info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Poor Trump! Jan 6 Committee Reportedly Deleted 117 Fi les Containing 'Critical Information'
0 views
Skip to first unread message
OrigInfoJunkie
Jan 24, 2024, 11:25:41 AMJan 24
to
On 1/24/2024 8:17 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
> me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net wrote:
>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>> bigtrump...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
>>>> The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 reportedly deleted 117
>>>> files containing f ocritical informationf before Republicans
>>>> took back the majority in the House of Representatives.
>>>
>>> More proof that the so-called "insurrection" is bogus.
>>
>> Hmmm... Wouldn't that be destruction of evidence in a police case?
>>
>> I believe that would be a crime..
>
> If memory serves, so is the committe [sic] members lieing [sic] to Congress.
No "committe" [sic] members lied to Congress, you illiterate fucktard.
> me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net wrote:
>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>> bigtrump...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
>>>> The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 reportedly deleted 117
>>>> files containing f ocritical informationf before Republicans
>>>> took back the majority in the House of Representatives.
>>>
>>> More proof that the so-called "insurrection" is bogus.
>>
>> Hmmm... Wouldn't that be destruction of evidence in a police case?
>>
>> I believe that would be a crime..
>
> If memory serves, so is the committe [sic] members lieing [sic] to Congress.
No "committe" [sic] members lied to Congress, you illiterate fucktard.
Scout
Jan 24, 2024, 12:11:03 PMJan 24
to
"Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote in message
news:uord77$1sc3g$1...@dont-email.me...
> me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net wrote:
>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>> bigtrump...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
>>>>The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 reportedly deleted 117
>>>>files containing f ocritical informationf before Republicans
>>>>took back the majority in the House of Representatives.
>>>
>>> More proof that the so-called "insurrection" is bogus.
>>
>>Hmmm... Wouldn't that be destruction of evidence in a police case?
>>
>>I believe that would be a crime..
>
> If memory serves, so is the committe members lieing to Congress.
>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>> bigtrump...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
>>>>The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 reportedly deleted 117
>>>>files containing f ocritical informationf before Republicans
>>>>took back the majority in the House of Representatives.
>>>
>>> More proof that the so-called "insurrection" is bogus.
>>
>>Hmmm... Wouldn't that be destruction of evidence in a police case?
>>
>>I believe that would be a crime..
>
Well, I doubt you will ever get Adam Schiff charged with that even though he
lied to Congress, to the Media and to the American People.
Wilson Woods
Jan 24, 2024, 3:16:09 PMJan 24
to
On 1/24/2024 9:10 AM, scooter lied:
> I doubt you will ever get Adam Schiff charged with that even though he
> lied to Congress
Schiff didn't lie, scooter.
>
>
> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote in message
> news:uord77$1sc3g$1...@dont-email.me...
>> me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net wrote:
>>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>> bigtrump...@protonmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>>> The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 reportedly deleted 117
>>>>> files containing f ocritical informationf before Republicans
>>>>> took back the majority in the House of Representatives.
>>>>
>>>> More proof that the so-called "insurrection" is bogus.
>>>
>>> Hmmm... Wouldn't that be destruction of evidence in a police case?
>>>
>>> I believe that would be a crime..
>>
>> If memory serves, so is the committe members lieing to Congress.
>
> Well,
Another scooterism: empty wheezy padding that adds no meaning.
>
> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote in message
> news:uord77$1sc3g$1...@dont-email.me...
>> me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net wrote:
>>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>> bigtrump...@protonmail.com wrote:
>>
>>>>> The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 reportedly deleted 117
>>>>> files containing f ocritical informationf before Republicans
>>>>> took back the majority in the House of Representatives.
>>>>
>>>> More proof that the so-called "insurrection" is bogus.
>>>
>>> Hmmm... Wouldn't that be destruction of evidence in a police case?
>>>
>>> I believe that would be a crime..
>>
>> If memory serves, so is the committe members lieing to Congress.
>
> Well,
> I doubt you will ever get Adam Schiff charged with that even though he
> lied to Congress
Skeeter
Jan 24, 2024, 3:53:34 PMJan 24
to
In article <beesN.68806$GX69....@fx46.iad>, ban...@hotmail.com
says...
He did and it's already been proven.
says...
Michael A Terrell
Jan 24, 2024, 4:06:06 PMJan 24
to
On 1/24/2024 12:53 PM, Skeeter-Shit Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell, convicted child
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
He didn't.
molester and another fucking do-nothing, lied:
Scout
Jan 25, 2024, 11:13:56 AMJan 25
to
"Wilson Woods" <ban...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:beesN.68806$GX69....@fx46.iad...
> On 1/24/2024 9:10 AM, scooter lied:
>>
>>
>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote in message
>> news:uord77$1sc3g$1...@dont-email.me...
