Arny Krueger, Internet Pussy
Marc Phillips
to fight your fights for you, when you ask her for protection against all of
your enemies, imagined and real, do you think she still respects you as her
father? At what age was she first able to kick your ass? Was she still a
teenager? Younger?
I'll tell you what. When I come over, I think I'll bring my seventy-year-old
mom along to kick your ass while I'm dealing with this supposedly fearsome
offspring of yours.
LOL!
Boon
Arny Krueger
news:20030814045924...@mb-m20.aol.com
> Arny, tell me more about this kickboxing daughter of yours. When you
> ask her to fight your fights for you,
Who said anything about fighting?
>when you ask her for protection against all of your enemies, imagined and
real,
Are you threatening me, Phillips?
> do you think she
> still respects you as her father? At what age was she first able to
> kick your ass? Was she still a teenager? Younger?
What's this about fighting, Phillips? Have your paranoid delusions taken
over again?
> I'll tell you what. When I come over, I think I'll bring my
> seventy-year-old mom along to kick your ass while I'm dealing with
> this supposedly fearsome offspring of yours.
Wow, I guess that paranoia thing has you in its grip again, Phillips.
Daniel
Yeah, Marc - I guess you're paranoid. Anus Kroofeces never mentioned
his kickboxing daughter.
Oh, wait. Yes, he did:
Message 9 in thread
From: Arny Krueger (ar...@hotpop.com)
Subject: Re: No wonder The Porkster is fat and stupid :-((
View this article only
Newsgroups: rec.audio.opinion
Date: 2003-08-13 05:02:07 PST
"tor b" <torre...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:e1607be3.03081...@posting.google.com
> boon...@aol.comm (Marc Phillips) wrote in message
> news:<20030812205510...@mb-m03.aol.com>...
>> Arny said:
>>> Phillips, you're been fingered as a pedophile by the guy who
>>> animates the sockpuppet known as "S888wheel" Given the way you
>>> keep bringing it up, I can't say that I wasn't surprised.
>> I told you that if you keep making things up about me without
proof,
>> we'd be discussing it in person. You get your wish.
> Look out, Arny, the "physically imposing" (or is it just "grossly
> obese") Marc Phillips is gonna "make you accountable". Be afraid, be
> very afraid!!!!! LOL! ;-)
Presumably, Marc is resurrecting his old troll related to Atkinson
visiting
Detroit.
> Maybe I should post Porky's pictures again so you know what you're up
> against (?)
I was thinking of showing some of Marc's posts to my daughter, the
kick-boxer. I'm sure she'd like to meet him under *the right*
conditions...
George M. Middius
Daniel said:
> > > I'll tell you what. When I come over, I think I'll bring my
> > > seventy-year-old mom along to kick your ass while I'm dealing with
> > > this supposedly fearsome offspring of yours.
> >
> > Wow, I guess that paranoia thing has you in its grip again, Phillips.
>
> Yeah, Marc - I guess you're paranoid. Anus Kroofeces never mentioned
> his kickboxing daughter.
>
> Oh, wait. Yes, he did:
[snip]
[begin quote from Krooshit.......]
> I was thinking of showing some of Marc's posts to my daughter, the
> kick-boxer. I'm sure she'd like to meet him under *the right*
> conditions...
[end quote from Krooshit.......]
I think we may have misinterpreted what Dirty K meant by showing the
posts to Missy Kickboxer. Sure, it sounds like Krooger is going to
hide behind her and her heavy-shod hooves when the day of reckoning
comes. But maybe Mr. Shit is trying to deal with a different problem
-- how to get his tomboy daughter out of his house. "Please, Lord,
send her a guy, any guy, that she can glom onto and ease my
burden...." Maybe he meant the "kick-boxer" description merely as
praise for a potential mate, showing she's not just a nerd with her
nose in a book all the time.
What say, Arnii? Is that what you meant, except, as usual, you
Krooglished it up to sound like a threat?
Bruce J. Richman
>news:<odWdnWYV58i...@comcast.com>...
>> "Marc Phillips" <boon...@aol.comm> wrote in message
>> news:20030814045924...@mb-m20.aol.com
>>
>> > Arny, tell me more about this kickboxing daughter of yours. When you
>> > ask her to fight your fights for you,
>>
>> Who said anything about fighting?
>>
>> >when you ask her for protection against all of your enemies, imagined and
>> real,
>>
>> Are you threatening me, Phillips?
>>
>> > do you think she
>> > still respects you as her father? At what age was she first able to
>> > kick your ass? Was she still a teenager? Younger?
>>
>> What's this about fighting, Phillips? Have your paranoid delusions taken
>> over again?
>>
>> > I'll tell you what. When I come over, I think I'll bring my
>> > seventy-year-old mom along to kick your ass while I'm dealing with
>> > this supposedly fearsome offspring of yours.
>>
>> Wow, I guess that paranoia thing has you in its grip again, Phillips.
>
>Yeah, Marc - I guess you're paranoid. Anus Kroofeces never mentioned
>his kickboxing daughter.
>
>Oh, wait. Yes, he did:
>
Of course he did, but don't expect Compulsive Liar Krueger to admit it. He
generally tries to cover up his lies with selective editing out and deletion of
what other posters have to say. This is a common characteristic of his daily
personal attacks against other RAO posters.
Just more evidence of Krueger's lies. Unfortunately for him, the Google record
quickly reveals his behavior.
ROFLMAO!
Bruce J. Richman
tor b
<snipped>
> I'll tell you what. When I come over, I think I'll bring my seventy-year-old
> mom along to kick your ass while I'm dealing with this supposedly fearsome
> offspring of yours.
>
assault. Perhaps you should report Marc Phillips to both his ISP and
the appropriate authorities.
Marc Phillips
>> I'll tell you what. When I come over, I think I'll bring my
>seventy-year-old
>> mom along to kick your ass while I'm dealing with this supposedly fearsome
>> offspring of yours.
>>
>Arny, I do believe this kind of thing meets the legal definition of
>assault. Perhaps you should report Marc Phillips to both his ISP and
>the appropriate authorities.
Pull the trigger!!! Pull the trigger!!!
Boon
tor b
>Date: 8/14/2003 2:00 PM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: <20030814150051...@mb-m29.aol.com>
tor b
George M. Middius
Marc Phillips said to The Thing:
Every time Thing gives Krooger a "suggestion" like the one above, he
(it?) confirms his disdain for Mr. Shit. That's because only an
epochal idiot would take such a suggestion seriously. Therefore the
real purpose of urging Turdy to do something exceptionally stupid is
to remind him how dependent he is on Thing's supply of kiddie porn.
It's a veiled threat, disguised as helpful advice.
George M. Middius
SigNAIL said:
> >I think we may have misinterpreted what Dirty K meant by showing the
> >posts to Missy Kickboxer. Sure, it sounds like Krooger is going to
> >hide behind her and her heavy-shod hooves when the day of reckoning
> >comes. But maybe Mr. Shit is trying to deal with a different problem
> >-- how to get his tomboy daughter out of his house. "Please, Lord,
> >send her a guy, any guy, that she can glom onto and ease my
> >burden...." Maybe he meant the "kick-boxer" description merely as
> >praise for a potential mate, showing she's not just a nerd with her
> >nose in a book all the time.
>
> This is how I read it too. Krueger was offering Marc it's daughter.
Margaret may have been right. It's all too easy to imagine Mr. Shit
whoring out his daughter for some obsolete soundcards and a couple
of graphic equalizers.
Bruce J. Richman
>Arny Krueger wrote:
>
>>I was thinking of showing some of Marc's posts to my daughter, the
>>kick-boxer. I'm sure she'd like to meet him under *the right*
>>conditions...
>
>I've heard of arranged marriages but this is ridiculous....
>
>
LOL!
>
>--
>S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Bruce J. Richman
Marc Phillips
>>Pull the trigger!!! Pull the trigger!!!
>>
>You haven't assaulted *me*, hosebag. If you do so, I'll respond
>appropriately.
By crying and whimpering and curling up into a little ball, I presume.
Boon
tor b
>Date: 8/15/2003 9:22 AM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: <20030815102241...@mb-m17.aol.com>
tor b
George M. Middius
Marc Phillips said to The Thing:
> >>Pull the trigger!!! Pull the trigger!!!
> >>
> >You haven't assaulted *me*, hosebag. If you do so, I'll respond
> >appropriately.
>
> By crying and whimpering and curling up into a little ball, I presume.
Doesn't the creature sound more like Druggums every day? I heard the
poor dear got very angry and bitter when his life turned to shit.
Marc Phillips
>>>>Pull the trigger!!! Pull the trigger!!!
>>>>
>>>You haven't assaulted *me*, hosebag. If you do so, I'll respond
>>>appropriately.
>>
>>By crying and whimpering and curling up into a little ball, I presume.
