So, I am looking for someone who has built either type to share their
experiences. Basically, I would like their opinion on how the amplifier
sounded.
Currently, I am running a single ended 45 directly driven by a 6SN7 with a bias
supply. The bias supply sounds much beter than cathode biasing. Much more
detail. Voices and instruments separate.
Ed
You might try the Direct Heated Triode WWW page at www4.big.or.jp/~dh/
(thanks, Ned, for the excellent Links page). It is an interesting site
and I believe has one or more schematics and text on tube amps using
interstage transformers. You might also check out some of the other links
at www.triodeel.com. Good luck!
Carl Seals
In article <19980204034...@ladder03.news.aol.com>,
-------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====-----------------------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet
>I am planning to build either a single ended amp 1) 45/2A3/300B with an
>interstage or 2) 801A with an inverted interstage transformer.
>So, I am looking for someone who has built either type to share their
>experiences. Basically, I would like their opinion on how the amplifier
>sounded.
>Currently, I am running a single ended 45 directly driven by a 6SN7 with a bias
>supply. The bias supply sounds much beter than cathode biasing. Much more
>detail. Voices and instruments separate.
>Ed
I have been playing with a similar to yours setup: initially 6SN7
driving a 6A3 (same as 2A3 but 6.3v). Didn't like the sound much;
maybe it's the general sound of 6SN7, some call it cold, in my system
it's outright harsh and also can it drive the o/p tube? I know many
amps are built around it, in some it drives not one but two 300B, hmm.
The sound improved tremendously when the i/p was replaced with a 6SL7
and the driver with a triode strapped 6L6: bass, freedom from
distortion, drive (don't take my metaphors too literally, it's a bit
short of a Krell (oops, sorry)). It may have been better to simply use
another 6A3 as a driver but I didn't have extra. Now that I had a
reasonable driver (about 1.3kohm o/p resistance if not mistaken) a
logical step looked to use an IT transformer, it's also an elegant way
to apply fixed bias to the o/p tube. Of course you need good quality
preferably airgapped xformers. I used poxy little Hammonds and a few
nameless ones without much luck. The sound mellows down and becomes
pleasanly homogenous but at the expense of serious bandwidth limiting:
pleasant but lofi. What a really good IT transformer can do I have no
idea.
peter
If you're using two 6SN7 in a cascade, using different brands can
sometimes prevent them ripping your ears off. But once you get them
right (bypassing the cathode resistor helps), nothing is more precise
and beautiful, given that your taste is austere rather than hedonistic.
(Jesus, if I carry on like this, Randy will come hold me up as an
example against the "Engineers". Better mend my ways quickly:)
>and also can it drive the o/p tube? I know many
> amps are built around it, in some it drives not one but two 300B, hmm.
Calculate the slew rate current, multiply by an arbitrary constant of 5,
and you have a good idea of how much drive a tube needs. It comes to
well under 5mA for a 300B (from memory actually 4.1mA), and (also from
memory) under 20mA for an 845, and under 13mA for a 212-E. It is for
this reason that the bigger tubes are so often driven by another power
tube in a booster configuration, and via an interstage transformer.
> The sound improved tremendously when the i/p was replaced with a 6SL7
A much warmer sound than a 6SN7, but less accuracy too. I'm not knocking
it; my first choke coupled 300B, a very successful amp, uses a 6SL7 for
a lovely warm, enveloping sound. You should also in zero feedback
situations check the SL's bandwidth with a very skeptical eye.
> and the driver with a triode strapped 6L6: bass, freedom from
> distortion, drive (don't take my metaphors too literally, it's a bit
> short of a Krell (oops, sorry)). It may have been better to simply use
> another 6A3 as a driver but I didn't have extra. Now that I had a
> reasonable driver (about 1.3kohm o/p resistance if not mistaken) a
> logical step looked to use an IT transformer, it's also an elegant way
> to apply fixed bias to the o/p tube. Of course you need good quality
> preferably airgapped xformers. I used poxy little Hammonds and a few
> nameless ones without much luck. The sound mellows down and becomes
> pleasanly homogenous but at the expense of serious bandwidth limiting:
> pleasant but lofi. What a really good IT transformer can do I have no
> idea.
Plenty.
I use the Lundahl LL1635-SE which is very keenly priced. I was looking
for an IST for a series of SE amps, so I asked Per Lundahl to make the
established LL1635-PP with an airgap for SE use. He will, if he hasn't
already, be cataloguing the LL1635-SE when I publish the circuits I
designed around it. It is a 1:1 IST capable of 9mA before it saturates,
requires no loading, and is recommended for 5mA, which is just right for
6SN7 driving 300B. It sounds great.
I use only 1:1 IST whenever I can, because that avoids bandwidth and
peaking problems that come with stepped transformers, requiring primary
or secondary loading which in turn brings added distortion.
I'm working with another tranny designer and windery on a very high
current interstage to use in my SV572 "Universal" design. But we're
still at the output tranny, so it will be a while before we know how
well the IST works.
Andre
--
Andre Jute an...@indigo.ie COMMUNICATION JUTE
--see our pages for music lovers, writers and audiophiles at
http://indigo.ie/~andre/ComJuteF1.html
http://www.foundmark.com/ComJute/ComJuteF1.html
http://opera.iinet.net.au/~rang
Rob.
[Much nonsense snipped.]
> I use the Lundahl LL1635-SE which is very keenly priced.
Hmmm, what does price matter if you aren't paying for them?
Care to tell us how many Lundahl transformers you have bought, Andre?
Did you buy 100? Did you buy 27? (They are the Chosen Transformer for
your Real McCoy 'Lundahl' amps, right?) Did you buy 10? Did you buy 2?
Did you even buy a single Lundahl transformer, ever??!!!
> I'm working with another tranny designer and windery on a very high
> current interstage to use in my SV572 "Universal" design. But we're
> still at the output tranny, so it will be a while before we know how
> well the IST works.
Who are you scamming now, scum? Do they know your deal, that you refuse
to return review samples *loaned* to you? (How many people have you
pulled this scam with anyway?)
> Andre Jute an...@indigo.ie COMMUNICATION JUTE
> --see our pages for music lovers, writers and audiophiles at
> http://indigo.ie/~andre/ComJuteF1.html
> http://www.foundmark.com/ComJute/ComJuteF1.html
Advertising, all advertising. But the question is: were the companies
and products highlighted on your pages aware of the deal -- advertising
and promotion in exchange for free components -- before the fact, or are
you simply providing the promotional service to appease them after the
fact, after you have refused to return the review samples they loaned
you?
Shall we post a public tally of what the various suppliers have told us
about your scams? (Oh, and by the way, how is Mr. Andrew Taylor, your
partner in the "Taylor-Jute Manuscript Review Service" you advertise?)
-frank (I have taken the liberty of having a copy of this post e-mailed
to Mr. Jute, as he is claiming to be using a killfile....)