Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Tire Pressure

686 views
Skip to first unread message

Lynn Martin

unread,
May 2, 2005, 11:53:27 AM5/2/05
to
I just got some new Kuhmo Tires, 165/80/15, (great deals for $26 a piece on
the net!) for my 1974 Superbeetle.

Anyhow, I am going to get them mounted/etc. The "recommended tire
pressure" listed on the glove compartment door says Front - 18 psi and Rear
29 psi. This seems too low to me, especially in the front tires.

Just wondering what pressures everyone else is running in a stock size tire?

Lynn
1974 Super


Hal

unread,
May 2, 2005, 1:00:34 PM5/2/05
to

On my 74 super I usually run 35psi all around. I probably have the
fronts a little over-inflated, but I have never noted any abnormal wear
so I just leave it at 35.

I think(I could be mistaken) that the pressures listed on the glovebox
door are for bias-ply tires. All I've ever run is radial tires.

Chris

Jim O'Malley (KCIT/KCPN)

unread,
May 2, 2005, 1:09:16 PM5/2/05
to
Nope, follow the recommended pressures -- and don't trust the tire boys to
remember!

Most Detroit iron has a fairly even weight distribution pattern, squaring
the car's weight between the front and rear. Beetles only have a third of
the curb weight riding on the front tires. Overinflating the fronts has the
effect of changing your 165/15s into 95/16s -- not enough weight to maintain
full footprint contact with the road.

This concept will be painfully obvious if you live anywhere with wind. You
think Chicago is the windy city? Try Amarillo TX. Last time I put new tires
on my '74 Super, I specifically asked them to inflate to 18psi/29psi. They
didn't, putting in 32psi all the way 'round. I hit the freeway and grabbed
the next exit as a relatively calm15mph crosswind made the car undriveable.

Jim O'Malley / http://vwfilms.net/

"Lynn Martin" <jamesly...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:lXrde.122839$f%4.9...@bignews1.bellsouth.net...

Dan Smith

unread,
May 2, 2005, 7:03:23 PM5/2/05
to

"Lynn Martin" <jamesly...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:lXrde.122839$f%4.9...@bignews1.bellsouth.net...

Follow your Owner's Manual to the letter!

I've read too many warnings about how you should never inflate your tires to
a higher pressure than what VW says, ESPECIALLY THE FRONT TIRES!!! It's
DANGEROUS!!! You've been WARNED...TWICE.

Glenn

unread,
May 2, 2005, 7:09:54 PM5/2/05
to
where on the web did find the tires?
"Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%kyde.42148$r53.32517@attbi_s21...

Dan Smith

unread,
May 2, 2005, 7:28:07 PM5/2/05
to

"Hal" <halat...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1115053234.1...@l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

GEEEEZ!!! You're running at 35psi all the way around??? Are you
suicidal???

You're tires are probably rated at a maximum of 35psi. That's fine if
you're just going to leave it parked in the garage or in the shade.

You put yourself in the car and the pressure goes up. You drive for more
than a couple of minutes and the pressure goes up more. You're probably
driving around with close to 38psi in tires rated at 35psi.

Where in the world did you get the idea that this was an OK thing to do???
Why are you intentionally ignoring the safety ratings of your tires and the
car manufacturers recommendations???


Lynn Martin

unread,
May 2, 2005, 9:24:58 PM5/2/05
to
> where on the web did find the tires?

Here:

http://www.tirerack.com/

Kumho Power Star 758

for your 1974 Volkswagen Beetle Load Rating: SL

Size: 165/80TR15 Blackwall

TR Speed Rated Price: $26

Estimated Availability: In Stock


Kumho usually makes excellent racing tires, and I have heard good reviews of
them.


Lynn
1974 Superbeetle

Shag

unread,
May 2, 2005, 9:04:27 PM5/2/05
to
On Mon, 02 May 2005 23:28:07 GMT, "Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com>
wrote:


>
>GEEEEZ!!! You're running at 35psi all the way around??? Are you
>suicidal???
>
>You're tires are probably rated at a maximum of 35psi. That's fine if
>you're just going to leave it parked in the garage or in the shade.
>
>You put yourself in the car and the pressure goes up. You drive for more
>than a couple of minutes and the pressure goes up more. You're probably
>driving around with close to 38psi in tires rated at 35psi.
>
>Where in the world did you get the idea that this was an OK thing to do???
>Why are you intentionally ignoring the safety ratings of your tires and the
>car manufacturers recommendations???
>

Calm down, dude!!! Next step is for your post to be in ALL CAPS!!!
When you use multiple !!!!!!!s and ?????s you come off as frantic
and/or annoying!!! NOW EXCUSE ME WHILE I GO PUMP MY TIRES UP TO 40
PSI ALL AROUND!!!
ps- You misspelled "your."
Think about it... "you're" = "you are"
"You are tires are probably rated at....."
Question: Does that make sense?
Answer: No.

"Stupid people are funny." - me

Lynn Martin

unread,
May 2, 2005, 9:33:14 PM5/2/05
to
> Follow your Owner's Manual to the letter!
>
> I've read too many warnings about how you should never inflate your tires
> to
> a higher pressure than what VW says, ESPECIALLY THE FRONT TIRES!!! It's
> DANGEROUS!!! You've been WARNED...TWICE.

Ok, Ok! I get it! :-)

I got them back from the auto place, and of course, they all had 32 psi in
them. I deflated the fronts to 18, and the backs to 29.

Lynn
1974 Superbeetle


Mike64Bug

unread,
May 2, 2005, 9:41:14 PM5/2/05
to
The 18/29 psi applies to the original equipment bias ply tires only.(which you
don't have anymore) Radial tires have always required more air pressure
than the same size bias ply tire. 18 psi in a radial tire would be dangerously
low. Radial tires are not supposed to have a bulge in the sidewall when you
look at them from the front or back like a lot of people seem to think.
On the other hand max pressure(35psi) for a radial tire that size would be a
bit too much unless you were carrying a ton of extra weight. You'll probably
find that mid twenties in the front works well.
>>>Mike

Lynn Martin

unread,
May 2, 2005, 10:05:02 PM5/2/05
to
The Bentley Manual (1970-79) sez:

------------------------------------------
Conventional Tire Inflation Pressures (Bias ply):

Beetle, Ghia, to December 1972; 1970 Convertible; With 1-2 persons - 16 psi
Front, 24 psi Rear; Fully loaded - 17 psi Front, 26 psi Rear

Super Beetle, Convertible from 1971 up to Dec. 1972; With 1-2 persons - 16
psi Front, 27 psi Rear; Fully loaded - 18 psi Front, 27 psi Rear

All models, from Jan. 1973; With 1-2 persons - 18 psi Front, 29 psi Rear;
Fully loaded - 18 psi Front, 29 psi Rear

--------------------------------------

Radial Tire Inflation Pressures (Radial ply)

Beetle, Ghia, to December 1972; 1970 Convertible; With 1-2 persons - 18 psi
Front, 27 psi Rear; Fully loaded - 18 psi Front, 27 psi Rear

Super Beetle, Convertible from 1971 up to Dec. 1972; With 1-2 persons - 18
psi Front, 27 psi Rear; Fully loaded - 18 psi Front, 27 psi Rear

All models, from Jan. 1973; With 1-2 persons - 18 psi Front, 29 psi Rear;
Fully loaded - 18 psi Front, 29 psi Rear

- NOTE: Increase the pressures in conventional bias ply tires by 3 psi for
prolonged high speeds but never exceed the maximum tire inflation pressure
designated on the tire sidewall.


