Toyota indicates that the backslap in all 1993 Camry’s is normal.
This is noticeable when returning to the accelerator after slowing down
to about 45 mph. Also noticeable when car is parked and running then
move the shifting lever back and forth between reverse and drive
several times and you will experience a loud clunk in the transmission.
Any news on this would be helpful!
Toyota trains their employees to repeat "It's normal, Toyota's just do
that" in response to all reported problems.
--
Steve Sheldon [These are my own opinions] '95 Dodge Neon
Iowa State University ICSS Resource Facility by day '85 Honda Spree
she...@iastate.edu ProMap by night '91 Bridgestone MB5
BEEF! -- Cause the west wasn't won on salad.
Hey there,
I have similiar problems with my 87' Supra. The reverse - drive clunk
ends up being some rubberized check ball in the valve body in the
transmission (yes, very Toyota like). I did however reduce the
shifting clunks by using changing all 7.2 quarts with synthetic trans
fluid (Amsoil). That was 1 week ago, and it keeps on smoothing out as
I drive it.
Tim Jakoboski
I have a 94 V6 XLE and it dosen't exhibit this behavior. I hear / feel
no loud "clunk" in the tramsmission. However I DO get a bit of a "kick"
as the tranny drops out of lockup and then responds to moderate to hard
acceleration, such as when one has to brake hard and swerve around someone
under hard acceleration, but not loud "clunking" noise.
You may have something as simple as a mount that needs tightening.
I reccomend calling the regional factory service representative and ask
about any special service bulletins on the subject. An independent trans-
mission shop might also provide some clues.
/Steve
Andy Jones
ASE Master Tech 241908708JONES
We also have a 95 Toyota Camry LE-V6. While we're on funny tranny
behaviors, I'll add:
1. When the car has set for several hours, I can drive up to 0.6 miles
before it will shift above second gear. (below about 34MPH). After that,
it's normal. The colder, the longer it takes.
2. Cruising at boulevard speeds (45-50), letting off the gas causes a
thump. Annoying when driving in dense traffic where acceleration and
deceleration are frequent. I'd guess this is the tranny dropping out of
lockup mode...?
>> Toyota trains their employees to repeat "It's normal, Toyota's just do
>>that" in response to all reported problems.
They told me this about the 0.6-miles-in-second-gear thing, though they
could only relate it to the tranny staying in non-overdrive mode
automatically for a warm up period, which has nothing to do with second
gear. The point at which it drops out of warm-up mode (non-overdrive) is
always after the second gear thing is over, and is distinctly different.
(Oh, well, maybe I should be happy -- our other car's transmission needed
replacement twice under warranty. No, not a Toyota.)
--
----------------------------
Bill -- thi...@rahul.net "I'd never quote myself." (...me)
I'll take on ANYBODY in a missppelling contest.
My web home page --> http://rahul.net/thinker/
Funny, I owned two and it never was a problem, so be careful when
you use the word "ALL". Furthermore, the material was changed as soon
as it became apparent that the seals could be improved. Remember that
these were small, high-revving engines, and combining this with Americans'
penchant for leaving engines idling for long periods, pushed the limits
of valve-seal materials available at the time. This "problem" certainly
existed in other engines of the period, but may not have been noticed
because the rest of the car may not have lasted as long as a that of a
Rabbit/Scirocco/Dasher/Fox could. On the East coast, rust would
entirely consume a 70s-vintage Japanese car in five years or less.
> They even
>continued to build the same flaw in the car for several years in spite of
>ceratain knowledge of the flaw.
Actually, the material was changed as soon as it became apparent that
it could be improved. But it's hard to put a number on what constitutes
"excessive" oil consumption, and even today we see postings by owners of
new cars who feel that 1 Liter/3000 miles is too much. While I am certain
that over 1 Liter/600 miles is universally recognized as unacceptable,
if the car burns less than that I'm not sure what the consumer can do.
Back to the original topic, we have seen here that Toyota dealers will
describe almost anything as "normal". Remember the Camry sunroof that
allowed water to pour into the interior whenever driven through a car
wash? The woman's dealer claimed it was normal. Yeah, right.
Clunking is not normal, but may be due to causes other than the
transmission, such as a loose/broken motor mount or even a bad
ball-joint.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
John Greenstreet, Senior Engineer (jgre...@motown.ge.com)
Lockheed-Martin Government Electronic Systems Moorestown NJ 08057
WPI Class of '75, Temple Class of '94
My new car history:
1975 1978 1982 1986 1989 1992 1995
VW -> Audi -> Audi -> Mercedes -> Mercedes -> Audi -> Mercedes
Scirocco Fox GTI 4000S 190E 2.3 190E 2.6 100CS S320
POSSLQ's* new car history:
1978 1981 1985 1988 1990 1993
Triumph -> Toyota -> Toyota -> VW -> Audi -> Audi
Spitfire Tercel Corolla Jetta GL 80 90S
*POSSLQ = Person of Opposite Sex Sharing Living Quarters
Note: All Audis and Mercedes above were sold to friends or family.
--------------------------------------------------------------------