Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Hickok 536 tester reading GM

207 views
Skip to first unread message

Adam Stouffer

unread,
Aug 30, 2008, 1:47:29 PM8/30/08
to
I have a Western Electric KS-5727-L1 tester which is basically a
re-badged Hickok 536. The meter has 3 numbered scales, 0-3000, 0-6000,
and 0-15,000. When the chart says to use the english dial and a minimum
reading is say 2700 what scale should be used?

Now a side question, doing the calibration procedures all the voltages
appear normal and the dials are very close to spec. Why do certain tubes
read good but extremely off the scale? As in the needle is bouncing on
the right. Is there something in particular to look for?


Adam

Message has been deleted

JP

unread,
Aug 31, 2008, 9:30:27 AM8/31/08
to
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 10:31:23 +0200, François Yves Le Gal
<fle...@aingeal.com> wrote:

>On Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:47:29 GMT, Adam Stouffer <adam_s...@hotmail.com>
>wrote:


>
>>I have a Western Electric KS-5727-L1 tester which is basically a
>>re-badged Hickok 536.
>

>Itself a 533 with an added line voltage meter.


>
>>When the chart says to use the english dial and a minimum
>>reading is say 2700 what scale should be used?
>

>The English scale is the Replace/Good scale. A reading above 2 700 on the
>top 0 - 3 000 Gm scale means that the tube is at the top of the Good range,
>a totally meaningless reading (except for eBay sellers of questionable
>tubes).
>
>Tubes should be measured at realistic voltages for emission *and*
>transconductance : a pumped tube still shows nominal transconductance with
>very little emission!


>
>>Now a side question, doing the calibration procedures all the voltages
>>appear normal and the dials are very close to spec. Why do certain tubes
>>read good but extremely off the scale? As in the needle is bouncing on
>>the right. Is there something in particular to look for?
>

>The tester should be fully checked, preferably by a qualified techie. What
>WE describes as a calibration is only a basic alignment procedure. A full
>calibration requires the use of bogey (reference) tubes - but don't worry,
>most Hickoks can't be properly calibrated: they are either precise for small
>signal tubes or for power bottles, not both...
>
Send it to Kennedy for cal...

BretLudwig

unread,
Aug 31, 2008, 5:07:02 PM8/31/08
to
AFAIK the WE Hickoks had an independent oscillator to test directly heated
tubes more accurately. As far as bogey tubes goes, I think the preferred
procedure today is to use a FET based calibration module.

All vintage tube testers should only be used with a precision AC source
if more than casual results are desired.

--
Message posted using http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/group/rec.audio.tubes/
More information at http://www.talkaboutaudio.com/faq.html

Adam Stouffer

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 11:16:38 AM9/1/08
to
JP wrote:
>>
> Send it to Kennedy for cal...

Sounds like the way to go. Going to put a few things on ebay first to
bring up my paypal account.


Adam

Adam Stouffer

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 11:31:07 AM9/1/08
to
BretLudwig wrote:
> AFAIK the WE Hickoks had an independent oscillator to test directly heated
> tubes more accurately. As far as bogey tubes goes, I think the preferred
> procedure today is to use a FET based calibration module.

I saw that idea mentioned on a tube tester site but it was called a "gm
emulator". Nobody really has any info on how its made. A DN2540 FET and
probably a handful of parts? Hey why aren't I selling these?


>
> All vintage tube testers should only be used with a precision AC source
> if more than casual results are desired.

The tester in question has a line voltage meter and rheostat for
adjustments, plus the AC in my apt is usually 120 exactly.


Adam

JP

unread,
Sep 1, 2008, 12:48:48 PM9/1/08
to
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:31:07 GMT, Adam Stouffer
<adam_s...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>gm
>emulator
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread/t-95834.html

Message has been deleted

sucke...@gmx.us

unread,
Sep 2, 2008, 1:00:23 AM9/2/08
to
On Sep 1, 2:11 pm, François Yves Le Gal <fle...@aingeal.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:31:07 GMT, Adam Stouffer <adam_stouf...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >I saw that idea mentioned on a tube tester site but it was called a "gm
> >emulator".
>
> Silicon can't replace bogey tubes when it comes to calibrating a tester for
> current and emissions.

Quite wrong. The precision is much better. And, there are no more
bogey tubes left. Any tube older than 25 years or so has had SOME
gassing making them useless for metrology even if they work fine in
practical circuits.

There are tests that silicon can't easily emulate such as multiple
gain curve plots done on pentagrid converter/oscillators and pentodes
used with varying screen grid signals, which some radar circuits used.
Regular testers do not make these tests.

The Hickok transconductance tube tester is a simple concept that can
be easily duplicated by the hobbyist. What you are buying with a tube
tester is the multiple sockets, configurations and heater voltages
which take a lot of complication.

Message has been deleted
0 new messages