Glove compartment in my 74 super sez 18/29 for bias and radial. I was just
wondering if these values were right or not. Probably wouldn't hurt to have
mid 20's pressures. But it would probably drive like a tractor any higher.

Thanks for everyone's help!

Lynn
1974 Superbeetle

"Mike64Bug" <mfkoch...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:_EAde.3154$7F4....@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...

Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 2, 2005, 11:21:42 PM5/2/05
to

"Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bIyde.42166$r53.25669@attbi_s21...

>
> >
>
> GEEEEZ!!! You're running at 35psi all the way around??? Are you
> suicidal???
>
> You're tires are probably rated at a maximum of 35psi. That's fine if
> you're just going to leave it parked in the garage or in the shade.
>
> You put yourself in the car and the pressure goes up. You drive for more
> than a couple of minutes and the pressure goes up more. You're probably
> driving around with close to 38psi in tires rated at 35psi.
>
> Where in the world did you get the idea that this was an OK thing to do???
> Why are you intentionally ignoring the safety ratings of your tires and
the
> car manufacturers recommendations???
>


dude calm down..its obvious you are no tire tech so maybe read your sidewall
sometime...the max psi is listed as a cold temp....this pressure is set with
a tollerance for an increase in pressure due to heat....it is not uncommon
to gain up to 5-6 psi in summer weather on the interstate, and the tire
manufacturers know it.....so don't have a stroke, your point is not only
wrong, but basically pointless....(BTW "put yourself in the car the pressure
goes up" is incorrect too...the max weight is also what the max pressure is
designed for...sheesh...)


Dan Smith

unread,
May 2, 2005, 11:42:14 PM5/2/05
to

"Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:f7Cde.1260$sy6.76@lakeread04...

So Joey, are you saying the tire manufacturer knows more about the air
pressure I should have in my tires than the car manufacturer knows? Hardly!

My point is 35psi is a lot of pressure over the recommended front tire
pressure on the car. Are you saying this is OK? Because it's not. It's
flat out dangerous. It's almost double the recommended pressure. It's
unsafe. It's WRONG!

So don't tell me my point is wrong.


Dan Smith

unread,
May 2, 2005, 11:45:29 PM5/2/05
to

"Lynn Martin" <jamesly...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:uXAde.151558$vK6.1...@bignews3.bellsouth.net...

Lynn, the pressures you posted are right. Mike is making up nonsense.


Dan Smith

unread,
May 3, 2005, 12:33:58 AM5/3/05
to

"Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:f7Cde.1260$sy6.76@lakeread04...
>

Oh, and the max pressure isn't listed as a cold temp, it's listed as a max
pressure. Max means max.

The normal car manufacturer's tire pressure recommendation is the cold
inflation pressure you're thinking of.

Yes, while driving it's not uncommon for the tire to gain pressure in the
summer weather or in cold weather either. And that was my point. If
someone is foolish enough to air up their tires to the maximum then they
have no leeway for normal pressure increases due to load and friction.

You also said, ""put yourself in the car the pressure
goes up" is incorrect ".

Who are you trying to BS? Of course the tire pressure goes up as the load
increases. You're talking nonsense.

Since you don't think tire pressure goes up as the load goes up you
definitely don't know what you're talking about.

If I air up my tires to the car manufacturer's recommended pressures and
then I put 400 pounds of people in the car obviously the tire pressure goes
up.


Jim Adney

unread,
May 3, 2005, 12:24:13 AM5/3/05
to
On Mon, 2 May 2005 10:53:27 -0500 "Lynn Martin"
<jamesly...@bellsouth.net> wrote:

>I just got some new Kuhmo Tires, 165/80/15, (great deals for $26 a piece on
>the net!) for my 1974 Superbeetle.
>
>Anyhow, I am going to get them mounted/etc. The "recommended tire
>pressure" listed on the glove compartment door says Front - 18 psi and Rear
>29 psi. This seems too low to me, especially in the front tires.

The sticker is correct. You could add a couple of pounds to each,
especially if the car is heavily loaded, but don't inflate it the same
as your Chevy. The reason the front tires get so little pressure is
that they have so little weight on them.

-
-----------------------------------------------
Jim Adney jad...@vwtype3.org
Madison, WI 53711 USA
-----------------------------------------------

tricky

unread,
May 3, 2005, 3:58:43 AM5/3/05
to
I may have been wrong for years... I learned ( I think from the AA
(AAA) ) that before a long journey, to put a couple of extra pounds in
your tyres. When they warm up, they soften and need more air.

As for loading up your car, 'my' thoughts were, a given volume of air in
a given space, give a constant pressure. For it to go up 'much' when
you load the car, you would have to see a serious flat spot (less space)
on the bottom of the tyre.

I havent looked recently, but I thought the MAX pressure was like 135psi
or something way up there ?

Just my thoughts

Rich

Jan Andersson

unread,
May 3, 2005, 5:09:49 AM5/3/05
to
tricky wrote:
>
> I may have been wrong for years... I learned ( I think from the AA
> (AAA) ) that before a long journey, to put a couple of extra pounds in
> your tyres. When they warm up, they soften and need more air.


Air is a gas, which when heated, expands.
On race cars, tire pressures are sometimes critical. You put a certain
pressure in the tires before the race,
and when you immediately measure the tire pressure during the first
seconds of pitstop, you will find that the tire pressures have increased
by 50% easily.
Granted, in that environment the race slicks also get much hotter than
you'd ever see your street tires get...


Jan (Race car mechanic)

Tim Rogers

unread,
May 3, 2005, 6:04:50 AM5/3/05
to
"Jim Adney" <jad...@vwtype3.org> wrote in message
news:65vd711j7lbtnsce7...@4ax.com...

>
> The sticker is correct. You could add a couple of pounds to each,
> especially if the car is heavily loaded, but don't inflate it the same
> as your Chevy. The reason the front tires get so little pressure is
> that they have so little weight on them.
>
>

...................Correct! And if the front tires are larger than the std.
165's, they should have less pressure, not more. My '77 has 185/65-15's on
the front and I've been running 16 psi for about 10,000 miles now. These
tires are wearing evenly and handle superbly even when cornering and braking
hard. With no front bumper, There is only about 425 lbs. load on each front
tire which is way way below the load rating of these tires. A tire's
cross-section shape is determined by the load and the pressure working to
counteract the other and less load always requires less pressure to maintain
the optimal shape that maximises the contact patch on the pavement while not
sacrificing the structural integrity of the tire. Formula 1 racing cars use
less than 25 psi on the front tires I read somewhere because they have large
profiles and only 200 lbs. load per front tire at rest and still only about
800 lbs. load per tire from the downforce generated by the wings & spoilers
that are used to increase traction at 200 mph! The worst aspect of this
'theory' that the front tires on a bug should be inflated to the twenty or
thirty psi range is that the tread's grip during braking and cornering goes
way down. I've done a lot of 'seat of the pants' experimenting with this
question over the years and I drive like a maniac sometimes. This goes
beyond everyone's right to their own opinion for me because I've seen
through direct experience that overinflated front tires on a bug are a
direct cause for loss of control at high speeds when cornering and braking.
When the road is wet, this loss of tire grip from overinflated tires is even
worse.


Tom Nakashima

unread,
May 3, 2005, 10:49:47 AM5/3/05
to

"Jim Adney" <jad...@vwtype3.org> wrote in message
news:65vd711j7lbtnsce7...@4ax.com...

It was overwhelming for me when I first saw the listed tire pressure for my
'66 bug. I had to question the settings also, when I was used to inflating
the tires on my other vehicles at 32 psi. I'm putting in 20 psi front, and
28 psi rear in my Bug. My car handles better and rides a lot smoother at
these tire pressures, however I'm not a racer and never intended to drive
the VW fast.
Rob and Dave's VW website have experimented with tire pressures, I also got
to speak with Rob by phone not only on tires but other related VW matters as
well. I really like Rob for his expertise and honesty on VW's. Since he's
done most of the research, I'll trust his recommendations.
http://www.vw-resource.com/tires.html#pressure
-tom


tricky

unread,
May 3, 2005, 3:52:16 PM5/3/05
to
Ok checked today.

I was way off on the max pressures !!!

My bug/beetle tyres have a max PSI of 44 and my bus 65.

Still more than 35 though :-)

Rich

Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 3, 2005, 5:08:46 PM5/3/05
to

"Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:WaDde.42812$r53.30945@attbi_s21...

> Oh, and the max pressure isn't listed as a cold temp, it's listed as a max
> pressure. Max means max.

*before* you try to "call someone out" you should study up....i was
certified years ago for suspensions....alignment/brakes/tires/etc...i have
been to school and trained....the max pressure is measured at ambient
temperature, I.E. *COLD*....


>
> The normal car manufacturer's tire pressure recommendation is the cold
> inflation pressure you're thinking of.

no buttlips it is a "standard"....just as you do not check your engine oil
with the engine runing you check air pressure "cold"...


>
> Yes, while driving it's not uncommon for the tire to gain pressure in the
> summer weather or in cold weather either. And that was my point. If
> someone is foolish enough to air up their tires to the maximum then they
> have no leeway for normal pressure increases due to load and friction.

load does not increase pressure....not air pressure...surface pressure yes,
but not the internal air pressure

>
> You also said, ""put yourself in the car the pressure
> goes up" is incorrect ".
>
> Who are you trying to BS? Of course the tire pressure goes up as the load
> increases. You're talking nonsense.

i'm talking from education and training...you are spouting off bullshit....

>
> Since you don't think tire pressure goes up as the load goes up you
> definitely don't know what you're talking about.
>
> If I air up my tires to the car manufacturer's recommended pressures and
> then I put 400 pounds of people in the car obviously the tire pressure
goes
> up.
>

there are two ways to increase pressure...to add it(through more air or
heat ) or to make the space smaller....you will not resize your tires by
adding weight...you only displace air in the tire from one area to another
when it is loaded down....so to quote you "you definitely don't know what
you are talking about"....get educated before you spout off...


Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 3, 2005, 5:08:50 PM5/3/05
to

"Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qqCde.43596$c24.10859@attbi_s72...

learn to comprehend what you read...i never said anything remotely similar
to what you said above...

>
> My point is 35psi is a lot of pressure over the recommended front tire
> pressure on the car. Are you saying this is OK? Because it's not. It's
> flat out dangerous. It's almost double the recommended pressure. It's
> unsafe. It's WRONG!
>
> So don't tell me my point is wrong.
>
>

your point was wrong...exactly what i responded to was wrong....couldn't get
anymore wrong...re-read it and don't take it personal...ignorance is lack of
knowledge and apparently when it comes to tires you do lack that
knowledge...putting weight in the vehicle will not increase pressure....and
every "point" i wrote is true and verifiable....and as i said read the side
of tires sometime you may be enlightened....


Dan Smith

unread,
May 3, 2005, 7:59:13 PM5/3/05
to

"Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:QbSde.1330$sy6.20@lakeread04...

Wrong!


Dan Smith

unread,
May 3, 2005, 8:01:19 PM5/3/05
to

"Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:HLRde.1324$sy6.1135@lakeread04...

What are you smoking???

According to what you're saying I can't pop a balloon by stepping on it.

Dream on!


Shag

unread,
May 3, 2005, 8:01:41 PM5/3/05
to
On Tue, 03 May 2005 23:59:13 GMT, "Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>Wrong!

Well... it's tough to argue with an intelligent argument like that.
*watches tumbleweed blow by*

Dan Smith

unread,
May 3, 2005, 8:51:03 PM5/3/05
to

"Shag" <travist67_...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a54g71leh9gmfmen5...@4ax.com...

I prefer the following:

"Stupid people are dangerous."


Shag

unread,
May 3, 2005, 9:06:59 PM5/3/05
to
On Wed, 04 May 2005 00:51:03 GMT, "Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>
>"Shag" <travist67_...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:a54g71leh9gmfmen5...@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 03 May 2005 23:59:13 GMT, "Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Wrong!
>>
>> Well... it's tough to argue with an intelligent argument like that.
>> *watches tumbleweed blow by*
>>
>> "Stupid people are funny." - me
>
>I prefer the following:
>
>"Stupid people are dangerous."
>

You are funny.

Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 3, 2005, 9:39:28 PM5/3/05
to

"Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:jhUde.50664$c24.50002@attbi_s72...

>
>
> What are you smoking???
>
> According to what you're saying I can't pop a balloon by stepping on it.
>
> Dream on!
>
>

no sir...your reading comprehension and single digit IQ have comdemned you
to ignorance....the balloon thing is actually a very good example of what i
am saying....if you step on the balloon it will pop...we all know this...but
its not due to pressure increasing....so as you say "dream on"....(hint just
for you dipshit, you displace the air(as i stated in the actual *RELEVANT*
reply) and it distorts/thins the balloon which is why the failure
happens...has a big fat ZERO thing to do with your dreamworld
statements....the air pressure in the balloon remains constant....and it
overpowers the surface strength....if you would like your ASE certifications
in suspension/brakes/etc, you will have to do the time and classes as *I*
did...now take your lumps and move on you ignorant little troll....


Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 3, 2005, 9:40:48 PM5/3/05
to

"Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:lfUde.50826$WI3.12617@attbi_s71...

> Wrong!
>
>

i say i'm correct...if you feel otherwise the "burden of proof" falls on
you...so put up or shut up..i prefer you put up so i can continue laughing
at the puppy that came off the porch....you are a fucking amateur and not
even a shadetree grade "mechanic"..... what a dumbfuck


Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 3, 2005, 9:42:05 PM5/3/05
to

"Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:X%Ude.50839$c24.16694@attbi_s72...

>
> I prefer the following:
>
> "Stupid people are dangerous."
>
>

you are not dangerous...except to society if you reproduce...and im sure you
will/have as most ignorant fucks are too ignorant to use proper birth
control....


Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 3, 2005, 9:55:52 PM5/3/05
to

$sy6.563@lakeread04...

>
> "Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:jhUde.50664$c24.50002@attbi_s72...
> >
> >
> > What are you smoking???
> >
> > According to what you're saying I can't pop a balloon by stepping on it.
> >
> > Dream on!
> >
> >
>
> no sir...your reading comprehension and single digit IQ have comdemned
you
> to ignorance....the balloon thing is actually a very good example of what
i
> am saying....if you step on the balloon it will pop...we all know
this...but
> its not due to pressure increasing....

as a follow up, please Dan-d-man tell me why a helium balloon will burst
when you release it into the "sky"?....the pressure inside the balloon
decreases the higher it goes..but it still ruptures....or can you not wrap
your brain cell around this either?


Lynn Martin

unread,
May 3, 2005, 10:44:08 PM5/3/05
to
Nobody even noticed that I spelled Kumho wrong! hee hee

I am glad I take Zoloft. We all should after this thread! haha!

