Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

80 series Landcruiser rear axle removal - need advice.

628 views
Skip to first unread message

MugMechanic

unread,
Jan 11, 2008, 1:08:08 AM1/11/08
to
I've been doing the brakes on my '94 Landcruiser, no problem with that, but
I've noticed a slight oil leak from the right rear axle when I pulled off
the brake disk to check the handbrake and adjust. So I suspect an axle oil
seal needs replacing.
I have one of those rather useless Gregory's repair manuals and all it says
about removing the rear axle is :-

1. Remove the axle shaft to rear hub nuts and spring washers.
[OK done, removed six 12mm nuts and spring washers, bit tight with rust
but they came off OK with WD40.]

2. Using a hammer and brass punch on the studs remove the cone washers from
the axle shaft flange.
{Here I'm stuck. I've tried tapping the studs with a brass drift, but
nothing happens. I can see the "cone washers" but how hard do I have to belt
the studs to get them out? I'm afraid to bash the studs too hard for fear of
damaging them. I've applied some WD40 and let it stand overnight.}

3. Install 2 x M8x25mm bolts to the threaded holes in the axle shaft flange
and tighten evenly until the flange is dislodged from the rear hub.

[OK no problem, I can do that, but it seems you have to get the cone
washers out first as per step 2]

There are no comprehensive illustrations in the Gregory's manual to help.

Can anyone please advise on how to go about step 2 to get the cone washers
out, just tapping the studs even fairly hard with the brass drift dies not
seem to do the trick.

Cheers,

MugMechanic.


Terminal Crazy

unread,
Jan 11, 2008, 2:31:41 AM1/11/08
to
In article <fm7148$mt7$1...@news-01.bur.connect.com.au>, MugMechanic

<4435...@7489opiut.org.sk> wrote:
> 2. Using a hammer and brass punch on the studs remove the cone washers
> from the axle shaft flange. {Here I'm stuck. I've tried tapping the
> studs with a brass drift, but nothing happens. I can see the "cone
> washers" but how hard do I have to belt the studs to get them out? I'm
> afraid to bash the studs too hard for fear of damaging them. I've
> applied some WD40 and let it stand overnight.}

Hiya,
I recently adjusted the front wheel bearing on my wifes 91 Hulux surf
SSR-X. I've never come across the cone washers before but if you look
closely they are split to allow a change of diameter. They were in really
tight. You could try heat & wd40 but I just 'kept beating' on them behind
the split and between the gasket of the flange. The gasket itself wasn't
for moving either. Also thread the wheel nuts back on to protect the thread
and tap the bolt helps to loosen the cones.

HTH

--
Terminal_Crazy

Mitch - 1995 Z28 LT1 M6 termina...@sand-hill.freeserve.co.uk
Lancashire England http://www.sand-hill.freeserve.co.uk/terminal_crazy/

Mike Romain

unread,
Jan 11, 2008, 10:04:29 AM1/11/08
to
I would recommend you stop using a Water Displacement fluid and get some
real penetrating fluid. A product named PB BLaster is decent, Liquid
Wrench is decent and I am sure there are a few more brands.

Liquid wrench will do in an hour what a water displacer like WD40 will
loosen in a week of daily soakings. (well, maybe a few days) There is a
radical difference. Even brake fluid is a better penetrant than WD40,
but it is real hard on paint.

Mike (in the rust belt)
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
'New' frame in the works for '08. Some Canadian Bush Trip and Build
Photos: http://mikeromainjeeptrips.shutterfly.com

PeterD

unread,
Jan 11, 2008, 1:34:25 PM1/11/08
to
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:04:29 -0500, Mike Romain <rom...@sympatico.ca>
wrote:

>I would recommend you stop using a Water Displacement fluid and get some
>real penetrating fluid. A product named PB BLaster is decent, Liquid
>Wrench is decent and I am sure there are a few more brands.
>
>Liquid wrench will do in an hour what a water displacer like WD40 will
>loosen in a week of daily soakings. (well, maybe a few days) There is a
>radical difference. Even brake fluid is a better penetrant than WD40,
>but it is real hard on paint.
>

And for anyone too cheap to buy you can make your own. Take two parts
diesel fuel to ATF... Works well, and will soak in generally.

Aero-Kroil is another good product.

Mike Romain

unread,
Jan 14, 2008, 9:47:00 PM1/14/08
to
the same body, idem numero
would be in China.

The same river which runs there is idem numero as that which runs at the
same time in China.

513. Why God has established prayer.

1. To communicate to His creatures the dignity of causality.

2. To teach us from whom our virtue comes.

3. To make us deserve other virtues by work.

(But to keep His own pre-eminence, He grants prayer to whom He pleases.)

Objection: But we believe that we hold prayer of ourselves.

This is absurd; for since, though having faith, we cannot have virtues, how
should we have faith? Is there a greater distance between infidelity and
faith than between faith and virtue?

Merit. This word is ambiguous.

Meruit habere Redemptorem.78

Meruit tam sacra membra tangere.79

Digno tam sacra membra tangere.80

Non sum dignus.81

Qui manducat indignus.82

Dignus est accipere.83

Dignare me.84

God is only bound according to His promises. He has promised to grant
justice to prayers; He has never promised prayer only to the children of
promise.

Saint Augustine has distinctly said that strength would be taken away from
the righteous. But it is by


Mike Romain

unread,
Jan 15, 2008, 10:24:41 AM1/15/08
to
Mike Romain wrote:
> the same body, idem numero

Some brain dead asshole has a really warped sense of humor....

Mike

ruwade...@fairfaxmedia.co.nz

unread,
Dec 11, 2017, 2:57:23 PM12/11/17
to
Hey guys, does anyone know what the thread size is for the two bolts that remove the axles? M8 x what? 1? 1.5?

--
The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying files
is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use,
dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or
any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to copyright. No
part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the
written consent of the copyright owner. If you have received this e-mail in
error please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail or telephone
and delete all copies. Fairfax Media does not guarantee the accuracy or
completeness of any information contained in this e-mail or attached files.
Internet communications are not secure, therefore Fairfax Media does not
accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or attached
files.
0 new messages