Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

New approach to PT Cruiser power steering cooler repair

171 views
Skip to first unread message

Pete E. Kruzer

unread,
Mar 27, 2008, 3:49:51 PM3/27/08
to
I previously posted a problem in getting a power steerin cooler
without an upgrade.
There has to be OE coolers for a 2001 PT Cruiser somewhere that I can
purchase
and have installed. I see no reason to pay hundreds of additional
dollars for an
upgrade. I only have 48K on the car. If I could get another 46K
without the upgrade
I'd be satisfied.

Paul of Dayton

unread,
Mar 27, 2008, 10:07:31 PM3/27/08
to
note below:


"Pete E. Kruzer" <tomk...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:e194166f-7702-41c9...@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

why not buy a transmission cooler at the local parts barn and use it?

PoD


damnnickname

unread,
Mar 28, 2008, 5:52:34 PM3/28/08
to
And we have previously answered your reply. The only upgrade was adding the
hoses (return) to the cooler, If someone is telling you that there is more
labor to install this unit you need to find another person to work on your
vehicle.

Glenn Beasley
Chrysler Tech

--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutautos.com/group/rec.autos.makers.chrysler/
More information at http://www.talkaboutautos.com/faq.html

Pete E. Kruzer

unread,
Mar 29, 2008, 9:12:18 AM3/29/08
to

Glenn, Chrysler told me that part of the upgrade was a new resorvoir.

Pete E. Kruzer

unread,
Mar 29, 2008, 9:14:18 AM3/29/08
to
On Mar 29, 9:12 am, "Pete E. Kruzer" <tomka...@aol.com> wrote:

> Glenn, Chrysler told me that part of the upgrade was a new resorvoir.

And I forgot, new hoses, and of course a re-designed cooler, are part
of the upgrade.

All I wanted was an old style OE cooler.

maxpower

unread,
Mar 29, 2008, 10:22:24 PM3/29/08
to

"Pete E. Kruzer" <tomk...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:9497401c-0932-414b...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

Give me the last 8 numbers of the vin and the part number they want to sell
you.

Glenn


Pete E. Kruzer

unread,
Mar 30, 2008, 9:43:48 AM3/30/08
to
On Mar 29, 10:22 pm, "maxpower" <damnnickn...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Give me the last 8 numbers of the vin and the part number they want to sell
> you.
>
> Glenn

Glenn, I don't have the part number, but I can tell you the following:

VIN 1T503754

Krebs Chrysler / Jeep parts department told me:
Cooler - $97.75
Resorvoir - $43.26
Hose - $36.00
Labor - $295

maxpower

unread,
Mar 30, 2008, 2:43:18 PM3/30/08
to

"Pete E. Kruzer" <tomk...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:d9a3c895-5189-41ec...@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

VIN 1T503754

The part number is what I would really need. Im just wondering if the
reservoir and Pressure hose are leaking along with the cooler. Is that is
how the price got so high or are they not sure and just selling you
everything?

Glenn


Pete E. Kruzer

unread,
Mar 30, 2008, 3:56:49 PM3/30/08
to
On Mar 30, 2:43 pm, "maxpower" <damnnickn...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> The part number is what I would really need. Im just wondering if  the
> reservoir and Pressure hose are leaking along with the cooler. Is that is
> how the price got so high or are they not sure and just selling you
> everything?
>
> Glenn

They claim they're selling me everything because it's an upgrade from
the parts installed when the car was new in 2001.

damnnickname

unread,
Mar 31, 2008, 7:04:44 AM3/31/08
to
Pete I just ran your vin number and yes you are correct they did supersede
the cooler to a new number just recently and it does require installing a
new hose and resorvoir. It does not give us the info on why it was
changed. The part numbers are.
5272867ad hose
5272351aa resorvoir
5272354ae cooler

Glenn

Pete E. Kruzer

unread,
Mar 31, 2008, 8:51:02 AM3/31/08
to
On Mar 31, 7:04 am, "damnnickname" <damnnickn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Pete I just ran your vin number and yes you are correct they did supersede
> the cooler to a new number just recently and it does require installing a
> new hose and resorvoir. It does not give us the info on why it was
> changed. The part numbers are.
> 5272867ad hose
> 5272351aa resorvoir
> 5272354ae cooler
>
> Glenn

Thanks. Don't you think that Chrysler should pay for the hose and
resorvoir when all I need is a cooler?

I half jokingly said to the parts department person, "For $500 I can
add a hell of a lot of power steering fluid. She said, "You could have
a fire from the leaked fulid."
Now this statement indicates to me that it's a safety hazard, the
vehicle is "unsafe." Right now Ford is recalling thousands of F-150
pickups back to 1999 for replacement of cruise control parts. Why?
Because the OE could become defective and CAUSE A FIRE!! And the
owners of the 1999 trucks which are out of warranty aren't paying
penny one.

maxpower

unread,
Mar 31, 2008, 5:39:51 PM3/31/08
to

"Pete E. Kruzer" <tomk...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:05f3304c-1ecf-42cc...@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...