Lynn
1974 Super


"Lynn Martin" <jamesly...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message

news:lXrde.122839$f%4.9...@bignews1.bellsouth.net...


>I just got some new Kuhmo Tires, 165/80/15, (great deals for $26 a piece on
>the net!) for my 1974 Superbeetle.
>
> Anyhow, I am going to get them mounted/etc. The "recommended tire
> pressure" listed on the glove compartment door says Front - 18 psi and
> Rear 29 psi. This seems too low to me, especially in the front tires.
>

> Just wondering what pressures everyone else is running in a stock size
> tire?
>

> Lynn
> 1974 Super
>


Scott H

unread,
May 3, 2005, 11:18:33 PM5/3/05
to
"Lynn Martin" wrote ...

> I just got some new Kuhmo Tires, 165/80/15, (great deals for $26 a piece on
> the net!) for my 1974 Superbeetle.
>
> Anyhow, I am going to get them mounted/etc. The "recommended tire
> pressure" listed on the glove compartment door says Front - 18 psi and Rear
> 29 psi. This seems too low to me, especially in the front tires.
>
> Just wondering what pressures everyone else is running in a stock size tire?

I run 19 front/27 rear, just like the glovebox sticker says.
165/80 tires on a '72 Super.

--
Scott


Jan Andersson

unread,
May 4, 2005, 1:16:15 AM5/4/05
to

Kuhmo is the largest (by surface area) city in Finland :)


Jan

Adam

unread,
May 4, 2005, 6:48:25 AM5/4/05
to
On Tue, 03 May 2005 21:55:52 -0400, Joey Tribiani wrote:

> as a follow up, please Dan-d-man tell me why a helium balloon will burst
> when you release it into the "sky"?....the pressure inside the balloon
> decreases the higher it goes..but it still ruptures....or can you not wrap
> your brain cell around this either?

A bird flew into it?

Tom Nakashima

unread,
May 4, 2005, 9:37:05 AM5/4/05
to

"Jan Andersson" <bug...@rocketcom.mail> wrote in message
news:42785A9F...@rocketcom.mail...

>
> Kuhmo is the largest (by surface area) city in Finland :)
>
>
> Jan
>
>
> Lynn Martin wrote:
> >
> > Nobody even noticed that I spelled Kumho wrong! hee hee
> >
> > I am glad I take Zoloft. We all should after this thread! haha!
> >

All this time, I thought Kuhmo was a sushi.
I have four of those Kuhmo's and a beer please.
-tom


Joao Eliseu

unread,
May 4, 2005, 12:27:22 PM5/4/05
to
I run 21 front/30 on rear. Best setup I found...
Joao

72 Super 1302

Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 4, 2005, 12:09:27 PM5/4/05
to

"Adam" <nn...@snika.uklinux.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.05.04....@snika.uklinux.net...

Adam i hope you are just kidding...the above example can be found in most
grade school science books....


Hal

unread,
May 4, 2005, 12:38:42 PM5/4/05
to
> GEEEEZ!!! You're running at 35psi all the way around??? Are you
> suicidal???

No Dan, I am not suicidal. ;) The sidewall on my tires says maximum
inflation 44psi.

> Where in the world did you get the idea that this was an OK thing to
do???
> Why are you intentionally ignoring the safety ratings of your tires
and the
> car manufacturers recommendations???

I'm not ignoring anything. I have seen tires rated for a maximum of
35psi in the past, but I do not presently have any on any of my
vehicles. Of the 20 tires I presently own, all say 44psi maximum.

I will try running a lower pressure in the front and run a mileage
check and see what the result is. After my recent carb overhaul I am
measuring out at 24.5 miles per gallon. That seems a little low, but
one possible explanation is that the supers weigh more than the
standard if I am not mistaken. I would imagine my mileage will drop
slightly if I run a lower pressure in the front.

Chris

Lorem Ipsum

unread,
May 4, 2005, 2:29:16 PM5/4/05
to
[... attributes lost ...]

> as a follow up, please Dan-d-man tell me why a helium balloon will burst
> when you release it into the "sky"?....the pressure inside the balloon
> decreases the higher it goes..but it still ruptures

True. The pressure inside the balloon lowers as the atmospheric pressures
lowers, and the ballooon ruptures because it expands beyond its elasticity
(elasticity is lost mostly due to stretching but also in part by the low
temperature of the environment), but what's the point of the observation?
How does it relate to Dan's position?

Lorem Ipsum

unread,
May 4, 2005, 2:33:01 PM5/4/05
to

"Hal" <halat...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1115224722.3...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...

>> GEEEEZ!!! You're running at 35psi all the way around??? Are you
>> suicidal???
>
> No Dan, I am not suicidal. ;) The sidewall on my tires says maximum
> inflation 44psi.

:) That's the rating of the tire, not the tire/car combination. Those tires
fit many different vehicles. A heavier vehicle require up to 44psi, but
yours doesn't.


Shag

unread,
May 4, 2005, 5:02:03 PM5/4/05
to
On Wed, 4 May 2005 13:29:16 -0500, "Lorem Ipsum" <Lo...@ipsum.xxx>
wrote:

I think at this point he was trying to see exactly how far Dan had his
head up his ass. I could be wrong. Have been before.

Shag

unread,
May 4, 2005, 5:02:42 PM5/4/05
to

I'll have one of those Kuhmos and 4 beers, please. :-)

Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 4, 2005, 5:39:18 PM5/4/05
to

"Lorem Ipsum" <Lo...@ipsum.xxx> wrote in message
news:117i53t...@news.supernews.com...

it relates simply because dan is proposing that stepping on a balloon will
in essence *raise* the pressure till it pops...it won't...the pressure
inside is just displaced from under the foot and the balloon stretches until
the surface ruptures.... what he thought it had to do with tires, I don't
know either, but he was kinda swinging at something, so I posed the question
to show that the balloon will still pop when the reverse of what he believes
happens...that's all...


Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 4, 2005, 5:40:59 PM5/4/05
to

"Shag" <travist67_...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e1ei71lqc2km0g6fn...@4ax.com...

you are not wrong this time shag....<G>

thanks to Scott for this picture of dan:
http://www.angelfire.com/retro/ssterile/SINGLETON.html

oggel...@yahoo.com

unread,
May 4, 2005, 6:17:45 PM5/4/05
to
That higher air pressure might make your ride a bit stiff. The tires
are part of the suspension on your little guy.

ogg

Lynn Martin wrote:
> I just got some new Kuhmo Tires, 165/80/15, (great deals for $26 a
piece on
> the net!) for my 1974 Superbeetle.
>
> Anyhow, I am going to get them mounted/etc. The "recommended tire
> pressure" listed on the glove compartment door says Front - 18 psi
and Rear
> 29 psi. This seems too low to me, especially in the front tires.
>
> Just wondering what pressures everyone else is running in a stock
size tire?
>

> Lynn
> 1974 Super

Lorem Ipsum

unread,
May 4, 2005, 8:51:59 PM5/4/05
to

"Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:gibee.1396$sy6.247@lakeread04...

>> True. The pressure inside the balloon lowers as the atmospheric pressures
>> lowers, and the ballooon ruptures because it expands beyond its
>> elasticity
>> (elasticity is lost mostly due to stretching but also in part by the low
>> temperature of the environment), but what's the point of the observation?
>> How does it relate to Dan's position?

> it relates simply because dan is proposing that stepping on a balloon will
> in essence *raise* the pressure till it pops...it won't...the pressure
> inside is just displaced from under the foot and the balloon stretches
> until
> the surface ruptures

He is right. If stepping on the balloon causes the skin to exceed its
capacity, then it behaves just as it would if it were at a high altitude,
and for the same reasons.


