info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Biden's own DoJ does a political hit job....on Biden
60 views
Skip to first unread message
ScottW
Feb 9, 2024, 1:14:53 AMFeb 9
to
What a report....he willfully did it.
But he's too old and his memory is too faulty to bother prosecuting.
WTF could possibly be the point of such a report if not to end his political career? The inner workings of your party year in and year out makes Watergate look like kids vandalizing on Halloween.
And then Joe seals his own campaign coffin with that ridiculous press conference.
If they just wanted the SCOTUS questioning of Co. off the news cycle I think they went a little overboard.
ScottW
But he's too old and his memory is too faulty to bother prosecuting.
WTF could possibly be the point of such a report if not to end his political career? The inner workings of your party year in and year out makes Watergate look like kids vandalizing on Halloween.
And then Joe seals his own campaign coffin with that ridiculous press conference.
If they just wanted the SCOTUS questioning of Co. off the news cycle I think they went a little overboard.
ScottW
mINE109
Feb 9, 2024, 10:31:04 AMFeb 9
to
On 2/9/24 12:14 AM, ScottW wrote:
> What a report....he willfully did it.
You're correct: a political hit piece on Biden. Maybe time to break the
> What a report....he willfully did it.
unspoken rule only Republicans can be special prosecutors. Or maybe
Garland should get out his editor's pen and enforce the policy against
holding subjects up to "opprobrium."
ScottW
Feb 9, 2024, 1:18:45 PMFeb 9
to
On Friday, February 9, 2024 at 7:31:04 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
> On 2/9/24 12:14 AM, ScottW wrote:
> > What a report....he willfully did it.
> You're correct: a political hit piece on Biden. Maybe time
Too late for Joe. You think Garland didn't know what they were doing
> On 2/9/24 12:14 AM, ScottW wrote:
> > What a report....he willfully did it.
> You're correct: a political hit piece on Biden. Maybe time
over there in SCville or didn't know who he was appointing?
GMAFB. That justification for not indicting was a joke in the form
of the pole hook yanking a bad act off the stage.
Only 2 questions remain....
how much kicking and squealing will we witness
as he's dragged off into the dustbin of the disgraced and discarded.
And who wants to follow that calamity act?
ScottW
mINE109
Feb 9, 2024, 2:09:42 PMFeb 9
to
On 2/9/24 12:18 PM, ScottW wrote:
> On Friday, February 9, 2024 at 7:31:04 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
>> On 2/9/24 12:14 AM, ScottW wrote:
>>> What a report....he willfully did it.
>> You're correct: a political hit piece on Biden. Maybe time
>
> Too late for Joe. You think Garland didn't know what they were doing
> over there in SCville or didn't know who he was appointing?
Hence the reference to only Republicans being qualified to be special
> On Friday, February 9, 2024 at 7:31:04 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
>> On 2/9/24 12:14 AM, ScottW wrote:
>>> What a report....he willfully did it.
>> You're correct: a political hit piece on Biden. Maybe time
>
> Too late for Joe. You think Garland didn't know what they were doing
> over there in SCville or didn't know who he was appointing?
counsels. That's the political environment and it's time for it to
change after decades of abuses from the Republican side.
> GMAFB. That justification for not indicting was a joke in the form
> of the pole hook yanking a bad act off the stage.
conspiracy to hide them, etc.
> Only 2 questions remain....
How does Trump get excused for actual criminal acts?
ScottW
Feb 10, 2024, 4:44:44 PMFeb 10
to
On Friday, February 9, 2024 at 11:09:42 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
> On 2/9/24 12:18 PM, ScottW wrote:
> > On Friday, February 9, 2024 at 7:31:04 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
> >> On 2/9/24 12:14 AM, ScottW wrote:
> >>> What a report....he willfully did it.
> >> You're correct: a political hit piece on Biden. Maybe time
> >
> > Too late for Joe. You think Garland didn't know what they were doing
> > over there in SCville or didn't know who he was appointing?
> Hence the reference to only Republicans being qualified to be special
> counsels. That's the political environment and it's time for it to
> change after decades of abuses from the Republican side.
Wah-wah. Guy was recommended for his DA job by the two dem senators of
> On 2/9/24 12:18 PM, ScottW wrote:
> > On Friday, February 9, 2024 at 7:31:04 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
> >> On 2/9/24 12:14 AM, ScottW wrote:
> >>> What a report....he willfully did it.
