<donm...@home.com> wrote in message
news:TbJS5.26364$g6.99...@news1.elmhst1.il.home.com...
"Steve Parker" <sparke...@wtceng.com> wrote in message
news:t1npnni...@corp.supernews.com...
> You need to read the error codes and fix it.
>
> <donm...@home.com> wrote in message
> news:TbJS5.26364$g6.99...@news1.elmhst1.il.home.com...
Listen to Steve he is correct and you are very wrong.
Rob
The current use of the "Check engine" light is to indicate that the on
board computer has detected a problem. This does require a code
scanner to determine what is wrong. It could be as simple as a loose
gas cap or a more serious problem. In any case whatever cased the
light to come on should be repaired.
Robert C.
I had my Explorer in for fuel injector service. About two days after that,
the check engine light came on so I made an appointment to go back. When I
took it back, they ran the scanner on it but couldn't get anything but
gibberish (their words not mine). The reset the light and said to come back
if it came back on. Luckily they didn't charge me. :)
Sure enough, two days later, bingo the "Check Engine" light is back on. I
can't see/hear/feel any problems other than being a little gutless on long
slow inclines/hills but I doubt that would make the light go on (it's been
like that since I bought it).
Anyway, back to the shop, onto the scanner, same "gibberish", same look of
confusion from the tech. Once again with the reset "call if it happens
again" answer (luckily again, no charge).
So do I find another Ford service center and see if they can find anything
or is this a chronic problem like I used to have on my F150 (even the
original dealer I bought it from said to ignore it as a known "glitch" on
that model pickup).
Comments, suggestions, areas to look for problems? The vehicle is a '97 XL
4x4 with the SOHC. 90,000km mostly highway, some city and some light offroad
(dirt/gravel). I don't tow anything but do carry a Bull Mastiff (all 130lbs)
in the back.
"Robert C" <rob...@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
news:fc7q1tskcvehudsg3...@4ax.com...
> Over the years manufactures have used the caption "Check Engine" on
> indicator lights that covered many different functions. Some did come
> on simply as a matter of mileage. This was designed to force certain
> emissions system maintenance although some repair shop did simply
> reset the light without performing the required maintenance. At on
> time Ford used a single light called "Check Engine" for both high
> engine temperature and low oil pressure.
>
> The current use of the "Check engine" light is to indicate that the on
> board computer has detected a problem. This does require a code
> scanner to determine what is wrong. It could be as simple as a loose
> gas cap or a more serious problem. In any case whatever cased the
> light to come on should be repaired.
>
> Robert C.
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Nov 2000 03:58:47 GMT, <donm...@home.com> wrote:
>
Since the light came on two days after the fuel injector service and
then comes back on two days after the "reset" would suggest the
possibility the repair shop did something wrong in the fuel injector
service which is causing the problem. Could this also explain why
they see "gibberish"? If they caused the problem they might have an
incentive not to be able to read the code.
Robert C
On Fri, 24 Nov 2000 04:55:38 GMT, "John Phillips" <jcph...@home.com>
wrote:
Well, I have looked through a lot of the postings on this board and there seems
to be a lot of this type of problem. According to the bulletin I just received
from my mechanic, Ford should replace these items at no cost up to 6 years or
72,000 miles, or until April 30, 2001.
Good luck all.
Chris.
Robert
"Cpieri" <cpi...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20001124175349...@ng-me1.aol.com...
The codes can be read without a scanner. In fact, the engine warning
light can be made to flash the codes. (The correct way is with a simple
voltmeter with a sweep hand). I have the diagram for a 91 somewhere It
is simple enough when you kind of think it through. Most explorer
manuals have a list of error codes. I have a set of those too. Codes are
cumulative so one probelm may result in 3 or 4 error codes which in
themselves are not errors but are set off by the first code. There are
static codes and dynamic codes as well as a procedure to be followed
prior to reading them.. I could go on...............
I believe you are right for a 91 ford (chevy and several others as well)
but as I understand it Ford has gone to a system which requires a scan
tool to read the new codes.
Anyone back me up on this?
Steve
Luigi Marazzi wrote:
-- IK
Chris, thanks for the heads-up!
--
Robert
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Robert C
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 17:20:55 GMT, sehaare <seh...@home.com> wrote:
>Luigi,
>
>I believe you are right for a 91 ford (chevy and several others as well)
>but as I understand it Ford has gone to a system which requires a scan
>tool to read the new codes.
>
>Anyone back me up on this?
>
>Steve
>
>Luigi Marazzi wrote: