Ahhhhhhh!!!!!!!! Hi Alvin. Setting up an 009 at idle speeds by turning
it to its fastest idle speed is a surefire way to burn an exhaust valve.
Keep reading....
> I tried all three methods. Static, strobe and by feel (above
> method). I think both the static and strobe net me the same result, but
> by feel, if I let her run the fastest, I think the timing will be in the
> region of 15-20* BTDC. That can't be right, can it?
That's correct, 15-20* BTDC is WAY too much. If you don't have a degree
wheel (pulley), find static TDC (it might not be the notch already
there) and get some chalk. Make chalk marks at 1/8" and 1/4" to the
right of TDC on the pulley (engine not running;). Start and warm the
engine, then time it at one of these two marks, the correct one being
whichever one creates less exhaust heat. HUH! you say? While adjusting
timing to either one of these marks, put your hand in the flow of
exhaust (at the tailpipe) and try to determine which of the two timing
marks makes the exhaust cooler. If you can't tell, or there's no change
in exhaust temperature, use whatever mark makes the engine run smoother.
It's a crude way to time an 009, but if you're not equipped to measure
total advance, it's better err on the side of conservatism.
> Also, I realized that at 10* BTDC, the total advance will be about
> 37*. But the thing is I don't hear any detonation. Is it safe?
As one of the other posters pointed out, it may be fine at idle or
freeway speeds on flat ground, but if you're climbing a steep grade
(under load), you could have detonation problems.
> BTW, my Bug is a '70 std 1600SP, with 009 and 30/31 solex. Is the
> carb too small for it? Can I get a better one without going DP? (Money
> problem.)
If it ain't broke.......well, you know the rest....
--
Robert J. Salvi, Ambiance Acoustics
http://www.calcube.com
San Diego, CA USA
619-485-7514
I read that some guys without a strobe light time their 009s by
turning it till the engine idles fastest. Is that right? Or is opitimal
not necessary the fastest idle?
I tried all three methods. Static, strobe and by feel (above
method). I think both the static and strobe net me the same result, but
by feel, if I let her run the fastest, I think the timing will be in the
region of 15-20* BTDC. That can't be right, can it?
Also, I realized that at 10* BTDC, the total advance will be about
37*. But the thing is I don't hear any detonation. Is it safe?
BTW, my Bug is a '70 std 1600SP, with 009 and 30/31 solex. Is the
carb too small for it? Can I get a better one without going DP? (Money
problem.)
Thank you!
Alvin.
--
___
/___\ My Smurfette
(o\ | /o) is a '70 Beetle.
U-----U Boy, does she Fweem!
Tony
Alvin NG Boon Kim <I_love...@VOCSWorld.com> wrote in article
<36AE6517...@VOCSWorld.com>...
--
P.J.Berg
Ph.# +47 22594552
Fax.#+47 22569587
Mob.#+47 905 67487
E-mail: Berg...@c2i.net
Alvin NG Boon Kim wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I read that some guys without a strobe light time their 009s by
> turning it till the engine idles fastest. Is that right? Or is opitimal
> not necessary the fastest idle?
NEVER time it like that, you noticed yourself how much excess advance it
gave.
If you are stranded in the mioddle of nowhere, with no strobe light or
static light
(a piece of wire and your interior light bulb!!!)
You can time it first to "fastest idle", then turn back so the idle gets
noticeably lower, say 500rpm. You can drive the car to a mechanic or
maybe home for a REAL tuning.
> I tried all three methods. Static, strobe and by feel (above
> method). I think both the static and strobe net me the same result, but
> by feel, if I let her run the fastest, I think the timing will be in the
> region of 15-20* BTDC. That can't be right, can it?
No it can't, it will destroy the engine.
> Also, I realized that at 10* BTDC, the total advance will be about
> 37*. But the thing is I don't hear any detonation. Is it safe?
No, it is NOT safe. You cannot always HEAR detonation. And it doesn't
even occur at all engine loads and rpm, it is worst under heavy load.
> BTW, my Bug is a '70 std 1600SP, with 009 and 30/31 solex. Is the
> carb too small for it? Can I get a better one without going DP? (Money
> problem.)