> >> You're correct: a political hit piece on Biden. Maybe time
> >
> > Too late for Joe. You think Garland didn't know what they were doing
> > over there in SCville or didn't know who he was appointing?
> Hence the reference to only Republicans being qualified to be special
> counsels. That's the political environment and it's time for it to
> change after decades of abuses from the Republican side.
the district. And Garland didn't have to release the report in full.
But he did.
> > GMAFB. That justification for not indicting was a joke in the form
> > of the pole hook yanking a bad act off the stage.
> Sorry, there's no criminal state of mind,
no refusal to return docs, no
> conspiracy to hide them, etc.
Keep trotting Joe out to bark mumble and gaffe his way to not just a defeat,
a slaughter.
ScottW
Fascist Flea
Feb 10, 2024, 6:18:47 PMFeb 10
to
Maybe it's weeping or wailing. I can't tell anymore.
http://tinyurl.com/23tvdpkn
>
> > no refusal to return docs, no conspiracy to hide them, etc.
> Irrelevant. That smoke just won't hang around to cover anything.
This guy is wearing a prayer shawl. Must be one of Witlessbowser's relatives.
> > no refusal to return docs, no conspiracy to hide them, etc.
> Irrelevant. That smoke just won't hang around to cover anything.
http://tinyurl.com/23tvdpkn
mINE109
Feb 10, 2024, 6:27:06 PMFeb 10
to
On 2/10/24 3:44 PM, ScottW wrote:
> On Friday, February 9, 2024 at 11:09:42 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
>> On 2/9/24 12:18 PM, ScottW wrote:
>>> On Friday, February 9, 2024 at 7:31:04 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
>>>> On 2/9/24 12:14 AM, ScottW wrote:
>>>>> What a report....he willfully did it.
>>>> You're correct: a political hit piece on Biden. Maybe time
>>>
>>> Too late for Joe. You think Garland didn't know what they were
>>> doing over there in SCville or didn't know who he was
>>> appointing?
>> Hence the reference to only Republicans being qualified to be
>> special counsels. That's the political environment and it's time
>> for it to change after decades of abuses from the Republican side.
>
> Wah-wah. Guy was recommended for his DA job by the two dem senators
> of the district. And Garland didn't have to release the report in
> full. But he did.
Hence my comment he didn't exercise his editing responsibility.
> On Friday, February 9, 2024 at 11:09:42 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
>> On 2/9/24 12:18 PM, ScottW wrote:
>>> On Friday, February 9, 2024 at 7:31:04 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
>>>> On 2/9/24 12:14 AM, ScottW wrote:
>>>>> What a report....he willfully did it.
>>>> You're correct: a political hit piece on Biden. Maybe time
>>>
>>> Too late for Joe. You think Garland didn't know what they were
>>> doing over there in SCville or didn't know who he was
>>> appointing?
>> Hence the reference to only Republicans being qualified to be
>> special counsels. That's the political environment and it's time
>> for it to change after decades of abuses from the Republican side.
>
> Wah-wah. Guy was recommended for his DA job by the two dem senators
> of the district. And Garland didn't have to release the report in
> full. But he did.
>>> GMAFB. That justification for not indicting was a joke in the
>>> form of the pole hook yanking a bad act off the stage.
>> Sorry, there's no criminal state of mind,
>
> Because there is no mind left. What a silly defense.
>> no refusal to return docs, noconspiracy to hide them, etc.
>
> Irrelevant. That smoke just won't hang around to cover anything.
No, it's the exact point of difference between Biden who won't be
> Irrelevant. That smoke just won't hang around to cover anything.
prosecuted and Trump who is being prosecuted.
> Keep trotting Joe out to bark mumble and gaffe his way to not just a
> defeat, a slaughter.
Trump, otoh, benefits from not being taken seriously.
ScottW
Feb 12, 2024, 12:41:18 PMFeb 12
to
https://nypost.com/2024/02/11/news/whopping-86-of-voters-feel-biden-is-too-old-to-finish-another-term-poll/
ScottW
Fascist Flea
Feb 12, 2024, 2:10:24 PMFeb 12
to
That dog is barking again...
> > > Biden does well in public when his mistakes aren't taken out of context.
> > Trump, otoh, benefits from not being taken seriously.
> So well that "Whopping 86% of voters feel Biden is too old to finish another term: poll"
>
http://tinyurl.com/3wdmnkt6
> > Trump, otoh, benefits from not being taken seriously.
