the same result?
Allen #13
Unfortunately, I cannot give you the Technical Terms to back this up, but I can
give you a "Real World" Testimonial. We converted a 3-Link "Dirt" WISSOTA Super
Stock to run on Asphalt. We swapped the Panhard from being dirt-optimized i.e.
mount to right-tube/left-chassis (like your Monza-I assume) to being Asphalt
optimized i.e. left-tube/right-chassis. The function of Roll Center is what the
panhard height, regardless of angle is controlling(AFAIK) doesn't change either
way you mount it. It is "optimized" for one or the other based on whether the
panhard is in "Tension aka being stretched" or "Compression-being squished".
This is how it was explained to me anyway-hey I just drive the thing. Well...3
weeks into the season, someone who gets beat on a real regular basis, finds
wording in an obscure rule/dimension diagram that the axle tube mount is
supposed to be on the right side. So we changed it back. The other guy kept
losing. The car didn't slow down. The HEIGHT of the CENTER of the panhard still
controlled roll center the same.
Happy Lappin'
Wade Tschida
tsch...@tc.umn.edu
Where the centreline of the panhard rod crosses the car centreline
that is the roll centre.
With a right side body mount bar, when the car turns left and the body
rolls right, the body mount point drops. The left side (on the axle)
stays at the same height. This gives a _lowering_ of the roll centre.
With a left side body mount bar, when the car turns left and the body
rolls right, the body mount point rises. The right side (on the axle)
stays at the same height. This gives a _raising_ of the roll centre.
What do you want it to do?
==
Bob Small
True, but as the car corners, the roll center changes, and the change is
more or less beneficial relative to which side the bar is mounted.
**********************************************
All answers are replies,
but not all replies are answers.
**********************************************
Bob,
The problem is the rear axle doesn't know anything about roll center's.
It only knows about the forces applied by the Panhard rod at the point
of attachment to the axle.
The change of the mounting on the chassis side does not change this
point of attachment, only the angle at which the forces are applied.
Assuming 1500 lbf lateral force through the axle, a 1 inch chassis
height change on a 35 inch bar would amount to 25 lbf vertical force at
the bars attachment point to the axle. This would probably amount to
about 25 ft-lbf of torque around the inner tire's contact patch. Not
much for 11 turns of the screw! There would be no change to the lateral
force (1500 lbf) or the torques resulting from it.
By contrast, lowering the axle attachment point one inch (without
changing the chassis mount) would create 25 lbf downward force, but
reduce the torque around the inside wheel contact point by 125 ft-lbf!!!
David
>> The panhard rod determines the location of the roll centre.
>The problem is the rear axle doesn't know anything about roll center's.
True.
But the sprung mass does. That is what it rolls about.
==
Bob Small
Dan Pinkham <pink...@nh.ultranet.com> wrote in article
<5bqjtl$k...@decius.ultra.net>...
[snip]
> if a control link
>actually fixed the roll center it could cause anti-susspension.
[snip]
Explain please.
What is anti-suspension?
Are you suggesting that a control link configuration that positively
fixed the roll centre would not allow "suspension"?
==
Bob Small