In article <rhj358$al4$4...@dont-email.me
> supe...@super70s.invalid wrote:
> > Miloch <Miloch...@newsguy.com
> >> ...because outcome will be unclear as he doubles down on claims
> >> mail-ballots will lead to widespread fraud
> >> https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8639725/Donald-Trump-says-
> >> country-election-AGAIN.html
> >> President Donald Trump inveighed against mail-in voting at a White House
> >> event on women's suffrage -- where he said the practice would be such a
> >> 'disaster' it might force a redo of the November election.
> >> Trump complained that mail-in voting amounted to sending 'millions and
> >> millions of ballots all over the place' -- and said he stood by his own
> >> proscribed election practices 'win, lose, or draw.'
> >> But after blasting the new efforts to use the mail for expanded voting
> >> during a Monday midwestern campaign swing, Trump raised the possibility
> >> the elections would have to be run a second time -- a remedy that is not
> >> included in the Constitution.
> >> 'It'll end up being a rigged election or they will never come out with an
> >> outcome. They'll have to do it again and nobody wants that and I don't
> >> want that,' Trump said.
> >Why spend $2.4 billion dollars* doing it again, why not just declare
> >yourself the winner even when you lose and have the military which is
> >sworn to the Constitution perp walk you out of the White House. A
> >spectacle that would put the icing on the cake of the Trump presidency.
> >* estimated cost of the 2016 national election
> And you posted this off-topic article here because?
So you could make a laughable response to an OT message (BTW nobody's
losing in a landslide except Republicans).