> So well that "Whopping 86% of voters feel Biden is too old to finish another term: poll"
>
mINE109
Feb 13, 2024, 11:04:05 AMFeb 13
to
On 2/12/24 11:41 AM, ScottW wrote:
> So well that "Whopping 86% of voters feel Biden is too old to finish another term: poll"
>
> https://nypost.com/2024/02/11/news/whopping-86-of-voters-feel-biden-is-too-old-to-finish-another-term-poll/
Can't get enough of that, can you? Going to noise polls is less useful
> So well that "Whopping 86% of voters feel Biden is too old to finish another term: poll"
>
> https://nypost.com/2024/02/11/news/whopping-86-of-voters-feel-biden-is-too-old-to-finish-another-term-poll/
when the media have their collective thumbs on the scale, previously
seen in "but her emails."
The choice will still be Biden against Trump. The last time that
happened a majority of 7 million chose 'too old' over 'too old *and*
criminal' and that was before Trump tried to overthrow the government
and made it clear he favors Putin over world peace.
ScottW
Feb 13, 2024, 1:26:04 PMFeb 13
to
On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 8:04:05 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
> On 2/12/24 11:41 AM, ScottW wrote:
> > So well that "Whopping 86% of voters feel Biden is too old to finish another term: poll"
> >
> > https://nypost.com/2024/02/11/news/whopping-86-of-voters-feel-biden-is-too-old-to-finish-another-term-poll/
> Can't get enough of that, can you? Going to noise polls is less useful
> when the media have their collective thumbs on the scale, previously
> seen in "but her emails."
I don't recall Hillary every having a poll this bad.
> On 2/12/24 11:41 AM, ScottW wrote:
> > So well that "Whopping 86% of voters feel Biden is too old to finish another term: poll"
> >
> > https://nypost.com/2024/02/11/news/whopping-86-of-voters-feel-biden-is-too-old-to-finish-another-term-poll/
> Can't get enough of that, can you? Going to noise polls is less useful
> when the media have their collective thumbs on the scale, previously
> seen in "but her emails."
In fact, Hillary led in most polls right up until she lost.
ScottW
mINE109
Feb 13, 2024, 2:21:04 PMFeb 13
to
On 2/13/24 12:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 8:04:05 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
>> On 2/12/24 11:41 AM, ScottW wrote:
>>> So well that "Whopping 86% of voters feel Biden is too old to finish another term: poll"
>>>
>>> https://nypost.com/2024/02/11/news/whopping-86-of-voters-feel-biden-is-too-old-to-finish-another-term-poll/
>> Can't get enough of that, can you? Going to noise polls is less useful
>> when the media have their collective thumbs on the scale, previously
>> seen in "but her emails."
>
> I don't recall Hillary every having a poll this bad.
There was no equivalent poll to the one you just cited. Go find a poll
> On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 8:04:05 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
>> On 2/12/24 11:41 AM, ScottW wrote:
>>> So well that "Whopping 86% of voters feel Biden is too old to finish another term: poll"
>>>
>>> https://nypost.com/2024/02/11/news/whopping-86-of-voters-feel-biden-is-too-old-to-finish-another-term-poll/
>> Can't get enough of that, can you? Going to noise polls is less useful
>> when the media have their collective thumbs on the scale, previously
>> seen in "but her emails."
>
> I don't recall Hillary every having a poll this bad.
that asked if she would be better at implementing best server security
practices. I'm sure you could find junk that tried to make her look bad.
> In fact, Hillary led in most polls right up until she lost.
last-minute publicity.
ScottW
Feb 13, 2024, 3:30:18 PMFeb 13
to
personality that undid her.
Meanwhile Joe's again demanding fat deficit increasing spending proposals while bidenflation
remains persistently high.
ScottW
Fascist Flea
Feb 13, 2024, 4:40:09 PMFeb 13
to
Witlessidiot is losing their "discussion" on every front.
one can demand or propose, but "demanding proposals" is nonsense,
aka word salad (the Reality version, not the Witlessbabble version).
Maybe now would be an opportune moment for you to bark something
about Dumpster's hideously unjust tax cuts for the super-rich. You do
recall that horrorshow, don't you? One day you'll have to admit that your
"Dumpy can do no wrong" stance is very much at odds with Reality.
> while bidenflation remains persistently high.
Yes, 3.1% is terribly burdensome. Maybe you should switch to yapping
about interest rates instead.
>
> Meanwhile Joe's again demanding fat deficit increasing spending proposals
Someone still hasn't mastered basic language skills. FYI, numbskull,
> Meanwhile Joe's again demanding fat deficit increasing spending proposals
one can demand or propose, but "demanding proposals" is nonsense,
aka word salad (the Reality version, not the Witlessbabble version).
