"Robert McElwee" <rmce...@mymiata.com> wrote in message
news:e_9m5.1254$z64.2...@den-news1.rmi.net...
>My bumper (I have a white car) is always black from my tailpipe.
Unless your bumper is showing a LARGE area of soot, it appears to be a normal
condition. I bought my white '99 new, and every time I wash it I find a small
build-up of blackness around and on the pipe.
Eric Ziegler
> My bumper (I have a white car) is always black from my tailpipe. What can I
> do to fix this?
>
>
Probably due to impurities in the gasoline (carbon, point of fact). No
gasoline is perfectly perfect but if you are getting the cheapest gas you
can, it might do your system some good to bump up to a good brand (Texaco
comes to mind). You might also try some gas additive system cleaner to get
rid of any built up gunk as well. There will always be a little and if you
wanted to really get rid of the problem, you could get a slightly longer
tailpipe :-)
Amy and Seeger
'91 Silverstone "A"
"The horizon is nothing save the limit of our sight."
--
My '91 runs so clean, you can wipe the inside of the tail pipe with a
white rag (anytime after it has been run on the road) & only see a
slight trace of black.
When I autocross it, I use 92 oct. & it will soot more, but that is a
lot of full on the gas that does that & 92 oct. burns slower.
If you have that much "soot" , you need to get it looked at. It's rich
& not all the gas is burning in the engine. It's trying to burn in the
exhaust system too.
Bruce RED '91
Robert McElwee <rmce...@mymiata.com> wrote in message
news:e_9m5.1254$z64.2...@den-news1.rmi.net...
"Miata Guy" <mx5_mi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Slam5.10415$T9.17...@news0.telusplanet.net...
> Wash, rinse, repeat...
Glenn Price
T. Kennelly <tken...@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3999FEB1...@cfl.rr.com...
Glenn Price
Robert McElwee <rmce...@mymiata.com> wrote in message
news:qKvm5.1520$z64.2...@den-news1.rmi.net...
> Only one problem - the stuff doesn't wash off. I use rubbing alcohol or
> blech-wite. They work the best but it is still permenantly stained.
>
> "Miata Guy" <mx5_mi...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Slam5.10415$T9.17...@news0.telusplanet.net...
> > Wash, rinse, repeat...
> >
In article <ymBm5.10984$4T.6...@bgtnsc07-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Glenn Price" <nospammin...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> You can get the stuff off with either rubbing compound or degreaser...don't
> worry, your bumper isn't permanently stained, I had the same problem and the
> bumper came completely clean after using the stuff above.
>
> Glenn Price
>
--
****delete "blah" to reply****
>You can get the stuff off with either rubbing compound or degreaser
I had a Genie exhaust (which has too short a tail pipe) on a Sebring Miata
(which runs rich on feathering the throttle) and had this *bad*. I used bug
and tar remover. I may note that it appeared the soot was hard to
get off because it seems to get stuck in the wax. In other words,
I believed I was solidly dewaxing the area to get it clean. (Which WD-40
should also do well; I did not try.)
>...don't
>worry, your bumper isn't permanently stained, I had the same problem and the
>bumper came completely clean after using the stuff above.
Same here. Bumper was completely unaffected.
Leon
--
Leon van Dommelen :) Bozo, the White 96 Sebring Miata .)
Our last trip at http://www.dommelen.net/miata/tripsu00
REMOVE THE "z"s -> domm...@zmiata.net www.dommelen.net
Since you were running 18 degrees of advance AND 92 octane do you support the high octane had an effect on the
temperature of the combustion (before the exhaust valve opens)
Speculation off.
Glenn Price wrote:
> I had this same problem, with timing at 10 degrees, and up the timing to 18
> degrees using 92 octane and the problem didn't change at all.
>
> Glenn Price
>
> T. Kennelly <tken...@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:3999FEB1...@cfl.rr.com...
Glenn Price
T. Kennelly <tken...@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
news:399BEBF9...@cfl.rr.com...
> Speculation on (i.e., this is just guess work on my part)
>
> Since you were running 18 degrees of advance AND 92 octane do you support
the high octane had an effect on the
> temperature of the combustion (before the exhaust valve opens)
>
> Speculation off.
>
> Glenn Price wrote:
>
> > I had this same problem, with timing at 10 degrees, and up the timing to
18
> > degrees using 92 octane and the problem didn't change at all.
> >
> > Glenn Price
> >
> > T. Kennelly <tken...@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
> > news:3999FEB1...@cfl.rr.com...