Shag

unread,
May 4, 2005, 9:44:11 PM5/4/05
to
On Wed, 4 May 2005 19:51:59 -0500, "Lorem Ipsum" <Lo...@ipsum.xxx>
wrote:

>

Who are you, his boyfriend? (I typed up a much less flame-worthy
response to your post until I realized I didn't know why I bothered.)

Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 4, 2005, 10:07:01 PM5/4/05
to

"Lorem Ipsum" <Lo...@ipsum.xxx> wrote in message
news:117irhg...@news.supernews.com...

>
> "Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
> news:gibee.1396$sy6.247@lakeread04...
>
> He is right. If stepping on the balloon causes the skin to exceed its
> capacity, then it behaves just as it would if it were at a high altitude,
> and for the same reasons.
>
>

you are semi-correct...which is the whole point...can you follow me?
stepping on the balloon puts MORE force on the outside(pressure)....high
altitude puts less....can't see how that would be it failing for "the same
reasons"....the "opposite" I could see, but you are wrong on "the same"...if
you need a more thorough explanation of this, and the post you replied to,
since its * APPARENT * you don't follow it, feel free to ask someone that
actually feels like educating people as I do not....


Lorem Ipsum

unread,
May 5, 2005, 7:41:16 AM5/5/05
to
"Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:fdfee.1412$sy6.1002@lakeread04...

> you are semi-correct...which is the whole point...can you follow me?
> stepping on the balloon puts MORE force on the outside(pressure)....high

> altitude puts less.... can't see how that would be it failing for "the

> same
> reasons"....the "opposite" I could see,

Yep. The altitude and balloon thing shouldn't even have been in the thread
because it has nothing to do in reality with the tire issue.


Dan Smith

unread,
May 5, 2005, 8:05:47 PM5/5/05
to

"Shag" <travist67_...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:218g71pa1p20ghmsu...@4ax.com...

You're hilarious! ^^^^^^


Dan Smith

unread,
May 5, 2005, 8:08:24 PM5/5/05
to

"Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:NYVde.1354$sy6.1288@lakeread04...

That cinched it! You really don't know what you're talking about.

"Stupid people are funny!" - Shaggie


Dan Smith

unread,
May 5, 2005, 8:09:54 PM5/5/05
to

"Shag" <travist67_...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e1ei71lqc2km0g6fn...@4ax.com...

And you're wrong again.

"Stupid people are funny." - Shaggie


Dan Smith

unread,
May 5, 2005, 8:11:53 PM5/5/05
to

"Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:gibee.1396$sy6.247@lakeread04...

And just what do you think causes it to stretch??? PRESSURE!!!

Hell, this is grade school level science.


Dan Smith

unread,
May 5, 2005, 8:13:24 PM5/5/05
to

"Shag" <travist67_...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jtti71l8ddld6ofdm...@4ax.com...

Gee Shaggie! I've never seen you like this.

What's wrong? You're mig welder go belly up?


Dan Smith

unread,
May 5, 2005, 8:18:21 PM5/5/05
to

"Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:fdfee.1412$sy6.1002@lakeread04...

So Joey, you're saying that when someone steps on a balloon and it pops it's
really imploding. You're saying it doesn't develop such high pressure inside
that the balloon finally bursts from the inside out?...???

I'm not following that line of (il)logic. Please enlighten us with you
brilliance (or are you just baffling us with your bullshit?).


Lorem Ipsum

unread,
May 5, 2005, 8:36:09 PM5/5/05
to
"Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote

> And just what do you think causes it to stretch??? PRESSURE!!!

Don't trouble JT with facts. He doesn't understand the meaning of the
concept.


Dan Smith

unread,
May 5, 2005, 8:41:03 PM5/5/05
to

"Lorem Ipsum" <Lo...@ipsum.xxx> wrote in message
news:117k1ir...@news.supernews.com...

Well, it sort of is similar. As the balloon rises the pressure outside the
balloon drops. The skin of the balloon can't contain the higher pressure
inside the balloon at a fixed volume (because the skin of the balloon is
neither strong enough nor rigid enough) so it stretches...and
stretches...and stretches. This stretching lowers the pressure differential
between the inside of the balloon and the ouside of the balloon by allowing
the the internal volume to increase.

This continues until the skin of the balloon ruptures.

This is also what happens when you step on a balloon only you reduce the
volume for a fixed amount of a gas (the air) by distorting the shape of the
balloon until the pressure is so great and the skin has stretched so far
that some part of the skin of the balloon ruptures.

When you add weight to a car you distort the shape of the tire. This
distortion reduced the volume inside the tire. The tire stretches some to
help keep the pressure differential reduced but it can't stretch enough to
totally compensate so the pressure inside the tire increases.

When you have a fixed amount of gas (in this case air) in a container (the
tire) and reduce the volume of the container the pressure goes up. This is
why the tire pressure goes up as the weight it is supporting increases.

You already admitted the shape of the tire distorts. Now all you have to
wrap your brain around is the fact that when you distort the shape of the
tire you also reduce the volume inside the tire and the pressure increases.

I'm not going to go into the calculus supporting this. You're just going to
have to research that yourself.


Lorem Ipsum

unread,
May 5, 2005, 8:46:27 PM5/5/05
to
"Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:z2zee.58865$WI3.20397@attbi_s71...
>
> "Lorem Ipsum" <Lo...@ipsum.xxx> wrote

>> Yep. The altitude and balloon thing shouldn't even have been in the
>> thread
>> because it has nothing to do in reality with the tire issue.

> Well, it sort of is similar. As the balloon rises the pressure outside
> the
> balloon drops. The skin of the balloon can't contain the higher pressure

> [...]

Yeah. I said that in fewer words. What have you added to the thread?

>I'm not going to go into the calculus supporting this. You're just going
>to
>have to research that yourself.

You don't need calculus. Linear arithmetic will suffice. Or, in its place,
two brain cells firing in unison.


Dan Smith

unread,
May 5, 2005, 8:48:36 PM5/5/05
to

"Lorem Ipsum" <Lo...@ipsum.xxx> wrote in message
news:117levo...@news.supernews.com...

Lorem Ipsum,

In a prior post replying to your post I ended up by saying something about,
"Now you need to wrap your brain around..." You are not the 'you' I was
referring to. I was initially replying to you, then I was replying to Joey
when I finished up.

Sorry about that.

-Dan


Shag

unread,
May 5, 2005, 8:48:46 PM5/5/05
to
On Fri, 06 May 2005 00:13:24 GMT, "Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>


>Gee Shaggie! I've never seen you like this.
>
>What's wrong? You're mig welder go belly up?
>

No, welder is doing fine. It's a character flaw of mine to enjoy
being able to pull a string and watching the funny clown attached to
the string dance for me. *tug* Dance for me little clown... *tug*
Dance! *grin* Oh, by the way, you still haven't learned. You
misspelled "your" again... AGAIN. Silly clown. :-) *tug*

Lorem Ipsum

unread,
May 5, 2005, 8:55:38 PM5/5/05
to

"Shag" <travist67_...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:kgfl719nlcqlan24e...@4ax.com...

Lorem Ipsum

unread,
May 5, 2005, 8:58:04 PM5/5/05
to
"Shag" <travist67_...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:kgfl719nlcqlan24e...@4ax.com...

