Congrats Democrats - attacking children works
SFTV_troy
.
Yay. That's the lesson you've learned from the Letterman scandal,
followed by the defense by Democrats saying, "It's a-okay to attack
children and/or pregnant teens", and concluding with the hated-
republican Palin's resignation because she was sick of her family
being abused.
Whose children are you going to attack next, in hopes of forcing a
resignation from a Republican governor?
.
tomcervo
> alt-x-noarchive: yes
>
> .
>
> Yay. �That's the lesson you've learned from the Letterman scandal,
> followed by the defense by Democrats saying, "It's a-okay to attack
> children and/or pregnant teens", and concluding with the hated-
> republican Palin's resignation because she was sick of her family
> being abused.
Well, when Rush did it to Chelsea Clinton, I don't recall Bill's
resignation, or Hillary leaving political life. I guess he was a
little tougher than Sarah Barracuda. That's the trouble with modern
republicans--they like to envision themselves as the tough town-tamer,
but in reality they're the prissy dude made to dance by the local
louts shooting at their feet.
> Whose children are you going to attack next, in hopes of forcing a
> resignation from a Republican governor?
We're hoping Terry Sanford doesn't resign--too much entertainment
value, but he's probably going to get sued by a romance novelist for
plagiarism.
George
> On Jul 5, 9:55�am, SFTV_troy <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> alt-x-noarchive: yes
>>
>> .
>>
>> Yay. �That's the lesson you've learned from the Letterman scandal,
>> followed by the defense by Democrats saying, "It's a-okay to attack
>> children and/or pregnant teens", and concluding with the hated-
>> republican Palin's resignation because she was sick of her family
>> being abused.
>
>
> Well, when Rush did it to Chelsea Clinton, I don't recall Bill's
> resignation, or Hillary leaving political life.
because KKKlintax didn't care about anything but power.
clouddreamer
> alt-x-noarchive: yes
>
> .
>
> Yay. That's the lesson you've learned from the Letterman scandal,
> followed by the defense by Democrats saying, "It's a-okay to attack
> children and/or pregnant teens", and concluding with the hated-
> republican Palin's resignation because she was sick of her family
> being abused.
Put yourself into the spotlight, proclaim that children should not be
given sex education while your own underage daughter gets pregnant then
you open yourself up to ridicule.
D'uh.
..
--
We must change the way we live,
or the climate will do it for us.
Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
Let's see:
-- Sarah Palin dragged her pregnant teenaged daughter the the scared
shitless teenaged father onto the national stage and set them up as an
example of how knocked-up teenagers should act.
-- She dragged around the country a 6-month-old Down's Syndrome child,
hefting him around like a sack of taters.
-- Ditto for the rest of her kids.
No one has attacked her children. What's been attacked is her
hypocritical use of the children as props then trying to hide behind
them when the going gets tough.
KiniK
news:d974d055-2118-4a62...@26g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 5, 9:55 am, SFTV_troy <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> alt-x-noarchive: yes
>
> .
>
> Yay. That's the lesson you've learned from the Letterman scandal,
> followed by the defense by Democrats saying, "It's a-okay to attack
> children and/or pregnant teens", and concluding with the hated-
> republican Palin's resignation because she was sick of her family
> being abused.
>
> Whose children are you going to attack next, in hopes of forcing a
> resignation from a Republican governor?
>
> .
Let's see:
-- Sarah Palin dragged her pregnant teenaged daughter the the scared
shitless teenaged father onto the national stage and set them up as an
example of how knocked-up teenagers should act.
-- She dragged around the country a 6-month-old Down's Syndrome child,
hefting him around like a sack of taters.
-- Ditto for the rest of her kids.
So then Obama's kids are fair game?
What a dope.
trotsky
> On Jul 5, 9:55�am, SFTV_troy <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> alt-x-noarchive: yes
>>
>> .
>>
>> Yay. �That's the lesson you've learned from the Letterman scandal,
>> followed by the defense by Democrats saying, "It's a-okay to attack
>> children and/or pregnant teens", and concluding with the hated-
>> republican Palin's resignation because she was sick of her family
>> being abused.
>
>
> Well, when Rush did it to Chelsea Clinton, I don't recall Bill's
> resignation, or Hillary leaving political life. I guess he was a
> little tougher than Sarah Barracuda.
Personally I'm a little disappointed that the pitbull with lipstick has
now become just a dog with fleas.
trotsky
Agreed.
trotsky
The children! Won't somebody think of the children?
Bugman
"SFTV_troy" <SFTV...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:79c7f728-794d-498d...@c36g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
Are they all weak spined quitters like Palin?
Dano
Shit...if it's THAT easy...let's do it. Well worth the "suffering" of a few
rich kids who would be taunted anyway over their dipshit Republicunt parents
anyhow. Sounds like a plan. Thanks Troy.
Anyone think Troy was teased by the other kids?
robw
> Bugman wrote:
> > "SFTV_troy" <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
I think Troy is still teased by kids.
clouddreamer
I think he's still being teased by kids.
It's the Principle!
And then whining about it. Laura Bush didn't even whine that much when
her girls were constantly caught underage drinking. You can't have it
both ways publically parading your kids and then bitching when people
are watching them.
--
Brandy Alexandre
Yes, the TP should always unwind over, not under.
Syvyn11
"tomcervo" <tomc...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:f82ab9fe-5af6-4e6c...@o6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 5, 9:55�am, SFTV_troy <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> alt-x-noarchive: yes
>
> .
>
> Yay. �That's the lesson you've learned from the Letterman scandal,
> followed by the defense by Democrats saying, "It's a-okay to attack
> children and/or pregnant teens", and concluding with the hated-
> republican Palin's resignation because she was sick of her family
> being abused.
Well, when Rush did it to Chelsea Clinton, I don't recall Bill's
resignation, or Hillary leaving political life. I guess he was a
little tougher than Sarah Barracuda. That's the trouble with modern
republicans--they like to envision themselves as the tough town-tamer,
but in reality they're the prissy dude made to dance by the local
louts shooting at their feet.
