Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Identifying Rocker Arms

915 views
Skip to first unread message

chris....@deltasolutions.com

unread,
Mar 25, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/25/98
to

I have a question that hopefully someone with more engine re-building
experience can answer. Is there some way to tell a standard 1.1:1 rocker
from a 1.25:1 or a 1.4:1 by just looking at them? I have a pair of junk 041
heads (serious cracks) that came off of an engine that was in my Thing when I
purchased it. I recently pulled the rocker arms off getting ready to toss
the heads, and was wondering what kind they were. They were on a heavy duty
rocker shaft (bolted ends, not clips). The markings on them are similar to
the following:

46E <SPACE> <SINGLE NUMBER> <SPACE> <VW Logo> <SPACE> <SNGL. NUMBER>

e.g. 46E 1 VW 3

The heads were from CB Performance and I know they sell a HD rocker shaft so
I called them and asked if they could identify the rockers or tell me if
their rockers had any distinguishing markings I could look for. The woman I
talked to basically said no. (so much for product knowledge) In any case, I
was wondering if anyone else out there could help. Any info would be
appreciated.

Thanks,
-Chris
'73 Thing
'97 Jetta Trek

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/ Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading

DesertAuto

unread,
Mar 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/26/98
to

In article <6fbc0j$f5k$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, chris....@deltasolutions.com
writes:

>The heads were from CB Performance and I know they sell a HD rocker shaft so
>I called them and asked if they could identify the rockers or tell me if
>their rockers had any distinguishing markings I could look for. The woman I
>talked to basically said no. (so much for product knowledge)

CB Performance sells VW 1.25 rocker arms. They look like stock arms and you
can't tell them apart. You have to put one side by side with a stock on and
see if they are the same. The casting numbers won't tell you anything.


darryl
Desert AutoHaus
16574 D Street
Victorville, CA 92392
760-243-1868

Mr.MoparA.K.A.Dave

unread,
Mar 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/26/98
to

chris....@deltasolutions.com wrote:
>
> I have a question that hopefully someone with more engine re-building
> experience can answer. Is there some way to tell a standard 1.1:1 rocker
> from a 1.25:1 or a 1.4:1 by just looking at them? I have a pair of junk 041
> heads (serious cracks) that came off of an engine that was in my Thing when I
> purchased it. I recently pulled the rocker arms off getting ready to toss
> the heads, and was wondering what kind they were. They were on a heavy duty
> rocker shaft (bolted ends, not clips). The markings on them are similar to
> the following:
>
> 46E <SPACE> <SINGLE NUMBER> <SPACE> <VW Logo> <SPACE> <SNGL. NUMBER>
>
> e.g. 46E 1 VW 3
>
> The heads were from CB Performance and I know they sell a HD rocker shaft so
> I called them and asked if they could identify the rockers or tell me if
> their rockers had any distinguishing markings I could look for. The woman I
> talked to basically said no. (so much for product knowledge) In any case, I
> was wondering if anyone else out there could help. Any info would be
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
You also forgot the 1.0:1 Rockers.The only way to tel them apart is to
place them on a shaft & visually inspect the location of the piviot
point & the length of the rocker.The longer the more ratio.The shorter
the less ratio.
Dave.

jd...@lehigh.edu

unread,
Mar 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/26/98
to

In article <351AA8...@yahoo.com>, "Mr.MoparA.K.A.Dave" <Mr.M...@yahoo.com>
writes:

>You also forgot the 1.0:1 Rockers.The only way to tel them apart is to
>place them on a shaft & visually inspect the location of the piviot
>point & the length of the rocker.The longer the more ratio.The shorter
>the less ratio.
>Dave.
>

Not true Dave, it's easy to tell the 1.1:1 from the 1.0:1 rockers by casting
features. The 1.1 has two lines cast above the hub and the 1.0 is plain in
this area. Check it out.

John Caffrey

John Connolly

unread,
Mar 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/26/98
to

1.25 rockers have the pushrod hole machined CLOSER to the rocker shaft than the 1.1
or 1.0 rocker arms. They are also stamped (all the ones I have seen) with the
VW/Audi symbol on them, which I have NOT seen on the regular rocker arms.

John

BTW, I have a set with less than 500 miles on them, completely shimmed with bolt on
rocker shafts ( and adjusted properly, and broken in) that I will sell for $115 if
someone is interested.

