I have a stereo receiver that has + - connection for each
speaker for a total of two speakers . I am attempting to connect these
two connections to an amplifier that has female rca inputs . My
question is can I snip the ends off of two rca cables and run wires
from the + - connection of each speaker to the exposed wire of the
snipped off end . I thought when I snipped off the ends there would be
two wires exposed one for the inner pin of the rca jack and one for
the outer shield of the rca jack (ground). What I have found is one
single strand of wire which confuses me as I thought that + and - had
to be seperated. I do not want to damage my receiver so I am afraid to
experiment.
Any help would be deeply appreciated .
Thanks Mason
"MASON" <allo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:74e35d64.0312...@posting.google.com...
> NO, do not connect your receiver speaker outputs to an
> RCA line input of an amp...... not only will you end up
> with hum, distortion and signal level problems BUT
Could we please say "do not connect directly, use a suitable interface
box with an attenuator, thank you very much.
> it you accidentally reverse the polarity and ground out the (+)
> terminal of the speaker output you can "blow" your receiver's
> amplifier section..... big bucks to repair.
Worst case yes.
> receiver..... You would be much wiser to use the
> TAPE OUT or TAPE REC output jack on the
> back of the receiver
No he will not, the questionee appears to want the signal after the
volume control. In which case the reply is:
USE THE HEADPHONE OUTPUT, it is a suitable line level signal, albeit
possibly somewhat strong, so take care with the level adjustment.
> ...... not only will these output jacks be of the RCA
Stereo jack -> pair of phono adapters do exist on the marketplace.
> type but it will also be the correct "line" level and impedance
> to feed into the RCA jacks of the AUX input of your amp.
It will not be regulated.
> You can then use standard
> RCA/RCA patch cords.
As with the adapter plug described.
> Best Regards,
> Daniel Sofie
> Electronics Supply & Repair
Hmmm ... anyway, the questionee appears to have overlooked the shield
when cutting a cable. Again: the correct reply that addresses the
required functionality is to use the headphone output because it is
suitably attenuated and resistor-buffered.
/* context lost due to topposting */
--
*************************************************************
* \\\\\\\ Quality Ascii handcrafted by Peter Larsen /////// *
* \\\\\\\ My site is at: http://www.muyiovatki.dk /////// *
*************************************************************
Mark Z.
--
Please reply only to Group. I regret this is necessary. Viruses and spam
have rendered my regular e-mail address useless.
"MASON" <allo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:74e35d64.0312...@posting.google.com...
Thanks for all the ideas,your all very knowlegable . I am going
to go with the headphone jack idea as the tape out does not let me
control volume as a previous poster stated and the stereo amp does not
have a volume control . One more question to clarify things if I may.
I pulled back the boot if that is what it is called on the rca jack
that I snipped off and did notice two wires . One wire to the inner
pin and one wire to the outer shield, ground I assume. My problem is
theses two wires seem to join together in the wiring part of the cable
between the two ends . I thought like I stated prevously that + and -
on a speaker connection had to be kept seperated . Am I incorrect in
stating this from viewing the snipped off rca cable ? Just looking to
learn something .
Thanks Again Mason
"MASON" <allo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message