>>
>Try me, fatso
Okay! When and where?
Boon
Moi
<20030815132001...@mb-m05.aol.com>:
Approximately two messages related to audio in the past 24 hours or
so, and the rest consisting mostly of a bunch of 7th grade level
infighting. Amazing.
P.S... I guess the guy looking for cartridge advice never got my more
recent messages re: the AT440ML (?)...
Cheers everyone...
tor b
>Date: 8/15/2003 6:45 PM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: <20030815194504...@mb-m25.aol.com>
appointment to commit assault? Internet assault? If so, you need only type the
words and I'll gladly take it from there. Or are you talking about actual
in-person assault? If so, you will need to continue to stalk me ("hunt you
down" were your exact words, IIRC), find me and *then* just say the words and
I'll take it from there. Your move! Let's see exactly how stupid you really
are, Porky. ;-)
tor b
*
Arny Krueger
news:iksqjv0p1kthhudbq...@4ax.com
> Approximately two messages related to audio in the past 24 hours or
> so, and the rest consisting mostly of a bunch of 7th grade level
> infighting. Amazing.
Hey, they are your allies, Moi.
> P.S... I guess the guy looking for cartridge advice never got my more
> recent messages re: the AT440ML (?)...
He should have posted his question on uk.rec.audio.vinyl, methinks.
Moi
wrote in <ywCdnVnNP7f...@comcast.com>:
>"Moi" <zis...@NOxSPAMMxhotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:iksqjv0p1kthhudbq...@4ax.com
>
>> Approximately two messages related to audio in the past 24 hours or
>> so, and the rest consisting mostly of a bunch of 7th grade level
>> infighting. Amazing.
>
>Hey, they are your allies, Moi.
Absurd. As far as I'm concerned, I have neither allies nor enemies
here (and no use for either, with a medium like Usenet).
This here is playtime, my friend... maybe you take it a bit too
seriously.
>> P.S... I guess the guy looking for cartridge advice never got my more
>> recent messages re: the AT440ML (?)...
>
>He should have posted his question on uk.rec.audio.vinyl, methinks.
When looking for an opinion about an audio-related topic,
"rec.audio.opinion" is the logical choice as I see it. It might help
to get more specific in terms of newsgroups, but no reason why he
couldn't have found an opinion here as well.
George M. Middius
Moi said to Shit-for-Brains:
> When looking for an opinion about an audio-related topic,
> "rec.audio.opinion" is the logical choice as I see it. It might help
> to get more specific in terms of newsgroups, but no reason why he
> couldn't have found an opinion here as well.
My opinion is that Krooger has exceeded the time allotted him by his
god, and somebody should expedite his transit beyond this plane.
Marc Phillips
>>>>>>Pull the trigger!!! Pull the trigger!!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>You haven't assaulted *me*, hosebag. If you do so, I'll respond
>>>>>appropriately.
>>>>
>>>>By crying and whimpering and curling up into a little ball, I presume.
>>>>
>>>Try me, fatso
>>
>>Okay! When and where?
>>
>Let's be clear here, Fat Boy, are you saying you would like to set up an
>appointment to commit assault? Internet assault? If so, you need only type
>the
>words and I'll gladly take it from there. Or are you talking about actual
>in-person assault? If so, you will need to continue to stalk me ("hunt you
>down" were your exact words, IIRC), find me and *then* just say the words and
>I'll take it from there. Your move! Let's see exactly how stupid you really
>are, Porky. ;-)
Find you? Then it seems that it would be your move to supply me with the
correct information.
BTW, I'm tired of cleaning up your posts, too.
Boon
tor b
>Date: 8/15/2003 10:02 PM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: <20030815230231...@mb-m14.aol.com>
>
>BTW, I'm tired of cleaning up your posts, too.
>
tor b
Arny Krueger
> On Fri, 15 Aug 2003 21:31:25 -0400, "Arny Krueger" <ar...@hotpop.com>
> wrote in <ywCdnVnNP7f...@comcast.com>:
>
>> "Moi" <zis...@NOxSPAMMxhotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:iksqjv0p1kthhudbq...@4ax.com
>>
>>> Approximately two messages related to audio in the past 24 hours or
>>> so, and the rest consisting mostly of a bunch of 7th grade level
>>> infighting. Amazing.
>> Hey, they are your allies, Moi.
> Absurd. As far as I'm concerned, I have neither allies nor enemies
> here (and no use for either, with a medium like Usenet).
As far as you are concerned sockpuppet "Moi", you are a smart guy. Just goes
to show exactly how stupid you are.
> This here is playtime, my friend... maybe you take it a bit too
> seriously.
Maybe you think that everybody is as stupid and easy to lie to as you are,
sockpuppet "Moi".
>>> P.S... I guess the guy looking for cartridge advice never got my
>>> more recent messages re: the AT440ML (?)...
>> He should have posted his question on uk.rec.audio.vinyl, methinks.
> When looking for an opinion about an audio-related topic,
> "rec.audio.opinion" is the logical choice as I see it.
As you see it sockpuppet "Moi", you are a smart guy. Just goes to show
exactly how stupid you are.
> It might help
> to get more specific in terms of newsgroups, but no reason why he
> couldn't have found an opinion here as well.
LOL!
Sockpuppet Yustabe
"George M. Middius" <Spam-...@resistance.org> wrote in message
news:s85rjv4infm0sd0qe...@4ax.com...
What kind of god would invent Krueger?
----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
George M. Middius
Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
> > My opinion is that Krooger has exceeded the time allotted him by his
> > god, and somebody should expedite his transit beyond this plane.
> What kind of god would invent Krueger?
You got another explanation? Let's hear it.
Marc Phillips
Let's see here...you're real life is miserable, your job is menial, your boss
verbally abuses you, you live in a shithole apartment, and you haven't been
laid since you were a teenager. Yet you saved enough money to buy a computer,
and now you lash out at complete strangers by making up things about them, and
then cower in complete horror at the thought of them finding out who you really
are.
You win!
ROTFLMAO!
Boon
tor b
Aren't you a "highly paid" prophessunel righter??? LOL!!!!
tor b
>Date: 8/16/2003 1:44 PM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: <20030816144414...@mb-m19.aol.com>
*
tor b
Moi
<e1607be3.03081...@posting.google.com>:
Hey Tor... if you think Marc's a pig, what are you doing rolling
around in the mud with him?
I've gotta say that what I'm smelling is not pigshit but bullshit, and
it's mostly coming from your direction, not his.
Seems to me you're one of the lowest forms of life on Usenet: An
inveterate flamer who flames for no other reason than because he
enjoys flaming. Other than spammers, I really can't think of anything
closer to dissolving into the primordial ooze of stupidity, immaturity
and worthlessness.
Marc Phillips
Yeah. I'm conceding to a pathetic, bitter, universally despised coward on
Usenet.
Sure.
BTW, "you're real life..."???
Why yes, I am. My real name accompanies every post I make.
>Aren't you a "highly paid" prophessunel righter???
Nope. I'm a highly paid telecommunications project manager.
LOL!!!!
I bet you really cry yourself to sleep every night, Internet Geek.
Boon
Arny Krueger
> Hey Tor... if you think Marc's a pig, what are you doing rolling
> around in the mud with him?
Let's hear your answer, insofar as the same concept applies to you,
sockpuppet "Moi".
> I've gotta say that what I'm smelling is not pigshit but bullshit, and
> it's mostly coming from your direction, not his.
> Seems to me you're one of the lowest forms of life on Usenet: An
> inveterate flamer who flames for no other reason than because he
> enjoys flaming. Other than spammers, I really can't think of anything
> closer to dissolving into the primordial ooze of stupidity, immaturity
> and worthlessness.
Let's hear your answer, insofar as the same concept applies to you,
sockpuppet "Moi".
Moi
wrote in <GgydneGQ1rT...@comcast.com>:
>"Moi" <zis...@NOxSPAMMxhotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:6n4ujvg0nfpv84g5g...@4ax.com
>
>> Hey Tor... if you think Marc's a pig, what are you doing rolling
>> around in the mud with him?
>
>Let's hear your answer, insofar as the same concept applies to you,
>sockpuppet "Moi".
It doesn't apply to me -- I haven't called anyone a pig and am not
actively engaged in insulting Marc or Tor. This fact renders your
entire post null, void and moot (what else is new?).
tor b
> On 16 Aug 2003 21:32:51 -0700, torre...@aol.com (tor b) wrote in
> <e1607be3.03081...@posting.google.com>:
>
> [You are]An
> inveterate flamer who flames for no other reason than because he
> enjoys flaming.
