Also, one of the amplifiers has a small bimetal contact with heater
resistor. Is this the "surgistor" mentioned in one of the service
bulletins?
Many thanks in advance,
- Gary
Hiya Gary,
The larger 16458 trannies were a replacement for the smaller OPTs that
blew often, I wouldn't worry about the 16458 (IMHO)
I replaced the PS with cerafines and the decoupling caps with solen
polyprops.... very worthwhile. I would also recommend changing the input /
driver to a 7119 or 5687. The phase splitter; well I would be interested in a
Lundhal 1638 interstage tranny for starters. Yes, the bimetal / nichrome wire
is the surgistor. All in all, the Heath W5M was pretty well the culmination of
prior heathkit efforts and is quite a nice amp... just lose the 12AU7A
distortion tubes!
My opinion only!
Oh yea, change output tubes to EL37!
FWIW
bill
Randy Fay
William Mollard wrote in message <36ce...@news.vphos.net>...
Randy Fay
Randolph Fay wrote in message ...
I have a pair that use the small opt, have been modded to use EL34's, 5687's
6FQ7 and a GZ34 rectifier. The power transformers have hung in there just
fine. And these have been running for several years now. I have noticed that
Stancor made some of the power transformers on these. And this seems to be
the one of my two that doesn't get as hot. Everything I did stresses the
power transformer harder than the orig ckt, but still they live.
The extra 6.3V supply does make sense. I don't see a need for DC though.
The other pair I own use 6B4's in the output, DC was a necessity here.
Should one lose a power transformer, there are good substitutions out there.
And the sneaky guy might even be able to fit one inside the original can.
Have fun!
Ron S.
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own