Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Hamlin at Talladega

11 views
Skip to first unread message

John McCoy

unread,
May 3, 2013, 6:23:27 PM5/3/13
to
A while back I posted:

> John McCoy <igo...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
> news:XnsA1907FEB934...@78.46.70.116:
>
> Well, maybe not. There's the off week for Easter, then he'd
> miss Martinsville, Texas, Kansas and Richmond. Next after
> that is Talladega, which is a less physically demanding
> track, and a short race time-wise. So I could see him trying
> to make it back for that race.

Am I good, or what :-)

John

Pete_Zahria

unread,
May 3, 2013, 7:52:24 PM5/3/13
to
"John McCoy" <igo...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
> Am I good, or what :-)
>
> John

Good call, but I still think it's a poor idea.
Risk/Gain factor comes in here, imo, of course..
He has an entire career to think about.
We've seen guys get hurt under cautions.
But.. he knows a lot better than me.


Mike Marlow

unread,
May 3, 2013, 11:03:28 PM5/3/13
to
Yeahbut, awe - hell. These guys make so much in a year that if it all fell
apart they'd comfortably retire in way better shape than 90% of America
today. Then again, there's that infalability of youth...

--

-Mike-
mmarlo...@windstream.net


John McCoy

unread,
May 4, 2013, 8:12:02 AM5/4/13
to
"Pete_Zahria" <Pete_...@nospam.com> wrote in news:km1ijq$5vn$1
@speranza.aioe.org:
I'm going to assume his doctors have told him that the
risk of additional injury in a typical accident is low
(by which I mean, all accidents have a risk of injury,
but the added risk from Hamlin's prior injury is small).

As we don't have access to his medical records, it's
all speculation on our part, of course.

It will be interesting to see how long he stays out
if there isn't an early caution.

John

Pete_Zahria

unread,
May 4, 2013, 9:01:00 AM5/4/13
to

"John McCoy" <igo...@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message

> I'm going to assume his doctors have told him that the
> risk of additional injury in a typical accident is low
> (by which I mean, all accidents have a risk of injury,
> but the added risk from Hamlin's prior injury is small).
>
> As we don't have access to his medical records, it's
> all speculation on our part, of course.
> John

Which is why I said "imo"......
I can't believe that a crash of significant impact
would have no effect on a not fully healed spinal injury*.
Again, that's just an "imo".

*iffin' he was as good as new, there would be no need
for a sub... "imo"...



John McCoy

unread,
May 4, 2013, 11:05:13 AM5/4/13
to
"Pete_Zahria" <Pete_...@nospam.com> wrote in news:km30q8$g8f$1
@speranza.aioe.org:

> *iffin' he was as good as new, there would be no need
> for a sub... "imo"...

True, altho I guess there's a difference between having
a risk of futher injury versus just being painful to sit
in the race car for hours.

I saw somewhere that JGR has built a special Talladega
car with a roof hatch (which is apparently still allowed
by the rules, even tho no-one has used one since Mikey
all those years ago). The plan is for Hamlin to exit
thru the roof hatch, which I guess is easier than going
out thru the window in the normal fashion.

John
0 new messages