>Yes, by increasing the timing advance the combustion pressure increases thus
>increasing temperature, and 92 octane fuel burns hotter
It does? How much?
> so that's a double
>whammy. If I had not run 92 but increased the advance like I did, I'd get
>higher temps anyway and probably a couple holes in my pistons too! :)
>
>Glenn Price
>
>T. Kennelly <tken...@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:399BEBF9...@cfl.rr.com...
>> Speculation on (i.e., this is just guess work on my part)
>>
>> Since you were running 18 degrees of advance AND 92 octane do you support
>the high octane had an effect on the
>> temperature of the combustion (before the exhaust valve opens)
>>
>> Speculation off.
>>
>> Glenn Price wrote:
>>
>> > I had this same problem, with timing at 10 degrees, and up the timing to
>18
>> > degrees using 92 octane and the problem didn't change at all.
>> >
>> > Glenn Price
>> >
>> > T. Kennelly <tken...@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
>> > news:3999FEB1...@cfl.rr.com...
--
>not a problem at all.....original (European) mx-5's run and imported Miata's
>from the US or Canada run perfectly on the fuel here....it is at lest 95
>octane, and premium is 98 in the Netherlands,
The octane in Europe is computed differently than in the US. Don't know
or remember what the difference was, but you cannot simply compare numbers.
> and no one has problems with
>the "hotter burning"
Here is an earlier post indicating higher octane does not burn hotter:
|From: raw...@aol.com (Rawdomg)
|Subject: Re: Octane Rating?
|
|>Some engines actually have more deposit problems with a higher octane, since
|>it burns slightly cooler.
|
|I don't believe the flame temperature is significantly lower (absent profound
|knocking, that is). The increased deposits are generally due to higher amounts
|of condensed ring aromatic hydrocarbons in most premium gasolines compared to
|regular. And yes, I can provide a reference for this, Including the phone
|number of the researcher who published the technical paper.
> the higher octane just means it burns easier,
Actually, the higher octane means it starts burning *less* easily by itself
before the flame front hits it. (Less knock=autoignition)
>but not hotter.
The other post seems to agree with you. I have a vague memory that someone
might have posted a table of info on various fuels, but if true, I did not
save it.
>Regards Jasper
>
>Glenn Price wrote in message ...
>>Yes, by increasing the timing advance the combustion pressure increases
>thus
>>increasing temperature, and 92 octane fuel burns hotter so that's a double
>>whammy. If I had not run 92 but increased the advance like I did, I'd get
>>higher temps anyway and probably a couple holes in my pistons too! :)
>>
>>Glenn Price
>>
>>T. Kennelly <tken...@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
>>news:399BEBF9...@cfl.rr.com...
>>> Speculation on (i.e., this is just guess work on my part)
>>>
>>> Since you were running 18 degrees of advance AND 92 octane do you support
>>the high octane had an effect on the
>>> temperature of the combustion (before the exhaust valve opens)
>>>
>>> Speculation off.
>>>
>>> Glenn Price wrote:
>>>
>>> > I had this same problem, with timing at 10 degrees, and up the timing
>to
>>18
>>> > degrees using 92 octane and the problem didn't change at all.
>>> >
>>> > Glenn Price
>>> >
>>> > T. Kennelly <tken...@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
>>> > news:3999FEB1...@cfl.rr.com...
--
Leon van Dommelen :) Bozo, the White 96 Sebring Miata .)
REMOVE THE "z"s -> domm...@zmiata.net www.dommelen.net
"EXIT THE INTERSTATES" (Jamie Jensen)
Regards Jasper
Glenn Price wrote in message ...
>Yes, by increasing the timing advance the combustion pressure increases
thus
>increasing temperature, and 92 octane fuel burns hotter so that's a double
>whammy. If I had not run 92 but increased the advance like I did, I'd get
>higher temps anyway and probably a couple holes in my pistons too! :)
>
>Glenn Price
>
>T. Kennelly <tken...@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:399BEBF9...@cfl.rr.com...
>> Speculation on (i.e., this is just guess work on my part)
>>
>> Since you were running 18 degrees of advance AND 92 octane do you support
>the high octane had an effect on the
>> temperature of the combustion (before the exhaust valve opens)
>>
>> Speculation off.
>>
>> Glenn Price wrote:
>>
>> > I had this same problem, with timing at 10 degrees, and up the timing
to
>18
>> > degrees using 92 octane and the problem didn't change at all.
>> >
>> > Glenn Price
>> >
>> > T. Kennelly <tken...@cfl.rr.com> wrote in message
>> > news:3999FEB1...@cfl.rr.com...