However, I had the opportunity to hear Norah singing "Don't Know Why"
live on Saturday Night Live, and he was right on-pitch! She didn't
hit a single bad note, either vocally or on the piano, during the
whole performance, and I was very impressed. I've since come across
an early recording of her singing "One Flight Down" live (at The
Living Room in NYC in 2000) and in that case she's also spot-on pitch
and flawless -- in fact, were it not for the occasional clinking of
chinaware in the background and the applause at the end, it could pass
for a final mix of a studio recording.
So, the question is, who and *why* was Norah told to *purposely* sing
flat on her album? If that was just part of her "style", you'd expect
her to do it when singing live as well, but that's not the case.
Would she NOT have won so many Grammys if she had sung "Don't Know
Why" on-pitch? I don't think so....
They are called producers.
Must have worked. She sold a metric shitload of copies of that album.
--
Dr. Nuketopia
Sorry, no e-Mail.
Spam forgeries have resulted in thousands of faked bounces to my address.
Hmm ... it's VERY hard to sing a few cents flat *consistently*. It's my
guess that it's the result of electronic processing of some kind - either
deliberately, to create the effect, or as a consequence of processing to
achieve some other end ...
Mind you, with her looks and her talant, who cares anyway? :o)
The standard fix....one ear on, one ear off (headphones that is).
Regards,
MM
Michael McInnis Productions
www.mm-pro.com
"WBRW" <wb...@radiomailbox.com> wrote in message news:2736fe5c.03072...@posting.google.com...
--
Serwis Usenet w portalu Gazeta.pl -> http://www.gazeta.pl/usenet/
I think this is just a sad side effect of all the other current artists
using pitch correction (whether they need it or not) and kudos to her
producers for NOT using it. Someone has be the bold first one. I've found
that after listening to lots of "current" music putting on some old
favorites that were "perfect" to me before sound almost unlistenable at
times because of "bad pitch" (but that's a relative remember). Autotune is a
form of addiction and functions just like a drug addict that needs purer and
purer levels to attain the same "high". Normal things no longer sound "good
enough". Autotune is to good music as an apple is to corn syrup.
Thanks Michael,
I was wondering if the phenomenon was that headphones always cause flatting.
Does anyone know if headphones may also cause sharping?
And what's that about anyway? Too much level in the headphones might cause
the tympanic membrane to be pushed slightly out of shape? Would that make
the singer's voice appear higher in pitch than it really is?
Regards,
Ty Ford
For Ty Ford V/O demos, audio services and equipment reviews,
click on http://www.jagunet.com/~tford
I wonder about latency & pitch as well.
A lot of singers seem to do better overall hearing some of themselves in real air, for whatever reason. So, before I chalk
it up to lack of talent, I always try the headphone deal.
Regards,
MM
Michael McInnis Productions
www.mm-pro.com
m...@maine.rr.com
"Ty Ford" <tf...@jagunet.com> wrote in message news:tford.14...@news.jagunet.com...
> << So, the question is, who and *why* was Norah told to *purposely* sing
> flat on her album? I >><BR><BR>
> They are called producers.
> Must have worked. She sold a metric shitload of copies of that album.
I was just trying to remember the name of the last guy who thought to
build his career on second guessing Arif Mardin...
--
ha
That depends on what "level" you're talking about. Louder overall
headphone volume tends to make someone push a little to get above the
mix in the cans... but I find the following to be true more often than
not:
1) When the vocals are hotter than the backing tracks in the headphone
mix, the singer tends to get tenative and starts flatting and...
2) When the backing tracks are hotter, the singer starts going sharp
trying to hear themselves.
For me, before I start telling the talent that they're going flat or
sharp I ask "how's the headphone mix?"
Different cans can help, too.
"Ricky W. Hunt" <ricky...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:IKwSa.105321$ye4.77902@sccrnsc01...
Still, some singers need the non-electronic room sound...I don't know why.
Regards,
MM
Michael McInnis Productions
www.mm-pro.com
m...@maine.rr.com
"Chris Coleman" <lyndhol...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:fa9bc045.03072...@posting.google.com...
> In Article <vhl1ssj...@news.supernews.com>, "Michael McInnis"
> <m...@maine.rr.com> wrote:
> >Lots of vocalists with good pitch sing flat when using headphones.
> >
> >The standard fix....one ear on, one ear off (headphones that is).
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >MM
> >
> >Michael McInnis Productions
> >www.mm-pro.com
>
> Thanks Michael,
>
> I was wondering if the phenomenon was that headphones always cause flatting.
> Does anyone know if headphones may also cause sharping?
>
> And what's that about anyway? Too much level in the headphones might cause
> the tympanic membrane to be pushed slightly out of shape? Would that make
> the singer's voice appear higher in pitch than it really is?
