Thanks,
John
ANON248
sier...@hotmail.com
John Eustice wrote in message <36E98B...@epix.net>...
What 3? Like the 3 on the tach, as in 3000 rpm? That's probably safe, and
adequate for tooling around town. For faster acceleration, you'll want to
shift at higher revs, but don't exceed redline!
--
Mike Smith. No, the other one.
C. Tague aka. Mista Bone
"Baby won't you rock it tonight."
93 Honda Civic DX HB
1.5L NO VTEC! #17 DSP
AEM,Neuspeed, Eibach, Stillen, & BFG R1
15.56 @ 84 mph 1/4mile 2.02 60 ft.
If you do decide to drive aggressivly then you should do oil changes a bit
more frequently.
PS. My mustang has a redline of 5900 but on daily driving I usually just
shift around 2000 to 2200 rpm but if I need to race someone I usually end up
shifting around 5200. I can get away by shifting around 1800 but the car
feels pretty sluggish so I only do this if I am real low on fuel :)
John Eustice wrote in message <36E98B...@epix.net>...
>I was wondering what damage driving in high RPM's causes to your car. I
>taught myself how to drive a manual but pretty much assumed you always
>shift around the 3.
>
>Thanks,
>John
Andrew Pottle
e-mail --- awpo...@nb.sympatico.ca
What kind of Honda (assuming it's a Honda) are you driving? If it's one of
the newer 4-cylinder models, shifting around 3 is very low.
I have a '99 Miata, and a good shift point is 5500 rpm, although shifting at
7000 rpm is fun from time to time. It's also harmless. The same should be
true of the 4-cylinder Honda's, although you might want to check with a
guru.
Javier Afanador wrote:
> I usually drive my 97 Civic a little hard, shifting at about redline every
> now and then. But usually when I'm just driving around I shift around 4k to
> 4.5k. If you shift lower the car seems to lag when you put it in the next
> gear (especially if you have 4 other people in the car)....which is probably
> not good for the engine.
>
> Hondas, as well as most (newer) cars, come with computer-controlled
> rev-limiters which prevent you from damaging your engine by cutting off the
> fuel supply to your engine when you over-rev. So it should not damage the
> engine if you shift at higher rpm's.
>
> Just my $.02
> Rascal
> 97 Civic EX
>
> Keith Peterson <kpe...@v-wave.com> wrote in message
> news:36f67...@eccles.iplenergy.com...
You're kidding me right. What, you're afraid the engine will blow up if you
take it past 3K? At your shifting rpms, you get jack for torque, you foul the
plugs and get crappy gas mileage.
el
--
Electricity comes from electrons; morality comes from morons.
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Johnny Liu wrote:
>
> my gawd!!!!!! u guyz shift late. i shift at like 1700-2000 ! I've got a 98
> accord I-4 too
You have got to be kidding me. 2k? What are you reserving the
other 4500 rpms for?
When I drive my '92 Accord, I usually shift around 3 to 3.5K for
normal "blah blah' driving. 4 to 5K when I feel a little frisky,
and 6K when I want to pull ahead of something real quick.
--
Lee Cao - http://www.leecao.com/
If I had 100 million dollars...
Johnny Liu wrote in message <36F72263...@hotmail.com>...
>my gawd!!!!!! u guyz shift late. i shift at like 1700-2000 ! I've got
a 98
>accord I-4 too
>
>my gawd!!!!!! u guyz shift late. i shift at like 1700-2000 ! I've got a 98
>accord I-4 too
Jeezes. You're joking, right? Maybe if you're driving for maximum
fuel economy.... These motors are designed for best torque around
4000 RPM's. You KNEW that, right?
To drive a Honda automobile and never rev beyond 3,000 rpm is ridiculous.
Every current Honda/Acura car, even the 3.5RL, makes its highest-rated
horsepower above 5000 rpm. Never "cranking" it means you never use the Honda
horsepower you bought and which was advertised/promoted by Honda. My
soon-to-arrive Prelude VTEC kicks out 200 bhp at 7000 rpm. Heck, the VTEC
changeover doesn't even kick in until post 5000 rpm. And I intend to enjoy
my 200 bhp....
Of course, even though I've already had five Honda/Acura cars and 1 Honda
bike in splendid shape after daily high revs (all in family hands or
otherwise still going strong despite the cars being at least 8 years old),
one never knows what might happen to your engine. Just in case you have a
bum engine or some other bad luck, you understand!
<d_w...@my-dejanews.com> wrote in message
news:7dbh5o$o69$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com...
>I would think shifting at such high RPM's would cause you to have clutch
>problems earlier than normal.
>
I think about 80% of clutch wear occurs starting from a dead stop. If you rev
it high and let the clutch slip a lot you will definitely increase the wear on
your clutch. But running it up to red line in gear, then shifting smoothly to
the next gear would have negligible effect on clutch life.
>I would think shifting at such high RPM's would cause you to have clutch
>problems earlier than normal.
And you'd be wrong. The motors are designed for the higher RPM's.
I'm always amazed with people who think that they know more about the
motor's safe operating area than the Honda enggineers do.
He may have a point. The only problem I've had with my GSR is a
broken clutch spring. And it broke when I downshifted from 5th
to 3rd (about 3000 to 6000 rpm) which is something I do regularly
when I pass on two-lane roads. I wonder whether all those rpms
might have contributed.
john baker
John Baker <jba...@azstarnet.com> wrote in message
news:3701BE...@azstarnet.com...
That's pretty high for a downshift. Why not wait for an opening in 4th gear
and then downshift to 3rd?
redd <erict...@earthling.net> wrote in message
news:7d8996$tni$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com...
> In article <36F72263...@hotmail.com>,
> Johnny Liu <see...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > my gawd!!!!!! u guyz shift late. i shift at like 1700-2000 ! I've
got a 98
> > accord I-4 too
>
> You're kidding me right. What, you're afraid the engine will blow up if
you
> take it past 3K? At your shifting rpms, you get jack for torque, you foul
the
> plugs and get crappy gas mileage.
>
> el
>
> --
> Electricity comes from electrons; morality comes from morons.
>
Pars
Pars