Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

what is relation between ci/L

1 view
Skip to first unread message

curtis Novak

unread,
May 4, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/4/99
to
Sorry if this is a dumb question, but what is the comparison between the
old Cubic Inch engines and the new Liter designations?

thanks
curt
'65 289 coupe

raybec

unread,
May 4, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/4/99
to
they both refer to the volume of space. in this example the volume of the
cylinders in the engine.
he difference is the measurement system - metric and English units

ci is an abbreviation for cubic inches or inches squared - English units
and L is an abbreviation for liter for the metric units

so for a 5.0L engine that would mean :

5.0 liter *( 1 gallon/ 3.7854 liter) * (231 inches squared/ 1 gallon) =
305.11967 ci

this is approximately a 302 ci engine.....

raybec
91 must hatch
AMP Inc. - Die Engineer
306 DSS, alum heads, comp cam

charles copeland

unread,
May 4, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/4/99
to
In article <7gnhmd$i9o$1...@newshost.lanl.gov>,

302ci / 4.9L = 62ci / 1L

There are 62ci to a liter


Musashi

unread,
May 4, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/4/99
to
On 4 May 1999 19:27:09 GMT, curtis Novak <cu...@lanl.gov> wrote:

>Sorry if this is a dumb question, but what is the comparison between the
>old Cubic Inch engines and the new Liter designations?

61 cubic inches per liter.

-----
What made you say that?
Was it the moonlight, the starlight in your eyes?
What made you say that?
Have you been listening to your heart?
It's too late now, you don't want to take it back
I know love's what made you say that.

Walt Boeninger

unread,
May 4, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/4/99
to

charles copeland wrote:

>
> 302ci / 4.9L = 62ci / 1L

Need to go on order deeper in precision:

302ci / 4.94L = 61.1ci / 1l

61ci per liter


--

Regards
--------------
Walt Boeninger
HP1000 World Wide Support
Hewlett-Packard Mountain View Response Center
email: wa...@hpwrchm.mayfield.hp.com

ds...@mindspring.com

unread,
May 4, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/4/99
to
Walt Boeninger wrote in message
<372F8D5F...@hpwrchm.mayfield.hp.com>...

>
>
>charles copeland wrote:
>
>>
>> 302ci / 4.9L = 62ci / 1L
>
>Need to go on order deeper in precision:
>
>302ci / 4.94L = 61.1ci / 1l
>
>61ci per liter


Why do all that messy 'cipherin' when you can just plug 'n' chug into Dave's
Displacement Calculator at http://dsma.home.mindspring.com/cars/dc.html

More precision than you can shake a stick at!

Dave

Roger Marino

unread,
May 4, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/4/99
to
Here's a site that might be helpful (I can't/won't vouch for it's accuracy),

http://altnews.com.au/hadrian/measures/measures.htm


cu inch/L:
289 x .016387= 4.735843L or about a 4.7L
or take the
4.7L x 61.03=286.841
4.735843L x 61.03=289.0285

miles/Kilometers:
(the conversion #'s for mph to kph are "1.609344" & "0.6214", it runs a
little close together on that page)
so converting 100Km to miles is
100 x .6214 = 62.14mph
& the 55mph to Km is
55 x 1.6090344 = 88.45Km

Hope this helps.

Roger
95GT AODE

curtis Novak <cu...@lanl.gov> wrote in message
news:7gnhmd$i9o$1...@newshost.lanl.gov...


> Sorry if this is a dumb question, but what is the comparison between the
> old Cubic Inch engines and the new Liter designations?
>

Kevin Baker

unread,
May 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/5/99
to

ds...@mindspring.com wrote in message
<7go4qa$r0u$1...@nntp3.atl.mindspring.net>...


Well, Dave, if I'm somewhere without my computer and I want to figure
something out, I can remember 62ci/liter and do the math in my head.
Imagine that! BTW, the advertised displacement for most engines is
approximate at best. Most "2.0L" engines are 19XX cc.

GA Tech News

unread,
May 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/5/99
to
What i do is to set up a ratio-its not the most accurate but neither is the
liter designation they give to an engine (in other words, dont worry about
it). Since i know a 302 is 5.0L, i go: (5/302)=(liters/ci). If u want to
know the ci, u do (5/302)=(6.5L/??). Just go (302*6.5)/5 = 392.6 ci. It
sounds complicated but its just a ratio math problem (and u thought there
was no use for high school algebra!).

Hope this helps,
stangboy67

Mark Jones

unread,
May 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/5/99
to
The only problem with this is that the 302 should have
been listed as 4.9 liters but it wasn't for marketing reasons.
If you convert the 302 cu. inches to liters and round to
the nearest 0.1 liters you get 4.9 but that number doesn't
sound as good as 5.0 since the 305 in the Camaro is just enough
bigger to round to 5.0 liters. Often me the marketing
people have the final say when the competition is close like
this.

1 cubic inch = 16.387 Cubic Centimeters
61.02 cubic inches/liter


Ford 302 calculation:

Displacement = # of cylinders x stroke x (pi x bore x bore / 4)

8 x 3in x (3.1416 x 4in x 4in / 4) = 301.59 cubic inches

301.59 cubic inches = 301.59 x 16.387 = 4,942.15 cc = 4.9442 liters

Rounds to 4.9 liters

Chevy 305 calculation:

Displacement = # of cylinders x stroke x (pi x bore x bore / 4)

8 x 3.48in x (3.1416 x 3.736in x 3.736in / 4) = 305.19 cubic inches

305.19 cubic inches = 305.19 x 16.387 = 5,001.15 cc = 5.001 liters

Rounds to 5.0 liters


GA Tech News <m...@home.net> wrote in message
news:7gpshj$o1j$1...@news-int.gatech.edu...

0 new messages