________________________________________________________________________________
ONCE! Limbaugh made that joke ONCE! And you liberals wear it like
that's all he did for eight years. He apologized and yet you won't let
it go. It's been almost 16 years. And you libs still hang your hat on
"LIMBAUGH JOKED ABOUT CHELSEA!!!!" Like it absolves you for any blame in
attacking Briston or Willow Palin. It doesn't.
___________________________________________________________________________________
Syvyn11
"clouddreamer" <George.W.Bu...@End.of.an.Error> wrote in message
news:Z5adnQRYavuRX83X...@supernews.com...
> SFTV_troy wrote:
>> alt-x-noarchive: yes
>>
>> .
>>
>> Yay. That's the lesson you've learned from the Letterman scandal,
>> followed by the defense by Democrats saying, "It's a-okay to attack
>> children and/or pregnant teens", and concluding with the hated-
>> republican Palin's resignation because she was sick of her family
>> being abused.
>
>
> Put yourself into the spotlight, proclaim that children should not be
> given sex education while your own underage daughter gets pregnant then
> you open yourself up to ridicule.
>
> D'uh.
no, you are just spinning it so you can make yourself feel good about
attacking a child.
GREAT TO BE YOU!
Syvyn11
"Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names" <old_r...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:d974d055-2118-4a62...@26g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
Let's see:
If you think that, faggot. You are indeed a pitiful human being.
Tom
Is David Letterman a registered Democrat? I'm sure you'll provide
proof one way the other.
Name one, just one, Democratic official... elected, appointed or hired
(such as a party official) who has attacked any of Palin's children?
Back in the '90s, John McCain told a joke about Chelsea Clinton when
she was a young girl. Have any Democratic Senators told jokes about
any of Palin's kids?
When Palin was sparring with Letterman recently, she referred back to
an instruction candidate Obama made publicly to his campaign staff,
volunteers and Democrats in general... kids and families are off
limits during the campaign. Unfortunately for Palin, she thought he
was also telling the press and comedians such as Letterman that kids
and families are off limits. Otherwise, why would she have referenced
that in one of the public statements she made to/about Letterman?
Tom
Not Sure
2001.2...@End.of.an.Error> wrote:
> SFTV_troy wrote:
> > alt-x-noarchive: yes
>
> > .
>
> > Yay. That's the lesson you've learned from the Letterman scandal,
> > followed by the defense by Democrats saying, "It's a-okay to attack
> > children and/or pregnant teens", and concluding with the hated-
> > republican Palin's resignation because she was sick of her family
> > being abused.
>
> Put yourself into the spotlight, proclaim that children should not be
> given sex education while your own underage daughter gets pregnant then
> you open yourself up to ridicule.
>
> D'uh.
I'm still waiting for some of your outrage over Letterman's disgusting
jokes about Palin's daughters, hypocrite. Perhaps you need time to
compile them? :)
chicagofan
That's going in my quote file for a sig line!!! Hope you don't
object... :)
bj
trotsky
> On Jul 5, 8:08 am, clouddreamer <George.W.Bush.
> 2001.2...@End.of.an.Error> wrote:
>> SFTV_troy wrote:
>>> alt-x-noarchive: yes
>>> .
>>> Yay. That's the lesson you've learned from the Letterman scandal,
>>> followed by the defense by Democrats saying, "It's a-okay to attack
>>> children and/or pregnant teens", and concluding with the hated-
>>> republican Palin's resignation because she was sick of her family
>>> being abused.
>> Put yourself into the spotlight, proclaim that children should not be
>> given sex education while your own underage daughter gets pregnant then
>> you open yourself up to ridicule.
>>
>> D'uh.
>
> I'm still waiting for some of your outrage over Letterman's disgusting
> jokes about Palin's daughters, hypocrite.
How many jokes about how many of the daughters were there, brainiac?
SFTV_troy
> when her girls were constantly caught underage drinking. ...
Bush's daughters were full adults. WOMEN not girls. In contrast
Letterman and his Democratic apologists made jokes about the sex-rape
of a 14-yr-old (this year) and a 17-yr-old (last year) - both of whom
were still children. They should be completely and totally off-limits
until they pass their 18th birthday.
SFTV_troy
clouddreamer wrote:
>
>
> Put yourself into the spotlight, proclaim that children should not be
> given sex education while your own underage daughter gets pregnant then
> you open yourself up to ridicule. D'uh.
Ridicule is fine, but saying a 14-year-old should be raped by a 33-
year-old man is crossing the line from criticism to child pron.
SFTV_troy
tomcervo wrote:
>
>
> When Rush did it to Chelsea Clinton, I don't recall
> Bill's resignation, or Hillary leaving political life.
That's because Lush Rimbaugh never criticized Chelsea while she was an
underage child.
Also it's a mistake to assume all Republicans approve of Lush's
antics. I certainly don't. He disgusts me almost as much as Democrat
Rachel Maddow. They sacrifice integrity for entertainment, and I'd
rather not listen to either of them.
trotsky
Child pron is the worst.
trotsky
Glad I could help.
Tom
Who said that? No one said a 14 year-old girl should be raped by a 33
year-old man.
Please provide video proof of the exact quote.
Tom
Tom
No they weren't They were underage college girls binge drinking. They
were the President's daughters and were breaking the law...
> In contrast
> Letterman and his Democratic apologists made jokes about the sex-rape
> of a 14-yr-old (this year) and a 17-yr-old (last year) - both of whom
> were still children. They should be completely and totally off-limits
> until they pass their 18th birthday.
You're delusional. Letterman was making fun of the unwed teen-mother,
not her younger sister. More importantly, it was Palin's hypocrisy
that has been the subject of comment for months, not her daughter's
out-of-wedlock pregnancy.
The difference isn't that subtle.
Tom
Not Sure
Thanks for quoting me, dipshit. Now Clouddreamer the coward can
respond to me without having to violate her precious killfile. :)
Not Sure
How are those kneepads working out for you, hooker? :)
> bj- Hide quoted text -
Kris Baker
Not worth replying to you twice, so I'll combine these.
First, you say:
>
> Ridicule is fine, but saying a 14-year-old should
> be raped by a 33-year-old man is crossing the line
> from criticism to child pron.
No one said that. That's four words.
No.
One.
Said.
That.
Was Letterman's joke funny? Hell, no. But misrepresenting
it for your own purpose (whatever that is), is useless.