>
Marc Phillips is one of a small group of individuals who have chosen
to engage in what can only be described as despicable and manifestly
irresponsible behavior: first, they accused someone they dis-like
(Arny Krueger) of engaging in child pornography. This accusation was
made without one scintilla of evidence. Mr. Krueger has never been
arrested or indicted, let alone convicted, of any such offense. There
isn't even any evidence that Mr. Krueger has ever been investigated
for such conduct. Nothing/zero/zilch/nada. The next step was to begin
to refer to Mr. Krueger as a *proven* child pornogrpher, but of course
they offered no proof. Their latest ploy is to say that anyone who
supports or defends Mr. Krueger against this outrageous behavior is
also a child pornographer. Porky Phillips has made this accusation
against me. Of course, there is no evidence of any sort to prove such
an allegation. My offense was really to have the temerity to defend
someone Porky had unjustly accused. Tell me, Moi, what do you think of
witch hunts? What is your opinion of the behavior of the late Senator
Joe McCarthy?
What do you think of the behavior of Phillips and his little gang?
Sockpuppet Yustabe
"tor b" <torre...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:e1607be3.03081...@posting.google.com...
> ......what do you think of
> witch hunts? What is your opinion of the behavior of the late Senator
> Joe McCarthy?
His tactics are one of the bases of Krueger's behavior patterns.
> What do you think of the behavior of Phillips and his little gang?
That they have exposed a self admitted child pornographer, not that
it is the least of the Beatst's sins.
Moi
<e1607be3.03081...@posting.google.com>:
None of this changes the fact that you're doing nothing but flaming
idiotically and contributing to the overall situation. As far as I'm
concerned, you're at least as immature, nasty and small minded as
those whom you continue to attack.
As far as the behavior of Phillips and such, somehow I haven't noticed
it as sticking out like a sore, retarded thumb the way yours has. To
put it another way, an interesting/intelligent or well thought out
flame can at least be entertaining or catch my attention. You just
stand out as a pure neanderthal with a sloped forehead and nothing to
say because all you can do is grunt.
Marc Phillips
That's a pretty accurate appraisal of the situation, Moi.
The whole child pornography incident is well documented on RAO, however, and
the sockpuppet who posts as "tor" seems to be the only one to deny its
authenticity.
If you are so inclined, and I wouldn't blame you if you weren't, you should
check out the Google archive URL which I've been posting frequently:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Arny,+daddy,+fellatio&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
safe=off&selm=afvB2.12%24lz6.48%40news.flash.net&rnum=1
This is the origin of the whole nasty incident, which played out over three
years. Basically, the e-mail in question in the above post was manufactured by
Arny, and this was proved by an professional Internet investigator on this very
NG. Arny, of course, denied this, and fell into a trap when he admitted that
he had kept the offending pictures in question on his hard drive for three
years, which is a federal offense. So basically, Arny would rather be known as
a child pornographer than a simple liar.
Yet Arny doesn't get off that easy. If he DID make up the e-mail out of thin
air, which was proven conclusively, then he was a sick enough individual to
concoct such brutally offensive material, especially since it was about his own
deceased teenaged son. If he's not into child pornography per se, he's into
something even worse.
All of this is beyond reprehensible behavior, unacceptable in every social
situation, which begs the question of why anyone would side with Arny. The
evidence of his mental illness and deviant behavior is there for anyone to
read, so why are there still people who think it's okay for Arny to try to hold
court here as a so-called audio expert, yet not okay for the others to object
to his criminal presence? Anyone who does this must also be treated with
suspicion, since it is not okay to condone, encourage, or even ignore such
behavior.
The "tor" sockpuppet falls into this category.
Boon
Arny Krueger
I knew that the word "concept" would be way over your head, sockpuppet
"Moi".
The fact of the matter sockpuppet "Moi" is that you're no different from the
rest of your clique - your approach to putting out fires is to throw on more
gasolene. You heap praise on habitual flamers like Marc Philips.
Moi pandered to the Phillips/Middius clique by writing:
"As far as the behavior of Phillips and such, somehow I haven't noticed
it as sticking out like a sore, retarded thumb the way yours has."
What elicited this fire and damnation from sockpuppet "Moi"?
Moi heaped on this abuse because of this statement which neither attacked
sockpuppet "Moi" nor any other person and didn't contain any actual errors:
"Marc Phillips is one of a small group of individuals who have chosen
to engage in what can only be described as despicable and manifestly
irresponsible behavior: first, they accused someone they dis-like
(Arny Krueger) of engaging in child pornography. This accusation was
made without one scintilla of evidence. Mr. Krueger has never been
arrested or indicted, let alone convicted, of any such offense. There
isn't even any evidence that Mr. Krueger has ever been investigated
for such conduct. Nothing/zero/zilch/nada. The next step was to begin
to refer to Mr. Krueger as a *proven* child pornogrpher, but of course
they offered no proof. Their latest ploy is to say that anyone who
supports or defends Mr. Krueger against this outrageous behavior is
also a child pornographer. Porky Phillips has made this accusation
against me. Of course, there is no evidence of any sort to prove such
an allegation. My offense was really to have the temerity to defend
someone Porky had unjustly accused. "
Bottom line sockpuppet "Moi" is that you love flaming and heaping praise on
proven liars.
Marc Phillips
>Marc Phillips is one of a small group
Wrong. It is a large group.
of individuals who have chosen
>to engage in what can only be described as despicable and manifestly
>irresponsible behavior: first, they accused someone they dis-like
>(Arny Krueger) of engaging in child pornography. This accusation was
>made without one scintilla of evidence.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Arny,+daddy,+fellatio&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
safe=off&selm=afvB2.12%24lz6.48%40news.flash.net&rnum=1
Mr. Krueger has never been
>arrested or indicted, let alone convicted, of any such offense.
Tell us how you know that. Surely it just isn't because Arny, a pathological
liar, told you so. Tell us why you know what you do.
There
>isn't even any evidence that Mr. Krueger has ever been investigated
>for such conduct.
"We have received your complaint regarding Mr. Krueger. We are turning your
complaint over to County and/or State authorities to evaluate the
complaint.
James C. Fowler, Deputy Director
Grosse Pointe Woods D.P.S.
20025 Mack Plaza
Grosse Pointe Woods, MI 48236
jfo...@ci.grosse-pointe-woods.mi.us"
Nothing/zero/zilch/nada.
"We have received your complaint regarding Mr. Krueger. We are turning your
complaint over to County and/or State authorities to evaluate the
complaint.
James C. Fowler, Deputy Director
Grosse Pointe Woods D.P.S.
20025 Mack Plaza
Grosse Pointe Woods, MI 48236
jfo...@ci.grosse-pointe-woods.mi.us"
The next step was to begin
>to refer to Mr. Krueger as a *proven* child pornogrpher, but of course
>they offered no proof.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Arny,+daddy,+fellatio&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
safe=off&selm=afvB2.12%24lz6.48%40news.flash.net&rnum=1
Their latest ploy is to say that anyone who
>supports or defends Mr. Krueger against this outrageous behavior is
>also a child pornographer. Porky Phillips has made this accusation
>against me.
Because no one would side with Arny unless they're a sockpuppet of Arny, or
they have been hired by Arny to agree with him, or they share his lurid
interests and have something to protect.
Also, anyone who believes that it is okay to look the other way with regards to
Arny's pedophilia because fighting the EHEE is more important, i.e. Howard
Ferstler, is also encouraging child pornography.
Of course, there is no evidence of any sort to prove such
>an allegation.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Arny,+daddy,+fellatio&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
safe=off&selm=afvB2.12%24lz6.48%40news.flash.net&rnum=1
My offense was really to have the temerity to defend
>someone Porky had unjustly accused.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Arny,+daddy,+fellatio&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&
safe=off&selm=afvB2.12%24lz6.48%40news.flash.net&rnum=1
Tell me, Moi, what do you think of
>witch hunts?
I don't think witches should be hunted unless they break the law, like Arny
has.
What is your opinion of the behavior of the late Senator
>Joe McCarthy?
Another Kroopologist, Mikey the Bug Eater, has recently gone on record as
saying McCarthy was a great man, and was widely misunderstood. Doesn't Arny
have conference calls with you idiots to make sure there's a modicum of
consistency to his cause?
>What do you think of the behavior of Phillips and his little gang?
More importantly, what do you think of a sad little Internet geek, a failure in
real life, who appears anonymously on an AUDIO forum and publicly supports
pederasts?
I don't think much of "tor," either.
Boon
Leon North
Yo, Turdy. Look closely at what you wrote and what comes next...
> Moi heaped on this abuse because of this statement which neither attacked
> sockpuppet "Moi" nor any other person...
>
> "Marc Phillips is one of a small group of individuals who have chosen to
> engage in what can only be described as despicable and manifestly
> irresponsible behavior:
That would be an attack. The reading comp thing is still a real bitch for you,
eh, retard?
> first, they accused someone they dis-like (Arny Krueger) of engaging in child
> pornography. This accusation was made without one scintilla of evidence.
