Holy Rosie the Rifleman, Batman!

[George M. Middius]

I witnessed the most amazing event this a.m. I saw a huge SUV (a Suburban)
being parallel-parked by a woman! She handled the oversized car as well as any
man. I was astonished. This was something I'd never seen before. In my mind,
parallel parking has always been the province of males.

Clearly, if a woman can learn to parallel-park, then women can easily handle
the stresses of warfare and combat. Not to wax apocalyptic (woof!), but I'd
say women's liberation has finally been achieved.

Also, props to Obama for getting on the right side of the homophobia issue in
California. Getting re-elected, even if his opponent was a turkey, has
obviously freed the Prez to follow his conscience instead of pandering and
hedging like he did in '08.

[ScottW]

On Mar 2, 7:36 am, George M. Middius <glanb...@gmail.com> wrote:

Damn George...this place is deader than Boon's audio career.
What are you trying to do....inspire Jenn to wake up and declare her
life long proficiency at parallel parking?

Yeah...campaign commitments are so annoying...a downright impediment
to
evolution.

But hey...there's hope...Holder has declared that under extraordinary
circumstances
you may one day be eligible for a drone up the bun. No annoying due
process required.
Perhaps if you petition the WH...100K signatures and they promise to
consider it.
Used to be 25K but it's was taking away from golf time.

Wanna bet my post gets just as much or more action than yours?

ScottW

[MiNe 109]

In article
<5640d335-db93-4dcb...@ps9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,

ScottW <Scot...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Wanna bet my post gets just as much or more action than yours?

Well-formatted and spell-checked!

Of course, any reply to your post is also a reply to George, the
original poster.

Stephen

[ScottW]

On Mar 6, 4:39 pm, MiNe 109 <smcelr...@POPaustin.rr.com> wrote:
> In article
> <5640d335-db93-4dcb-8779-d89277644...@ps9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,

>
>  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Wanna bet my post gets just as much or more action than yours?
>
> Well-formatted and spell-checked!
>
> Of course, any reply to your post is also a reply to George, the
> original poster.

All these years and you're still confused by usenet.
Try google options and view as tree...the indents indicate to whom you
are replying.

And if you were actually trying to reply to George via my post....why
did you scrub off his sexist drooling? Or are you as easily amazed by
parallel parking?

ScottW

[MiNe 109]

In article
<ade1cee4-f70e-469a...@f5g2000pbs.googlegroups.com>,

ScottW <Scot...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On Mar 6, 4:39 pm, MiNe 109 <smcelr...@POPaustin.rr.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <5640d335-db93-4dcb-8779-d89277644...@ps9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> >  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > Wanna bet my post gets just as much or more action than yours?
> >
> > Well-formatted and spell-checked!
> >
> > Of course, any reply to your post is also a reply to George, the
> > original poster.
>
> All these years and you're still confused by usenet.
> Try google options and view as tree...the indents indicate to whom you
> are replying.

Google? Now who's confused by usenet! A reply to George's thread, of
course.

> And if you were actually trying to reply to George via my post....why
> did you scrub off his sexist drooling? Or are you as easily amazed by
> parallel parking?

Congrats! You've now extended George's lead over yourself.

Funny you should mention parallel parking. Did you just buy a
self-parking car?

[ScottW]

On Mar 6, 7:30 pm, MiNe 109 <smcelr...@POPaustin.rr.com> wrote:
> In article

> <ade1cee4-f70e-469a-ae14-2f697ff76...@f5g2000pbs.googlegroups.com>,

>
>
>
>
>
>  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 6, 4:39 pm, MiNe 109   <smcelr...@POPaustin.rr.com> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <5640d335-db93-4dcb-8779-d89277644...@ps9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > >  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Wanna bet my post gets just as much or more action than yours?
>
> > > Well-formatted and spell-checked!
>
> > > Of course, any reply to your post is also a reply to George, the
> > > original poster.
>
> >  All these years and you're still confused by usenet.
> > Try google options and view as tree...the indents indicate to whom you
> > are replying.
>
> Google? Now who's confused by usenet! A reply to George's thread, of
> course.

I know you're not very current...technically...but google has owned
the usenet archives for quite. But indent and reply to post is pretty
commonly supported in most readers.

>
> > And if you were actually trying to reply to George via my post....why
> > did you scrub off his sexist drooling?  Or are you as easily amazed by
> > parallel parking?
>
> Congrats! You've now extended George's lead over yourself.

George....leading from behind (or should we say with his
behind)....again.

>
> Funny you should mention parallel parking. Did you just buy a
> self-parking car?

No, I'm more interested in an anti-drone drone. But perhaps what
George saw in action was a self parking car and was simply confused.
Technology has long passed him by.