THEN, you try for a goal:
>
> That's because Lush Rimbaugh never criticized Chelsea
> while she was an underage child.
He said it in October 1993. Chelsea was born in 1980.
I'm sure even you can do the math on this one.
You're a fucking idiot (or troll). You don't get to pick.
You report, we decide.
HTH, HAND, fucktard.
Tom Sr.
> On Jul 5, 12:30 pm, "Dano" wrote:
> > Bugman wrote:
> > >> Whose children are you going to attack next, in hopes of forcing a
> > >> resignation from a Republican governor?
> > > Are they all weak spined quitters like Palin?
> > Shit...if it's THAT easy...let's do it. Well worth the "suffering" of a few
> > rich kids who would be taunted anyway over their dipshit Republicunt parents
> > anyhow. Sounds like a plan. Thanks Troy.
> > Anyone think Troy was teased by the other kids?
> I think Troy is still teased by kids.- Hide quoted text -
"SFTV [Science Fiction television] Troy" has always been considered
fairly much a total idiot, even over 20 years ago when I was posting
in the rec.arts.sf.tv newsgroup.
He was thought a bad joke in that newsgroup for well-over a decade.
(Remember Gharlane, Troy?! Unlike you, he was someone who truly
*knew* and *understood* SF TV.)
I suspect Troy still very much is.
-Tom Sr.
SFTV_troy
>
>
>>>>Laura Bush didn't even whine that much when
>>>>her girls were constantly caught underage drinking
>
>
> No they weren't They were underage college girls binge drinking
You keep making the same error, even after I corrected you. Yes the
Bush daughters were breaking the law. Agreed. But they were NOT
girls. They were full-grown adults (18 and up). That's a major
difference.
>
> > In contrast
> > Letterman and his Democratic apologists made jokes about the sex-rape
> > of a 14-yr-old (this year) and a 17-yr-old (last year) - both of whom
> > were still children. They should be completely and totally off-limits
> > until they pass their 18th birthday.
>
> You're delusional. Letterman was making fun of the unwed
> teen-mother, not her younger sister.
Doesn't matter. He was making those jokes LAST year (during the
campaign) when the pregant girl was still an underage 17. Attacking
children is never acceptable.
Kris Baker
news:9b569217-48ad-4e1f...@g19g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
>
> "SFTV [Science Fiction television] Troy" has always been considered
> fairly much a total idiot, even over 20 years ago when I was posting
> in the rec.arts.sf.tv newsgroup.
>
> He was thought a bad joke in that newsgroup for well-over a decade.
> (Remember Gharlane, Troy?! Unlike you, he was someone who truly
> *knew* and *understood* SF TV.)
Now I feel bad for attacking him; he can't help it he's
deficient.
Tom
You've never seen the Rachel Maddow Show, have you? Otherwise, you'd
know she frequently has people of opposing viewpoints on her show.
Governor Tim Pawlenty is a frequent guest.
The only entertaining part of Rachel's show is the cocktail moment and
pop culture segments at the show.
Tom
Tom
> On Jul 5, 4:04 pm, Tom <drso...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 5, 3:54 pm, SFTV_troy >
> >>Tom wrote:
>
> >>>>Laura Bush didn't even whine that much when
> >>>>her girls were constantly caught underage drinking
>
> > > Bush's daughters were full adults. WOMEN not girls.
>
> > No they weren't They were underage college girls binge drinking
>
> You keep making the same error, even after I corrected you. Yes the
> Bush daughters were breaking the law. Agreed. But they were NOT
> girls. They were full-grown adults (18 and up). That's a major
> difference.
I've made no error. Just because one reaches the legal age of
emancipation doesn't mean they are adults.
>
>
>
> > > In contrast
> > > Letterman and his Democratic apologists made jokes about the sex-rape
> > > of a 14-yr-old (this year) and a 17-yr-old (last year) - both of whom
> > > were still children. They should be completely and totally off-limits
> > > until they pass their 18th birthday.
>
> > You're delusional. Letterman was making fun of the unwed
> > teen-mother, not her younger sister.
>
> Doesn't matter. He was making those jokes LAST year (during the
> campaign) when the pregant girl was still an underage 17. Attacking
> children is never acceptable.
It does matter. We're not talking about last year, we're talking about
Letterman's jokes about Willow, or whatever her name is.
BTW, please tell us some of the jokes Letterman told about the Palin's
unwed, pregnant daughter. Just make it one joke...
Tom
It's the Principle!
She doesn't have a killfile. She just says "plonk" a lot and then
starts responding to your posts when she decides she approves again.
It's the Principle!
They're just twisting facts to suit their argument. Letterman thought
Palin was at the ballgame with Bristol, not Willow, when he said it.
But people have been wanking to the idea of it being a 14 year old ever
since.
SFTV_troy
Kris Baker wrote:
> "SFTV_troy" <SFTV...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:36af16d0-e39f-4355...@26g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>
> Not worth replying to you twice, so I'll combine these.
>
> First, you say:
> >
> > Ridicule is fine, but saying a 14-year-old should
> > be raped by a 33-year-old man is crossing the line
> > from criticism to child pron.
>
> No one said that. That's four words.
He made a joke about "Sarash Palin's daughter getting knocked-up
during the 7th inning" by one of the ball players. So which daughter
was at the game? That's who the joke was about.
> Was Letterman's joke funny? Hell, no.But misrepresenting
I'm not misrepresenting. I just provided an exact quote.
> > That's because Lush Rimbaugh never criticized Chelsea
> > while she was an underage child.
>
> He said it in October 1993.
Proof please. Or retract.
Syvyn11
"SFTV_troy" <SFTV...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:36af16d0-e39f-4355...@26g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>
>
but he did, made a comment about her being a dog. And it was roundly
critized.
Just like a few years ago when a MSNBC guy said that Hillary was pimping
Chelsea, even though Chelsea is well into adulthood, the MSM said you
couldn't attack her despite being a adult and despite working on her mom's
campaign to be president.
Funny how the rules are different between demcrats and republicans.
>
>
>
It's the Principle!