That carb should be just fine, but if your engine is otherwise stock, I
would recommend replacing the distributor with a late model new one. The
kind that has both vacuum and mechanical advance. That is the best
distributor for your engine, and it will work SOOOO much better than the
009.
The 009 should only be used if you have dual carbs.
Jan
Tony
Per Jørn Berg <berg...@c2i.net> wrote in article
<78lsro$r70$1...@romeo.dax.net>...
>Read the article on the RAMVA FAQ site about timing a 009 under the
>engine section. http://www.ramva.vwmagazine.com
It does seem strange that all the regulars know about the index, but only you
and I ever point people to it.
Gaz
To e-mail me remove the ".nospam"
Visit the RAMVA FAQ index at
http://www.ramva.vwmagazine.com
for all your aircooled VW questions
GazMP wrote:
>
> In article <36ae7e12...@news.mindspring.com>, k...@w-p-c.com (Ken) writes:
>
> >Read the article on the RAMVA FAQ site about timing a 009 under the
> >engine section. http://www.ramva.vwmagazine.com
>
> It does seem strange that all the regulars know about the index, but only you
> and I ever point people to it.
>
> Gaz
I used to be proud for NOT using a .sig file, but I guess I should start
using one. So here goes. Let me know what you ALL think.
Jan
--
Ramva FAQ index http://www.ramva.vwmagazine.com
Ramva members
http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/9772/ramvaworld.html
Ramva Car Show http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/6575/
My Home Page http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/2691/
John
"Per Jørn Berg" wrote:
> The very best way of setting up a 009 is to use a strobe and a degreed
> pulley.Or a strobe with a built in degree dial.Either way you want to rev
> the engine to 3000 rpm. and set the total advance for 34 degrees.The total
> amount adviced will vary with whom you ask ,but this realy pends on the
> quality of fuel used (Octane rating)
> The normal "ballpark" advise ranges from a low 28 to a high 36.You asked
> whether 37 could be harmful since you could not detect any "pinging".You
> will not get detonations before engine is under load.Try a steep hill and
> short shift it (a gear to high) If you hear no knocking now , you are O.K.
>
> --
> P.J.Berg
> Ph.# +47 22594552
> Fax.#+47 22569587
> Mob.#+47 905 67487
> E-mail: Berg...@c2i.net
--
While you capitalists are purging my email and spamming me, don't
forget to include these people:
Fraud Watch: frau...@psinet.com Federal Trade Commission:
ACCC: swee...@accc.gov.au u...@ftc.gov
Oh, and while you're at it, here's a taste of your own medicine!
admin@loopback $LOGIN@localhost $LOGNAME@localhost $USER@localhost
$USER@$HOST -h1024@localhost ro...@mailloop.com
> Let me know what you ALL think.
>
>Jan
>
>--
>Ramva FAQ index http://www.ramva.vwmagazine.com
>Ramva members
>http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/9772/ramvaworld.html
>Ramva Car Show http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/6575/
>My Home Page http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/2691/
>
Lovely.
>I used to be proud for NOT using a .sig file, but I guess I should start
>using one. So here goes. Let me know what you ALL think.
>
>Jan
>
>--
>Ramva FAQ index http://www.ramva.vwmagazine.com
>Ramva members
>http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/9772/ramvaworld.html
>Ramva Car Show http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/6575/
>My Home Page http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/2691/
>
Mike F
98 GTI VR6
On the lookout for a pre 68 Bug
<Remove "nospam" in email address to reply>
>
>In article <36ae7e12...@news.mindspring.com>, k...@w-p-c.com (Ken) writes:
>
>>Read the article on the RAMVA FAQ site about timing a 009 under the
>>engine section. http://www.ramva.vwmagazine.com
>
>It does seem strange that all the regulars know about the index, but only you
>and I ever point people to it.
>
>
>Gaz
>To e-mail me remove the ".nospam"
>Visit the RAMVA FAQ index at
>http://www.ramva.vwmagazine.com
>for all your aircooled VW questions
I believe you are correct.
Ken