ScottW

[MiNe 109]

In article
<8c9488f2-d79b-4d0e...@mk3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,

ScottW <Scot...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On Mar 6, 7:30�pm, MiNe 109 <smcelr...@POPaustin.rr.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <ade1cee4-f70e-469a-ae14-2f697ff76...@f5g2000pbs.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > �ScottW <Scott...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mar 6, 4:39�pm, MiNe 109 � <smcelr...@POPaustin.rr.com> wrote:
> > > > In article
> > > > <5640d335-db93-4dcb-8779-d89277644...@ps9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > > > �ScottW <Scott...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Wanna bet my post gets just as much or more action than yours?
> >
> > > > Well-formatted and spell-checked!
> >
> > > > Of course, any reply to your post is also a reply to George, the
> > > > original poster.
> >
> > > �All these years and you're still confused by usenet.
> > > Try google options and view as tree...the indents indicate to whom you
> > > are replying.
> >
> > Google? Now who's confused by usenet! A reply to George's thread, of
> > course.
>
> I know you're not very current...technically...but google has owned
> the usenet archives for quite. But indent and reply to post is pretty
> commonly supported in most readers.

Who said anything different? However, google is not usenet no matter who
owns an archive.

> > > And if you were actually trying to reply to George via my post....why
> > > did you scrub off his sexist drooling? �Or are you as easily amazed by
> > > parallel parking?
> >
> > Congrats! You've now extended George's lead over yourself.
>
> George....leading from behind (or should we say with his
> behind)....again.

Funny how that works. No matter what you do, you lose to George.

> > Funny you should mention parallel parking. Did you just buy a
> > self-parking car?
>
> No, I'm more interested in an anti-drone drone. But perhaps what
> George saw in action was a self parking car and was simply confused.
> Technology has long passed him by.

It appears you like to pretend others aren't up-to-date. You must miss
being on the cutting edge at work. Why not go exchange notes with the
retired dudes on uk.rec.audio now that your writing has improved past
its former self-disqualifying level?

[ScottW]

On Mar 7, 9:33 am, MiNe 109 <smcelr...@POPaustin.rr.com> wrote:
> In article

> <8c9488f2-d79b-4d0e-a345-d89f96de4...@mk3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,

>
>
>
>
>
>  ScottW <Scott...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mar 6, 7:30 pm, MiNe 109   <smcelr...@POPaustin.rr.com> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <ade1cee4-f70e-469a-ae14-2f697ff76...@f5g2000pbs.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > > ScottW <Scott...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Mar 6, 4:39 pm, MiNe 109 <smcelr...@POPaustin.rr.com> wrote:
> > > > > In article
> > > > > <5640d335-db93-4dcb-8779-d89277644...@ps9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > > > > ScottW <Scott...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Wanna bet my post gets just as much or more action than yours?
>
> > > > > Well-formatted and spell-checked!
>
> > > > > Of course, any reply to your post is also a reply to George, the
> > > > > original poster.
>
> > > > All these years and you're still confused by usenet.
> > > > Try google options and view as tree...the indents indicate to whom you
> > > > are replying.
>
> > > Google? Now who's confused by usenet! A reply to George's thread, of
> > > course.
>
> >  I know you're not very current...technically...but google has owned
> > the usenet archives for quite.  But indent and reply to post is pretty
> > commonly supported in most readers.
>
> Who said anything different?

Actually...you did. But this is quickly becoming typical...who said
what when and what did they really mean or think they meant or just
went delusional.
You remind me of O'Reily claiming Obama never proposed a spending cut.
Now if he just said he never proposed a spending he actually intended
to implement, he would have been right.

> However, google is not usenet no matter who
> owns an archive.
>
> > > > And if you were actually trying to reply to George via my post....why
> > > > did you scrub off his sexist drooling? Or are you as easily amazed by
> > > > parallel parking?
>
> > > Congrats! You've now extended George's lead over yourself.
>
> >  George....leading from behind (or should we say with his
> > behind)....again.
>
> Funny how that works. No matter what you do, you lose to George.
>
> > > Funny you should mention parallel parking. Did you just buy a
> > > self-parking car?
>
> > No, I'm more interested in an anti-drone drone.  But perhaps what
> > George saw in action was a self parking car and was simply confused.
> > Technology has long passed him by.
>
> It appears you like to pretend others aren't up-to-date.

Not exactly. Some people are obsolete...while others were
never informed at all.

> You must miss
> being on the cutting edge at work. Why not go exchange notes with the
> retired dudes on uk.rec.audio now that your writing has improved past
> its former self-disqualifying level?

Good idea. They're at least interesting and informed...and not all
that
anal.

ScottW



- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

[MiNe 109]

In article
<410090c2-cacf-4203...@q9g2000pbf.googlegroups.com>,

You're just making stuff up. I didn't say anything about indenting and
Google is still not usenet

> You remind me of O'Reily claiming Obama never proposed a spending cut.
> Now if he just said he never proposed a spending he actually intended
> to implement, he would have been right.