> On Jul 5, 4:16�pm, SFTV_troy <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 5, 4:04�pm, Tom <drso...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Jul 5, 3:54�pm, SFTV_troy >
>> >>Tom wrote:
>>
>> >>>>Laura Bush didn't even whine that much when
>> >>>>her girls were constantly caught underage drinking
>>
>> > > Bush's daughters were full adults. �WOMEN not girls.
>>
>> > No they weren't They were underage college girls binge drinking
>>
>> You keep making the same error, even after I corrected you. �Yes
>> the Bush daughters were breaking the law. �Agreed. �But they were
>> NOT girls. �They were full-grown adults (18 and up). �That's a
>> major difference.
>
> I've made no error. Just because one reaches the legal age of
> emancipation doesn't mean they are adults.
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> > > �In contrast
>> > > Letterman and his Democratic apologists made jokes about the
>> > > sex-rape of a 14-yr-old (this year) and a 17-yr-old (last
>> > > year) - both of whom were still children. �They should be
>> > > completely and totally off-lim
> its
>> > > until they pass their 18th birthday.
>>
>> > You're delusional. Letterman was making fun of the unwed
>> > teen-mother, not her younger sister.
>>
>> Doesn't matter. �He was making those jokes LAST year (during the
>> campaign) when the pregant girl was still �an underage 17. �
>> Attackin
> g
>> children is never acceptable.
>
> It does matter. We're not talking about last year, we're talking
> about Letterman's jokes about Willow, or whatever her name is.
>
> BTW, please tell us some of the jokes Letterman told about the
> Palin's unwed, pregnant daughter. Just make it one joke...
>
> Tom
>
>
He never said it was Willow, and he thought she had been at the game
with Bristol, who was 18 at the time. It's just tickling too many
people in that special place to make the error intentional on
Letterman's part, which is why they keep flogging the story that
way.
SFTV_troy
It's the Principle! wrote:
> Tom <drs...@aol.com> wrote in alt.gossip.celebrities:
>
> >
> > Who said that? No one said a 14 year-old girl should be raped by a
> > 33 year-old man.
> >
> >
>
> They're just twisting facts to suit their argument. Letterman thought
> Palin was at the ballgame with Bristol, not Willow, when he said it.
False. You can find the video on youtube, or simply read what he
said: "Top Ten Highlights Of Sarah Palin's Trip To New York ....
(snip).... One awkward moment for Sarah Palin at the Yankee game,
during the seventh inning, her daughter was knocked-up by Alex
Rodriguez."
He didn't specify which daughter but astute people know the only
daughter present was the 14-year-old. Letterman knew it, and his
writing staff knew it. They are not idiots.
clouddreamer
He never said she "should be raped" by a 33 year old man.
Given your comments, Bristol was "raped" by her boyfriend since she was
15 at the time. Palin put her "principles" and children into the
forefront. She is in no position to whine. If she wanted to protect
them, she should have left them home in Alaska.
..
--
We must change the way we live,
or the climate will do it for us.
clouddreamer
Oh grow up. If Palin didn't want the big bad Letterman to make jokes
about her daughter, she should have left her behind in Alaska instead of
parading them in front of the media.
Tom Sr.
> "Tom Sr." <tomswiftsen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > "SFTV [Science Fiction television] Troy" has always been considered
> > fairly much a total idiot, even over 20 years ago when I was posting
> > in the rec.arts.sf.tv newsgroup.
> > He was thought a bad joke in that newsgroup for well-over a decade.
> > (Remember Gharlane, Troy?! Unlike you, he was someone who truly
> > *knew* and *understood* SF TV.)
> Now I feel bad for attacking him; he can't help it he's deficient.
Not to worry, Kris. Even if someone is deficient like Troy, this does
not mean they must be a clueless pain-in-the-ass like Troy is.
For 98.9998% of the people posting to and reading rec.arts.sf.tv, Troy
was one of the posters everyone wished would Just Go Away.
FYI Kris, over the years you and I have traded equally insightful
posts before, with my writing under my primary email address.
-Tom Sr.
trotsky
Coward? Who's the one who has to keep changing his screen name to make
it more difficult for people to take out the trash? LOL!
clouddreamer
I see nothing coherent to reply to anyway.
;]
Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names
> On Jul 5, 8:08 am, clouddreamer <George.W.Bush.
>
>
>
>
>
> 2001.2...@End.of.an.Error> wrote:
> > SFTV_troy wrote:
> > > alt-x-noarchive: yes
>
> > > .
>
> > > Yay. That's the lesson you've learned from the Letterman scandal,
> > > followed by the defense by Democrats saying, "It's a-okay to attack
> > > children and/or pregnant teens", and concluding with the hated-
> > > republican Palin's resignation because she was sick of her family
> > > being abused.
>
> > Put yourself into the spotlight, proclaim that children should not be
> > given sex education while your own underage daughter gets pregnant then
> > you open yourself up to ridicule.
>
> > D'uh.
>
> I'm still waiting for some of your outrage over Letterman's disgusting
> compile them? :)
>
Letterman should apologize to A Rod.
Audie Murphy's Ghost
> > That's because Lush Rimbaugh never criticized Chelsea while she was an
> > underage child.
The hell he didn't. Does the phrase "White House dog" ring any bells?
Limbaugh was a pig then, and he's worse now.
> > Also it's a mistake to assume all Republicans approve of Lush's
> > antics. �I certainly don't.
Then let's see some testimony from more Republicans that Limbaugh
doesn't speak for them. All I've seen recently are Republican
officeholders pissing in their pants, afraid that they might have
offended Limbaugh somehow by having said the wrong thing.
Audie Murphy's Ghost
<b3ccb26a-9b8a-429f...@h18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
SFTV_troy <SFTV...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> He didn't specify which daughter but astute people know the only
> daughter present was the 14-year-old. Letterman knew it, and his
> writing staff knew it. They are not idiots.
"Astute people" didn't give a shit about the Palins or that they were
at the ballgame in the first place. Past that, it's obvious that the
joke was about Bristol.
Audie Murphy's Ghost
<robhor...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Just like a few years ago when a MSNBC guy said that Hillary was pimping
> Chelsea, even though Chelsea is well into adulthood, the MSM said you
> couldn't attack her despite being a adult and despite working on her mom's
> campaign to be president.
Show me a quote where someone in the so-called MSM said anything like
that.