And here, along with the claim of "a small group", is a gross error. You,
yourself, dimbulb, posted the lurid descriptions of the purported emails you
had "received". Not only was that a despicable action, which permanently
sullied the memory of your son, but you then went one further, and over the
line I might add, by claiming that one of the fictitious pictures was of an
infant male with mutilated genitalia. You then posted that you had never
reported this to the authorities, thereby depriving this purported "victim" of
possible help (a felony). You then (computer wiz that you aren't) claimed that
you couldn't recover the pictures from your computer when you were challenged
for proof. Any way you want to cut it, you fucked up large. By your own hand
you've been labeled a child pornographer, a pederast and a monumental fucking
liar. As you are so fond of saying, "Your gun, your bullet, your foot". It's
all there in the Google archives for any who may think you're a swell person.
It's required reading for any budding Kroopologist. Any who would come to your
defense is either terminally brain damaged and illiterate or one of your
numerous sockpuppets.
BTW, you're a despicable, repugnant, mendacious sicko. QED
You remain bone grindingly stupid.
I remain,
LN
--
"I = ER is a fact" - A. Dimbulb Krooger
dave weil
wrote:
>Bottom line sockpuppet "Moi" is that you love flaming and heaping praise on
>proven liars.
Mindreading again I see, Mr. Krueger.
<chortle>
Moi
wrote in <rCqdnYij8cm...@comcast.com>:
>"Moi" <zis...@NOxSPAMMxhotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:ggc0kv0phhbaq14jo...@4ax.com
>> On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 09:08:19 -0400, "Arny Krueger" <ar...@hotpop.com>
>> wrote in <GgydneGQ1rT...@comcast.com>:
>>
>>> "Moi" <zis...@NOxSPAMMxhotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:6n4ujvg0nfpv84g5g...@4ax.com
>>>
>>>> Hey Tor... if you think Marc's a pig, what are you doing rolling
>>>> around in the mud with him?
>>>
>>> Let's hear your answer, insofar as the same concept applies to you,
>>> sockpuppet "Moi".
>>
>> It doesn't apply to me -- I haven't called anyone a pig and am not
>> actively engaged in insulting Marc or Tor. This fact renders your
>> entire post null, void and moot (what else is new?).
>
>I knew that the word "concept" would be way over your head, sockpuppet
>"Moi".
>
>The fact of the matter sockpuppet "Moi" is that you're no different from the
>rest of your clique - your approach to putting out fires is to throw on more
>gasolene. You heap praise on habitual flamers like Marc Philips.
>
>Moi pandered to the Phillips/Middius clique by writing:
>
>"As far as the behavior of Phillips and such, somehow I haven't noticed
>it as sticking out like a sore, retarded thumb the way yours has."
>
>What elicited this fire and damnation from sockpuppet "Moi"?
I'll just ignore the "sockpuppet" accusation (whatever the hell a
sockpuppet really is, it's merely a nickname) and reiterate that the
stupidity and sheer idiocy of Tor's flaming is what elicited my
reaction. If one cannot flame with a bit of flair or panache (and
resorts to comments like "he's so fat, he can't stand up" and such)
why even bother?
>Bottom line sockpuppet "Moi" is that you love flaming and heaping praise on
>proven liars.
*Yawn*... Arny, you've lost the ability to stir anything but the
slightest bit of interest as far as I'm concerned... keep up your
meaningless tirades and I'm sure even that little bit will go away.
Moi
<leon_n...@hotmail.com> wrote in <3F40DE37...@hotmail.com>:
>R-kneee "best worst case" Krooooger fumbles pathetically:
<snip>
>You remain bone grindingly stupid.
Not to mention, he's as boring as a 300 Hz test tone.
I'm not sure why anyone even bothers replying to Arnii's posts anymore
(maybe when I figure out why I do, I'll have my answer).
Anon E Mouse
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Leon North wrote:
Tiens, mon bon ami L=E9on, expert en TIC... Dis, tu veux bien me d=E9s=
ennuyer durant les
vacances du tr=E8s rigolo Lionel, hein?
> [...]
--=20
Anon E. Mouse
[Playing] "Wild About You, Baby" - Theodore "Hound Dog" Taylor & The Hou=
serockers
Arny Krueger
news:3F40DE37...@hotmail.com
> R-kneee "best worst case" Krooooger fumbles pathetically:
>
> Yo, Turdy. Look closely at what you wrote and what comes next...
>
>> Moi heaped on this abuse because of this statement which neither
>> attacked sockpuppet "Moi" nor any other person...
>>
>> "Marc Phillips is one of a small group of individuals who have
>> chosen to engage in what can only be described as despicable and
>> manifestly irresponsible behavior:
>
> That would be an attack. The reading comp thing is still a real
> bitch for you, eh, retard?
>
>> first, they accused someone they dis-like (Arny Krueger) of engaging
>> in child pornography. This accusation was made without one scintilla
>> of evidence.
>
> And here, along with the claim of "a small group", is a gross error.
> You, yourself, dimbulb, posted the lurid descriptions of the
> purported emails you had "received".
So sockpuppet "North" you want all these good people to believe that there's
something wrong with complaining about people who try to use a personal
tragedy against me?
> Not only was that a despicable
> action, which permanently sullied the memory of your son, but you
> then went one further, and over the line I might add, by claiming
> that one of the fictitious pictures was of an infant male with
> mutilated genitalia.
What fictitious pictures? The pictures were real. And at this point you've
stale-mated yourself sockpuppet "North". If the pictures were fictitious,
then you're calling Marc Phillips a liar when he called me a "pedophile".
> You then posted that you had never reported
> this to the authorities, thereby depriving this purported "victim" of
> possible help (a felony).
At the time it was appearntly quite stylish to send me pornographic
pictures.
>You then (computer wiz that you aren't)
> claimed that you couldn't recover the pictures from your computer
> when you were challenged for proof.
I didn't think it was worth the effort.
> Any way you want to cut it, you fucked up large.
No, sockpuppet "North" you screwed up. By posting "proof" that the pictures
were imagainary you ended up proving that both you and Phillips are liars.
Phillips is a liar because the pictures were imaginary, and you're were
proven a liar when I deconstructed your alleged technical proof.
>By your own hand you've been labeled a child
> pornographer, a pederast and a monumental fucking liar.
Not at all. The pictures were examined by an expert and found to not be of
children, but adults. You proved that Phillips was lying when he called me a
"pedophile", and you proved yourself sockpuppet "north" to be a liar when
your alleged technical proof came unraveled.
> As you are so fond of saying, "Your gun, your bullet, your foot".
It seems to apply to you and Phillips, big time.
>It's all
> there in the Google archives for any who may think you're a swell
> person.
As well as anybody who might want to find proof that sockpuppet North
doesn't even know what "RFC" stands for.
> It's required reading for any budding Kroopologist.
I recommend it because its so freakin' hilarious.
> Any who
> would come to your defense is either terminally brain damaged and
> illiterate or one of your numerous sockpuppets.
More proof that you are a liar, sockpuppet "North". Despite all the whining,
nobody has ever proven that I create sockpuppets. That has a lot to do with
the fact that I don't do sockpuppets.
> BTW, you're a despicable, repugnant, mendacious sicko. QED
The facts show that you've done a pretty good job of describing yourself
sockpuppet "North".
> You remain bone grindingly stupid.
You'd be more correct if you stopped at the bone grinding part, because it's
obvious that I've ground your figurative *bone* quite nicely, sockpuppet
"North".
Arny Krueger
news:hmp1kv0g2843i2c4f...@4ax.com
According to your *logic* Weil, Moi flames me and heaps praise on proven
liars because he hates it so much.
LOL!
dave weil
wrote:
>"dave weil" <dw...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:hmp1kv0g2843i2c4f...@4ax.com
>> On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 07:14:30 -0400, "Arny Krueger" <ar...@hotpop.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Bottom line sockpuppet "Moi" is that you love flaming and heaping
>>> praise on proven liars.
>>
>> Mindreading again I see, Mr. Krueger.
>
>According to your *logic* Weil, Moi flames me and heaps praise on proven
>liars because he hates it so much.
Nope, he might see it as a necessary evil.
So you lose.
Again.
Marc Phillips
>> Not only was that a despicable
>> action, which permanently sullied the memory of your son, but you
>> then went one further, and over the line I might add, by claiming
>> that one of the fictitious pictures was of an infant male with
>> mutilated genitalia.
>What fictitious pictures? The pictures were real. And at this point you've
>stale-mated yourself sockpuppet "North". If the pictures were fictitious,
>then you're calling Marc Phillips a liar when he called me a "pedophile".