No, doesn't ring a bell.

> > However, google is not usenet no matter who
> > owns an archive.
> >
> > > > > And if you were actually trying to reply to George via my post....why
> > > > > did you scrub off his sexist drooling? Or are you as easily amazed by
> > > > > parallel parking?
> >
> > > > Congrats! You've now extended George's lead over yourself.
> >
> > > �George....leading from behind (or should we say with his
> > > behind)....again.
> >
> > Funny how that works. No matter what you do, you lose to George.
> >
> > > > Funny you should mention parallel parking. Did you just buy a
> > > > self-parking car?
> >
> > > No, I'm more interested in an anti-drone drone. �But perhaps what
> > > George saw in action was a self parking car and was simply confused.
> > > Technology has long passed him by.
> >
> > It appears you like to pretend others aren't up-to-date.
>
> Not exactly. Some people are obsolete...while others were
> never informed at all.

And some think usenet is google.

> > You must miss
> > being on the cutting edge at work. Why not go exchange notes with the
> > retired dudes on uk.rec.audio now that your writing has improved past
> > its former self-disqualifying level?
>
> Good idea. They're at least interesting and informed...and not all
> that
> anal.

Your writing has improved but google groups is still a formatting
nightmare.

[George M. Middius]

MiNe 109 wrote:

> > > Funny you should mention parallel parking. Did you just buy a
> > > self-parking car?
> >
> > No, I'm more interested in an anti-drone drone. But perhaps what
> > George saw in action was a self parking car and was simply confused.
> > Technology has long passed him by.
>
> It appears you like to pretend others aren't up-to-date. You must miss
> being on the cutting edge at work. Why not go exchange notes with the
> retired dudes on uk.rec.audio now that your writing has improved past
> its former self-disqualifying level?

<grrrrr....>

Scottie took the buyout quite a while ago. Qualcomm has no more use for
Witless now that ADA goals have become the defacto standard, obviating the
need for Affirmative Action For The Reeding & Riting Disabled.

[MiNe 109]

In article <in3kj8hiia15rj21j...@4ax.com>,

A set-aside set aside.

[George M. Middius]

MiNe 109 wrote:

> > Scottie took the buyout quite a while ago. Qualcomm has no more use for
> > Witless now that ADA goals have become the defacto standard, obviating the
> > need for Affirmative Action For The Reeding & Riting Disabled.
>
> A set-aside set aside.

I was expecting some gloating from the Weenie Far Right now that Socialist
Obama's destruction of the mighty U.S. economy is complete. Here's today's
update from the Pinko Times:

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Unemployment at 4-Year Low as U.S. Hiring Gains Steam

Bolstered by a healthier private sector, the United States economy gained
236,000 jobs in February, well above what had been expected, while the
unemployment rate fell to 7.7 percent, its lowest level since December 2008.
The gains were broad-based, the Labor Department said Friday, with sectors
ranging from manufacturing to business services turning in healthy results.
Construction was especially strong, adding 48,000 jobs, a sign that the
recovery in the housing market is beginning to translate into new jobs.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Not to mention the huge expansion in the bloodsucking gov't workforce:

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Public-sector employment continued to shrink, however, as the number of
government employees nationwide fell by 10,000.

<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/09/business/economy/us-added-236000-jobs-in-february.html?adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1362777557-WCLmf0W1gJEq4OdKp3yrjw>

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Scottie & Co. were right all along. Obama has nationalized the car companies,
neutered the military, confiscated millions of guns, and spread welfare wide
and deep among his peeps. The apocalpyse is upon us.

[MiNe 109]

In article <gblkj8tcimp4qtsh6...@4ax.com>,

George M. Middius <glan...@gmail.com> wrote:

You left out the exploding deficit that didn't explode and is actually
dropping too fast. And what happened to that runaway inflation?

Stephen

[George M. Middius]

MiNe 109 wrote:

> > Scottie & Co. were right all along. Obama has nationalized the car companies,
> > neutered the military, confiscated millions of guns, and spread welfare wide
> > and deep among his peeps. The apocalpyse is upon us.
>
> You left out the exploding deficit that didn't explode and is actually
> dropping too fast. And what happened to that runaway inflation?

What's the frequency of that whistle you're using? A certain pooch isn't
picking it up.

[MiNe 109]

In article <7orpj8l0rlll9uglg...@4ax.com>,

George M. Middius <glan...@gmail.com> wrote:

I guess he's spent after the drones.

