TIA,
Steven
"Steven Hilgendorf" <stev...@wi.rr.com> wrote in message
news:QkJ5h.15080$vJ.1...@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
Thanks again,
Steven
Xx wrote:
>> That's the route I went about a month ago. I'd remove the tire on
>> the side of the engine I'm working on though, since some say it can
>> be done with the tire installed, I think it's easier with the tire
>> out of the way. I recommend wearing gloves at least on the driver's
>> side since when you remove the spark plug wire on one of the front
>> wires, you end up gouging your hand. Now is a good time to replace
>> the wires if needed.
my 2000 V8 will be needing plugs before too long. now has 79000 miles and
runs well. will the 2000 V8 be similar to the 98 V8??
should you use anti-seize when replacing plugs?
"Happy Traveler" <happy_t...@abc.net> wrote in message
news:x5idnWA0SbckuMXY...@comcast.com...
"Steven Hilgendorf" <stev...@wi.rr.com> wrote in message
news:1D%5h.93225$yd7....@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
Steven
>> HT, after some more research I found out that the SP432 (AGSF32FM) are
>> the correct NEW plugs recommended by Ford to replace the AWSF32EE. It
>> seems the AGSF32FM (SP432) is a new Motorcraft Fine-Wire Platinum plug.
By the way, I found a typo in my advice about wires. Meant to say:
".... Measuring resistance (as suggested by some manuals) is also futile,
because it's typically NOT the center conductor that fails...."
Another weird thing about the replacement plugs is that the threads are
longer, which appears as if the plug will seat further into the
cylinder. Here is a site that notes the differences of the plugs:
http://www.v8sho.com/SHO/SparkPlugChanges.htm
In addition, I am going to price a set of Motorcraft wires and will most
likely change them at the same time too.
Steven
If you look at the photographs in your reference, the distance from the
seating taper to the tip of the plug is the same for both types. Thus they
reach exactly to the same depth inside the chamber (I would be really
concerned about sticking in a plug that reaches longer than the original -
for a variety of reasons, including colliding with the piston at TDC). The
difference is that one is fully threaded, while the other is not. The fully
threaded one may be able to engage one or two more threads and help a bit
to prevent stripped threads by those who do not believe in torque
wrenches -- especially on aluminum heads (which luckily, our ancient 302
engines do not have...)
"Steven Hilgendorf" <stev...@wi.rr.com> wrote in message
news:n_G6h.13991$fh.1...@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
I did change the plugs and the pricey wires (~$216.00), turns out
removing the wheels and fender apron flaps made the job easy, thanks for
the tip. The hardest part was routing the wires. It seems to be
running perfect, though it run fine before the maintenance too.
Thanks again,
Steven
The reason double platinums are used on some engines is because the the
ignition system fires the spark with a negative voltage on half of the
cylinders and a positive voltage on the others. If you used single
platinum plugs, you'd have to get two kinds of plugs and install them
in the correct cylinders.
The double platinums cost a little more, but allow you to use the same
plug in all cylinders.
So you're right- the double platinums are not "better" and do cost
more, but just make the job simpler.
-Paul