> No, welder is doing fine. It's a character flaw of mine to enjoy
> being able to pull a string and watching the funny clown attached to
> the string dance for me. *tug* Dance for me little clown... *tug*
> Dance! *grin*

You have one character flaw? That ain't bad. Unfortunately, it's the only
character you have. One-note Shag. It would be a pity if you were smart
enough to know, but you don't so we all laugh in your place.


Shag

unread,
May 5, 2005, 9:00:47 PM5/5/05
to
On Thu, 5 May 2005 19:58:04 -0500, "Lorem Ipsum" <Lo...@ipsum.xxx>
wrote:

>"Shag" <travist67_...@gmail.com> wrote in message

*tug* *wave*

Lorem Ipsum

unread,
May 5, 2005, 9:05:42 PM5/5/05
to
"Shag" <trav...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cdgl71t1gl60goslg...@4ax.com...

> *tug* *wave*

*URP* Pass the beer and shudup.
An da Jack Daniels.

Dan Smith

unread,
May 5, 2005, 9:12:58 PM5/5/05
to

"Shag" <travist67_...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:kgfl719nlcqlan24e...@4ax.com...

My guess is that the string is attached to something down the front of your
shorts. You call it 'clown' huh?

Did you get out a magnifying glass and paint a little face on it? Did you
put red hair on it or have you already got it red enough? :)

Are you planning on pulling that string all night long?

Lighten up Shaggie. Toke a bowl and relax. :)


Hal

unread,
May 6, 2005, 2:14:33 AM5/6/05
to
My latest tank of fuel gave me a little over 25mpg. I lowered the tire
pressure in the front to 20psi. I'll see how it goes on the drive to
work tomorrow and measure the results when I fill it up next time.

Chris

tricky

unread,
May 6, 2005, 4:04:45 AM5/6/05
to

>>>>"Stupid people are funny." - me
>>>
>>>I prefer the following:
>>>
>>>"Stupid people are dangerous."
>>>
>>
>>You are funny.
>>
>>"Stupid people are funny." - me
>
>
> You're hilarious! ^^^^^^
>
>

How long did that take for the penny to drop !

Spose it took a while to work out before he could reply.

Rich

Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 6, 2005, 4:22:47 AM5/6/05
to

"Lorem Ipsum" <Lo...@ipsum.xxx> wrote in message
news:117k1ir...@news.supernews.com...

okay...are you dan in desguise or is reading comprehension a lost art? the
altitude/balloon reference was in direct reply to his bogus claim that said
"so you are saying i can't pop a balloon by stepping on it"....so it was a
GREAT reply to show how HIS example was bullshit.... your user name did not
exist until you posted here, so it is very likely you are someone
else...ahem.... anyway an out of place example to an out of place example is
perfectly acceptible...you don't like it? i don't give a fuck...we are
even....now run along you dumbshit


Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 6, 2005, 4:23:55 AM5/6/05
to

"Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:mByee.58864$c24.4638@attbi_s72...

>
> > I think at this point he was trying to see exactly how far Dan had his
> > head up his ass. I could be wrong. Have been before.
> >
> > "Stupid people are funny." - me
>
> And you're wrong again.
>
> "Stupid people are funny." - Shaggie
>
>

you should know being wrong, you are an expert....


Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 6, 2005, 4:25:15 AM5/6/05
to

" >
> And just what do you think causes it to stretch??? PRESSURE!!!
>
> Hell, this is grade school level science.
>
>

you say it is the air pressure i say it is surface pressure....so i did not
say it wasn't pressure my reading comprehension challenged pet.... you were
wrong, now man up and admit it...i won't hold my breath...(nice stealing of
the "grade school science" though...)


Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 6, 2005, 4:30:42 AM5/6/05
to

"Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hJyee.58871$c24.25863@attbi_s72...

>
>
> "stepping on the balloon puts MORE force on the outside(pressure)...."
>
> So Joey, you're saying that when someone steps on a balloon and it pops
it's
> really imploding. You're saying it doesn't develop such high pressure
inside
> that the balloon finally bursts from the inside out?...???
>
> I'm not following that line of (il)logic. Please enlighten us with you
> brilliance (or are you just baffling us with your bullshit?).
>
>

it is neither brilliance or bullshit...it is just not comprehendible to a
dumbshit like you... you did not quote the entire statement above trying to
prove a point(your point) but it still does not.... i never stated the
balloon implodes(since your reading comprehension wont' allow you to
understand what i *did* write you have to try and make shit up...quote me
in context or don't quote at all you fucking moron).... you step on a
balloon, or i could just step on your oversized head, and the "pressure"
your foot puts on the surface does not change the pressure *inside* the
balloon, as you wrongfully stated.....it *displaces* it and causes the
fucking balloon to stretch....got it? probably not, but anyway, that is what
causes the balloon to rupture...not from *more* internal pressure but from
the surface being stretched further than it can handle...its so simple i
would think you could understand...but im not surprised you don't....


Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 6, 2005, 4:39:19 AM5/6/05
to

"Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:z2zee.58865$WI3.20397@attbi_s71...

>
> This is also what happens when you step on a balloon only you reduce the
> volume for a fixed amount of a gas (the air) by distorting the shape of
the
> balloon until the pressure is so great and the skin has stretched so far
> that some part of the skin of the balloon ruptures.

this is not correct...in the case of the balloon you are indeed distorting,
but the balloon stretches so the internal "volume' is unchanged...that is my
hangup....you seem to know what is going on, and you probably know your
original statement was a "stretch" to say the least, you are just trying
your damnedest to not admit it...

>
> When you add weight to a car you distort the shape of the tire. This
> distortion reduced the volume inside the tire. The tire stretches some to
> help keep the pressure differential reduced but it can't stretch enough to
> totally compensate so the pressure inside the tire increases.

there is no pressure increase.... you would have to overload the tire beyond
what was the subject at hand to *ever* decrease the inside
volume....period... you won't make the tire smaller...it will burst first...

>
> When you have a fixed amount of gas (in this case air) in a container (the
> tire) and reduce the volume of the container the pressure goes up. This
is
> why the tire pressure goes up as the weight it is supporting increases.

again you seem to have the theory, but you are still not quite there.... my
tires on my pu contain 50psi cold.....even when i slap a couple tons of
gravel on the back it still has 50psi cold.... this is not just me talking,
it is from training and actually measuring tire pressures...something you
have done neither of...


>
> You already admitted the shape of the tire distorts. Now all you have to
> wrap your brain around is the fact that when you distort the shape of the
> tire you also reduce the volume inside the tire and the pressure
increases.

distorting the shape has exactly NOTHING to do with it....if you load the
tire(which is so far from your original, yet brilliant, statement it apples
to oranges) the air is displaced locally in the tire...this causes the
pressure to move inside the tire...so localized inside the tire you could
have more pressure but the overall read at the guage is the same...wrap your
"brain"(yeah right) around that....or get educated on tires....

> I'm not going to go into the calculus supporting this. You're just going
to
> have to research that yourself.
>

no need....i breezed through calculus and "tire school"..... you can shove
your "opinions" based on shit you don't know about, or what you *think*
would happen, straight up your ass.... i have BTDT with the training and the
experience....


Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 6, 2005, 4:41:28 AM5/6/05
to

"Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Yzyee.58832$WI3.39180@attbi_s71...

