> "ceed" <cdposte...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:op.u55vvjpf325jvr@christian-laptop...
>> On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:54:51 -0600, Ezekiel <not-...@the-zeke.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> What explains its chronic and long-standing problems?
>>> Such as?
>>
>> http://is.gd/5QSLB
>>
>> There tons more of these all over. I have a lot of friends and family
>> on Windows. Behind malware and general windows not working problems
>> Explorer related ones is a good #3.
>
> I've been using Windows for many years. Not only have I never seen this
> bug - I've never even heard of this. And this doesn't sound like a "long
> standing problem<BITCHSLAP>
"Windows 7"
You brain-dead fuckweed.
--
Test signature
> Matt pulled this Usenet boner:
>
>> Hadron wrote:
>>
>>> *ANY* real C programmer that works on many projects will tell you that
>>> the biggest issue by far is the C prorammers writing code for speed
>>> and forgetting that an int MIGHT be more than 16 bits or even on the
>>> other end of the endian scale ....
>
> An int hasn't been 16 bits in a lonnnnnng time.
>
>> As you say, why would most programmers working against a deadline worry
>> about architectures that were merely pie in the sky? Because they or
>> their managers don't want their work thrown on the scrap heap?
>
> That is where open-source *shines* -- you don't have to worry about
> marketing deadlines, and you *can* code more portably, and do things the
> *right* way.
Well, at least until the project gets bought out by commercial interests
and makes the project's founder's filthy fucking rich and you don't see a
single cent, let alone a "Thanks for making me us rich, you suckers!"
--
Test signature
> Ezekiel wrote:
>> brain
>
> You obviously don't use it.
You obviously don't have one.
> See below why not
--
Test signature
> I don't know what I've done to it either.
I said that to one of my rent-wives who came home with a looser cunt than
what she went out with.
I have scratches down the side of my face to prove it.
--
Test signature