> Funny how the rules are different between demcrats and republicans.
Nonsense. There was, and is, plenty of criticism of the protection
Chelsea gets from the press. Go take a look. Further, the "pimping"
remark wasn't an attack, and it wasn't "a few years ago." It was last
year.
Funny how you wingnuts never notice facts contrary to your uninformed
opinion.
robw
> tomcervo wrote:
>
> > When Rush did it to Chelsea Clinton, I don't recall
> > Bill's resignation, or Hillary leaving political life.
>
> underage child.
>
> Rachel Maddow. They sacrifice integrity for entertainment, and I'd
> rather not listen to either of them.
Chelsea wasn't underage when Limpballs made his remark?
I believe Limpball's tv show was cancelled in the mid 90's.
Chelsea was born in 1980.
Want to try your remark again?
robw
> "SFTV_troy" <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Ah, so you're saying that Letterman made a joke he thought was about
an 18 yr. old but he was wrong and it was about a 14 yr. old while
Limpballs made a joke about someone he knew to be 13 yrs old.
These conservative idiots are morons.
By the way, the "You report, we decide" line was great.
be well.
robw
> Kris Baker wrote:
> > "SFTV_troy" <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
You could use Google to prove when Limpballs made the remark.
Even so, his tv show went off the air in 1996. Even if he made the
remark on his last show (which didn't happen) Chelsea would have been
16 and underage.
You lose either way.
Syvyn11
"Audie Murphy's Ghost" <takebac...@2008.com> wrote in message
news:050720091820409878%takebac...@2008.com...
> In article <_9-dnQLz3bRNgMzX...@earthlink.com>, Syvyn11
> <robhor...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Just like a few years ago when a MSNBC guy said that Hillary was pimping
>> Chelsea, even though Chelsea is well into adulthood, the MSM said you
>> couldn't attack her despite being a adult and despite working on her
>> mom's
>> campaign to be president.
>
> Show me a quote where someone in the so-called MSM said anything like
> that.
better than that, VIDEO! David Shuster (who now fills in for Keith
Olbermann) interviewing Bill Press (another liberal moron). When Shuster
said this....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2St8qoXx1g
>
>> Funny how the rules are different between demcrats and republicans.
>
>
> Nonsense. There was, and is, plenty of criticism of the protection
> Chelsea gets from the press. Go take a look. Further, the "pimping"
> remark wasn't an attack, and it wasn't "a few years ago." It was last
> year.
excatly, but nary a differnce. A adult Chelsea is protected while the
Palin kids get attacked.
>
> Funny how you wingnuts never notice facts contrary to your uninformed
> opinion.
Right back at you!
Siobhan Medeiros
> alt-x-noarchive: yes
>
> .
>
> Yay. That's the lesson you've learned from the Letterman scandal,
> followed by the defense by Democrats saying, "It's a-okay to attack
> children and/or pregnant teens", and concluding with the hated-
> republican Palin's resignation because she was sick of her family
> being abused.
>
> resignation from a Republican governor?
>
You're kidding, right? You're saying that Palin resigned because of
the Letterman joke?
Since when does David Letterman represent the Democratic party anyway?
Syvyn11
"robw" <nodd...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:6827a64e-499b-4f31...@h31g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
_____________________________________________
what does that have to do with the price of tea in china?
Siobhan Medeiros
> "tomcervo" <tomce...@aol.com> wrote in message
>
> news:f82ab9fe-5af6-4e6c...@o6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 5, 9:55 am, SFTV_troy <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > alt-x-noarchive: yes
>
> > .
>
> > Yay. That's the lesson you've learned from the Letterman scandal,
> > followed by the defense by Democrats saying, "It's a-okay to attack
> > children and/or pregnant teens", and concluding with the hated-
> > republican Palin's resignation because she was sick of her family
> > being abused.
>
> resignation, or Hillary leaving political life. I guess he was a
> little tougher than Sarah Barracuda. That's the trouble with modern
> republicans--they like to envision themselves as the tough town-tamer,
> but in reality they're the prissy dude made to dance by the local
> louts shooting at their feet.
> ___________________________________________________________________________ _____
> ONCE! Limbaugh made that joke ONCE!
And Letterman made that joke once.
> And you liberals wear it like
> that's all he did for eight years. He apologized and yet you won't let
> it go. It's been almost 16 years. And you libs still hang your hat on
> "LIMBAUGH JOKED ABOUT CHELSEA!!!!" Like it absolves you for any blame in
> attacking Briston or Willow Palin. It doesn't.
No, but it does make you look like a bunch of hypocrites when you keep
whining about it.
THe difference is, many Democrats came down on Letterman for the joke
too, I don't recall any Republicans standing up to Rush.
> ___________________________________________________________________________ ________
>
> > Whose children are you going to attack next, in hopes of forcing a
> > resignation from a Republican governor?
>
> We're hoping Terry Sanford doesn't resign--too much entertainment
> value, but he's probably going to get sued by a romance novelist for
> plagiarism.
George
since he started fantasizing about raping 14 year olds.
robw
> "robw" <noddy...@comcast.net> wrote in message
The poster said that Limpballs didn't make his Chelsea remark when she
was underage.
She was.
The poster was wrong.
Questions?
Siobhan Medeiros
Why would he say it prior to 1992, when Clinton was just the President
of Arkansas?
You want proof of Chelsea's birthday too?
Tom
> "Audie Murphy's Ghost" <takebackamer...@2008.com> wrote in messagenews:050720091820409878%takebac...@2008.com...
>
> > In article <_9-dnQLz3bRNgMzXnZ2dnUVZ_sWdn...@earthlink.com>, Syvyn11
> > <robhorine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> Just like a few years ago when a MSNBC guy said that Hillary was pimping
> >> Chelsea, even though Chelsea is well into adulthood, the MSM said you
> >> couldn't attack her despite being a adult and despite working on her
> >> mom's
> >> campaign to be president.
>
> > Show me a quote where someone in the so-called MSM said anything like
> > that.
>
> better than that, VIDEO! David Shuster (who now fills in for Keith
> Olbermann) interviewing Bill Press (another liberal moron). When Shuster
> said this....
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2St8qoXx1g
>
>
>
> >> Funny how the rules are different between demcrats and republicans.