Stephen

[Jenn]

On Mar 8, 2:25 pm, George M. Middius <glanb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> MiNe 109 wrote:
> > > Scottie took the buyout quite a while ago. Qualcomm has no more use for
> > > Witless now that ADA goals have become the defacto standard, obviating the
> > > need for Affirmative Action For The Reeding & Riting Disabled.
>
> > A set-aside set aside.
>
> I was expecting some gloating from the Weenie Far Right now that Socialist
> Obama's destruction of the mighty U.S. economy is complete. Here's today's
> update from the Pinko Times:
>
> *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
> Unemployment at 4-Year Low as U.S. Hiring Gains Steam
>
> Bolstered by a healthier private sector, the United States economy gained
> 236,000 jobs in February, well above what had been expected, while the
> unemployment rate fell to 7.7 percent, its lowest level since December 2008.
> The gains were broad-based, the Labor Department said Friday, with sectors
> ranging from manufacturing to business services turning in healthy results.
> Construction was especially strong, adding 48,000 jobs, a sign that the
> recovery in the housing market is beginning to translate into new jobs.
>
> *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
> Not to mention the huge expansion in the bloodsucking gov't workforce:
>
> *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
> Public-sector employment continued to shrink, however, as the number of
> government employees nationwide fell by 10,000.
>

> <http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/09/business/economy/us-added-236000-jo...>

>
> *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *
>
> Scottie & Co. were right all along. Obama has nationalized the car companies,
> neutered the military, confiscated millions of guns, and spread welfare wide
> and deep among his peeps. The apocalpyse is upon us.

Barack Obama (or this weekend is it O'Bama?): The worst socialist in
history!

[George M. Middius]

Jenn wrote:

> > Scottie & Co. were right all along. Obama has nationalized the car companies,
> > neutered the military, confiscated millions of guns, and spread welfare wide
> > and deep among his peeps. The apocalpyse is upon us.
>
> Barack Obama (or this weekend is it O'Bama?): The worst socialist in
> history!

Your jellous cos the Real Ameracans are in charge of the House of
Representatives, the pple have spoke & the tax n spend librells are finished.

[Boon]

On Mar 6, 11:17 am, ScottW <Scott...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 2, 7:36 am, George M. Middius <glanb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Damn George...this place is deader than Boon's audio career.

Really, troll? I've gone from two lines to five lines since October,
and I've added a dozen dealers.

Tell us about your early "retirement" again. How's that golden
parachute holding up?

[George M. Middius]

Boon wrote:

> > Damn George...this place is deader than Boon's audio career.
>
> Really, troll? I've gone from two lines to five lines since October,
> and I've added a dozen dealers.
>
> Tell us about your early "retirement" again. How's that golden
> parachute holding up?

Not to speak out of turn, but it's probably a waste of time trying to get
Witless to acknowledge his own shitfulness. I think a simple scolding would
serve better. "Bad doggie!" comes to mind.

[Boon]

I've always subscribed to the "crush him like a bug on the ground"
approach, but you're right. It would be more fun to extract his wings
and legs, one at a time.

[Shhhh! I'm listening to reason!]

I wonder if 2pid still hates me. I admire him. I learned so much about military matters from him. I'm still grappling with why we shouldn't axe the F-35 though. Perhaps he can help me with that one. I know he tried before, but I must be thick.

[Shhhh! I'm listening to reason!]

Check your demographics. ;)

[Boon]

On Mar 7, 11:18 am, ScottW <Scott...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> No, I'm more interested in an anti-drone drone.  But perhaps what
> George saw in action was a self parking car and was simply confused.
> Technology has long passed him by.

...says the guy with the '80s Yamaha preamp and the Mitsubishi
turntable.

[George M. Middius]

Boon wrote:

> > Technology has long passed him by.
>
> ...says the guy with the '80s Yamaha preamp and the Mitsubishi
> turntable.

He may have lost all his prized audio gear in the divorce.

[Boon]

Or he may have sold all the audio gear to buy her a new
Mercedes...just so she'd stay around another year.

[George M. Middius]

Boon wrote:

> > He may have lost all his prized audio gear in the divorce.
>
> Or he may have sold all the audio gear to buy her a new
> Mercedes...just so she'd stay around another year.

Yep. There's certain bones you just can't bury forever.

[Shhhh! I'm listening to reason!]

On Thursday, March 28, 2013 11:10:37 AM UTC-5, Glanbrok wrote:

> Yep. There's certain bones you just can't bury forever.

It doesn't matter if they can be covered by a mullet.

[George M. Middius]

Shhhh! I'm listening to reason! wrote:

> > Yep. There's certain bones you just can't bury forever.
>
> It doesn't matter if they can be covered by a mullet.

Are mullets a food fish? I thought they are bottom-feeders.

[Boon]

On Mar 28, 11:25 pm, "Shhhh! I'm listening to reason!"

He claimed to have cut it off. Too bad they grow back.