Singers are fascinating. I've been fortunate to have worked with some very
accomplished, talented singers and their teachers who come from varied
pedagogies. The explanation I got is that singers have individual registers
(those parts of their anatomies which detect or interpret pitch!) and some are
blinded by headphones. Classically trained belcanto tenors, for instance, use
much of their body, even the feet, when singing. I can offer another tool that
sometimes helps. When singers are having a problem with pitch perception I
will strip the mix in their cans down to two elements, tempo and pitch. Some
singers will hear the bass better than a piano so for them I will leave a bit
of the drums and the bass. Others will relate to the guitar, whatever. One
fairly constant thing is that most IME have trouble singing with a full, high
volume mix. Oh, and I've seen singers go both sharp and flat on phones.
FWIW
Cheers,
TB
--
All tribal myths are true, for a given value of "true"
This is great advice and can work wonders with some singers.
---------------------------------------
"I know enough to know I don't know enough"
Probably because we are accustomed to listening to ourselves without
headphones, and what we hear then is mostly via bone conduction. Wearing
headphones overrides bone conduction and that changes what we hear
dramatically.
--
Chris White, Freelance Advertising Writer & Voice Overs*
Email: ch...@chriswhite.com Web: www.chriswhite.com
Phone: 757-621-1348
*Your opinion may vary
I often notice headphones make people tune their instruments sharp and the mix
is key for a singer certainly, but different singers usually find what works
for them and it can vary a lot. I do more often hear women sing sharp and men
flat than the other way around.
P h i l i p
______________________________
"I'm too fucking busy and vice-versa"
- Dorothy Parker
> Can you really see these producers telling someone to sing off key?
> "No honey that was on pitch, can we try it again"? Unfortunately the
> pitch correction era in music has made people used to perfect pitched
> vocals and other things..like perfect rhythm section timing. I see it
> in my own discernment of recordings. Jones' success has at least
> somewhat proven that it's still songs and mood that people key into.
Carol Burnett sings well enough for Broadway. She used to mimic bad
singing just that way -- singing the song very near a semi-tone off pitch.
That might be harder than singing in key.
dtk
>Hmm ... it's VERY hard to sing a few cents flat *consistently*. It's my
>guess that it's the result of electronic processing of some kind - either
>deliberately, to create the effect, or as a consequence of processing to
>achieve some other end ...
or, more likely, a shitty headphone mix...
>I often notice headphones make people tune their instruments sharp and the mix
>is key for a singer certainly, but different singers usually find what works
>for them and it can vary a lot. I do more often hear women sing sharp and men
>flat than the other way around.
Interesting. Perceived intervals expand as you listen louder and shrink
as you turn the volume down.
I had a chance once to experiment on a bunch of complete novices in a
class I taught with a vocal coach. Without exception, they all sang way
better in tune when none of their vocal was being fed to the phones.
Too bad we can't talk most folks into recording that way.
Jo Stafford and Paul Weston (??) used to do a gag act at parties, where she
would sing (perfectly) a semi-tone flat. Paul's exagerated and flowery
piano accompaniment was brilliant. Later they recorded a couple of albums
as Jonathan and Darlene Edwards. The album cover showed two left hands
playing the piano.
Steve King
> Can you really see these producers telling someone to sing off key?
One of the reasons Arif is so famous for his work with divas is that he
doesn't tell them what to do. In a largely male dominated environment he
puts his producer shoulder to the wheel on the woman's behalf, so that
she stands a chance of making the record she wants. And the results
speak for all of them.
--
hank alrich * secret mountain
audio recording * music production * sound reinforcement
"If laughter is the best medicine let's take a double dose"
And what's that about anyway? Too much level in the headphones might cause
the tympanic membrane to be pushed slightly out of shape? Would that make
the singer's voice appear higher in pitch than it really is? >>
I find it to be psychological rather than physical...
If a singer, particularly an inexperienced one, has too much volume from the
track, or from their vocal in the 'phones, they tend to oversing to keep up and
then often go sharp.
Or, if there is too little of the track in the 'phones, they sometimes
undersing and go flat.
It's voodoo, a black art, really, with folks who don't sing in headphones a
lot, to figure out what it is they need to feel good and stay on pitch...
But then I work with a lot of these folks....
stv
The same exact thing could be said about loudness/compression used in
audio mastering. Just as the "hypercompression wars" hit CDs in the
mid-'90s, the same thing happened to *cassettes* as well -- pull out
an old (but well-cared for) cassette from the '70s or '80s and you'd
be astonished by how much dynamic range they have (yes, even despite
the background hiss).
And in Ms. Jones' case, it is worthwhile to seek a copy of her "Early
Sessions" CD, which not only offers her songs in a more pure form,
lacking the over-dubbed backing vocals and extra instrumentation, it
is also refreshingly free from the over-compressed "grunge" of her
commercial CD release. It is amazing to be able to listen to "Don't
Know Why" without that awfully obvious clipping distortion during the
"loud" bridge parts -- and her voice isn't jacked up enough in
loudness to drown out the piano and drums, either.
Still, I perfer the live, on-pitch Saturday Night Live rendition of
the song. Unfortunately, I didn't have my VCR cued up at the time.