>
> > Nonsense. There was, and is, plenty of criticism of the protection
> > Chelsea gets from the press. Go take a look. Further, the "pimping"
> > remark wasn't an attack, and it wasn't "a few years ago." It was last
> > year.
>
> excatly, but nary a differnce. A adult Chelsea is protected while the
> Palin kids get attacked.
Princess, please provide one cite in which anyone from the NEWS media,
not an entertainer such as Letterman, attacked Palin's children.
Just one. That's all, One.
Tom
clouddreamer
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1895
"MORE REALITY: Columnist Molly Ivins reported (Arizona Republic
10/17/93) this incident from Limbaugh's TV show--"Here is a Limbaugh
joke: Everyone knows the Clintons have a cat. Socks is the White House
cat. But did you know there is a White House dog?" And he puts up a
picture of Chelsea Clinton. Chelsea Clinton is 13 years old."
..
tomcervo
> Well, when Rush did it to Chelsea Clinton, I don't recall Bill's
> resignation, or Hillary leaving political life. I guess he was a
> little tougher than Sarah Barracuda. That's the trouble with modern
> republicans--they like to envision themselves as the tough town-tamer,
> but in reality they're the prissy dude made to dance by the local
> louts shooting at their feet.
> ___________________________________________________________________________�_____
> that's all he did for eight years. � � He apologized and yet you won't let
> it go. � �It's been almost 16 years. � And you libs still hang your hat on
> "LIMBAUGH JOKED ABOUT CHELSEA!!!!" � �Like it absolves you for any blame in
> attacking Briston or Willow Palin. � �It doesn't.
"LEAVE RUSH LIMBAUGH ALOOOOOONE!"
tomcervo
> On Jul 5, 4:04�pm, Tom <drso...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 5, 3:54�pm, SFTV_troy >
> >>Tom wrote:
>
> >>>>Laura Bush didn't even whine that much when
> >>>>her girls were constantly caught underage drinking
>
> > > Bush's daughters were full adults. �WOMEN not girls.
>
> > No they weren't They were underage college girls binge drinking
>
> You keep making the same error, even after I corrected you. �Yes the
> Bush daughters were breaking the law. �Agreed. �But they were NOT
> girls. �They were full-grown adults (18 and up). �That's a major
> difference.
>
>
>
> > > Letterman and his Democratic apologists made jokes about the sex-rape
> > > of a 14-yr-old (this year) and a 17-yr-old (last year) - both of whom
> > > were still children. �They should be completely and totally off-limits
> > > until they pass their 18th birthday.
>
> > You're delusional. Letterman was making fun of the unwed
> > teen-mother, not her younger sister.
>
> Doesn't matter. �He was making those jokes LAST year (during the
> campaign) when the pregant girl was still �an underage 17. � Attacking
> children is never acceptable.
Unless their last name is Clinton?
Syvyn11
"Tom" <drs...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:e1c0c165-dbca-4c03...@t21g2000yqi.googlegroups.com...
Tom
davis shuster! a anchor for MSNBC. Not a 'talk show host', not a
'entertainer', a NEWSMAN! do try to follow. Assclown.
Syvyn11
She was.
The poster was wrong.
Questions?
I said that she was under 18. So someone mistyped. Don't you make
mistakes?
Oh, I forgot, being a liberal means being perfect.
faggot!
Lou Stuhle
> On Jul 5, 3:54 pm, SFTV_troy <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > clouddreamer wrote:
>
> > > Put yourself into the spotlight, proclaim that children should not be
> > > given sex education while your own underage daughter gets pregnant then
> > > you open yourself up to ridicule. D'uh.
>
> > year-old man is crossing the line from criticism to child pron.
>
> year-old man.
>
> Please provide video proof of the exact quote.
>
> Tom
Hey Tom. If (when) you have sex with an UNDERAGE child the law says
it's RAPE !!!
Kris Baker
news:6bc0c020-4567-4692...@24g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
-Tom Sr.
-------------------------------------------
Of course we have.
Kris
Audie Murphy's Ghost
<robhor...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "Audie Murphy's Ghost" <takebac...@2008.com> wrote in message
> news:050720091820409878%takebac...@2008.com...
> > In article <_9-dnQLz3bRNgMzX...@earthlink.com>, Syvyn11
> > <robhor...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Just like a few years ago when a MSNBC guy said that Hillary was pimping
> >> Chelsea, even though Chelsea is well into adulthood, the MSM said you
> >> couldn't attack her despite being a adult and despite working on her
> >> mom's
> >> campaign to be president.
> >
> > Show me a quote where someone in the so-called MSM said anything like
> > that.
>
> better than that, VIDEO! David Shuster (who now fills in for Keith
> Olbermann) interviewing Bill Press (another liberal moron). When Shuster
> said this....
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2St8qoXx1g
'
Linking to a clip that everyone's seen 43 times is dumb and useless.
No, genius, I said show me a quote where someone in the so-called MSM
said you couldn't attack Chelsea Clinton. And by "attack" I don't mean
a slip-up from a tired anchor who'd been on duty since before 5 a.m.
that day; I mean something that directly challenges Chelsea Clinton's
position on an issue, or her general attitudes about everything, or
whatever you like. Warning: If this is going to be about how some fat
asshole on the radio should be allowed to call her a dog whenever he
likes, then don't waste our time here.
> >> Funny how the rules are different between demcrats and republicans.
> >
> >
> > Nonsense. There was, and is, plenty of criticism of the protection
> > Chelsea gets from the press. Go take a look. Further, the "pimping"
> > remark wasn't an attack, and it wasn't "a few years ago." It was last
> > year.
>
> excatly, but nary a differnce. A adult Chelsea is protected while the
> Palin kids get attacked.
"Protected" by whom? And from what? In fact, Shuster spent the day
apologizing. If Hillary Clinton had accepted that and moved on, she'd
have come off as generous. Instead, she more or less demanded his job.
That was over the line, and that's exactly when she lost an already
unfriendly press. Shuster's well-liked in the business. Witness that
his career has taken off since all this happened.
> > Funny how you wingnuts never notice facts contrary to your uninformed
> > opinion.
>
> Right back at you!