> > as a follow up, please Dan-d-man tell me why a helium balloon will burst
> > when you release it into the "sky"?....the pressure inside the balloon
> > decreases the higher it goes..but it still ruptures....or can you not
wrap
> > your brain cell around this either?
> >
> >
>
> That cinched it! You really don't know what you're talking about.
>
> "Stupid people are funny!" - Shaggie
>
>

i do.... and the above example is just to "trump" your bullshit about
stepping on the balloon....you realize it *does* so you don't even
answer....nice avoidance...i'd give it a 2 on the troll/dipshit meter...work
on that....


Shag

unread,
May 6, 2005, 7:01:54 AM5/6/05
to
On Fri, 06 May 2005 01:12:58 GMT, "Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

>yappity yap

Dan Smith

unread,
May 6, 2005, 7:11:52 AM5/6/05
to

"Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:DQFee.2441$sy6.963@lakeread04...

"Joey and Shaggie are hilarious." - Dan


Shag

unread,
May 6, 2005, 7:59:17 AM5/6/05
to

Lorem Ipsum

unread,
May 6, 2005, 8:14:19 AM5/6/05
to
"Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:1XFee.2443$sy6.1181@lakeread04...

> you step on a
> balloon and the "pressure"


> your foot puts on the surface does not change the pressure *inside* the
> balloon, as you wrongfully stated.....it *displaces* it and causes the

> fucking balloon to stretch....got it? [...]

In this case of the bursting balloon you are wrong. If you put a gauge in
the balloon you will see a rise in pressure when you step on it. Why?
Because the balloon is near enough its maximum expansion to burst when
stepped upon - it does not expand easily enough or fast enough for the air
to be displaced so the air pressure does rise considerably, then the walls
pop.


Lorem Ipsum

unread,
May 6, 2005, 8:23:59 AM5/6/05
to
"Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:23Gee.2444$sy6.1234@lakeread04...

> there is no pressure increase.... you would have to overload the tire
> beyond
> what was the subject at hand to *ever* decrease the inside
> volume....period... you won't make the tire smaller...it will burst
> first...

Yes - that's where you went wrong in the case of the balloon. In this case
you would have to squash an underrated tire one hell of a lot to burst it. I
am sure you have seen it happen at least once.

> again you seem to have the theory, but you are still not quite there....
> my
> tires on my pu contain 50psi cold.....even when i slap a couple tons of
> gravel on the back it still has 50psi cold....

Yep. Those tires are rated/built to the task. It is too bad the balloon part
of the thread was irrelevant to the thread.


Dan Smith

unread,
May 6, 2005, 11:36:35 AM5/6/05
to

"Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:23Gee.2444$sy6.1234@lakeread04...

You breezed through tire school? Was that breeze caused by your snoring?

You said, "distorting the shape has exactly NOTHING to do with it...." That
means that you believe that when you have a fixed amount of a substance in a
container and reduce the volume of the container the pressure stays the
same. ARE YOU JOKING??? Have you never heard of an air compressor? Have
you never heard of an internal combustion engine? Have you never heard of
an air conditioner? Have you never heard of ...

Never mind. You're just making stuff up. You can't really believe this
crap you're spewing forth and you can't really be this stupid. You're just
messing with me.


Just an opinion

unread,
May 6, 2005, 12:05:41 PM5/6/05
to
> I run 19 front/27 rear, just like the glovebox sticker says.
> 165/80 tires on a '72 Super.

Several months ago I had the front end on my '74 standard aligned at a
VW shop which has been in business for something like 30 years.
Driving the bug afterwards I felt that the front end stability was a
bit off, but put that down to the alignment. After several days of
this I finally got around to checking the tire pressure (165s, radials)
where I was suprised to find that all the tires were now at 32 psi.
Made me wonder is someone goofed, or the higher pressure is some new
recommendation. But I still adjusted the pressure back to values which
are closer to the recommended ones.

Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 6, 2005, 2:54:08 PM5/6/05
to

"Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:YhIee.59786$WI3.14237@attbi_s71...

> > >
> >
>
> "Stupid people are funny." - Shaggie
>
> "Joey and Shaggie are hilarious." - Dan
>
>

dan don't be upset everytime you put your foot in your big mouth...you will
have a very unhappy life...take your lumps and go....emphasis on the GO...


Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 6, 2005, 2:56:15 PM5/6/05
to

"Lorem Ipsum" <Lo...@ipsum.xxx> wrote in message
news:117mnsp...@news.supernews.com...

go to google...read the thread again...i am pretty tired of repeating myself
over and over so you fucksticks can nitpick....i even stated that the
pressure INSIDE The balloon would increase *initially*....but it stretches
and has a NET GAIN of NOTHING....


Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 6, 2005, 2:58:34 PM5/6/05
to

"Lorem Ipsum" <Lo...@ipsum.xxx> wrote in message
news:117moeu...@news.supernews.com...

i agree with you on the balloon being irrelevant, that was a spin by dan to
try and save face, did not work....BUT according to dan my tires should
explode when i drive down the road...they have a MAXIMUM rating of 50psi....
and he says that you can never have more than that...i can gurantee you that
when i drive down the road the tires heat up and the pressure goes up a few
pounds...then add the weight and according to Dan i should be on my rims by
now....


Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 6, 2005, 3:05:32 PM5/6/05
to

"Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6aMee.60500$WI3.10061@attbi_s71...

>
> You breezed through tire school? Was that breeze caused by your snoring?
>
> You said, "distorting the shape has exactly NOTHING to do with it...."
That
> means that you believe that when you have a fixed amount of a substance in
a
> container and reduce the volume of the container the pressure stays the
> same. ARE YOU JOKING??? Have you never heard of an air compressor? Have
> you never heard of an internal combustion engine? Have you never heard of
> an air conditioner? Have you never heard of ...
>
> Never mind. You're just making stuff up. You can't really believe this
> crap you're spewing forth and you can't really be this stupid. You're
just
> messing with me.
>
>
first of all trim your quotes you amateur...second i was fucking ASE
certified in suspension systems....ever done that? if not i doubt anyone
wasted the time or money to have engineers from Mohawk(Yokohama) come and
give you classes concerning tires....i on the other hand *did* have
those....you will NOT reduce the "volume of the container" (I.E. tire) by
adding weight....if you do, you have already overloaded the tire weightwise,
and the "point" is moot...tires, like every thing else are designed for use
under certain conditions...go outside that and you may suffer a
failure.....what adding weight has to do with your original claim that
having 35psi in a tire is suicidal, i don't know...do you? thats right
NOTHING.....just a spin to take the heat off you for being full of
shit....didn't work, you are still full of shit...to drive the point home
even more, the two reasons tires fail most are UNDERINFLATION and
OVERLOADING....and they BOTH fail for the same reason....HINT: its not from
being overpressurized....if you don't know what that reason is, i will
gladly tell you, but the childish "i'm right cause i wanna be" shit you have
been throwing out is getting tired....you are in over your head in this
"discussion" so you should either bail while you can or admit it and try to
actually learn something....the latter is the best so you don't spew wrong
information on a worldwide forum again....the choice is yours....


Lorem Ipsum

unread,
May 6, 2005, 4:50:35 PM5/6/05
to

"Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:r5Pee.2478$sy6.563@lakeread04...

> go to google...read the thread again...i am pretty tired of repeating
> myself
> over and over so you fucksticks can nitpick....i even stated that the
> pressure INSIDE The balloon would increase *initially*....but it stretches
> and has a NET GAIN of NOTHING....

Gain of nothing because it burst! At the moment before the burst, the
pressure was higher than before.


Lorem Ipsum

unread,
May 6, 2005, 4:52:48 PM5/6/05
to
"Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:C7Pee.2479$sy6.628@lakeread04...