Maybe now would be an opportune moment for you to bark something
about Dumpster's hideously unjust tax cuts for the super-rich. You do
recall that horrorshow, don't you? One day you'll have to admit that your
"Dumpy can do no wrong" stance is very much at odds with Reality.
> while bidenflation remains persistently high.
about interest rates instead.
Marc Stager
Feb 14, 2024, 5:29:24 AMFeb 14
to
Gary Johnson: 3%, Representing the Libertarian Party, Gary Johnson was a former Governor of New Mexico. He ran on a platform advocating for civil liberties, smaller government, and a non-interventionist foreign policy, and
Jill Stein: 1% Representing the Green Party, Jill Stein is a physician and activist. Her platform focused on environmentalism, social justice, and economic reform.
Just as Nader cost Al Gore the election.
mINE109
Feb 14, 2024, 10:51:04 AMFeb 14
to
On 2/13/24 2:30 PM, ScottW wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 11:21:04 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
>> On 2/13/24 12:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 8:04:05 AM UTC-8, mINE109
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 2/12/24 11:41 AM, ScottW wrote:
>>>>> So well that "Whopping 86% of voters feel Biden is too old to
>>>>> finish another term: poll"
>>>>>
>>>>> https://nypost.com/2024/02/11/news/whopping-86-of-voters-feel-biden-is-too-old-to-finish-another-term-poll/
>>>>Can't get enough of that, can you? Going to noise polls is less useful
>>>> when the media have their collective thumbs on the scale,
>>>> previously seen in "but her emails."
>>>
>>> I don't recall Hillary every having a poll this bad.
>> There was no equivalent poll to the one you just cited. Go find a
>> poll that asked if she would be better at implementing best server
>> security practices. I'm sure you could find junk that tried to make
>> her look bad.
>>> In fact, Hillary led in most polls right up until she lost.
>> She lost due to the drumbeat of "but her emails" stories and
>> Comey's last-minute publicity.
>
> and I always thought it was her stunning good looks and wonderful
> personality that undid her.
Against Trump? Try again. And considering how wrong the 2016 polling was
> On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 11:21:04 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
>> On 2/13/24 12:26 PM, ScottW wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 8:04:05 AM UTC-8, mINE109
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 2/12/24 11:41 AM, ScottW wrote:
>>>>> So well that "Whopping 86% of voters feel Biden is too old to
>>>>> finish another term: poll"
>>>>>
>>>>> https://nypost.com/2024/02/11/news/whopping-86-of-voters-feel-biden-is-too-old-to-finish-another-term-poll/
>>>>Can't get enough of that, can you? Going to noise polls is less useful
>>>> when the media have their collective thumbs on the scale,
>>>> previously seen in "but her emails."
>>>
>>> I don't recall Hillary every having a poll this bad.
>> There was no equivalent poll to the one you just cited. Go find a
>> poll that asked if she would be better at implementing best server
>> security practices. I'm sure you could find junk that tried to make
>> her look bad.
>>> In fact, Hillary led in most polls right up until she lost.
>> She lost due to the drumbeat of "but her emails" stories and
>> Comey's last-minute publicity.
>
> and I always thought it was her stunning good looks and wonderful
> personality that undid her.
isn't a point in favor of obsessing over today's polls. That said,
Biden-favoring polls are all but ignored.
> Meanwhile Joe's again demanding fat deficit increasing spending
> proposals while bidenflation remains persistently high.
context of a successful curtailment of inflation without inducing a
recession no matter how badly Larry Summers wanted one. Cutting the rate
in half over last year is a good thing.
You've been crying wolf on inflation pretty much forever.
ScottW
Feb 14, 2024, 12:55:36 PMFeb 14
to
> Biden-favoring polls are all but ignored.
> > Meanwhile Joe's again demanding fat deficit increasing spending
> > proposals while bidenflation remains persistently high.
> Doubling down on inflation. The latest numbers should be seen
and cry.
ScottW
mINE109
Feb 15, 2024, 10:27:57 AMFeb 15
to
>> Biden-favoring polls are all but ignored.
>>> Meanwhile Joe's again demanding fat deficit increasing spending
>>> proposals while bidenflation remains persistently high.
>> Doubling down on inflation. The latest numbers should be seen
>
> Keep telling people how they should see stuff as they look at their grocery bills
> and cry.
0 new messages