>>> me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net wrote:
>>>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>> bigtrump...@protonmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 reportedly deleted 117
>>>>>> files containing f ocritical informationf before Republicans
>>>>>> took back the majority in the House of Representatives.
>>>>>
>>>>> More proof that the so-called "insurrection" is bogus.
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm... Wouldn't that be destruction of evidence in a police case?
>>>>
>>>> I believe that would be a crime..
>>>
>>> If memory serves, so is the committe members lieing to Congress.
>>
>> Well,
>
> Another scooterism: empty wheezy padding that adds no meaning.
Rudyisms....
>>
>>
>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote in message
>> news:uord77$1sc3g$1...@dont-email.me...
>>> me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net wrote:
>>>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>> bigtrump...@protonmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 reportedly deleted 117
>>>>>> files containing f ocritical informationf before Republicans
>>>>>> took back the majority in the House of Representatives.
>>>>>
>>>>> More proof that the so-called "insurrection" is bogus.
>>>>
>>>> Hmmm... Wouldn't that be destruction of evidence in a police case?
>>>>
>>>> I believe that would be a crime..
>>>
>>> If memory serves, so is the committe members lieing to Congress.
>>
>> Well,
>
> Another scooterism: empty wheezy padding that adds no meaning.
Wilson Woods
Jan 25, 2024, 1:25:53 PMJan 25
to
On 1/25/2024 8:08 AM, scooter lied:
No, scooter.
scooterisms:
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately
before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}
"I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not subject to
acknowledgment]
"So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the opponent
*never* said, i.e. a straw man]
"TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." — a straw man]
"Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and "TRANSLATION:.."
— a straw man]
"Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't *be* in the
Constitution anyway]
"it's" [he means the possessive "its"]
"its" [he means the contraction "it's"]
"where" [he means "were"]
"were" [he means "where"]
"creditability" [he means "credibility"]
You do these these *all the fucking time*, scooter. They are all examples of
shitty writing, and your shitty writing is indicative of your shitty thinking.
You are only semi-literate, scooter, and you're aggressively stupid.
scooterisms:
"Further..." [empty padding]
"Naturally, ..." [empty padding]
"And just like that..." [scooter going "nyah-nyah" at an opponent immediately
before fleeing]
"On the contrary..." [scooter childishly disputing, *never* refuting]
"And yet..." [empty padding; scooter adding something irrelevant and pointless]
"Heck..." [empty padding]
"Well..." [empty padding]
"After all..." [empty padding]
"In fact..." [empty padding]
"Indeed..." [empty padding}
"I acknowledge that..." [something that hasn't happened, so not subject to
acknowledgment]
"So what you're saying..." [what follows is *always* something the opponent
*never* said, i.e. a straw man]
"TRANSLATION:..." [the same as "so what you're saying..." — a straw man]
"Rudy/Baxter/Lee admits..." same as "so what you're saying" and "TRANSLATION:.."
— a straw man]
"Where in the Constitution does it say..." [about shit that wouldn't *be* in the
Constitution anyway]
"it's" [he means the possessive "its"]
"its" [he means the contraction "it's"]
"where" [he means "were"]
"were" [he means "where"]
"creditability" [he means "credibility"]
You do these these *all the fucking time*, scooter. They are all examples of
shitty writing, and your shitty writing is indicative of your shitty thinking.
You are only semi-literate, scooter, and you're aggressively stupid.
Scout
Jan 25, 2024, 2:06:49 PMJan 25
to
news:OIxsN.255939$Wp_8....@fx17.iad...
> On 1/25/2024 8:08 AM, scooter lied:
>>
>>
>> "Wilson Woods" <ban...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:beesN.68806$GX69....@fx46.iad...
>>> On 1/24/2024 9:10 AM, scooter lied:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:uord77$1sc3g$1...@dont-email.me...
>>>>> me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net wrote:
>>>>>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> bigtrump...@protonmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 reportedly deleted 117
>>>>>>>> files containing f ocritical informationf before Republicans
>>>>>>>> took back the majority in the House of Representatives.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More proof that the so-called "insurrection" is bogus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmmm... Wouldn't that be destruction of evidence in a police case?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe that would be a crime..
>>>>>
>>>>> If memory serves, so is the committe members lieing to Congress.
>>>>
>>>> Well,
>>>
>>> Another scooterism: empty wheezy padding that adds no meaning.
>>
>> Rudyisms
>
> No
Rudy;s only word..
>>
>>
>> "Wilson Woods" <ban...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:beesN.68806$GX69....@fx46.iad...
>>> On 1/24/2024 9:10 AM, scooter lied:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote in message
>>>> news:uord77$1sc3g$1...@dont-email.me...
