Should I reset the timing to 5 degrees ATDC to overcompensate for the
vacuum advance?
Should i be looking for something else that is causing the problem?
Should I leave the distributor's vacuum advance permanently blocked?
Owner of '81, 82, &'83 rabbits and a lot of parts
I have found that certain vehicles with 02 sensors will hesitate slightly if
the mixture is too rich or way too lean. I suspect your engine may need a
CO adjustment to lean it up a tad. CW turning of the CO screw will lean it
up AND please go slowly like 1/8 or 1/4 turn and wait for things to adjust.
OR
I will hope that your engine does not have deposits inside that absorb the
fuel as it is trying to enter the combustion chamber. Some good Top Engine
Cleaner could help reduce that. Or some SeaFoam in the gas tank will give
you a slow cleaning process of both the engine and the fuel system.
What do the spark plug electrodes look like? And which plugs are you
running?
"jfruniontown" <roth...@peoplepc.com> wrote in message
news:1175407972.6...@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
The throttle plates (butterflys) are as clean as a pin, as is the
throttle chamber (assembly wherein the butterfly's are located). The
actual intake air distributor (THE BIG assembly to which the cold
start valve is attached) is dirty, with what i would assume to be
normal soot.
The dwell on the frequency valve is 45 degrees +/- 4 degrees of
fluctuation.
The plugs are autolight 63, with about 2000 miles on them and they
look good, with uniform gray deposits -- not glazed, not too hot,
not covered with ash or carbon deposits.
I have run two bottles of chevron techron thru it over the last 2000
miles.
I have not used any other engine cleaner. I usually run 87 or 89
octane in it, usually 87. The vehicle gets around 26 mpg. I have
always wondered if this was an indication of anything. good-bad-lean-
rich.
When I got this car about 9000 miles ago, it had been sitting in a
barn for 14 years, and it had a lot of problems with fuel delivery,
i.e. return line obstrucyed, gunk in the gas tank, rust in the tank.
I was changing the fuel filter every 200 miles and the gas in the
filter was brown with a lot of tiny rust particles. That has all been
fixed and now i get an appropriate flow of clean fuel.
I added three more feet of vacum line to the ported vacuum line and
it diminished the stumble, ( went from a bad stumble to a slight
stumble).
Do you have a specific recommendation to what you refer to as an
engine top cleaner.
Is it important to have the vacuum advance.
I think he asked if you cleaned the crud off the sensor plate which
sits on top of the fuel distributor.
Have you done the flow test for the injectors as per the Bentley?
Have you removed the injector inserts replacing any broken inserts and
using new orings when reseating the injectors? Are you using the
proper Locktite when replacing the injector inserts?
Yes you need the vacuum advance. Your off idle performance suffers
greatly with no vacuum advance.
On 1 Apr 2007 11:17:50 -0700, "jfruniontown" <roth...@peoplepc.com>
wrote:
Before I ever started the engine I flushed the tank of the debris
(tarballs. etc,) cleaned the in tank screen and lines in the tank, but
as you know it is impossible to get every speck of rust out. I have
an in-line prefilter installed that filters out the rust specks before
they get into the fuel pump, fouling it ang the parts upstream, i.e.
the check valve, accumulator, etc.
The output of the pump is 24oz in 30 seconds at the fuel return line,
while 30 would be perfect, 24 is acceptable, i think. i have run the 4
corona bottles test and the result revealed one less than adequate
injector which was replaced, a second test revealed that the output
was OK.
I installed new plastic injector inserts, & injector o-rings (the
green ones) when i was eradicating all the vacuum leaks. I did not
use loctite, ( a bottle of hi-temp air sealing loctite costs more than
i paid for the car) and there was no leak present, using the propane,
carb cleaner and Stereoscope ( vinly tubing nserted into my ear) test
at each injector.
The fuel distributor (& air flow metering plate) is as clean as a pin
-- i removed it and cleaned it before starting the engine, and it is
still clean 9000 miles later.
WUR/CPR in this car is right on spec --- original one is in my "83 and
it runs fine. i swaped them out to see if there was a difference.
Put some seafoam in the tank today, given the number of miles i
drive it will take a while to go thru a tank of gas.
The stumble can still be from the air flow plate being gunked up or
the plunger in the fuel distributor binding up a bit.Since the air
flow meter plate is clean that is one less thing to look at. If it
cannot move quickly responding to the throttle changes then you will
have some stumble. The Bentley shows the process to remove the plunger
to clean and inspect.
When you were doing the flow test of the injectors did you do just off
idle, part throttle and wide open? I need to send off the injectors in
my truck. I have a lack of power but my catalytic convertor looks ok
from the input side. They are electronic and I have no way to test. I
did toss them in the ultrasonic cleaner which seemed to help a bit but
that could just be my wallet speaking justiying the purchase of an
ultrasonic cleaner. My truck has a clean head and intake as the head
was rebuilt recently enough. That Techron may take some time to clean
up gunked up valves. About the only time I have seen gunk that worried
me on my VWs is the gunk from the egr clogging my intake but we are
not talking about TDIs today.
