Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

HAM nose stud issue "A bit silly"

23 views
Skip to first unread message

geoff

unread,
Oct 2, 2022, 7:40:12 PM10/2/22
to
Nose stud a bit silly in the first place IMHO.

geoff

Sir Tim

unread,
Oct 3, 2022, 2:59:32 AM10/3/22
to
geoff <ge...@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
> Nose stud a bit silly in the first place IMHO.
>
Personally I detest piercing of any sort but I can’t really see why the FIA
should seek to ban Hamilton’s nose stud.

More info here:

https://www.planetf1.com/news/lewis-hamilton-nose-stud-infection/

--
Sir Tim

Alan

unread,
Oct 3, 2022, 3:15:09 AM10/3/22
to
On 2022-10-02 23:59, Sir Tim wrote:
> geoff <ge...@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
>> Nose stud a bit silly in the first place IMHO.
>>
> Personally I detest piercing of any sort but I can’t really see why the FIA
> should seek to ban Hamilton’s nose stud.

I don't know that I'd go as far as "detest"...

..but I agree with the rest.

texas gate

unread,
Oct 3, 2022, 9:31:05 AM10/3/22
to
On Monday, October 3, 2022 at 1:15:09 AM UTC-6, Alan wrote:

> I don't know

your life story
FOAD asshole

Phil Carmody

unread,
Oct 4, 2022, 6:54:09 AM10/4/22
to
Welding yourself to your vanity statement seems a bit silly, but if the
issue is of personal safety we have things called "indeminity
statements" that solve that problem with one scribble. His personal
choice endangers noone else, and there isn't even any evidence it has
endangered even him.

TL;DR: agree

Phil
--
We are no longer hunters and nomads. No longer awed and frightened, as we have
gained some understanding of the world in which we live. As such, we can cast
aside childish remnants from the dawn of our civilization.
-- NotSanguine on SoylentNews, after Eugen Weber in /The Western Tradition/

Alan

unread,
Oct 4, 2022, 1:00:57 PM10/4/22
to
On 2022-10-04 03:54, Phil Carmody wrote:
> Sir Tim <no_e...@invalid.invalid> writes:
>> geoff <ge...@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
>>> Nose stud a bit silly in the first place IMHO.
>>>
>> Personally I detest piercing of any sort but I can’t really see why the FIA
>> should seek to ban Hamilton’s nose stud.
>>
>> More info here:
>>
>> https://www.planetf1.com/news/lewis-hamilton-nose-stud-infection/
>
> Welding yourself to your vanity statement seems a bit silly, but if the
> issue is of personal safety we have things called "indeminity
> statements" that solve that problem with one scribble. His personal
> choice endangers noone else, and there isn't even any evidence it has
> endangered even him.
>
> TL;DR: agree
>
> Phil

Yup.

His choice affects no one else AT ALL.



bra

unread,
Oct 4, 2022, 5:35:59 PM10/4/22
to
"What's that got to do with the price of fish?" as my late father used to retort.

texas gate

unread,
Oct 4, 2022, 9:45:11 PM10/4/22
to
On Tuesday, October 4, 2022 at 11:00:57 AM UTC-6, Alan wrote:

> His choice affects no one else AT ALL.

as usual. you know fuck all.
and shove your queer ass all caps
up your rotten cunthole
0 new messages