You've supplied nothing here. Take a pill and go back to sleep.
Audie Murphy's Ghost
<robhor...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Shuster attacked Palin's children? When? Where? What did he say?
Audie Murphy's Ghost
<robhor...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Why are you signing your messages "faggot!" now? Are you finally
getting comfortable with yourself?
robw
>
> - Show quoted text -
I have sex with my wife,
you?>
robw
>
> - Show quoted text -
When's the last time you had sex with anyone?
Put itr right here--------------
Kris Baker
>
> "Protected" by whom? And from what? In fact, Shuster spent the day
> apologizing. If Hillary Clinton had accepted that and moved on, she'd
> have come off as generous. Instead, she more or less demanded his job.
> That was over the line, and that's exactly when she lost an already
> unfriendly press. Shuster's well-liked in the business. Witness that
> his career has taken off since all this happened.
MSNBC suspended Schuster for his "pimping" remark.
Kris
SFTV_troy
It's the Principle! wrote:
> Tom <drso...@aol.com> wrote in alt.gossip.celebrities:
> > Who said that? No one said a 14 year-old girl should be raped by a
> > 33 year-old man.
> They're just twisting facts to suit their argument. Letterman thought
> Palin was at the ballgame with Bristol, not Willow, when he said it.
False. You can find the video on youtube, or simply read what he
said: "Top Ten Highlights Of Sarah Palin's Trip To New York ....
(snip).... One awkward moment for Sarah Palin at the Yankee game,
during the seventh inning, her daughter was knocked-up by Alex
Rodriguez."
He didn't specify which daughter but astute people know the only
daughter present was the 14-year-old. Letterman knew it, and his
writing staff knew it. They are not idiots.
Oh wait.
I just noticed I'm talking to Brandy Alexandre. That's like
convincing a lesbian to have sex with a man. You can talk 'til you
run out of breath, but you're never going to change her mind.
SFTV_troy
> On Jul 5, 4:16 pm, SFTV_troy <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > >>>>Laura Bush didn't even whine that much when
> > >>>>her girls were constantly caught underage drinking
> >
> > > > Bush's daughters were full adults. WOMEN not girls.
> >
> > > No they weren't They were underage college girls binge drinking
> >
> > You keep making the same error, even after I corrected you. Yes the
> > Bush daughters were breaking the law. Agreed. But they were NOT
> > girls. They were full-grown adults (18 and up). That's a major
> > difference.
>
> emancipation doesn't mean they are adults.
Well then I better be careful what I say to you... following your own
reasoning, you're still just a child. Kittchie-kitchie-koo.
But seriously, the daughters were legal adults during the Bush
presidency. I consider them fair game for criticism, just the same as
they'd be charged as adults in any crime they committed.
14-yr-old Willow on the other hand should be off-limits. She went
to a ballgame with her mom, and she found herself the target of an
aging, old comic. There's simply no excuse for that ashit, expect in
ther mind of ammoral leftist liberals.
Syvyn11
do any of you fucking listen. SHUSTER ATTACKED CHELSEA!
Learn how to read you fucking stupid liberals!
Syvyn11
you?>
I have sex with your wife too. She gave me crabs.
Not Sure
2001.2...@End.of.an.Error> wrote:
> SFTV_troy wrote:
>
> > It's the Principle! wrote:
> >> Tom <drso...@aol.com> wrote in alt.gossip.celebrities:
>
> >>> Who said that? No one said a 14 year-old girl should be raped by a
> >>> 33 year-old man.
>
> >> They're just twisting facts to suit their argument. Letterman thought
> >> Palin was at the ballgame with Bristol, not Willow, when he said it.
>
> > False. You can find the video on youtube, or simply read what he
> > said: "Top Ten Highlights Of Sarah Palin's Trip To New York ....
> > (snip).... One awkward moment for Sarah Palin at the Yankee game,
> > during the seventh inning, her daughter was knocked-up by Alex
> > Rodriguez."
>
> > He didn't specify which daughter but astute people know the only
> > daughter present was the 14-year-old. Letterman knew it, and his
> > writing staff knew it. They are not idiots.
>
> about her daughter, she should have left her behind in Alaska instead of
> parading them in front of the media.
How exactly did she "parade" them in front of the media, idiot?
Continue being the mysoginist pig, fatass.
>
> ..
>
> --
>
> We must change the way we live,
> or the climate will do it for us.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oCYW4ScUnw- Hide quoted text -
Not Sure
2001.2...@End.of.an.Error> wrote:
> SFTV_troy wrote:
>
> > clouddreamer wrote:
>
> >> Put yourself into the spotlight, proclaim that children should not be
> >> given sex education while your own underage daughter gets pregnant then
> >> you open yourself up to ridicule. D'uh.
>
> > Ridicule is fine, but saying a 14-year-old should be raped by a 33-
> > year-old man is crossing the line from criticism to child pron.
>
>
> Given your comments, Bristol was "raped" by her boyfriend since she was
> 15 at the time. Palin put her "principles" and children into the
> forefront. She is in no position to whine. If she wanted to protect
> them, she should have left them home in Alaska.
So because Palin's children leave the house, they have to put up with
sex jokes about them? I'm glad you've started commenting on this,
lardass, since your pretzel-twisting "logic" is as delicious as I knew
it was going to be and you're exempting yourself from *ever*
protesting anyone else's anti-woman comments again. Continue digging
yourself deeper :)
Tom
> "Tom" <drso...@aol.com> wrote in message
That's not a cite princess... how about a legitimate link, or at the
very least tell us what he said and when he said it.
Tom
Tom
The problem with you so-called response to me is that NO ONE had sex
with a 14 year-old girl in the context of this discussion.
So, I'll ask again, who said, "A 14 year-old girl should be raped by a
33 year-old man?"
I eagerly await your indisputable reply.
Tom
Syvyn11
Tom
again with 'princess'. Keep telling you Clyde, I'm not into dicks like you
are. I like women.
Syvyn11
"Kris Baker" <paralle...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7bcvv5F...@mid.individual.net...
and now he's guest hosting "countdown". With the blessing of Keith
Olbermann.
>
Bugman
"George" <sp...@nos.pam> wrote in message
news:wS94m.19350$he4...@bignews3.bellsouth.net...