You don't seem to get it. You're a pedophile whether or not the pictures are
real. You either kept them for three years without reporting them, which is a
crime that defines you as a child pornographer, or you came up with the
disgusting descriptions contained in the e-mail on your own, which defines you
as a pederast. You've been trying to wiggle out from under your monumental
blunder for some time now, but let's face it...you can't.
You could always leave Usenet and avoid all of this, but it's obvious that you
can't because you have nothing else in your life, which is unbelievably
pathetic. A normal person would have left a long time ago. You, however,
would rather be known as a pedophile than to lose an argument on Usenet, which
speaks volumes about your character, or your ridiculous lack thereof.
Boon
Anon E Mouse
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Marc Phillips wrote:
> Arny said:
>
> >> Not only was that a despicable
> >> action, which permanently sullied the memory of your son, but you
> >> then went one further, and over the line I might add, by claiming
> >> that one of the fictitious pictures was of an infant male with
> >> mutilated genitalia.
>
> >What fictitious pictures? The pictures were real. And at this point you've
> >stale-mated yourself sockpuppet "North". If the pictures were fictitious,
> >then you're calling Marc Phillips a liar when he called me a "pedophile".
>
> You don't seem to get it. You're a pedophile whether or not the pictures are
> real. You either kept them for three years without reporting them, which is a
> crime that defines you as a child pornographer, or you came up with the
> disgusting descriptions contained in the e-mail on your own, which defines you
> as a pederast. [...]
Post the connection logs showing Mr. Krueger relayed the offensive e-mails to himself
or the proof that the iname server could not have been set/maintained to be abused by
spammers/hoaxers (hint) or, better and easier, Mr. Krueger's server activity logs for
a period of time covering the dates/times already posted to show said connections were
never logged. Failing that, you will retract your accusations, apologize to Mr. Krueger
and RAOers, and kill all your current Internet handles.
Condition: You cannot argue based on the actual state of the iname server. You
must go back in time when the offensive e-mails were sent/received.
You accuse, you prove. Or retract and apologize.
--
Anon E. Mouse
Arny Krueger
news:20030818154610...@mb-m13.aol.com
> Arny said:
<restoring the header that Phillips ignorantly deleted>
>>Leon North" <leon_n...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3F40DE37...@hotmail.com
>>> Not only was that a despicable
>>> action, which permanently sullied the memory of your son, but you
>>> then went one further, and over the line I might add, by claiming
>>> that one of the fictitious pictures was of an infant male with
>>> mutilated genitalia.
>> What fictitious pictures? The pictures were real. And at this point
>> you've stale-mated yourself sockpuppet "North". If the pictures were
>> fictitious, then you're calling Marc Phillips a liar when he called
>> me a "pedophile".
> You don't seem to get it.
I get it very well, Phillips. Sockpuppet "North" has effectively called you
a liar. I think you two guys ought to stop messing up this NG trying to cut
each other off at the knees.
>You're a pedophile whether or not the pictures are real.
Facts don't matter to you, do they Phillips? Typical of a brain-dead radical
subjectivist.
> You either kept them for three years without
> reporting them, which is a crime that defines you as a child
> pornographer, or you came up with the disgusting descriptions
> contained in the e-mail on your own, which defines you as a pederast.
Your ignorance of the law is immense, Phillips. In order to convict, the
prosecutor has to show intent. I didn't intentionally acquire said
photographs. They showed up in my email one day, no doubt a freebie from you
or one of your *friends*. Shortly after I received them I deleted them. In
the long run they have been examined by a Michigan State Police Officer and
found to NOT be child pornography. End of story.
> You've been trying to wiggle out from under your monumental blunder
> for some time now, but let's face it...you can't.
Again, your immense ignorance of the federal law becomes apparent, Phillips.
The federal law relating to child pornography provides a means by which a
person who inadevertantly comes into the possession of suspect materials can
do the right thing and be blameless under the law. I have met the spirit and
letter of that law.
> You could always leave Usenet and avoid all of this,
Or, I could entertain myself by watching you dig your hole a little deeper
every time you bring this tired issue up, Phillips. How many times does it
have to blow up in your face, Phillips? How many times does sockpuppet North
have to call you a liar?
> but it's obvious
> that you can't because you have nothing else in your life, which is
> unbelievably pathetic.
Nothing else in my life, Phillips? You're delusional, right? I live in
Grosse Pointe and you live in Los Angeles. As they say, living well is the
best revenge.
> A normal person would have left a long time ago.
Why, I should leave because of your childish antics, Phillips?
LOL!
> You, however, would rather be known as a pedophile than to lose
> an argument on Usenet, which speaks volumes about your character, or
> your ridiculous lack thereof.
I've complied with the law, Phillips. I hate child pornography. However,
its quite clear that you are obsessed with child pornography, given how
often you bring it up.
Marc Phillips
If anything, the above posting by Arny proves only that he's done extensive
research into child pornography laws so that he can push the boundaries of his
own behavior without getting into trouble.
Leave Usenet, pervert.
Boon
Marc Phillips
Ah, another apologist for child pornographers speaks up. At least you were
smart enough to say it in English this time.
Boon
tor b
>Date: 8/18/2003 12:20 PM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: <PGSdneWha_B...@comcast.com>
<snipped>
tor b
Lived EHT
wrote:
>Mindreading again I see, Mr. Krueger.
Why not? Talking with Arnii is like frying your own shit and flicking
the fecal fritters into a ceiling fan. It makes a lot of mess and,
ultimately, it's rather pointless.
--
Thine
Sockpuppet Yustabe
"Marc Phillips" <boon...@aol.comm> wrote in message
>. A normal person would have left a long time ago.
Come, come. You're not calling Bruce Steinberg and Howard Ferstler normal,
are you?
Sockpuppet Yustabe
"Arny Krueger" <ar...@hotpop.com> wrote in message
news:3YScnYtUM8Y...@comcast.com...
>
> However,
> its quite clear that you are obsessed with child pornography, given how
> often you bring it up.
>
>
Only when he is talking about you.
George M. Middius
Moi said:
> I'm not sure why anyone even bothers replying to Arnii's posts anymore
> (maybe when I figure out why I do, I'll have my answer).
I think for the same reason if you walk by and see a toilet that
should have been flushed, you go ahead and flush it. You have to do
something, even if the toilet is permanently stopped up.
George M. Middius
Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
> >. A normal person would have left a long time ago.
>
> Come, come. You're not calling Bruce Steinberg and Howard Ferstler normal,
> are you?
Who is Bruce Steinberg?
As far as Harold, he's almost as much of a masochist as Krooger is.
Marc Phillips
>"Marc Phillips" <boon...@aol.comm> wrote in message
>news:20030818154610...@mb-m13.aol.com...
>
>>. A normal person would have left a long time ago.
>
>Come, come. You're not calling Bruce Steinberg and Howard Ferstler normal,
>are you?
How about "more normal" than Arny?
And Howard, pathetic little plagiarizer that he is, is still around, lurking
every day. What else does he have to do?
Boon
Marc Phillips
>"Arny Krueger" <ar...@hotpop.com> wrote in message
>news:3YScnYtUM8Y...@comcast.com...
>>
>> However,
>> its quite clear that you are obsessed with child pornography, given how
>> often you bring it up.
>>
>>
>
>Only when he is talking about you.
Exactly. See how often I'll bring up child pornography after Arny is properly
disposed of.
Boon
tor b
>Date: 8/18/2003 12:20 PM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: <PGSdneWha_B...@comcast.com>
>"Leon North" <leon_n...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3F40DE37...@hotmail.com
<snipped>
>> BTW, you're a despicable, repugnant, mendacious sicko.
>The facts show that you've done a pretty good job of describing yourself
>sockpuppet "North".
What do we know about "Leon North", anyway?
1) we know that, according to Google, the very first post under the name "Leon
North" made to Usenet was made to RAO on 9/11/01 at 17:19:01 PST in the thread
"Who's responsible?" . The subject was, of course, the terror attacks of
earlier in the day. Strange, no? Why on earth would anyone make their very
first Usenet post to RAO if that were the subject matter? Unless, of course,
"Leon North" was merely a new name for an RAO regular. ;-)
2) we know that "Leon North" claims to be an "internet investigator". We also
know that "Leon" has offered no proof whatsoever to make this claim credible.
Conclusion: "Leon North" is most likely another sockpuppet of an RAO regular.
Middius? Gindi? The confessed sockpuppeteer Marc "Porky" Phillips? Or??
The "internet investigator" claim is, in the complete absence of supporting
evidence, simply not credible.
tor b
Sockpuppet Yustabe
"George M. Middius" <Spam-...@resistance.org> wrote in message
news:p4s2kv0mchvsa2tqc...@4ax.com...
>
>
> Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
>
> > >. A normal person would have left a long time ago.
> >
> > Come, come. You're not calling Bruce Steinberg and Howard Ferstler
normal,
> > are you?
>
> Who is Bruce Steinberg?
