thank you
george
--
*--------------------------------------*
| George Vasileiadis |
| SLAC, Stanford Univ. |
| email : vasi...@slac.stanford.edu | |______________________________________|
| Tel : 1-650-926-4463 |
*--------------------------------------*
Dunno anything about the amp, but usually triode mode has lower distortion
and power. In my 50C5 SE amp, I prefer it. I think it also sounds better
at higher volume (even though power output is lower).
> By the why should I put a 100Ohm resistor in series for the connection ?
All the data sheets I've seen say direct connection, but I've always heard
to use a resistor. Go figure.
Tim
--
"Stupider like a FOX!"
- Homer Simpson
Jonathan Knight
Still, it's so easy to make a temporary change, it doesn't hurt to try. If
you have access to a square wave generator and an oscilloscope, you can
look at square wave performance before and after the change. If you see a
large increase in ringing on a 1kHz square wave, then you know you need to
go back and make changes to the driver stage. Otherwise you're not making
a valid comparison of the two modes of operation.
Jonathan Knight
I think it has to do more with "just being sure" than any
other consideration. Much like grid-stoppers at control
grids; they're not always needed, or even desirable, but
people like to put them in just in case something goes wrong.
Putting a grid-stopper in a screen grid seems to me
counter-productive, since there is a varying screen current
drawn which translates to a varying screen voltage (relative
to plate)... if this is too great, there goes true triode
mode. Whereas on control grids, generally the only thing
that happens with too large a grid stopper (unless you're
running class AB2 or B2) is that high frequencies can be
undesirably attenuated.
Fred N
--
+----------------------------------------------------------+
+ New Music for free download. Get it in hi-fi mp3 at +
+ http://www.ampcast.com/frednachbaur +
+ +
+ my home site: http://www.netidea.com/~fredn +
+----------------------------------------------------------+
I'm guessing that you have SA-300 amps. These are very good amps... far better
than many classic amps that are highly sought-after. They are likely to become
valuable in the future, when their great performance becomes known. Seriously
consider keeping any modifications reversible.
I'd suggest that you replace every coupling capacitor in there. Most will be
leaking by now and Fisher didn't use the best ones originally :-)
As for triode mode, I never connected mine in triode (wish I still had them; I
would :-) but I've done ti to lots of others and always found a great
improvement.
I definitely would use 100R between the screen grid and the plate to control
oscillations... otherwise, you might exceed screen max. dissipation.
Also, you say 6L6, but mention EL34s. I expect that the amp will sound better
with EL34s if you have good ones available.
The SA300 is one of the quietest amps I've ever used. You may be able to lift
the FB loop as well. I have found that most Fisher amps will work without FB
and require no other mod, except maybe a choke in the PSU. Yours may get by
without the choke unless you have very efficient speakers. When I lifted the FB
loop on my current Fisher X100-B, I had to add a choke (96dB speakers) to stop
the hum. 6 Hy was sufficient.
I think you will be pleased with quasi-triode operation as long as you have
sufficient power for your speakers.
Cheers/Carron
"LABOR SVGIT"
Patrick Turner.
--
message sent by Choky,
Prodanovic Aleksandar
ch...@EUnet.yu
YU
"Patrick Turner" <in...@turneraudio.com.au> wrote in message
news:3B712611...@turneraudio.com.au...
Wiz wrote in message <20010808072219...@ng-fu1.aol.com>...
>George,
>
>I'm guessing that you have SA-300 amps. These are very good amps... far
better
>than many classic amps that are highly sought-after. They are likely to
become
>valuable in the future, when their great performance becomes known.
Seriously
>consider keeping any modifications reversible.
You've probably guessed wrong: Fisher made three monoblocs (boy do I dislike
that word) that used PP EL37s. There was the 70AZ, the 80AZ and the 100.
It seems that they employed the same basic circuit with cosmetic and circuit
feature variations. All employed split loading using a conventional plate
winding and a less conventional cathode winding. As a result, the plate
load is quite low. The output transformer was probably optimized for
pentode operation. Assuming this to be the case, I would be very wary of
converting to triode operation. In my mind this would be akin to converting
a pentode unity coupled Mac amp to triode. BTW the EL37 is a true pentode
and not a beam tetrode like the 6L6 although in these amps they're
interchangeable.
Steve
I'd have to think you're right about this. They're funky-looking amps, by the
way.
> It seems that they employed the same basic circuit with cosmetic and circuit
> feature variations. All employed split loading using a conventional plate
> winding and a less conventional cathode winding. As a result, the plate
> load is quite low. The output transformer was probably optimized for
> pentode operation. Assuming this to be the case, I would be very wary of
> converting to triode operation. In my mind this would be akin to converting
> a pentode unity coupled Mac amp to triode.
I have plans of doing exactly this to my MC-30's one day, in hopes that they'll
sound a little more like my MI-200's (which blow the circuit breaker in my
house, overheat the living room in the summer and use rare, expensive output
tubes). I do expect it to be a big project, requiring careful selection of
tube type and modification to the drive circuitry. But I think it could be
promising if done right.
> BTW the EL37 is a true pentode
> and not a beam tetrode like the 6L6 although in these amps they're
> interchangeable.
>
> Steve
Jonathan