> Siobhan Medeiros wrote:
>> On Jul 5, 6:55 am, SFTV_troy <SFTV_t...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> alt-x-noarchive: yes
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>> Yay. That's the lesson you've learned from the Letterman scandal,
>>> followed by the defense by Democrats saying, "It's a-okay to attack
>>> children and/or pregnant teens", and concluding with the hated-
>>> republican Palin's resignation because she was sick of her family
>>> being abused.
>>>
>>> Whose children are you going to attack next, in hopes of forcing a
>>> resignation from a Republican governor?
>>>
>>> .
>>
>> You're kidding, right? You're saying that Palin resigned because of
>> the Letterman joke?
>>
>> Since when does David Letterman represent the Democratic party anyway?
>
> since he started fantasizing about raping 14 year olds.
Oh jeez
Tom
> "Audie Murphy's Ghost" <takebackamer...@2008.com> wrote in messagenews:050720092018399697%takebac...@2008.com...
>
>
>
> > In article <UMqdnWXgTKBooczXnZ2dnUVZ_iydn...@earthlink.com>, Syvyn11
> > <robhorine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> "Tom" <drso...@aol.com> wrote in message
Now you're just a liar...
Here's what you wrote:
"> excatly, but nary a differnce. A adult Chelsea is protected while
the
> Palin kids get attacked."
Here's my reply:
"Princess, please provide one cite in which anyone from the NEWS
media,
not an entertainer such as Letterman, attacked Palin's children.
Just one. That's all, One.
Tom"
Here's your reply:
"davis shuster! a anchor for MSNBC. Not a 'talk show host', not
a
'entertainer', a NEWSMAN! do try to follow. Assclown."
So, to recap, you said Shushter attacked Palin's kids, but provided no
proof. Then you said Shuster attacked Chelsea and that us stupid
fucking liberals should learn to read.
From where I sit, reading isn't the problem...
BTW, who's davis shuster? I thought his name is David Shuster.
Remember, words and spelling are important.
Tom
Tom
Where's the link, liar?
I'm happily married to my female wife. You may like women, but you've
never been with one.
Now, back to the topic at hand... Please provide a link of David
Shuster attacking Palin's kids.
Tom
Syvyn11
Here's my reply:
Tom"
Here's your reply:
Tom
Sorry, jackass. You don't set the rules! I do! I said my peace, if
you don't like it, that's on you. No go away, you bother me.
Syvyn11
Tom
sorry, that's all you get.
Tom
So, in other words, you've got nothing. You can't provide proof to
backup your lies, so now you say YOU set the rules. You're laughable,
you fucking coward.
BTW, the proper phrase is "I've said my PIECE." Not PEACE... peace is
something conservatards like you know nothing about.
Why do you hate education? Why do hate the importance of words?
Why do you hate yourself?
Tom
Tom
Because that's all you've got, chicken shit.
You're like every other usenet blow hard... you've nothing to back up
what you spew.
Tom
Audie Murphy's Ghost
<paralle...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, it did, and everybody in the building knew that Shuster was taking
the hit for Chris Matthews, whom the Clinton campaign despised.
Understanding that (Shuster said so at the time), Shuster didn't
complain about the suspension, and playing the good soldier was key to
his later (and current) success.
Happily, the "pimping" comment wound up not hurting Shuster at all. I
think it did wind up hurting Hillary, though.
Syvyn11
Tom
I hope someone kills you. You really need to die.
Syvyn11
Tom
now go back jerking off to your picture of Keith Olbermann!
Anim8rFSK
<ceaeb0f6-4940-45bc...@o6g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
Not Sure <fred1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2:53�pm, clouddreamer <George.W.Bush.
> 2001.2...@End.of.an.Error> wrote:
> > SFTV troy wrote:
> >
> > > It's the Principle! wrote:
> > >> Tom <drso...@aol.com> wrote in alt.gossip.celebrities:
> >
> > >>> Who said that? No one said a 14 year-old girl should be raped by a
> > >>> 33 year-old man.
> >
> > >> They're just twisting facts to suit their argument. �Letterman thought
> > >> Palin was at the ballgame with Bristol, not Willow, when he said it.
> >
> > > False. �You can find the video on youtube, or simply read what he
> > > said: �"Top Ten Highlights Of Sarah Palin's Trip To New York ....
> > > (snip).... One awkward moment for Sarah Palin at the Yankee game,
> > > during the seventh inning, her daughter was knocked-up by Alex
> > > Rodriguez."
> >
> > > He didn't specify which daughter but astute people know the only
> > > daughter present was the 14-year-old. �Letterman knew it, and his
> > > writing staff knew it. �They are not idiots.
> >
> > Oh grow up. If Palin didn't want the big bad Letterman to make jokes
> > about her daughter, she should have left her behind in Alaska instead of
> > parading them in front of the media.
>
> How exactly did she "parade" them in front of the media, idiot?
> Continue being the mysoginist pig, fatass.
Do note that Cloddreamer is admitting that Letterman's joke was about
the 14 year old.
--
Uncle Jack: "Will, you're invisible!"
Will: "Invisible? I can't be! I can touch myself!"
--actual dialog from third season LAND OF THE LOST
Dano
> SFTV_troy wrote:
>>
>> It's the Principle! wrote:
>>>
>>>> Who said that? No one said a 14 year-old girl should be raped by a
>>>> 33 year-old man.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> They're just twisting facts to suit their argument. Letterman
>>> thought Palin was at the ballgame with Bristol, not Willow, when he
>>> said it.
>>
>>
>> False. You can find the video on youtube, or simply read what he
>> said: "Top Ten Highlights Of Sarah Palin's Trip To New York ....
>> (snip).... One awkward moment for Sarah Palin at the Yankee game,
>> during the seventh inning, her daughter was knocked-up by Alex
>> Rodriguez."
>>
>> He didn't specify which daughter but astute people know the only
>> daughter present was the 14-year-old. Letterman knew it, and his
>> writing staff knew it. They are not idiots.
>
>
> Oh grow up. If Palin didn't want the big bad Letterman to make jokes
> about her daughter, she should have left her behind in Alaska instead
> of parading them in front of the media.
>
Not to mention she could have advised Bristol to use birth control.