Mr.MoparA.K.A.Dave wrote:

> chris....@deltasolutions.com wrote:
> >
> > I have a question that hopefully someone with more engine re-building
> > experience can answer. Is there some way to tell a standard 1.1:1 rocker
> > from a 1.25:1 or a 1.4:1 by just looking at them? I have a pair of junk 041
> > heads (serious cracks) that came off of an engine that was in my Thing when I
> > purchased it. I recently pulled the rocker arms off getting ready to toss
> > the heads, and was wondering what kind they were. They were on a heavy duty
> > rocker shaft (bolted ends, not clips). The markings on them are similar to
> > the following:
> >
> > 46E <SPACE> <SINGLE NUMBER> <SPACE> <VW Logo> <SPACE> <SNGL. NUMBER>
> >
> > e.g. 46E 1 VW 3
> >
> > The heads were from CB Performance and I know they sell a HD rocker shaft so
> > I called them and asked if they could identify the rockers or tell me if
> > their rockers had any distinguishing markings I could look for. The woman I
> > talked to basically said no. (so much for product knowledge) In any case, I
> > was wondering if anyone else out there could help. Any info would be
> > appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,

Mr.MoparA.K.A.Dave

unread,
Mar 27, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/27/98
to jd...@lehigh.edu

jd...@Lehigh.EDU wrote:
>
> In article <351AA8...@yahoo.com>, "Mr.MoparA.K.A.Dave" <Mr.M...@yahoo.com>
> writes:
>
> >You also forgot the 1.0:1 Rockers.The only way to tel them apart is to
> >place them on a shaft & visually inspect the location of the piviot
> >point & the length of the rocker.The longer the more ratio.The shorter
> >the less ratio.
> >Dave.
> >
> Not true Dave, it's easy to tell the 1.1:1 from the 1.0:1 rockers by casting
> features. The 1.1 has two lines cast above the hub and the 1.0 is plain in
> this area. Check it out.
>
> John Caffrey
Not entirely True John,
I had a set of 1.00:1 on one side of one of my old engine & a set of
1.1:1's on the other side!These rockers look identical to each other.Go
figure?I noticed this when I tore the 1500 apart for a rebuild.
Dave.

jd...@lehigh.edu

unread,
Mar 27, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/27/98
to

In article <351BAD...@yahoo.com>, "Mr.MoparA.K.A.Dave" <Mr.M...@yahoo.com>
writes:
How did you identify those rockers as 1.1:1 or 1.0:1 ratio?

John Caffrey

Mr.MoparA.K.A.Dave

unread,
Mar 27, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/27/98
to

As I was reinstalling them I was checking the Valve lift with a dial
indicator on the Valve spring retainer to get a idea of the total lift
at the valve when I noticed the difference.I did remove the rockers fron
their shafts & installed them the same way that I took them off.If i
diddn't use a dial indicator I'd probablly never of known.
Dave.

jd...@lehigh.edu

unread,
Mar 27, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/27/98
to

In article <351BD4...@yahoo.com>, "Mr.MoparA.K.A.Dave" <Mr.M...@yahoo.com>
writes:
Think about all the variables that affect your lift at the valve measurements
i.e. rocker stand height, how far the shaft is from the valve, valve depths,
pushrod length, adjuster length and geometry, and mfg tolerance on the rocker
dimensions themselves. It is not uncommon for the actual ratio to vary and the
ratio is not constant throughout it's arc of movement. Adjuster geometry
(Differing amounts of radius) makes a huge difference in lift at the valve.
The discussion was about casting ID and has now come full circle, which
castings were you checking? Did you really have two different rocker castings
on that engine?

John Caffrey

Mr.MoparA.K.A.Dave

unread,
Mar 27, 1998, 3:00:00 AM3/27/98
to jd...@lehigh.edu

Think about all the variables that affect your lift at the valve
measurements
>i.e. rocker stand height, how far the shaft is from the valve, valve depths,
>pushrod length(All the same length (even the tips!), adjuster length and geometry (Measured), and mfg tolerance on the rocker
>dimensions themselves (.020 max). It is not uncommon for the actual ratio to vary and the

>ratio is not constant throughout it's arc of movement. Adjuster geometry

No kidding i said to get a IDEA.Not a percise figure.
>(Differing amounts of radius) makes a huge difference in lift at the valve.It's because of their building procedure.


>The discussion was about casting ID and has now come full circle, which
>castings were you checking? Did you really have two different rocker castings
>on that engine?
>
> John Caffrey

Yep.

0 new messages