> [...] BUT according to dan my tires should


> explode when i drive down the road...they have a MAXIMUM rating of
> 50psi....

> and he says that you can never have more than that... [...]

Yep old dan is being silly.


Dan Smith

unread,
May 6, 2005, 5:24:55 PM5/6/05
to

"Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:C7Pee.2479$sy6.628@lakeread04...

Bwah! ha! ha! ha!

Now you're hallucinating!


Dan Smith

unread,
May 6, 2005, 5:26:08 PM5/6/05
to

"Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:s3Pee.2477$sy6.739@lakeread04...

Bwah! ha! ha! ha!

You're still hallucinating.


Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 6, 2005, 6:29:14 PM5/6/05
to

"Lorem Ipsum" <Lo...@ipsum.xxx> wrote in message
news:117nm4s...@news.supernews.com...

get you a balloon with a schrader valve and show us.....


Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 6, 2005, 6:41:28 PM5/6/05
to

"Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:HgRee.61059$c24.11331@attbi_s72...

> i agree with you on the balloon being irrelevant, that was a spin by
dan
> to
> > try and save face, did not work....BUT according to dan my tires should
> > explode when i drive down the road...they have a MAXIMUM rating of
> 50psi....
> > and he says that you can never have more than that...i can gurantee you
> that
> > when i drive down the road the tires heat up and the pressure goes up a
> few
> > pounds...then add the weight and according to Dan i should be on my rims
> by
> > now....
> >
> >
>
> Bwah! ha! ha! ha!
>
> Now you're hallucinating!
>

are you saying you did not say the following:?:

>Who are you trying to BS? Of course the tire pressure goes up as the load
>increases. You're talking nonsense.


>Since you don't think tire pressure goes up as the load goes up you
>definitely don't know what you're talking about.


>If I air up my tires to the car manufacturer's recommended pressures and
>then I put 400 pounds of people in the car obviously the tire pressure goes
>up.

be careful before you deny it because google archived it....

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/rec.autos.makers.vw.aircooled/msg/0da090b51543213d?hl=en

i wish to challenge it....and i suggest anyone that doesn't believe me when
i say the pressure will be the same to do so themselves...its pretty simple
to prove you wrong in this instance....and i have....

picture one....my 68 type 1 with the tire jacked off ground(note Marlboro
pack under tire for show)

http://bugadventures.dyndns.org/temp/1.jpg

same tire, now on the ground....at least that 400 pounds you speak of, yes?

http://bugadventures.dyndns.org/temp/2.jpg

rear tire, same car, same side.....in the air...same cigarette pack for show

http://bugadventures.dyndns.org/temp/3.jpg

same rear tire, now on ground....i'd say more than 400 pounds of weight have
just been placed on it....

http://bugadventures.dyndns.org/temp/4.jpg

>If I air up my tires to the car manufacturer's recommended pressures and
>then I put 400 pounds of people in the car obviously the tire pressure goes
>up.

as the mythbusters would say......"BUSTED"....

now go fuck yourself you shit-for-brains....are you Billybadass in desguise?


Shag

unread,
May 6, 2005, 8:34:36 PM5/6/05
to
On Fri, 6 May 2005 18:41:28 -0400, "Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com>
wrote:

Say it ain't so! I'm a little slow, but I think what this all means
is that dan was just wrong all along and was pretty rude about being
wrong. He just yap yap yapped a lot of crap and then when he realized
he was wrong he tried to back-pedal and say clever things like
"lighten up." dan, do me a favor and just realize one thing. I care
whether you like me or not exactly the same amount as you care whether
I like you or not. Get it? ps- You were wrong all along, ass-monkey.
Now follow your own advice: lighten up.
http://railadventures.dyndns.org/funny/ImpressKirk.jpg


"Stupid people are funny." - me

Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 6, 2005, 9:13:35 PM5/6/05
to

"Shag" <travist67_...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ql2o71llrdman0245...@4ax.com...

ps- You were wrong all along, ass-monkey.
> Now follow your own advice: lighten up.
> http://railadventures.dyndns.org/funny/ImpressKirk.jpg
>
>

don't hold your breath waiting for dan to admit he is full of it....but he
knows....

this is for him:

http://www.w3bdevil.com/forums/Owned-DogEatCat.jpg

Dan Smith

unread,
May 6, 2005, 10:08:17 PM5/6/05
to

"Joey Tribiani" <no...@home.com> wrote in message
news:7dSee.2502$sy6.2111@lakeread04...

Why? So you can come up with lame assed excuse why it's wrong after it
proves you wrong?


Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 6, 2005, 11:27:58 PM5/6/05
to

"Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:lqVee.54321$r53.5892@attbi_s21...

>
> Why? So you can come up with lame assed excuse why it's wrong after it
> proves you wrong?
>
>

nope...but funny you should say that....since it has been an hour and a half
since you replied to *this* you should have read the other responce i
posted...the one that blew your ass out of the water...yet no reply....i
guess you ran off....i don't blame ya....amateur....


Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 6, 2005, 11:29:31 PM5/6/05
to

"Dan Smith" <pgm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:lqVee.54321$r53.5892@attbi_s21...

>
> Why? So you can come up with lame assed excuse why it's wrong after it
> proves you wrong?
>
>

come on Dan...you are letting me down....where is your witty retort(ahem,
lame excuse) why your theory was bullshit....oh wait....i know why...because
it was....too bad you can't man up....oh well...catch ya in about 8 months
when you come back...that seems to be the pattern....


ilambert

unread,
May 6, 2005, 11:51:32 PM5/6/05
to
Tire pressures on race car are important for performance reasons.Inflation
affects slip angles,stagger,rolling resistance as well as traction in both
planes.Street tires have a max inflation figure(measured cold) than is well
on the safe side.Even exceding this by 10 or 15 # won't lead to catastrophic
failure(but don't try this at home).More dangerous is underinflation on a
heavy vehicle.This causes heat and belt seperation(remember Firestone/SUV
problems?
"Jan Andersson" <bug...@rocketcom.mail> wrote in message
news:42773FDD...@rocketcom.mail...
> tricky wrote:
>>
>> I may have been wrong for years... I learned ( I think from the AA
>> (AAA) ) that before a long journey, to put a couple of extra pounds in
>> your tyres. When they warm up, they soften and need more air.
>
>
> Air is a gas, which when heated, expands.
> On race cars, tire pressures are sometimes critical. You put a certain
> pressure in the tires before the race,
> and when you immediately measure the tire pressure during the first
> seconds of pitstop, you will find that the tire pressures have increased
> by 50% easily.
> Granted, in that environment the race slicks also get much hotter than
> you'd ever see your street tires get...
>
>
> Jan (Race car mechanic)


Joey Tribiani

unread,
May 7, 2005, 12:01:05 AM5/7/05
to

"ilambert" <ilam...@charter.net> wrote in message
news:9XWee.44109$QR1....@fe04.lga...

> Tire pressures on race car are important for performance reasons.Inflation
> affects slip angles,stagger,rolling resistance as well as traction in both
> planes.

I used to put 70psi into my race tires(hoosier) and put them in the sun to
"grow" them to the size i needed for the proper stagger for my car....my
qualifying pressures were 8-10psi higher than the start of the race
pressures....i miss those days...i should build me up another BMW for the
track...


Lorem Ipsum

unread,
May 7, 2005, 10:15:12 AM5/7/05
to
I know it has nothing to do with this thread, but it reminds me of news
articles many years ago where people were killed inflating or installing
truck tires on "split rims". The rim or something exploded. What was that
all about?


It is loading more messages.
0 new messages