>
Wasn't he the "Attack of the Rockoids" AOL shill we had a few years ago?
Or did I get the name wrong?
George M. Middius
Sockpuppet Yustabe said:
> > > Come, come. You're not calling Bruce Steinberg and Howard Ferstler normal,
> > > are you?
> > Who is Bruce Steinberg?
> Wasn't he the "Attack of the Rockoids" AOL shill we had a few years ago?
> Or did I get the name wrong?
You got it wrong. I should have just seen "Steinberg" and put it
together. However, you could also go with the flow and tag him
properly as Steindrone or Steinborg. Or Wiggy.
This post reformatted by the Resistance,
laboring tirelessly to de-Kroogerize Usenet.
Marc Phillips
>What do we know about "Leon North", anyway?
Well, some know more than others. If you're speaking for all of the other
Internet geeks like yourself, however, the answer is probably, "We don't know
shit about anything that we can't see on our computers!"
>
>1) we know that, according to Google, the very first post under the name
>"Leon
>North" made to Usenet was made to RAO on 9/11/01 at 17:19:01 PST in the
>thread
>"Who's responsible?" . The subject was, of course, the terror attacks of
>earlier in the day. Strange, no?
No.
Unless, of course, you think Leon is a terrorist. Is that what you think?
Why on earth would anyone make their very
>first Usenet post to RAO if that were the subject matter? Unless, of course,
>"Leon North" was merely a new name for an RAO regular. ;-)
Oh my God, I hope the world doesn't cave in with THIS revelation. I mean,
imagine that, people posting under other names. That narrows it down to about
70% of the people who post on Usenet newsgroups! You're onto something here,
Dick!
>2) we know that "Leon North" claims to be an "internet investigator". We also
>know that "Leon" has offered no proof whatsoever to make this claim credible.
Yes, "we." The Internet geeks tremble at the thought that some information may
not be available to them.
>
>Conclusion: "Leon North" is most likely another sockpuppet of an RAO regular.
>Middius? Gindi? The confessed sockpuppeteer Marc "Porky" Phillips? Or??
Or?? How about Arny? "We" know that Arny uses multiple ISPs, including AOL,
for instance. That revelation would be Leon's handiwork, I'm afraid, and if
you can't admit this is proof of his claim, then you're simply lying again.
>
>The "internet investigator" claim is, in the complete absence of supporting
>evidence, simply not credible.
To the Internet geeks who are stunned with disbelief that they don't know
everything that's happening in their tiny, claustrophobic worlds, no.
LOL!
Boon
Marc Phillips
>> Who is Bruce Steinberg?
>>
>
>Wasn't he the "Attack of the Rockoids" AOL shill we had a few years ago?
>Or did I get the name wrong?
Gene Steinberg. It's not your fault; he wasn't that memorable.
Boon
tor b
>Date: 8/18/2003 8:49 PM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: <20030818214929...@mb-m29.aol.com>
>Richard Haugen Krueger said
>Unless, of course,
>>"Leon North" was merely a new name for an RAO regular. ;-)
>Oh my God, I hope the world doesn't cave in with THIS revelation. I mean,
>imagine that, people posting under other names. That narrows it down to
>about
>70% of the people who post on Usenet newsgroups! You're onto something here,
Thank you for confirming that "Leon North" is a sockpuppet, Porky. Perhaps he
is your sockpuppet? A cousin of Andrew MacGowan?
tor b
Joe Duffy
No, the reason that one passes a permanently
stopped toilet without flushing it, is the
same reason that countless lurkers pass you
and rao quickly without wasting a breath.
Joe
Sockpuppet Yustabe
"Joe Duffy" <du...@bcstec.ca.boeing.com> wrote in message
news:HJuKJ...@news.boeing.com...
>
> No, the reason that one passes a permanently
> stopped toilet without flushing it, is the
> same reason that countless lurkers pass you
> and rao quickly without wasting a breath.
>
>
> Joe
>
Anybody got a plunger I can borrow to rid rao of this sewage?
Lived EHT
<idk...@comcast.net> wrote:
>Anybody got a plunger I can borrow to rid rao of this sewage?
In a few hours, Arnii will be bolting on his underwear ready for
breakfast and another day in front of his 'DAW'. Can it wait until
then?
--
Thine
Arny Krueger
> Or?? How about Arny? "We" know that Arny uses multiple ISPs,
> including AOL, for instance.
What's wrong with having an AOL account? You have one Phillips!
> That revelation would be Leon's
> handiwork, I'm afraid, and if you can't admit this is proof of his
> claim, then you're simply lying again.
It's a trivial claim to research, and therefore is right down Leon's alley.
Arny Krueger
news:6qo2kv8tkhf8n0s24...@news.usanon.net
And you've been doing it for how many years, Graham?
LOL!
Lived EHT
wrote:
>> Why not? Talking with Arnii is like frying your own shit and flicking
>> the fecal fritters into a ceiling fan. It makes a lot of mess and,
>> ultimately, it's rather pointless.
>
>And you've been doing it for how many years, Graham?
I'm sorry, donkey-legs, but Mickey won today's IKYABWAI award.
>LOL!
Shut your trap, TwatOmatic. If you had any self-awareness, you'd be
screaming, not laughing.
--
Thine
Arny Krueger
>>> Why not? Talking with Arnii is like frying your own shit and
>>> flicking the fecal fritters into a ceiling fan. It makes a lot of
>>> mess and, ultimately, it's rather pointless.
>> And you've been doing it for how many years, Graham?
> I'm sorry, donkey-legs, but Mickey won today's IKYABWAI award.
IOW Graham, you know that answering the question your post begged damns you.
>> LOL!
> Shut your trap, TwatOmatic.
I think you ought to get your story about my gender straight, Graham.
OTOH, after your
"Thanks to my impulsive buying streak, my penis is now 467 feet long, I have
fifty-eight slut mistresses (two of whom are amazing chicks with dicks and
don't mind doing it with donkeys)..."
post, it's clear that you are one confused, poor, sick little puppy.
> If you had any self-awareness, you'd be screaming, not laughing.
If irony killed...
tor b
>Date: 8/19/2003 4:49 AM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: <ztycnSNiv8V...@comcast.com>
>"Marc Phillips" <boon...@aol.comm> wrote in message
>news:20030818214929...@mb-m29.aol.com
>> That revelation would be Leon's
>> handiwork, I'm afraid, and if you can't admit this is proof of his
>> claim, then you're simply lying again.
And, of course, "Leon North" was the source of the "handiwork" that told you
there was a lot of email traffic between my (this, of course, was back when you
"knew" that I was Doug Haugen!) email account and Arny's last summer. I laughed
so hard that my sides ached! And I'll bet Arny did, too! I guess not being able
to find your own dick is something you and "Leon North" have in common, Porky.
;-)
tor b
tor b
>Date: 8/19/2003 8:10 AM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: <ELednU2xtY9...@comcast.com>
You beat me to it!!
tor b
Arny Krueger
news:20030819091159...@mb-m02.aol.com
>> From: "Arny Krueger" ar...@hotpop.com
>> Date: 8/19/2003 4:49 AM Central Daylight Time
>> Message-id: <ztycnSNiv8V...@comcast.com>
>
>> "Marc Phillips" <boon...@aol.comm> wrote in message
>> news:20030818214929...@mb-m29.aol.com
>>> That revelation would be Leon's
>>> handiwork, I'm afraid, and if you can't admit this is proof of his
>>> claim, then you're simply lying again.
> And, of course, "Leon North" was the source of the "handiwork" that
> told you there was a lot of email traffic between my (this, of
> course, was back when you "knew" that I was Doug Haugen!) email
> account and Arny's last summer.
Indeed.
> I laughed so hard that my sides
> ached! And I'll bet Arny did, too!
Antics like "Leon's" are only funny until they become boring. Leon's
time-to-boredom was faster than just about anybody but sockpuppet Jamie
Benchimol's.
>I guess not being able to find
> your own dick is something you and "Leon North" have in common,
> Porky. ;-)
I guess there's some possibility that sockpuppet "Leon North" is the
handiwork of sockpuppet "Marc Phillips" who is the handiwork of Jim
Sanders? Or whatever?
;-)
There are very few rules of sockpuppetry that seem to stand the test of
time. However the one rule I've never seen broken is the idea that a
sockpuppet can't be any smarter than the person who animates it. That fits
"Leon North" to "Marc Phillips" almost perfectly.
tor b
>Date: 8/19/2003 9:41 AM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: <Y-2dnaEwOf2...@comcast.com>
>tor b" <torre...@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:20030819091159...@mb-m02.aol.com
>>> From: "Arny Krueger" ar...@hotpop.com
>>> Date: 8/19/2003 4:49 AM Central Daylight Time
>>> Message-id: <ztycnSNiv8VZb9yiU-KYvA@com
>cast.com>
>I guess there's some possibility that sockpuppet "Leon North" is the
>handiwork of sockpuppet "Marc Phillips" who is the handiwork of Jim
>Sanders? Or whatever?