On 1 Apr 2007 19:44:26 -0700, "jfruniontown" <roth...@peoplepc.com>
wrote:
Two things..
1. Did you try setting the dwell of the frequency valve down to 30 degrees?
2. You have to DRIVE IT!!! And driving it hard should help since I still
think the engine might have deposits in it.
I have seen one cylinder head so clogged with buildup that I was shocked the
vehicle made it to me. After a mechanical cleaning of the head at the
machine shop that car, an '81 or '82 Audi 4000, was getting over 32 mpg.
JMHO
If your cylinder head has deposits...............the deposits will absorb
more fuel coming into the intake area especially when the engine is warm and
the fuel mixture is leaner. Setting the valve at 30 degrees and DRIVING IT
should help get things cleaned up quicker. Or I think that link I had
included in a prior post claims that some people slowly pour SeaFoam into
the intake to clean things up almost instantly. I doubt if your fuel system
is clogged since you have tested it well, so maybe the deposits are causing
the last bit of trouble. ;-)
BTW I saved a non-running Scirocco from the junkyard and it cost $1200 to
get it running perfectly. A quick turn of the key and the engine would
start and purr perfectly at all times.
In the very beginning I pulled the fuel distributor and shot a lot of
carb cleaner into the outlets and inlets, I also let the plunger slip
out (of it's own weight) and cleaned it. I cleaned every part of the
air flow mechanism and relubricated the moving parts, with the result
being that it was and is as clean and pristine as it can be. I also
tried a completely different air box/fuel distributor from a working
'82, thnking that the stumble was the fuel distributor, It was not.
The replacement unit exhibited the same problems. After tyring that I
put the original unit back on, and moved on to the vacuum leaks, which
have been since been eradicated.
30 degrees on the frequency valve, as i understand it, is making the
valve run lean correcting for a rich setting, RIGHT?? which means
that I am making the mixture richer??? clockwise richens up the
mixture. So I need to run rich to help burn up the deposits? I'll
try it, and also the seafoam directly into the throttle body/main
manifold.
Hate to keep asking the question, is the vacuum advance that
important, as it runs great without it.
On 2 Apr 2007 20:20:44 -0700, "jfruniontown" <roth...@peoplepc.com>
wrote:
>Are you positive you have the vacuum hoses correct and it is timed
>correctly? My 80 Rabbit had that vacuum retard and I never had a
>stumble I could recall. If it runs worse with the vacuum hoses
>attached it suggests you have the hoses incorrect.
I agree with checking timing and vacuum routing. 26 mpg
is very low for this vehicle, i'd expect more like 35.
The timing is exactly as described in bentley, there is a small O
for top dead center and a v shaped goldish colored mark to the left of
the O --- to the left three degrees. The label under the hood says 3
degrees plus or minus (+/-) 2 degrees.
I wish I had it mistimed, after the timing belt was installed by a
good mechanic, who timed it, I checked the static timing (with the
marks as described in Bentley) just to make sure that it was on
correctly, and at the static timing points, the O symbol for top dead
center was right in the middle of the timing hole. The three degree
mark was also viewable to the left the the top dead center mark.
Always wondered what decent mileage would be on a CIS engine which was
running correctly.
My Bentley figure 4-11 says 3 degrees after which is to the right of
the 0 mark. The Bentley on page 68 states that the mark to the right
about 6mm is correct for 3 degrees retarded. I do not see anything in
my manual that says 3 degrees advanced. I do see some get 6 BTDC, 7.5
BTDC and 3 ATDC. B is to the left, A is to the right. Right meaning
the firewall and left meaning the radiator.
I check the flywheel timing mark with a long screwdriver in cylinder
1. I slowly turn the crank and watch for TDC. I confirm that the marks
on the flywheel are correct.
On 3 Apr 2007 10:24:48 -0700, "jfruniontown" <roth...@peoplepc.com>
wrote:
Yes you have that correct, except that it may not burn off the deposits, it
may only compensate for them!
The cleaner will help rid your engine of deposits, if there are any.
>
> Hate to keep asking the question, is the vacuum advance that
> important, as it runs great without it.
It is important!
On 8 Apr 2007 15:44:45 -0700, "jfruniontown" <roth...@peoplepc.com>
wrote:
Yeah let us know what happens over time. ;-)
It is the "Italian Tune-up" that helped....really! <g>
I always think that the VW engines need to be driven hard instead of
pampered. My '83 GTI engine still runs smooth and powerful after 230K
miles. I drive it hard but not abusively and it does not need those
cleaners.
AND personally I like the inexpensive fix! ;-)
congrats and thanks for the followup report.
dave
(One out of many daves)
"Jim Behning" <jimbe...@doesthisblockpork.mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:i4aj13h33jl6tkvc3...@4ax.com...
I mess up links all the time but I think this is the link.
http://tech.bentleypublishers.com/thread.jspa?threadID=29631&tstart=0