>>>>> me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net wrote:
>>>>>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> bigtrump...@protonmail.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 reportedly deleted 117
>>>>>>>> files containing f ocritical informationf before Republicans
>>>>>>>> took back the majority in the House of Representatives.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> More proof that the so-called "insurrection" is bogus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmmm... Wouldn't that be destruction of evidence in a police case?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe that would be a crime..
>>>>>
>>>>> If memory serves, so is the committe members lieing to Congress.
>>>>
>>>> Well,
>>>
>>> Another scooterism: empty wheezy padding that adds no meaning.
>>
>> Rudyisms
>
> No
Wilson Woods
Jan 25, 2024, 3:16:51 PMJan 25
to
On 1/25/2024 11:06 AM, scooter lied:
> Rudy;s
LOL!
You lose again, scooter.
>
>
> "Wilson Woods" <ban...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:OIxsN.255939$Wp_8....@fx17.iad...
>> On 1/25/2024 8:08 AM, scooter lied:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Wilson Woods" <ban...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:beesN.68806$GX69....@fx46.iad...
>>>> On 1/24/2024 9:10 AM, scooter lied:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:uord77$1sc3g$1...@dont-email.me...
>>>>>> me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net wrote:
>>>>>>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> bigtrump...@protonmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 reportedly deleted 117
>>>>>>>>> files containing f ocritical informationf before Republicans
>>>>>>>>> took back the majority in the House of Representatives.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> More proof that the so-called "insurrection" is bogus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmmm... Wouldn't that be destruction of evidence in a police case?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe that would be a crime..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If memory serves, so is the committe members lieing to Congress.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well,
>>>>
>>>> Another scooterism: empty wheezy padding that adds no meaning.
>>>
>>> Rudyisms
>>
>
> "Wilson Woods" <ban...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:OIxsN.255939$Wp_8....@fx17.iad...
>> On 1/25/2024 8:08 AM, scooter lied:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Wilson Woods" <ban...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:beesN.68806$GX69....@fx46.iad...
>>>> On 1/24/2024 9:10 AM, scooter lied:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:uord77$1sc3g$1...@dont-email.me...
>>>>>> me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net wrote:
>>>>>>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> bigtrump...@protonmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 reportedly deleted 117
>>>>>>>>> files containing f ocritical informationf before Republicans
>>>>>>>>> took back the majority in the House of Representatives.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> More proof that the so-called "insurrection" is bogus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmmm... Wouldn't that be destruction of evidence in a police case?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe that would be a crime..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If memory serves, so is the committe members lieing to Congress.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well,
>>>>
>>>> Another scooterism: empty wheezy padding that adds no meaning.
>>>
>>> Rudyisms
>>
LOL!
You lose again, scooter.
Wilson Woods
Jan 26, 2024, 11:02:00 AMJan 26
to
On 1/25/2024 11:06 AM, scooter lied:
>
>
> "Wilson Woods" <ban...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:OIxsN.255939$Wp_8....@fx17.iad...
>> On 1/25/2024 8:08 AM, scooter lied:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Wilson Woods" <ban...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:beesN.68806$GX69....@fx46.iad...
>>>> On 1/24/2024 9:10 AM, scooter lied:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:uord77$1sc3g$1...@dont-email.me...
>>>>>> me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net wrote:
>>>>>>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> bigtrump...@protonmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 reportedly deleted 117
>>>>>>>>> files containing f ocritical informationf before Republicans
>>>>>>>>> took back the majority in the House of Representatives.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> More proof that the so-called "insurrection" is bogus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmmm... Wouldn't that be destruction of evidence in a police case?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe that would be a crime..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If memory serves, so is the committe members lieing to Congress.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well,
>>>>
>>>> Another scooterism: empty wheezy padding that adds no meaning.
>>>
>>> Rudyisms
>>
>
> "Wilson Woods" <ban...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:OIxsN.255939$Wp_8....@fx17.iad...
>> On 1/25/2024 8:08 AM, scooter lied:
>>>
>>>
>>> "Wilson Woods" <ban...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:beesN.68806$GX69....@fx46.iad...
>>>> On 1/24/2024 9:10 AM, scooter lied:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote in message
>>>>> news:uord77$1sc3g$1...@dont-email.me...
>>>>>> me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net wrote:
>>>>>>> "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> bigtrump...@protonmail.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The former House Select Committee on Jan. 6 reportedly deleted 117
>>>>>>>>> files containing f ocritical informationf before Republicans
>>>>>>>>> took back the majority in the House of Representatives.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> More proof that the so-called "insurrection" is bogus.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmmm... Wouldn't that be destruction of evidence in a police case?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I believe that would be a crime..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If memory serves, so is the committe members lieing to Congress.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well,
>>>>
>>>> Another scooterism: empty wheezy padding that adds no meaning.
>>>
>>> Rudyisms
>>
0 new messages