I nominate the very charming and knowledgable Felix (aka, "Fear 3000") as the
gasbag behind "Leon North".
>There are very few rules of sockpuppetry that seem to stand the test of
>time. However the one rule I've never seen broken is the idea that a
>sockpuppet can't be any smarter than the person who animates it. That fits
>"Leon North" to "Marc Phillips" almost perfectly.
IMO, it fits "Leon North" to Felix equally well. YMMV. :-)
tor b
Arny Krueger
> >From: "Arny Krueger" ar...@hotpop.com
> >Date: 8/19/2003 9:41 AM Central Daylight Time
> >Message-id: <Y-2dnaEwOf2...@comcast.com>
> >tor b" <torre...@aol.com> wrote in message
> >news:20030819091159...@mb-m02.aol.com
> >>> From: "Arny Krueger" ar...@hotpop.com
> >>> Date: 8/19/2003 4:49 AM Central Daylight Time
> >>> Message-id: <ztycnSNiv8VZb9yiU-KYvA@com
> >cast.com>
> >I guess there's some possibility that sockpuppet "Leon North" is the
> >handiwork of sockpuppet "Marc Phillips" who is the handiwork of Jim
> >Sanders? Or whatever?
> I nominate the very charming and knowledgeable Felix (aka, "Fear 3000") as
the
> gasbag behind "Leon North".
Good possibility of that one, too...
> >There are very few rules of sockpuppetry that seem to stand the test of
> >time. However the one rule I've never seen broken is the idea that a
> >sockpuppet can't be any smarter than the person who animates it. That
fits
> >"Leon North" to "Marc Phillips" almost perfectly.
> IMO, it fits "Leon North" to Felix equally well. YMMV. :-)
It's hard for me to figure which one has a poorer actual-to-ego ratio, or
which is the bigger liar.
tor b
>Date: 8/19/2003 11:37 AM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: <sE-dnZ2Ei6C...@comcast.com>
(except in the area of avoirdupois ;->) than Porky Phillips, it is almost
impossible to imagine anyone having a bigger ego than the puffed-up Felix. I'll
bet he's physically short (and in more ways than one ).
tor b
Marc Phillips
Watching you rail against sockpuppetry is about as disingenuous as watching
Arny rail against child pornography!
LOL!
Boon
Marc Phillips
>> Or?? How about Arny? "We" know that Arny uses multiple ISPs,
>> including AOL, for instance.
>
>What's wrong with having an AOL account? You have one Phillips!
I have one Phillips? What does that mean?
>
>> That revelation would be Leon's
>> handiwork, I'm afraid, and if you can't admit this is proof of his
>> claim, then you're simply lying again.
>
>It's a trivial claim to research, and therefore is right down Leon's alley.
So you admit that Leon is a professional.
Boon
Marc Phillips
>>> That revelation would be Leon's
>>> handiwork, I'm afraid, and if you can't admit this is proof of his
>>> claim, then you're simply lying again.
>
>And, of course, "Leon North" was the source of the "handiwork" that told you
>there was a lot of email traffic between my (this, of course, was back when
>you
>"knew" that I was Doug Haugen!) email account and Arny's last summer. I
>laughed
>so hard that my sides ached! And I'll bet Arny did, too! I guess not being
>able
>to find your own dick is something you and "Leon North" have in common,
>Porky.
>;-)
You know, I kind of liked it when you brought up Joe McCarthy, because it was
the first new thing you've said in over a year.
That didn't last.
Boon
Arny Krueger
"Marc Phillips" <boon...@aol.comm> wrote in message
> Watching you rail against sockpuppetry is about as disingenuous as
watching
> Arny rail against child pornography!
Noting that Phillips does not seem to have any problems with child
pornography, other than making false police reports about people he hates...
Arny Krueger
"Marc Phillips" <boon...@aol.comm> wrote in message
> Arny said:
>
> >> Or?? How about Arny? "We" know that Arny uses multiple ISPs,
> >> including AOL, for instance.
> >
> >What's wrong with having an AOL account? You have one Phillips!
>
> I have one Phillips? What does that mean?
If you need to ask, you won't understand the answer, Phillips.
> >> That revelation would be Leon's
> >> handiwork, I'm afraid, and if you can't admit this is proof of his
> >> claim, then you're simply lying again.
> >
> >It's a trivial claim to research, and therefore is right down Leon's
alley.
>
> So you admit that Leon is a professional.
A professional trivialist, yes.
tor b
>Date: 8/19/2003 12:16 PM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: <IrKdnZoiE9A...@comcast.com>
tor b
tor b
>Date: 8/19/2003 11:54 AM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: <20030819125434...@mb-m27.aol.com>
Where did I "rail against sockpuppetry", O Fat and Stupid One? I merely thanked
you for confirming that the "internet investigator" who made these allegations
against Arny Krueger was a sockpuppet. Or, what you have so many times referred
to as "an anonymous Usenet asshole".
Thanks again, Porky!!
tor b
Lived EHT
wrote:
>>>> Why not? Talking with Arnii is like frying your own shit and
>>>> flicking the fecal fritters into a ceiling fan. It makes a lot of
>>>> mess and, ultimately, it's rather pointless.
>
>>> And you've been doing it for how many years, Graham?
>
>> I'm sorry, donkey-legs, but Mickey won today's IKYABWAI award.
>
>IOW Graham, you know that answering the question your post begged damns you.
No, Arnii. I don't talk with you--I talk at you. Insults and ridicule.
I know better than to attempt any kind of normal conversation with
you. You serve to provide the occasional snap of entertainment. So
many problems in just one head. So reviled every place you go. So
completely and dazzlingly inept at everything. And so disgusting in
every respect imaginable. My curiosity as a human being naturally
demands that I occasionally prod and poke you to see which bit falls
off next.
>>> LOL!
>
>> Shut your trap, TwatOmatic.
>
>I think you ought to get your story about my gender straight, Graham.
>
>OTOH, after your
>
>"Thanks to my impulsive buying streak, my penis is now 467 feet long, I have
>fifty-eight slut mistresses (two of whom are amazing chicks with dicks and
>don't mind doing it with donkeys)..."
>
>post, it's clear that you are one confused, poor, sick little puppy.
Clear to you, yes, Mr Rigid-as-a-board humourless fuckhandles. That
really doesn't trouble me in the least.
>> If you had any self-awareness, you'd be screaming, not laughing.
>
>If irony killed...
Oh, I'm often wrong about things, Arnii. And it doesn't break my back
to admit it when I am. I know for certain however that I'm not wrong
about you.
--
Thine
tor b
>Date: 8/19/2003 2:17 PM Central Daylight Time
>Message-id: <get4kvspcjvipvlas...@4ax.com>
>
>Arny Krueger wrote this regarding his possession of "suspect"
>pornography :
>
>>In order to convict, the
>>prosecutor has to show intent. I didn't intentionally acquire said
>>photographs. They showed up in my email one day, no doubt a freebie from you
>>or one of your *friends*. Shortly after I received them I deleted them. In
>>the long run they have been examined by a Michigan State Police Officer and
>>found to NOT be child pornography. End of story.
>
>No - that's *not* the end of the story.
>
>You claim you deleted the pictures shortly after recieving them, but
>first you had them examined by a police officer at Michigan State HQ.
>This appears to be incongruous with your subsequent comments on the
>matter which appeared here on this newsgroup.
>
>So, on what date did you have them examined?
>By who?
>Which department?
>
>If you can *prove* that this version of events is true, now would be a
>good time to do that.
>
>
>--
>S i g n a l @ l i n e o n e . n e t
>
>
>
>
>
>
~
Arny Krueger
"Girth" <sig...@lineone.net> wrote in message
news:get4kvspcjvipvlas...@4ax.com...
> Arny Krueger wrote this regarding his possession of "suspect"
> pornography :
>
> >In order to convict, the
> >prosecutor has to show intent. I didn't intentionally acquire said
> >photographs. They showed up in my email one day, no doubt a freebie from
you
> >or one of your *friends*. Shortly after I received them I deleted them.
In
> >the long run they have been examined by a Michigan State Police Officer
and
> >found to NOT be child pornography. End of story.
> No - that's *not* the end of the story.
OK sockpuppet "Girth", you were there, and I wasn't. You know better than I!
LOL!
> You claim you deleted the pictures shortly after recieving them, but
> first you had them examined by a police officer at Michigan State HQ.
Your ignorance of how Outlook Express deletes emails is noted, sockpuppet
"Girth".
> This appears to be incongruous with your subsequent comments on the
> matter which appeared here on this newsgroup.