So, not that I condone "sharing" of copyrighted music, but does
anybody have a good-quality MP3 of it? Er... a "friend" of mine uses
Kazaa, and "he" hasn't been able to find it there yet.
Sure. And they'd refer to it as "old skool" or "analog".
I would think it was the vocal cords that are being pushed out of shape. The
singer can't hear themselves over the loud background music so they sing
harder thus "pushing sharp" via the forced air.
It's called expression', and can be done in both frequency and time domains.
In this case to provide a laid-back feel. Seems to have worked ....
> However, I had the opportunity to hear Norah singing "Don't Know Why"
> live on Saturday Night Live, and he was right on-pitch! She didn't
> hit a single bad note, either vocally or on the piano, during the
> whole performance, and I was very impressed.
Maybe it takes so much effort to acheive correctly, that she doesn't try the
pitch thing in live situtations.
> So, the question is, who and *why* was Norah told to *purposely* sing
> flat on her album? If that was just part of her "style", you'd expect
> her to do it when singing live as well, but that's not the case.
She could have had that input *herself*. Not necessarily instructions from
producer.
> Would she NOT have won so many Grammys if she had sung "Don't Know
> Why" on-pitch? I don't think so....
Dunno, but less likely to have hit the same chord (so to speak) if the music
was done to a click and pitch-perfect. Would have sounded a little on the
sterile side maybe ...
geoff
yes, I dont know why this has been the trend in my life. The instrument thing
is probably because it's always rock bands that are tuning through headphones
or using them in the first place their headphones are often unbelieveably loud.
The male/female thing I'm not sure about but it's probably has nothing to do
with headphones as much as how different people are pitch sensitive. Does
anyone know if people have a harder time hearing sharpness above a certain
octave?
>I had a chance once to experiment on a bunch of complete novices in a
>class I taught with a vocal coach. Without exception, they all sang way
>better in tune when none of their vocal was being fed to the phones.
>Too bad we can't talk most folks into recording that way.>
Oh I know, and I've done it to myself too. We all want to hear those little
details of our voice in the headphones but it's often death for the feel of the
performance because the rhythm goes along with the pitch.
I was just working with a singer/songwriter who was singing and playing
at the same time, and had two elements at his control: guitar and voc,
right? By the end of the session he'd pushed the guitar up so far in
the phones that he was barely playing it, with almost more voc than
guitar in the guitar mics. Not a pretty sound.
--
John Etnier
Studio Dual
http://www.studiodual.com
One of the true giants in this industry. I'll buy something just
because his name's on it, even if I don't know the artist.
Self recorded both "with vs. without" headphones, and the
ones without were MUCH better. Not just pitch, the "feel".
(have good relative pitch BTW)
Read Nora's is going to be using a SM58 for her next album,
maybe that's what they're planning (no headphones).
Chris
There was a discussion of this on the pro audio list a few months ago.
It is well known psychoacoustic phenomenon where quieter sounds are
perceived as being slightly flatter than louder sounds. Getting the
headphone level right is essential if you want the vocalist to pitch
correctly.
Cheers.
James.
"James Perrett" <j...@soc.soton.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:3F1D31E0...@soc.soton.ac.uk...
--
Roger W. Norman
SirMusic Studio
Ro...@SirMusicStudio.com
301-585-4681
"Tonebarge" <Tone...@iscweb.com> wrote in message
news:3F1AD399...@iscweb.com...
> Read Nora's is going to be using a SM58 for her next album,
> maybe that's what they're planning (no headphones).
Now why would someone put this in a place where you could read it? If
it already happened, Shure would probably issue a press release, but
"is going to be using" sounds like someone's overactive imagination.
I don't think there's anything wrong with using an SM-58. It will
probably work just fine. But I can't see anyone announcing what
they're planning to use on a future session.
--
I'm really Mike Rivers - (mri...@d-and-d.com)
> I don't think there's anything wrong with using an SM-58. It will
> probably work just fine. But I can't see anyone announcing what
> they're planning to use on a future session.
I heard Arif keeps a loaded SM58 in his wallet.
--
ha
I have one client who has done a lot of national jingles and never sings flat
show me a technique that may be helpful.
She has me crenk the headphone volume and then slided the headphones back off
her ears to get the correct level for herself.
I know that you get different perceptinns of pitch if headphones are forward,
centered and behind the ears. No idea why.
Richard H. Kuschel
"I canna change the law of physics."-----Scotty
> I know that you get different perceptinns of pitch if headphones are
forward,
> centered and behind the ears. No idea why.
For headphones, I'll bet it has a lot to do with the way heads are
constructed, with lots of hard stuff, soft stuff and hollow places.
I noticed that when I scratch my inner forearm, I can hear it in the back
of my head. Bone conduction?
Remember those radios that were designed to hang over your shoulders and
send sound through the back of your neck?
I play a windsynth. I've always wanted a piezo tranducer in the mouthpiece
so I could hear it through my teeth the way sax players do.
dtk
> Judging from what I've heard of your work, this goes into my book.
Thanks, Roger. Sometimes nothing but singing lessons will work, though. <G>