On Mar 31, 7:04 am, "damnnickname" <damnnickn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Pete I just ran your vin number and yes you are correct they did supersede
> the cooler to a new number just recently and it does require installing a
> new hose and resorvoir. It does not give us the info on why it was
> changed. The part numbers are.
> 5272867ad hose
> 5272351aa resorvoir
> 5272354ae cooler
>
> Glenn

Thanks. Don't you think that Chrysler should pay for the hose and
resorvoir when all I need is a cooler?

I dont know why they were superseded to an updated part.. No I dont think
Chrysler should pay for it. It is something that happens all the time and
not just with cars. I have a Homelite 360 Chain saw that needed bushings to
keep the engine from falling out of the mount and stop the vibration. I was
told they are no longer available and cant find them aftermarket either. I
cant make Homelite buy me a new saw. It happens!! They may have changed
suppliers and the supplier is making it different then the original part.
Just curious, how many miles does your PT have?

I half jokingly said to the parts department person, "For $500 I can
add a hell of a lot of power steering fluid. She said, "You could have
a fire from the leaked fulid." Now this statement indicates to me that it's
a safety hazard, the
vehicle is "unsafe."

I hate getting into conversations like this but think about it, you know
there is a leak, you can have it fixed. If it catches on fire then wouldnt
it be on the owner? If you kept adding fluid and it leaks out on the exhaust
whos fault is it? Transmissions leak fluid, engines leak oil, coolant leaks
as well, you cant say there should be a recall just because of that. Your
lawnmower may be leaking oil and could catch fire.


Right now Ford is recalling thousands of F-150
pickups back to 1999 for replacement of cruise control parts. Why?
Because the OE could become defective and CAUSE A FIRE!! And the
owners of the 1999 trucks which are out of warranty aren't paying
penny one.


I would think something like this would be different, it is a hidden problem
that cannot be seen.

My opinion

Glenn


Bill Putney

unread,
Mar 31, 2008, 6:15:53 PM3/31/08
to

There's a bunch of stuff that Chrysler should be forced to do safety
recalls on but aren't. How about windshield wipers that cut off and
otherwise behave sporadically on LH cars. How about steering racks that
lock up - that's right - lock up while going down the road at 60 mph.
The only thing I can figure is that the auto manufacturers have some
backdoor control of the NHTSA.

Bill Putney
(To reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with the letter 'x')

Bob AZ

unread,
Apr 1, 2008, 2:00:19 AM4/1/08
to
On Mar 27, 12:49�pm, "Pete E. Kruzer" <tomka...@aol.com> wrote:
> I previously posted a problem in getting a power steerin cooler
> without an upgrade.
> There has to be OE coolers for a 2001 PT Cruiser somewhere that I can
> purchase
> and have installed.

Where else have you tried for a cooler? Surely there ar aftermarket
coolers that will do what you need to do.

Bob AZ

maxpower

unread,
Apr 1, 2008, 3:21:38 PM4/1/08
to

"Pete E. Kruzer" <tomk...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:05f3304c-1ecf-42cc...@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Mar 31, 7:04 am, "damnnickname" <damnnickn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Pete I just ran your vin number and yes you are correct they did supersede
> the cooler to a new number just recently and it does require installing a
> new hose and resorvoir. It does not give us the info on why it was
> changed. The part numbers are.
> 5272867ad hose
> 5272351aa resorvoir
> 5272354ae cooler
>
> Glenn

Thanks. Don't you think that Chrysler should pay for the hose and
resorvoir when all I need is a cooler?

I dont know why they were superseded to an updated part.. No I dont think


Chrysler should pay for it. It is something that happens all the time and
not just with cars. I have a Homelite 360 Chain saw that needed bushings to
keep the engine from falling out of the mount and stop the vibration. I was
told they are no longer available and cant find them aftermarket either. I
cant make Homelite buy me a new saw. It happens!! They may have changed
suppliers and the supplier is making it different then the original part.
Just curious, how many miles does your PT have

I half jokingly said to the parts department person, "For $500 I can


add a hell of a lot of power steering fluid. She said, "You could have
a fire from the leaked fulid."
Now this statement indicates to me that it's a safety hazard, the
vehicle is "unsafe."

I hate getting into conversations like this but think about it, you know


there is a leak, you can have it fixed. If it catches on fire then wouldnt
it be on the owner? If you kept adding fluid and it leaks out on the exhaust
whos fault is it? Transmissions leak fluid, engines leak oil, coolant leaks
as well, you cant say there should be a recall just because of that. Your
lawnmower may be leaking oil and could catch fire.

Right now Ford is recalling thousands of F-150


pickups back to 1999 for replacement of cruise control parts. Why?
Because the OE could become defective and CAUSE A FIRE!! And the
owners of the 1999 trucks which are out of warranty aren't paying
penny one.

I would think something like this would be different, it is a hidden problem

0 new messages