Your total and complete ignorance of how Outlook Express Deletes emails is
noted, sockpuppet "Girth".
> So, on what date did you have them examined?
Earlier this year.
> By who?
A MSP officer
> Which department?
Michigan State Police.
> If you can *prove* that this version of events is true, now would be a
> good time to do that.
Sockpuppet "Girth" you are totally screwed in the head, aren't you? Unless
this appears in some large scale publication, the only account of what
happens is going to be from me. Guess what, this little incident isn't that
important in the cosmic scheme of things.
But thanks for showing once again how ignorant and stupid you are,
sockpuppet "Girth".
BTW sockpuppet "Girth", I presume that you adopted your new nickname in
sympathy with Marc "I never met any fast food that I didn't gobble right up"
Phillips.
Good one!
Arny Krueger
I think we're still arguing over who is the the more stupid, Felix or Marc.
It's an argument that nobody can lose - but them!
LOL!
Arny Krueger
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 09:10:42 -0400, "Arny Krueger" <ar...@hotpop.com>
> wrote:
>
> >>>> Why not? Talking with Arnii is like frying your own shit and
> >>>> flicking the fecal fritters into a ceiling fan. It makes a lot of
> >>>> mess and, ultimately, it's rather pointless.
> >
> >>> And you've been doing it for how many years, Graham?
> >
> >> I'm sorry, donkey-legs, but Mickey won today's IKYABWAI award.
> >
> >IOW Graham, you know that answering the question your post begged damns
you.
> No, Arnii. I don't talk with you--I talk at you.
That's right, empathy and personal communication aren't exactly your
strengths, now are they Graham.
> Insults and ridicule.
Have it your way, Graham.
> I know better than to attempt any kind of normal conversation with
> you.
Yeah, the level of the conversation quickly escalates above your limited
intelligence, Graham.
>You serve to provide the occasional snap of entertainment.
OK Graham, so you're a masochist.
>So many problems in just one head.
I've wondered how you live with the pain, Graham.
> So reviled every place you go.
Stop externalizing, Graham.
> So completely and dazzlingly inept at everything.
Ah yes Graham, just like your inability to buy a portable audio player that
meets your perceived needs.
>And so disgusting in every respect imaginable.
I'll have to give you this Graham, you try to be disgusting, so in some
sense you are successful.
> My curiosity as a human being naturally
> demands that I occasionally prod and poke you to see which bit falls
> off next.
BZZt, you don't have any curiosity as a human, Graham. Your membership was
suspended when you did that repulsive and disgusting thing that you did to
your daughter.
> >>> LOL!
> >
> >> Shut your trap, TwatOmatic.
>
> >I think you ought to get your story about my gender straight, Graham.
> >OTOH, after your
> >"Thanks to my impulsive buying streak, my penis is now 467 feet long, I
have
> >fifty-eight slut mistresses (two of whom are amazing chicks with dicks
and
> >don't mind doing it with donkeys)..."
> >post, it's clear that you are one confused, poor, sick little puppy.
> Clear to you, yes, Mr Rigid-as-a-board humourless fuckhandles. That
> really doesn't trouble me in the least.
That's why you are melting down again, Graham. It just doesn't bother you in
the slightest...
LOL!
> >> If you had any self-awareness, you'd be screaming, not laughing.
> >If irony killed...
> Oh, I'm often wrong about things, Arnii.
Let's do the shorter list and try to remember when you were right about
anything, Graham.
>And it doesn't break my back to admit it when I am.
Yeah, just like you melted down the other day, Graham.
> I know for certain however that I'm not wrong about you.
If you were right more often Graham, you wouldn't keep changing your Usenet
handle so often in a vain attempt to shrug off all your mistakes.
Arny Krueger
> >That's right, empathy and personal communication aren't exactly your
> >strengths, now are they Graham.
> It's just a practical and entertaining way of dealing with a twat,
> like yourself.
One is sitting in a favorable place when one's opponents are reduced to
simple-minded namecalling, sockpuppet "Girth". Give me points for realizing
that I can't do anything to you that's worse than what you've already done
to yourself!
> >> Insults and ridicule.
> >Have it your way, Graham.
> It's *your* way. You beget insults and ridicule.
I'm not your father, sockpuppet "Girth", no matter how hard you might wish
it to be true.
> >> I know better than to attempt any kind of normal conversation with
> >> you.
> >
> >Yeah, the level of the conversation quickly escalates above your limited
> >intelligence, Graham.
> In topsy-turvy world, perhaps.
What's topsy-turvy about a world in which smart guys who can carry on lucid
on-topic conversations have dominance over damaged goods and other lesser
forms of life such as yourself sockpuppet "Girth"?
> >>You serve to provide the occasional snap of entertainment.
> >
> >OK Graham, so you're a masochist.
> There's this real popular comedy show in the UK called "The Office".
> The central character (David Brent) is cringeworthy. He's arrogant,
> stupid, inept, contemptible. He gets himself into such awkward
> predicaments, you squirm in your seat. But, it's also highly
> entertaining. Of course, the guy who plays David Brent is acting...
...and you are playing your sad little self, sockpuppet "Girth".
Lived EHT
wrote:
>That's
I'm sorry, Mr Lollipop Bags, but you've had your time. I have no
desire to participate in your attempt to break the world record for
the highest number of IKYABWAIs in one post.
In your heyday, a high percentage of your posts attained total
randomness, rarely slipping into a subroutine of repetition (although,
of course, there was always the underlying envy and terror of people
who enjoyed music played on good audio equipment--which provided a
kind of kernel of irrationalities from which the randomness sprang).
You should therefore try harder. Perhaps exposing yourself to an
activity which gives you pleasure might provide the necessary misery.
--
Thine
Arny Krueger
>
> Somebody just pulled up in a 225BHP Golf GTI. See ya...
Oh, so you pump gas for a living, sockpuppet "Girth".
Arny Krueger
> You should therefore try harder. Perhaps exposing yourself to an
> activity which gives you pleasure might provide the necessary misery.
They say that the best revenge is living well. While you've been lamely
attacking me Graham, I loaded my NJB3 with the complete Walter and Toscanini
Beethoven symphonies as .WAV files. Don't try this at home as it would
pretty well eliminate the possibility of storing anything else on your
little Apple seed.
Lived EHT
wrote:
>They say that the best revenge is living well. While you've been lamely
>attacking me Graham, I loaded my NJB3 with the complete Walter and Toscanini
>Beethoven symphonies as .WAV files. Don't try this at home as it would
>pretty well eliminate the possibility of storing anything else on your
>little Apple seed.
Sounds just up your alley.
--
Thine
Arny Krueger
You should be able to relate to this guy, Graham. He is obviously very
inflexible, can't read and follow instructions, and is willing to
compromise sound quality to get nothing or very little in exchange.
Marc Phillips
Then I would have problems with child pornography. Jesus Christ, that was a
stupid statement you made.
Boon
Marc Phillips
>"Marc Phillips" <boon...@aol.comm> wrote in message
>news:20030819125635...@mb-m27.aol.com...
>> Arny said:
>>
>> >> Or?? How about Arny? "We" know that Arny uses multiple ISPs,
>> >> including AOL, for instance.
>> >
>> >What's wrong with having an AOL account? You have one Phillips!
>>
>> I have one Phillips? What does that mean?
>
>If you need to ask, you won't understand the answer, Phillips.
Well, if you're talking about my children, I have two. Stay away from them.
In other words, one day you will learn how to properly use a comma, I hope.
>
>> >> That revelation would be Leon's
>> >> handiwork, I'm afraid, and if you can't admit this is proof of his
>> >> claim, then you're simply lying again.
>> >
>> >It's a trivial claim to research, and therefore is right down Leon's
>alley.
>>
>> So you admit that Leon is a professional.
>
>A professional trivialist, yes.
So you're saying that child pornography is trivial. Does that explain how you
justify being obsessed with it?
Boon
Marc Phillips
>>> >> Or?? How about Arny? "We" know that Arny uses multiple ISPs,
>>> >> including AOL, for instance.
>>> >
>>> >What's wrong with having an AOL account? You have one Phillips!
>>>
>>> I have one Phillips? What does that mean?
>>
>>If you need to ask, you won't understand the answer, Phillips.
>>
>>> >> That revelation would be Leon's
>>> >> handiwork, I'm afraid, and if you can't admit this is proof of his
>>> >> claim, then you're simply lying again.
>>> >
>>> >It's a trivial claim to research, and therefore is right down Leon's
>>alley.
>>>
>>> So you admit that Leon is a professional.
>>
>>A professional trivialist, yes.
>>
>Sounds more and more like Felix, no?
Oh no, I'm Felix! Wait, now I'm George! No, no, I can't be George if I'm
Leon!
And you complain about me wondering who you are? ROTFLMAO!
Boon